Centralized vs. Decentralized Nursing Stations: An Evaluation of the Implications of Communication Technologies in Healthcare

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to explore the relationship between the nursing station design and use of communication technologies by comparing centralized and decentralized nursing stations.

BACKGROUND:

The rapid changes in communication technologies in healthcare are inevitable. Communication methods can change the way occupants use a space. In the meantime, decentralized nursing stations are emerging as a replacement for the traditional centralized nursing stations; however, not much research has been done on how the design of nursing stations can impact the use of communication technologies.

METHODS:

A cross sectional study was conducted using an Internet-based survey among registered nurses in a Southeastern hospital in the United States. Two units with centralized nursing stations and two units with decentralized nursing stations were compared in terms of the application of communication technologies. A total of 70 registered nurses completed the survey in a 2-week period.

RESULTS:

The results revealed no significant differences between centralized and decentralized nursing stations in terms of frequency of communication technologies used. However, a difference was found between perception of nurses toward communication technologies and perceptions of the use of communication technologies in decentralized nursing stations.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the study was limited to one hospital, the results indicate that nurses hold positive attitudes toward communication technologies. The results also reveal the strengths and weaknesses of each nursing station design with regard to communication technologies.

Keywords

Hospital interdisciplinary nursing technology work environment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2014). TeamSTEPPS® instructor guide. (AHRQ Publication No. 06-0020). Retrieved from www.ahrq.gov/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/.

Carroll

A. E.

, & Christakis

D. A.

(2004). Pediatricians' use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants. Pediatrics, 113(2), 238–242.

Coiera

, & Tombs

(1998). Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: An observational study. British Medical Journal, 316(7132), 673–676.

Garvin

Otto

, & McRae

(2000). Using handheld computers to document family practice resident procedure experience. Family Medicine, 32(2), 115–118.

Gray

(2012). Using clinical simulation centers to test design interventions: A pilot study of lighting and color modifications. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 5(3), 46–65.

Guarascio-Howard

(2011). Examination of wireless technology to improve nurse communication, response time to bed alarms, and patient safety. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(2), 109–120.

Guenther

, & Hall

(2007). Healthy buildings: Impact on nurses and nursing practice. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 12(2), 3.

Gum

Prideaux

Sweet

, & Greenhill

(2012). From the nurses' station to the health team hub: How can design promote interprofessional collaboration? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(1), 21–27.

Gurascio-Howard

, & Malloch

(2007). Centralized and decentralized nurse station design: An examination of caregiver communication, work activities, and technology. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(1), 44.

10.

Hall

L. M.

Doran

, & Pink

G. H.

(2004). Nurse staffing models, nursing hours, and patient safety outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34(1), 41–45.

11.

Hendrich

A. L.

Fay

, & Sorrells

A. K.

(2004). Effects of acuity adaptable rooms on flow of patients and delivery of care. American Journal of Critical Care, 73(1), 35–45.

12.

Hua

Becker

Wurmser

Bliss-Holtz

, & Hedges

(2012). Effects of nursing unit spatial layout on nursing team communication patterns, quality of care, and patient wafety. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 6(1), 8–38.

13.

Huston

(2013). The impact of emerging technology on nursing care: Warp speed ahead. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18(2), 1.

14.

Hylton

(2007, March 26). Building a greener world: Director: Gail Vittori. Time, 169(13), 64. Retrieved from www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1599700,00.html

15.

The Joint Commission. (2013). National patient safety goals. Retrieved from http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/NPSG_Chapter_Jan2013_HAP.pdf

16.

Kolenc

(2002). Influence of information and communication technology on education of nurses. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2002 (CBMS 2002) (pp. 47–49), June 7, Maribor, Slovenia.

17.

Luo

Koh

W. P.

W. Y.

Yau

J. W.

Lim

L. K.

Sim

S. S.

, & Tay

E. G.

(2009). Acceptance of information and communication technologies for healthcare delivery: A SingHealth Polyclinics study. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 38(6), 529.

18.

Meade

C. M.

Bursell

A. L.

, & Ketelsen

(2006). Effects of nursing rounds: On patients' call light use, satisfaction, and safety. The American Journal of Nursing, 106(9), 58–70.

19.

Sands

D. Z.

(2008). Challenges in healthcare communications: How technology can increase efficiency, safety, and satisfaction. Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group IBSG. Retrieved from http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/wp/Communication_Healthcare_WP_0724FINAL.pdf

20.

Seo

(2011). An investigation on task interruptions and the physical environment for human performance. (Georgia Institute of Technology). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 134. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/903791757?accountid=10920

21.

Singh

Naik

Rao

, & Petersen

(2008). Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: Harnessing the power of information technology. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(4), 489–494.

22.

Small

, & Small

(2011). Patients first! Engaging the hearts and minds of nurses with a patient-centered practice model. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16(2), 2. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No02Man02

23.

Smith

A. M.

Ortiguera

S. A.

Laskowski

E. R.

Hartman

A. D.

Mullenbach

D. M.

Gaines

K. A.

Fisher

(2001). A preliminary analysis of psychophysiological variables and nursing performance in situations of increasing criticality. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 76(3), 275–284.

24.

Spector

& Kappel

(2012). Guidelines for using electronic and social media: The regulatory perspective. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17(3), 1.

25.

K. W.

, & Liu

C. L.

(2012). A mobile nursing information system based on human-computer interaction design for improving quality of nursing. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(3), 1139–1153.

26.

Tradeline, Inc. (2010). Shands Cancer Hospital. Retrieved from http://www.tradelineinc.com/reports/2010-4/shands-cancer-hospital

27.

Tyson

G. A.

Lambert

, & Beattie

(2002). The impact of ward design on the behavior, occupational satisfaction and well-being of psychiatric nurses. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 77(2), 94–102.

28.

Ulrich

Zimring

Quan

Joseph

, & Choudhary

(2004). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century. Report sponsored by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Center for Health Design.

29.

University of Michigan Office of Space Analysis. (2006). Departmental space inventory survey—Room type codes & definitions. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/-ofa/Space/RmTyp800.htm

30.

Unluturk

M. S.

(2012). Advanced nurse-patient communication system. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(4), 2529–2536.

31.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). Male nurses becoming more commonplace, Census Bureau reports. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/employment_occupations/cb13-32.html

32.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2013). Health communication and health information technology. Retrieved from http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=18

33.

Wakefield

(2002). The changing “shape” of the nursing station. Contemporary Nursing, 73, 148–157.

34.

Wanta

and Wu

Y-C.

1992. Interpersonal communication and the agenda-setting process. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 69(4), 847–855.

35.

Weaver

Lindsay

, & Gitelman

(2012). Communication technology and social media: Opportunities and implications for healthcare systems. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17(3), 3.

36.

Westbrook

J. I.

Woods

Rob

M. I.

Dunsmuir

, & Day

R. O.

(2010). Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(8), 683.

37.

Wheeless

L. R.

Eddleman-Spears

Magness

L. D.

, & Preiss

R. W.

(2005). Informational reception apprehension and information from technology aversion: Development and test of a new construct. Communication Quarterly, 53(2), 143–158.

38.

Zborowsky

Bunker-Hellmich

Morelli

, & O'Neill

(2010). Centralized vs. decentralized nursing stations: Effects on nurses' functional use of space and work environment. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(4), 19.

39.

Bayramzadeh

& Alkazemi

M. F.

(2014). Centralized vs. decentralized nursing stations: An evaluation of the implications of communication technologies in healthcare. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(4), 62–80.