Centralized vs. Decentralized Nursing Stations: Effects on Nurses' Functional Use of Space and Work Environment

Abstract

Objective:

Evidence-based findings of the effects of nursing station design on nurses' work environment and work behavior are essential to improve conditions and increase retention among these fundamental members of the healthcare delivery team. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate how nursing station design (i.e., centralized and decentralized nursing station layouts) affected nurses' use of space, patient visibility, noise levels, and perceptions of the work environment.

Background:

Advances in information technology have enabled nurses to move away from traditional centralized paper-charting stations to smaller decentralized work stations and charting substations located closer to, or inside of, patient rooms. Improved understanding of the trade-offs presented by centralized and decentralized nursing station design has the potential to provide useful information for future nursing station layouts. This information will be critical for understanding the nurse environment “fit.”

Methods:

The study used an exploratory design with both qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative data regarding the effects of nursing station design on nurses' health and work environment were gathered by means of focus group interviews. Quantitative data-gathering techniques included place- and person-centered space use observations, patient visibility assessments, sound level measurements, and an online questionnaire regarding perceptions of the work environment.

Results:

Nurses on all units were observed most frequently performing telephone, computer, and administrative duties. Time spent using telephones, computers, and performing other administrative duties was significantly higher in the centralized nursing stations. Consultations with medical staff and social interactions were significantly less frequent in decentralized nursing stations. There were no indications that either centralized or decentralized nursing station designs resulted in superior visibility. Sound levels measured in all nursing stations exceeded recommended levels during all shifts. No significant differences were identified in nurses' perceptions of work control-demand-support in centralized and decentralized nursing station designs.

Conclusions:

The “hybrid” nursing design model in which decentralized nursing stations are coupled with centralized meeting rooms for consultation between staff members may strike a balance between the increase in computer duties and the ongoing need for communication and consultation that addresses the conflicting demands of technology and direct patient care.

Keywords

Nursing station design nurses' work environment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2005). The hospital built environment: What role might funders of health services research play? (Publication No. 05-0106-EF). Rockville, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Arneill

, & Frasca-Beaulieu

(2003). Healing environments: Architecture and design conducive to health. In Frampton

& Gilpin

(Eds.), Putting patients first: Designing and practicing patient-centered care. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bayo

, & Garcia

(1995). Noise level in an urban hospital and workers' subjective responses. Archives of Environmental Health, 50(3), 247–251.

Berry

, & Parish

(2008). The impact of facility improvements on hospital nurses. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(2), 5–13.

Blomkvist

Eriksen

C. A.

Theorell

Ulrich

R. S.

, & Rasmanis

(2005). Acoustics and psychosocial environment in coronary intensive care. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(3), e1.

Dube

J. A.

Barth

M. M.

Cmiel

C. A.

Cutshall

S. M.

Olson

S. M.

Sulla

S. J.

Holland

D. E.

(2008). Environmental noise sources and intervention to minimize them: A tale of 2 hospitals. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 23(3), 216–231.

Granheim

U. H.

, & Lundman

(2004). Qualitative analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.

Hamilton

D. K.

(1993). Unit two thousand: Patient beds for the future (Call no. 1995 G-208). Houston, TX: Watkins Carter Hamilton.

Hendrich

A. L.

Fay

, & Sorrells

A. K.

(2004). Effects of acuity-adaptable rooms on flow of patients and delivery of care. American Journal of Critical Care, 13(1), 35–45.

10.

Institute of Medicine. (2004). Keeping patients safe: Transforming the work environment of nurses. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

11.

Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (2002). Health care at the crossroads: Strategies for addressing the evolving nursing crisis. Retrieved May 24, 2010, from http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/5C138711-ED76-4D6F-909F-B06E0309F36D/0/health_care_at_the_crossroads.pdf

12.

Joseph

(2006). The role of the physical and social environment in promoting health, safety and effectiveness in the healthcare workplace. Retrieved May 24, 2010, from http://www.healthdesign.org/research/reports/documents/CHD_Issue_Paper3.pdf

13.

Karasek

, & Theorell

(1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and reconstruction of working life. New York, NY: Basic Books.

14.

Sanchez

M. Marqués

Calle Pardo

Sanchez

Gelado

, & Garcia

(2008). Nurses' perceptions of noise levels in hospitals in Spain. Journal of Nursing Administration, 38(5), 220–222.

15.

McCarthy

, & Blumenthal

(2006). Committed to safety: Ten case studies on reducing harm to patients. New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund.

16.

Morrison

W. E.

Haas

E. C.

Shaffner

D. H.

Garrett

E. S.

, & Fackler

J. C.

(2003). Noise, stress and annoyance in a pediatric intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine, 31(1), 113–119.

17.

Mroczek

Mikitarian

Vieira

E. K.

, & Rotarius

(2005). Hospital design and staff perceptions: An exploratory analysis. Health Care Manager, 24(3), 233–244.

18.

Office of Space Analysis, University of Michigan. (2006). Departmental space inventory survey—Room type codes & definitions. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://www.umich.edu/∼ofa/Space/RmTyp800.htm#E

19.

Peter D. Hart Research Associates. (2001). The nurse shortage: Perspectives from current direct care nurses and former direct care nurses. Washington, DC: Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals.

20.

Topf

(1985). Personal and environmental predictors of patient disturbance due to hospital noise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 21(6), 717–733.

21.

Tucker

, & Spear

(2006). Operational failures and interruptions in hospital nursing. Health Services Research, 41(3), 643–662.

22.

Tyson

G. A.

Lambert

, & Beattie

(2002). The impact of ward design on the behavior, occupational satisfaction and well-being of psychiatric nurses. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 11(2), 94–102.

23.

Ulrich

Quan

Zimring

Joseph

, & Choudhary

(2004). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Retrieved November 6, 2006, from http://www.healthdesign.org/research/reports/physical_environ.php

24.

Wakefield

(2002). The changing “shape” of the nursing station. Contemporary Nursing, 13,148–157.