The Research-Design Interaction: Lessons Learned from an Evidence-Based Design Studio

Abstract

As evidence-based design (EBD) emerges as a model of design practice, considerable attention has been given to its research component. However, this overshadows another essential component of EBD—the change agent, namely the designer. EBD introduced a new skill set to the practitioner: the ability to interact with scientific evidence. Industry sources suggest adoption of the EBD approach across a large number of design firms. How comfortable are these designers in integrating research with design decision making? Optimizing the interaction between the primary change agent (the designer) and the evidence is crucial to producing the desired outcomes. Preliminary to examining this question, an architectural design studio was used as a surrogate environment to examine how designers interact with evidence. Twelve students enrolled in a healthcare EBD studio during the spring of 2009. A three-phase didactic structure was adopted: knowing a hospital, knowing the evidence, and designing with knowledge and evidence. Products of the studio and questionnaire responses from the students were used as the data for analysis. The data suggest that optimization of the research-design relationship warrants consideration in four domains: (1) a knowledge structure that is easy to comprehend; (2) phase-complemented representation of evidence; (3) access to context and precedence information; and (4) a designer-friendly vocabulary.

Keywords

Evidence-based design (EBD)EBD studio healthcare hospital design research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berry

L. L.

Parker

Coile

R. C.

Hamilton

O'Neill

D. D.

, & Sadler

B. L.

(2004). The business case for better buildings. Healthcare Financial Management, 58(11), 86–96.

Cama

(2009). Evidence-based health care design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Chan

C. S.

(1990). Cognitive processes in architectural design problem solving. Design Studies, 11(2), 60–80.

Chaudhury

Mahmood

, & Valente

(2005). Advantages and disadvantages of single versus multiple occupancy rooms in acute care environments: A review and analysis of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 37(6), 760–786.

Gero

, & Purcell

(1993). Cognitive modelling in design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(3), 253–256.

Hamilton

D. K.

, & Watkins

D. H.

(2009). Evidence-based design for multiple building types. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Healthcare Design. (2009). HCD most influential in healthcare design voting. Retrieved August 11, 2009, from http://www.healthcaredesignmagazine.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=9B6FFC446FF7486981

Joiner

(1996). User participation: POE practice. In Baird

Gray

Isaacs

Kernohan

, & McIndoe

(Eds.), Building evaluation techniques (pp. 85–89). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Kantrowitz

, & Nordhaus

(1980). The impact of post-occupancy evaluation research: A case study. Environment and Behavior, 12(4), 508–519.

10.

Kernohan

Gray

Daish

, & Joiner

(1992). User participation in building design and management: A generic approach to building evaluation. Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth Architecture.

11.

Keys

, & Wener

(1980). Organizational intervention issues: A four-phase approach to post-occupancy evaluation. Environment and Behavior, 12(4), 533–540.

12.

Malkin

(2008). A visual reference to evidence-based design. Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design.

13.

Saarinen

T. F.

(1995). Extent of application of environment-behavior-design research: A mid-eighties assessment. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 12(2), 166–174.

14.

Sommer

(1974). Looking back at personal space. In Lang

(Ed.), Designing for human behavior. Architecture and the behavioral sciences (pp. 202–209). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.

15.

Ulrich

Zimring

Quan

, & Joseph

(2004). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design.

16.

Ulrich

Zimring

Zhu

DuBose

Seo

Choi

Joseph

(2008). A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(3), 61–111.

17.

Vischer

(2001). Post-occupancy evaluation: A multifaceted tool for building improvement. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

18.

Weisman

G. D.

(1998). Towards a model for architectural research and design: Pragmatism, place and patterns. Invited paper presented to the Sub-Committee of Environment and Behavior Studies and Working Group of Person-Environment Model in the Architectural Institute of Japan.

19.

Zeisel

(1984). Inquiry by design: Tools for environmental-behavior research. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Zimring

Augenbroe

Malone

E. B.

, & Sadler

B. L.

(2008). Implementing healthcare excellence: The vital role of the CEO in evidence-based design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 1(3), 7–21.

21.

Zimring

C. M.

, & Reizenstein

J. E.

(1980). Post-occupancy evaluation: An overview. Environment and Behavior, 12(4), 429–450.