The female reproductive system is highly complex, making it essential for applied research and translational medicine to accurately model its intricate physiological functions or develop strategies for restoring them. However, significant structural and functional differences between human and animal models, along with the limitations of static 2D cell culture technologies, underscore the need for more dynamic and sophisticated in vitro platforms, as well as in vivo therapies. These advancements are critical for deepening our understanding of reproductive biology and supporting clinical applications. Recent advancements in additive manufacturing technology have opened new frontiers in the study of the female reproductive system. By introducing diverse preclinical models and expanding the range of potential applications, this field has reached new heights, with the rapidly evolving research paradigm reshaping the scientific landscape. This review aims to summarize the growing body of evidence surrounding bioengineering strategies, platforms, and therapies in female reproductive medicine, with the goal of advancing our understanding of female reproductive biology and providing new avenues for fertility restoration. Specifically, we will examine the historical development, technological innovations, and scientific research related to the creation of 3D-engineered tissues for reconstructing the female reproductive system.
Impact Statement
This review aims to summarize the growing body of evidence surrounding bioengineering strategies, platforms, and therapies in female reproductive medicine, with the goal of advancing our understanding of female reproductive biology and providing new avenues for fertility restoration. Specifically, the historical development, technological innovations, and scientific research related to the 3D-engineered tissues for reconstructing the female reproductive system were summarized. This review would help the audience, especially bioengineers who study the female reproductive system disease, as well as obstetricians and gynecologists, understand the possible application of additive manufacturing and acquire the strategies to engineer the female reproductive system in vitro.
Holdsworth-CarsonSJ, MenkhorstE, MaybinJA, et al.Cyclic processes in the uterine tubes, endometrium, myometrium, and cervix: Pathways and perturbations. Mol Hum Reprod, 2023; 29(5):gaad012; doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaad012
2.
QiaoJ, WangY, LiX, et al.A lancet commission on 70 years of women’s reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health in China. Lancet, 2021; 397(10293):2497–2536; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32708-2
JinP, XieY. Treatment strategies for women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2018; 34(4):272–277; doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1395841
5.
UmerA, KhanN, GreeneDL, et al.The therapeutic potential of human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of premature ovarian failure. Stem Cell Rev Rep, 2023; 19(3):651–666; doi: 10.1007/s12015-022-10493-y
6.
ChenA, WangW, MaoZ, et al.Multimaterial 3D and 4D bioprinting of heterogenous constructs for tissue engineering. Adv Mater, 2024; 36(34):e2307686; doi: 10.1002/adma.202307686
7.
YousefpourP, NiK, IrvineDJ. Targeted modulation of immune cells and tissues using engineered biomaterials. Nat Rev Bioeng, 2023; 1(2):107–124; doi: 10.1038/s44222-022-00016-2
8.
AtalaA. Thirty years of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, 2024; 30(1–2):5–13; doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2023.0322
AlmadoriA, PalmieriS, CohoC, et al.Reconstructive surgery for women with female genital mutilation: A scoping review. BJOG, 2024; 131(12):1604–1619; doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17886
11.
AtalaA. Tissue engineering of reproductive tissues and organs. Fertil Steril, 2012; 98(1):21–29; doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.038
NgoTD, KashaniA, ImbalzanoG, et al.Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites, Part B, 2018; 143:172–196; doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
14.
SenT, KimJ, JangJ, et al.Regeneration of the female reproductive tract using 3D bioprinting technology. Virtual Phys Prototyping, 2024; 19(1):e2423838; doi: 10.1080/17452759.2024.2423838
15.
Francés-HerreroE, LopezR, HellströmM, et al.Bioengineering trends in female reproduction: A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update, 2022; 28(6):798–837; doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmac025
16.
Stener-VictorinE, PadmanabhanV, WaltersKA, et al.Animal models to understand the etiology and pathophysiology of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr Rev, 2020; 41(4):bnaa010; doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa010
17.
StoufferRL, WoodruffTK. Nonhuman primates: A vital model for basic and applied research on female reproduction, prenatal development, and women’s health. Ilar J, 2017; 58(2):281–294; doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilx027
18.
PampaloniF, ReynaudEG, StelzerEHK. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2007; 8(10):839–845; doi: 10.1038/nrm2236
19.
CharlesWH, ArcadiaC. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. United States; 1986.
20.
TelferE, TorranceC, GosdenRG. Morphological study of cultured preantral ovarian follicles of mice after transplantation under the kidney capsule. J Reprod Fertil, 1990; 89(2):565–571; doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0890565
21.
BerkholtzCB. In vitro primary follicle culture: Investigation into factors involved in primary follicle development. National Library of Medicine: Northwestern University; 2006.
22.
LeeW, PinckneyJ, LeeV, et al.Three-dimensional bioprinting of rat embryonic neural cells. NeuroReport, 2009; 20(8):798–803; doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832b8be4
23.
SkoryRM, XuY, SheaLD, et al.Engineering the ovarian cycle using in vitro follicle culture. Hum Reprod, 2015; 30(6):1386–1395; doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev052
24.
ZhuJ, XuY, RashediAS, et al.Human fallopian tube epithelium co-culture with murine ovarian follicles reveals crosstalk in the reproductive cycle. Mol Hum Reprod, 2016; 22(11):756–767; doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaw041
25.
XiaoS, CoppetaJR, RogersHB, et al.A microfluidic culture model of the human reproductive tract and 28-day menstrual cycle. Nat Commun, 2017; 8(1):14584; doi: 10.1038/ncomms14584
26.
LarondaMM, RutzAL, XiaoS, et al.A bioprosthetic ovary created using 3D printed microporous scaffolds restores ovarian function in sterilized mice. Nat Commun, 2017; 8(1):15261; doi: 10.1038/ncomms15261
27.
PaulK, DarziS, McPheeG, et al.3D bioprinted endometrial stem cells on melt electrospun poly ε-caprolactone mesh for pelvic floor application promote anti-inflammatory responses in mice. Acta Biomater, 2019; 97:162–176; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.003
28.
HouC, ZhengJ, LiZ, et al.Printing 3D vagina tissue analogues with vagina decellularized extracellular matrix bioink. Int J Biol Macromol, 2021; 180:177–186; doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.070
29.
NieN, GongL, JiangD, et al.3D bio-printed endometrial construct restores the full-thickness morphology and fertility of injured uterine endometrium. Acta Biomater, 2023; 157:187–199; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.12.016
30.
XiangY, ZhaoZ, YaoEJ, et al.Multifaceted cancer alleviation by cowpea mosaic virus in a bioprinted ovarian cancer peritoneal spheroid model. Biomaterials, 2024; 311:122663; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122663
31.
BlileyJM, ShiwarskiDJ, FeinbergAW. 3D-bioprinted human tissue and the path toward clinical translation. Sci Transl Med, 2022; 14(666):eabo7047; doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abo7047
32.
MurphySV, AtalaA. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol, 2014; 32(8):773–785; doi: 10.1038/nbt.2958
33.
AciénP, Nohales-AlfonsoFJ, Sánchez-FerrerM-L, et al.Clinical pilot study to evaluate the neovaginal PACIENA prosthesis® for vaginoplasty without skin grafts in women with vaginal agenesis. BMC Womens Health, 2019; 19(1):144; doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0841-z
34.
Domínguez-RoblesJ, MancinelliC, MancusoE, et al.3D printing of drug-loaded thermoplastic polyurethane meshes: A potential material for soft tissue reinforcement in vaginal surgery. Pharmaceutics, 2020; 12(1):63; doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12010063
35.
ShiW, ZhengJ, ZhangJ, et al.Desktop-Stereolithography 3D printing of a decellularized extracellular matrix/mesenchymal stem cell exosome Bioink for vaginal reconstruction. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2024; 21(6):943–957; doi: 10.1007/s13770-024-00649-x
36.
AbaciA, GuvendirenM. Designing decellularized extracellular matrix‐based Bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater, 2020; 9(24):e2000734; doi: 10.1002/adhm.202000734
37.
TianY, LiuY, XiaoY, et al.Alternative biological material for tissue engineering of the vagina: Porcine-derived acellular vaginal matrix. Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2024; 21(2):277–290; doi: 10.1007/s13770-023-00604-2
38.
TianY, ZhaoS, ZhengJ, et al.A stereological study of 3D printed tissues engineered from rat vaginas. Ann Transl Med, 2020; 8(22):1490–1490; doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6347
39.
AlmotairyA, AlyahyaM, AlthobaitiA, et al.Disulfiram 3D printed film produced via hot-melt extrusion techniques as a potential anticervical cancer candidate. Int J Pharm, 2023; 635:122709; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122709
40.
DarweshAY, HelmyAM, AbdelhakkHM, et al.3D-printed short nanofibers/hydrogel-based vaginal films as a novel system for the delivery of anti-HIV microbicide drugs. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol, 2024; 97:105775; doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105775
41.
EderS, WiltschkoL, KoutsamanisI, et al.Toward a new generation of vaginal pessaries via 3D-printing: Concomitant mechanical support and drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2022; 174:77–89; doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.04.001
42.
TiboniM, CampanaR, FrangipaniE, et al.3D printed clotrimazole intravaginal ring for the treatment of recurrent vaginal candidiasis. Int J Pharm, 2021; 596:120290; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120290
43.
WangL, ChengLC, ChenY, et al.Dual-Crosslinked bioactive hydrogel scaffold for accelerated repair of genital tract defect. Adv Funct Materials, 2024; 34(41):2405966; doi: 10.1002/adfm.202405966
44.
ChenS, LiJ, ZhengL, et al.Biomimicking trilayer scaffolds with controlled estradiol release for uterine tissue regeneration. Exploration (Beijing), 2024; 4(5):20230141; doi: 10.1002/EXP.20230141
45.
ParkS-R, KookMG, KimS-R, et al.Development of cell-laden multimodular Lego-like customizable endometrial tissue assembly for successful tissue regeneration. Biomater Res, 2023; 27(1):33; doi: 10.1186/s40824-023-00376-9
46.
CandidoriS, GraziosiS, RussoP, et al.Design and 3D printing of a modular phantom of a uterus for medical device validation. Rpj, 2023; 29(11):7–20; doi: 10.1108/RPJ-01-2022-0032
47.
ParkS-R, KimS-R, ImJB, et al.3D stem cell-laden artificial endometrium: Successful endometrial regeneration and pregnancy. Biofabrication, 2021; 13(4):045012; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac165a
48.
ZhaoL-M, DaL-C, WangR, et al.Promotion of uterine reconstruction by a tissue-engineered uterus with biomimetic structure and extracellular matrix microenvironment. Sci Adv, 2023; 9(46):eadi6488; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi6488
49.
SouzaG, TsengH, GageJ, et al.Magnetically bioprinted human myometrial 3D cell rings as A model for uterine contractility. Int J Mol Sci, 2017; 18(4):683; doi: 10.3390/ijms18040683
50.
MackeyA, NgJI, CoreJ, et al.Three-Dimensional–Printed uterine model for surgical planning of a cesarean delivery complicated by multiple myomas. Obstet Gynecol, 2019; 133(4):720–724; doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003107
51.
ChenS, TanS, ZhengL, et al.Multilayered shape-morphing scaffolds with a hierarchical structure for uterine tissue regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2024; 16(6):6772–6788; doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c14983
52.
JiW, HouB, LinW, et al.3D bioprinting a human iPSC-derived MSC-loaded scaffold for repair of the uterine endometrium. Acta Biomater, 2020; 116:268–284; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.012
53.
ZhaoC, WangZ, HuaC, et al.Design, modeling and 3D printing of a personalized cervix tissue implant with protein release function. Biomed Mater, 2020; 15(4):45005; doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab7b3b
54.
AlfaroK, MazaM, CremerM, et al.Removing global barriers to cervical cancer prevention and moving towards elimination. Nat Rev Cancer, 2021; 21(10):607–608; doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00396-4
55.
ZhaoY, YaoR, OuyangL, et al.Three-dimensional printing of Hela cells for cervical tumor model in vitro. Biofabrication, 2014; 6(3):35001; doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035001
56.
NassirM, LeviM, ShakedNT. The Synergic Effect of Tubal Endometriosis and Women’s Aging on Fallopian Tube Function: Insights from a 3D Mechanical Model. Bioengineering. 2024; 11(8):852; doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080852
57.
WangM, ZhuT, LiuC, et al.Oviduct-mimicking microfluidic chips decreased the ROS concentration in the in vitro fertilized embryos of CD-1 mice. Biomed Pharmacother, 2022; 154:113567; doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113567
58.
KooYD, KangM-H, KimD, et al.3D-bioprinted gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel culture system emulating the oviduct environment for enhanced preimplantation embryo development. IJB, 2024;10(4):3346; doi: 10.36922/ijb.3346
59.
FerrazMAMM, HenningHHW, StoutTAE, et al.Designing 3-Dimensional in vitro oviduct culture systems to study mammalian fertilization and embryo production. Ann Biomed Eng, 2017; 45(7):1731–1744; doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1760-x
60.
FerrazMAMM, HenningHHW, CostaPF, et al.Improved bovine embryo production in an oviduct-on-a-chip system: Prevention of poly-spermic fertilization and parthenogenic activation. Lab Chip, 2017; 17(5):905–916; doi: 10.1039/c6lc01566b
61.
FerrazM, HenningH, Van DorenmalenK, et al.52 use of transwell cell culture and 3-dimensional printing technology to develop an in vitro bovine oviduct. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2016; 28(2):156–156; doi: 10.1071/rdv28n2ab52
62.
KimYH, KimH-S, HongI-S. Advances in biomaterials-based tissue engineering for regeneration of female reproductive tissues. Biofabrication, 2025; 17(2):022001; doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/adae38
63.
KesslerM, HoffmannK, BrinkmannV, et al.The Notch and Wnt pathways regulate stemness and differentiation in human fallopian tube organoids. Nat Commun, 2015; 6(1):8989; doi: 10.1038/ncomms9989
64.
OuniE, PeaucelleA, HaasKT, et al.A blueprint of the topology and mechanics of the human ovary for next-generation bioengineering and diagnosis. Nat Commun, 2021; 12(1):5603; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25934-4
65.
Sánchez‐AjofrínI, AndreuCM, GalindoJM, et al.A biomimetic follicle‐based design for engineering reproductive technologies. Adv Funct Mater, 2023; 34(4):2310787; doi: 10.1002/adfm.202310787
66.
ShahJS, SabouniR, Cayton VaughtKC, et al.Biomechanics and mechanical signaling in the ovary: A systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018; 35(7):1135–1148; doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1180-y
67.
ChitiMC, DolmansM-M, MortiauxL, et al.A novel fibrin-based artificial ovary prototype resembling human ovarian tissue in terms of architecture and rigidity. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018; 35(1):41–48; doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1091-3
68.
WuT, GaoYY, SuJ, et al.Three-dimensional bioprinting of artificial ovaries by an extrusion-based method using gelatin-methacryloyl bioink. Climacteric, 2022; 25(2):170–178; doi: 10.1080/13697137.2021.1921726
69.
AmorimCA, Van LangendoncktA, DavidA, et al.Survival of human pre-antral follicles after cryopreservation of ovarian tissue, follicular isolation and in vitro culture in a calcium alginate matrix. Hum Reprod, 2009; 24(1):92–99; doi: 10.1093/humrep/den343
70.
JooS, OhS-H, SittadjodyS, et al.The effect of collagen hydrogel on 3D culture of ovarian follicles. Biomed Mater, 2016; 11(6):65009; doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/11/6/065009
71.
YoonH-J, LeeYJ, BaekS, et al.Hormone autocrination by vascularized hydrogel delivery of ovary spheroids to rescue ovarian dysfunctions. Sci Adv, 2021; 7(18):eabe8873; doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe8873
72.
LarondaMM, JakusAE, WhelanKA, et al.Initiation of puberty in mice following decellularized ovary transplant. Biomaterials, 2015; 50:20–29; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.051
73.
LiQ, ZhengJ, LiZ, et al.Drug-free in vitro activation combined with 3D-bioprinted adipose-derived stem cells restores ovarian function of rats with premature ovarian insufficiency. Stem Cell Res Ther, 2022; 13(1):347; doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03035-3
74.
ZhengJ, LiuY, HouC, et al.Ovary-derived decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioink for fabricating 3D primary ovarian cells-laden structures for mouse ovarian failure correction. Int J Bioprint, 2022; 8(3):597; doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i3.597
75.
BakaZ, GodierC, LamyL, et al.A coculture based, 3D bioprinted ovarian tumor model combining cancer cells and cancer associated fibroblasts. Macromol Biosci, 2023; 23(3):e2200434; doi: 10.1002/mabi.202200434
76.
AkhtarZB, GuptaAD. Integrative approaches for advancing organoid engineering: From mechanobiology to personalized therapeutics. J Appl Artif Intell, 2024; 5(1):1–27.
77.
RaheemA, MandalK, BiswasS, et al.Smart biomaterials in healthcare: Breakthroughs in tissue engineering, immunomodulation, patient-specific therapies, and biosensor applications. Appl Phys Rev, 2025; 12(1):11333; doi: 10.1063/5.0238817
78.
WangY, LiZ, MoF, et al.Chemically engineering cells for precision medicine. Chem Soc Rev, 2023; 52(3):1068–1102.
79.
MukherjeeP, ParkSH, PathakN, et al.Integrating micro and nano technologies for cell engineering and analysis: Toward the next generation of cell therapy workflows. ACS Nano, 2022; 16(10):15653–15680.
80.
FrankoR, FrankoY, Ribes MartinezE, et al.Mechanical properties of native and decellularized reproductive tissues: Insights for tissue engineering strategies. Sci Rep, 2024; 14(1):7347; doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57867-5
81.
XinL, LinX, PanY, et al.A collagen scaffold loaded with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells facilitates endometrial regeneration and restores fertility. Acta Biomater, 2019; 92:160–171; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.012
82.
XinL, LinX, ZhouF, et al.A scaffold laden with mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes for promoting endometrium regeneration and fertility restoration through macrophage immunomodulation. Acta Biomater, 2020; 113:252–266; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.029
83.
KhunmaneeS, YooJ, LeeJR, et al.Thiol-yne click crosslink hyaluronic acid/chitosan hydrogel for three-dimensional in vitro follicle development. Mater Today Bio, 2023; 23:100867; doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100867
84.
KimEJ, YangC, LeeJ, et al.The new biocompatible material for mouse ovarian follicle development in three-dimensional in vitro culture systems. Theriogenology, 2020; 144:33–40; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.12.009
85.
ZhaoW, HuC, XuT, et al.Subaqueous Bioprinting: A novel strategy for fetal membrane repair with 7-Axis robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Adv Funct Materials, 2022; 32(51):2207496; doi: 10.1002/adfm.202207496
86.
KimJ, PerezAS, ClaflinJ, et al.Synthetic hydrogel supports the function and regeneration of artificial ovarian tissue in mice. NPJ Regen Med, 2016; 1:16010–16010; doi: 10.1038/npjregenmed.2016.10
87.
StejskalováA, VankelecomH, SourouniM, et al.In vitro modelling of the physiological and diseased female reproductive system. Acta Biomater, 2021; 132:288–312; doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.032
88.
KimJJ, ChoD-W. Advanced strategies in 3D bioprinting for vascular tissue engineering and disease modelling using smart bioinks. Virtual Phys Prototyping, 2024; 19(1):e2395470; doi: 10.1080/17452759.2024.2395470
89.
O’ConnorC, BradyE, ZhengY, et al.Engineering the multiscale complexity of vascular networks. Nat Rev Mater, 2022; 7(9):702–716; doi: 10.1038/s41578-022-00447-8
90.
Da SilvaID, WuidarV, ZielonkaM, et al.Unraveling the dynamics of estrogen and progesterone signaling in the endometrium: An overview. Cells, 2024; 13(15):1236; doi: 10.3390/cells13151236
91.
De SpiritoM, PalmieriV, PeriniG, et al.Bridging the gap: Integrating 3D bioprinting and microfluidics for advanced multi-organ models in biomedical research. Bioengineering (Basel), 2024; 11(7):664; doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11070664
