Power misuse by managers in organizations is a wide-spread problem that has significant negative consequences for organizational performance. At the same time, published research on attempts of diagnosing power misuse is scarce. As such, organizations keep facing this problem without help from academia on handling it. The authors of this paper suggest addressing the issue by utilizing a regular survey with the purpose of diagnosing potential power misuse by supervising managers of an organization. The information collected via such a survey can be a powerful feedback instrument toward changing or continuing the state of affairs. Such a survey is developed in this paper. The survey has adequate face validity and Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.93. Furthermore, its criterion, convergent, external structure, and discriminant validity results indicate their good levels. Therefore, the survey may be recommended for use in the organizational setting. Utilization of this instrument can potentially lead to the increase of employee accomplishments, and the improvement of organization-wide performance.
AllenMarkRobsonDavinaIliescuDragos. 2023. “Face Validity: A Critical but Ignored Component of Scale Construction in Psychological Assessment.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment39(3):153–56. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000777.
2.
AmundsenS.Martinsen.Ø.2015. “Linking Empowering Leadership to Job Satisfaction, Work Effort, and Creativity: The Role of Self-leadership and Psychological Empowerment.” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies22:304–23.
AshforthB.1989. “The Experience of Powerlessness in Organizations.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes43(2):207–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90051-4.
5.
BagozziR.Phillips.L.1991. “Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research.” Administrative Science Quarterly36(3):421–58.
6.
BartlettJ.KotrlikJ.Higgins.C.2001. “Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research.” Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal9(1):43–50.
7.
BelkhamzaZ.Hubona.G.2012. “Nomological Network in IS Research.” Emergent Research Forum.
8.
BendahanSamuelZehnderChristianPralongFrancoisAntonakisJohn. 2015. “Leader Corruption Depends on Power and Testosterone.” The Leadership Quarterly26(2):101–22. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.010.
9.
BladerStevenChenYa-Ru. 2012. “Differentiating the Effects of Status and Power: A Justice Perspective.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology102(5):994–1014. doi: 10.1037/a0026651.
10.
BoatengG.NeilandsT.FrongilloE.Melgar-QuiñonezH.Young.S.2018. “Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.” Frontiers in Public Health: Article 00149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.
11.
BraekenJohanAssenvan. 2017. “An Empirical Kaiser Criterion.” Psychological Methods22(3):450–66. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000074.
12.
BujangMohamadOmarEviBaharumNur. 2018. “A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers.” The Malaysian Journal of Medical Science25(6):85–99. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9.
13.
ByrneB.1984. “The General/academic Self-concept Nomological Network: A Review of Construct Validation Research.” Review of Educational Research54(3):427–56.
14.
CarlsonD.FergusonM.HunterE.Whitten.D.2012. “Abusive Supervision and Work-family Conflict: The Path through Emotional Labor and Burnout.” The Leadership Quarterly23:849–59.
15.
ChoMinhaKeltnerDacher. 2020. “Power, Approach and Inhibition: Empirical Advances of a Theory.” Current Opinion in Psychology33:196–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.013.
16.
CislakAleksandraCichockaAleksandraWojcikAdrianFrankowskaNatalia. 2018. “Power Corrupts but Control Does Not: What Stands Behind the Effects of Holding High Positions.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44(6):944–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218757456.
17.
ColemanPeterVoronovMaxim. 2003. “Power in Groups and Organizations.” Pp. 229–54 in International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working, edited by WestM.TjosvoldD.Smith.K.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi:10.1002/9780470696712.ch12.
18.
CooperBrianEvaNathanFazlelahiForoughNewmanAlexanderLeeAllanObschonkaMartin. 2020. “Addressing Common Method Variance and Endogeneity in Vocational Behavior Research: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research.” Journal of Vocational Behavior121:Article 103472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103472.
19.
CostelloA.OsborneJ.2005. “Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis.” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation10(7):1–9.
20.
CourtrightS.GardnerR.SmithT.McCormickB.Colbert.A.2015. “My Family Made Me Do It: A Cross-domain, Self-regulatory Perspective on Antecedents to Abusive Supervision.” Academy of Management Journal59(5):1630–52. doi: 10.5465/amj.2013.1009.
21.
CronbachL.Meehl.P.1955. “Construct Validity in Psychological Tests.” Psychological Bulletin52:281–302.
22.
CroneL.BrunelL.AuzoultL.2021. “Validation of a Perception of Objectification in the Workplace Short Scale.” Frontiers in Psychology12:Article651071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651071.
23.
DaikelerJ.SilberH.Bošnjak.M.2021. “A Meta-analysis of How Country-level Factors Affect Web Survey Response Rates.” International Journal of Market Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853211050916.
24.
De CremerDavidVan DijkEric. 2005. “When and Why Leaders Put Themselves First: Leader Behavior in Resource Allocation as a Function of Feeling Entitled.” European Journal of Social Psychology35(4):553–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.260.
25.
DekkersTychoRentergemJoostMeijerBrenPopmaArneWagemakerElineHuizengaHilde. 2019. “A Meta-analytical Evaluation of the Dual-hormone Hypothesis: Does Cortisol Moderate the Relationship Between Testosterone and Status, Dominance, Risk Taking, Aggression, and Psychopathy?.” Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews96:250–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.004.
26.
FanW.Yan.Z.2010. “Factors Affecting Response Rates of the Web Surveys: A Systematic Review.” Computers in Human Behavior26(2):132–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015.
27.
FarleyS.MokhtarD.NgK.NivenK.2023. “What Influences the Relationship between Workplace Bullying and Employee Well-being? A Systematic Review of Moderators.” Work & Stress37(3):345–72. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2023.2169968.
28.
FastN.SchroederJ.2020. “Power and Decision-making: New Directions for Research in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.” Current Opinion in Psychology33:172–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.039.
29.
FastNathanaelSivanathanNiroMayerNicoleGalinsky.Adam2012. “Power and Confident Decision-making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes117(2):249–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.009.
30.
FehrErnstHerzHolgerWilkeningTom. 2013. “The Lure of Authority: Motivation and Incentive Effects of Power.” The American Economic Review103(4):1325–59. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.4.1325.
31.
FieldAndy. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
FieldsDail. 2002. Taking the Measure of Work: A Guide to Validated Scales for Organizational Research and Diagnosis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
FletcherJ.1999. Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. The MIT Press.
34.
FollettM. P.1973. “Power” Pp. 66–87 in Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett, edited by FoxE. M.Pitman.L Urwick.
35.
FosnachtK.SarrafS.HoweE.Peck.L.2017. “How Important Are High Response Rates for College Surveys?” The Review of Higher Education40(2):245–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2017.0003.
36.
FoulkTrevorLanajKlodianaTuMin-HsuanArchambeauLindy. 2018. “Heavy Is the Head That Wears the Crown: An Actor-centric Approach to Daily Psychological Power, Abusive Leader Behavior, and Perceived Incivility.” Academy of Management Journal61(2):661–84. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5465/amj2015.1061.
37.
FrenchJ. R. P.JrRavenB.1959. “The Bases of Social Power.” Pp. 150–67 in Studies in Social Power, edited by Cartwright.D.University of Michigan Press.
38.
FurrR. M.2017. Psychometrics. An Introduction. Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
GalićZvonimirRuźojćićMitjaBubićAndrejaTrojakNatašaZeljkoLucijaLeBretonJames. 2021. “Measuring the Motive for Power Using Conditional Reasoning: Some Preliminary Findings.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology30(2):175–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1745882.
40.
GalinskyA.GruenfeldD.MageeJ.WhitsonJ.Liljenquisk.K.2008. “Power Reduces the Press of the Situation: Implications for Creativity, Conformity, and Dissonance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95:1450–66.
GreerLindredChu.Charles2020. “Power Struggles: When and Why the Benefits of Power for Individuals Paradoxically Harm Groups.” Current Opinion in Psychology33:162–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.040.
43.
GuinoteA.2007. “Power and Goal Pursuit.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin33:1076–87. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301011.
44.
HairJ.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR.2018. Multivariate Data Analysis (8Th Ed.). London: Cengage Learning.
45.
HanSeongheeNandaVikramSilverySabatin. 2016. “CEO Power and Firm Performance Under Pressure.” Financial Management45:369–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12127.
HatcherL.1994. A Step-by Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Gary, NC: SAS Institute.
48.
HieuV. M.2020. “Employee Empowerment and Empowering Leadership: A Literature Review.” Technium2(7):20–28.
49.
HinkinTimothy. 1998. “A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires.” Organizational Research Methods1:104–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106.
50.
HinkinTimothyTraceyBruceEnzCathy. 1997. “Scale Construction: Developing Reliable and Valid Measurement Instruments.” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research21(1):100–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108.
51.
HirshJacobGalinskyAdamZhongChen-Bo. 2011. “Drunk, Powerful, and in the Dark: How General Processes of Disinhibition Produce Both Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior.” Perspectives on Psychological Science6:415–27. doi: 10.1177/1745691611416992.
52.
HodginsM.MacCurtainS.Mannix-McNamaraP.2020. “Power and Inaction: Why Organizations Fail to Address Workplace Bullying.”International Journal of Workplace Health Management13(3): 265–290.
53.
HuJiaLiden.Robert2015. “Making a Difference in the Teamwork: Linking Team Prosocial Motivation to Team Processes and Effectiveness.” Academy of Management Journal58(4):1102–27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj2012.1142.
54.
HuangCaiyunTianSiyu. 2021. “Why Not All the Powerful Abuse? The Competitive Effects of Psychological Distance and Self-control.” Frontiers in Psychology12:Article 730365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730365.
55.
HullandJohnBaumgartnerHansSmithKeith. 2018. “Marketing Survey Research Best Practices: Evidence and Recommendations from a Review of JAMS Articles.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science46:92–108.
56.
HussainKanwalAbbasZuhairGulzarSabaJibrilAbdulHussainAltaf. 2020. “Examining the Impact of Abusive Supervision on Employees’ Psychological Wellbeing and Turnover Intention: The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Motivation.” Cogent Business and Management7:Article 1818998. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1818998.
57.
HwangHyoseokKimHyun-DongKimTaeyeon. 2020. “The Blind Power: Power-led CEO Overconfidence and M&A Decision Making.” North American Journal of Economics and Finance52:Article 101141.
58.
JordanPeterTrothAshlea. 2020. “Common Method Bias in Applied Settings: The Dilemma of Researching in Organizations.” Australian Journal of Management45(1):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219871976.
59.
KaiserHenry. 1960. “The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis.” Educational and Psychological Measurement20:141–51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116.
60.
KanterR. M.1979. “Power Failure in Management Circuits.” Harvard Business Review57(4):65–75.
61.
KarimF.Rehman.O.2012. “Impact of Job Satisfaction, Perceived Organizational Justice, and Employee Empowerment on Organizational Commitment in Semi-government Organizations in Pakistan.” Journal of Business Studies Quarterly3(4):92–104.
62.
KeltnerDacher. 2017. The Power Paradox: How We Gain and Lose Influence. Penguin Books.
63.
KnektaEvaRunyonChristopherEddySarah. 2019. “One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Using Factor Analysis to Gather Validity Evidence When Using Surveys in Your Research.” CBE—Life Sciences Education18:1–17. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064.
64.
KockF.BerbekovaA.Assaf.G.2021. “Understanding and Managing the Threat of Common Method Bias: Detection, Prevention and Control.” Tourism Management86:Article104330.
65.
KockN.2015. “Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach.” International Journal of E-Collaboration11(4):1–10.
66.
KockN.GaskinsL.2014. “The Mediating Role of Voice and Accountability in the Relationship between Internet Diffusion and Government Corruption in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa.” Information Technology for Development20(1):23–43.
67.
KockN.Lynn.G.2012. “Latent Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations.” Journal of Association for Information Systems13(7):546–80.
68.
KocurDagnaMandalEugenia. 2018. “The Need for Power, Need for Influence, Sense of Power, and Directiveness in Female and Male Superiors and Subordinates.” Current Issues in Personality Psychology6(1):47–56. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2018.72200.
69.
KostRhondaRosaJoel de. 2018. “Impact of Survey Length and Compensation on Validity, Reliability, and Sample Characteristics for Ultrashort— Short— and Long—esearch Participant Perception Surveys.” Journal of Clinical and Translational Science2:31–37. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.18.
70.
KumarMukeshTalibSalim AbdulRamayah.T.2013. Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71.
KusyM.Holloway.E.2009. Toxic Workplace: Managing Toxic Personalities and Their Systems of Power. Jossey-Bass.
72.
LamL.XuA.2018. “Power Imbalance and Employee Silence: The Role of Abusive Leadership, Power Distance Orientation, and Perceived Organizational Politics.” Applied Psychology68(1). doi:10.1111/apps.12170.
73.
LambJ.PeplerD.CraigW.2009. “Approach to Bullying and Victimization.” Canadian Family Physician66:356–60.
74.
LammK.LammA.EdgarD.2020. “Scale Development and Validation: Methodology and Recommendations.” Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education27(2):Article 3. doi: 10.5191/jiaee.2020.27224.
75.
LiR.ChenZ.ZhangH.Luo.J.2021. “How Do Authoritarian Leadership and Abusive Supervision Jointly Thwart Follower Proactivity? A Social Control Perspective.” Journal of Management47(4):930–56. doi: 10.1177/0149206319878261.
76.
LimberS.WangW.2014. “Bullying.” Pp. 461-466 in Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, edited by MichalosA. C.Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_241.
77.
MageeJoeSmithPamela. 2013. “The Social Distance Theory of Power.” Personality and Social Psychology Review17(2):158–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312472732
78.
MatsunagaMasaki. 2010. “How to Factor Analyze Your Data Right: Do’s Don’ts, and How-to’s.” International Journal of Psychological Research3(1):98–111. doi: 10.21500/20112084.854.
79.
MedinaAliciaLopezEduardoMedinaRolf. 2020. “The Unethical Managerial Behaviors and Abuse of Power in Downwards Vertical Workplace Bullying: A Phenomenological Case Study.” Social Sciences9(6):Article 110. doi:10.3390/socsci9060110.
80.
MillerStewartMooreFionaEdenLorraine. 2023. “Ethics and International Business Research: Considerations and Best Practices.” International Business Review33:Article 102207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102207.
81.
MooijmanMarlonvan DijkWilcoEllemersNaomivan DijkEric. 2015. “Why Leaders Punish: A Power Perspective.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology109:75–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000021
82.
MurrayJanetKotabeMasaakiZhouJoe. 2005. “Strategic Alliance-based Sourcing and Market Performance: Evidence from Foreign Firms Operating in China.” Journal of International Business Studies36(2):187–208. https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400120.
83.
NaumanS.MalikS.Jalil.F.2019. “How Workplace Bullying Jeopardizes Employee’s Life Satisfaction: The Roles of Job Anxiety and Insomnia.” Frontiers in Psychology Article 2292. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02292.
OgundimuE.AltmanD.Collins.G.2016. “Adequate Sample Size for Developing Prediction Models Is Not Simply Related to Events Per Variable.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology76:175–82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinepi.2016.02.031.
86.
O’ReillyCharlesPfefferJeffrey. 2021. “Organizational Power and Politics: The Narcissist’s Advantage?.” Personality and Individual Differences182:Article 111061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111061.
87.
O’ReillyCharlesChatmanJ.2020. “Transformational Leader or Narcissist?”California Management Review62(3): 5–27.
88.
OverbeckJenniferParkBernadette. 2006. “Powerful Perceivers, Powerless Objects: Flexibility of Powerholders’ Social Attention.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes99(2):227–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.003
89.
PernegerT.CourvoisierD.HudelsonP.Gayet-AgeronA.2014. “Sample Size for Pre-tests of Questionnaires. Brief Communication.” Qual Life Res. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2.
90.
PfefferJ.2015. Leadership BS: Fixing Workplaces and Careers One Truth at a Time. HarperCollins Publishers.
91.
PfefferJeffrey. 2022. Seven Rules of Power. London: Swift Press.
92.
PodsakoffP.Organ.D.2016. “Self-reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects” Pp. 33–47 in Work and Organizational Psychology: Research Methodology; Assessment and Selection; Organizational Change and Development; Human Resource and Performance Management; Emerging Trends: Innovation/globalization, Technology, edited by BoyleG.O’GormanJ.FogartyG.Sage.
93.
PodsakoffPhilipMacKenzieScottLeeJeon-YeonPodsakoffNathan. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology88:879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
94.
ReynoldsM.1998. “Reflection and Critical Reflection in Management Learning.” Management Learning29:183–200.
95.
Rodriguez-ArduraI.Meseguer-Artola.A.2020. “Editorial: How to Prevent, Detect and Control Common Method Variance in Electronic Commerce Research.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research15(2):Online Article. doi: 10.4067/S0718-18762020000200101.
96.
RussellB.1938. Power: A New Social Analysis. W W Norton and Co.
97.
SamuelsPeter.2017. Advice on Reliability Analysis with Small Samples—Revised Version. (Technical Report). Birmingham City University, Center for Academic Success.
98.
SassenbergKaiEllemersNaomiScheepersDaanSchollAnnika. 2014. “Power Corrupts Revisited: The Role for Construal of Power as Opportunity or Responsibility.” Pp. 73–87 in Power, Politics, and Paranoia: Why People are Suspicious of Their Leaders, edited by van ProoijenJ.-W.van Lange.Paul A. M.Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139565417.007.
99.
ScheepersDaanKnightEric. 2020. “Neuroendocrine and Cardiovascular Responses to Shifting Status.” Current Opinions in Psychology33:115–19. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.035.
100.
SchollAnnikaWitFrank deEllemersNaomiFettermanAdamSassenbergKaiScheepersDaan. 2018. “The Burden of Power: Construing Power as Responsibility (Rather Than as Opportunity) Alters Threat-challenge Responses.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44(7):1024–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218757452.
101.
SchwabDonald. 1980. “Construct Validity in Organizational Behavior.” Vol. 2. Pp. 3–43 in Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by StawB. M.Cummings.L. L.Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
102.
SchynsBirgitSchilling.Jan2013. “How Bad Are the Effects of Bad Leaders? A Meta-analysis of Destructive Leadership and Its Outcomes.” Leadership Quarterly24:138–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001.
103.
SharmaHunny. 2022. “How Short or Long Should Be a Questionnaire for Any Research? Researchers’ Dilemma in Deciding the Appropriate Questionnaire Length.” Saudi Journal of Anesthesia16:65–68. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_163_21.
104.
ShermanG.MehtaP.2020. “Stress, Cortisol, and Social Hierarchy.”Current Opinions in Psychology33: 227–232.
105.
ShihT.Fan.X.2008. “Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-analysis.” Field Methods20(3):249–71. https:doe.org/10.1177/1525822X08317085.
106.
SinghA.2009. “Organizational Power in Perspective.” Leadership and Management in Engineering9:165–176.
107.
SongJiyoungHoweEstherOltmannsJoshuaFisherAaron. 2023. “Examining the Concurrent and Predictive Validity of Single Items in Ecological Momentary Assessments.” Assessment30(5):1662–71. doi:10.1177/10731911221113563.
108.
StevensJames. 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
109.
SuhrD.2006. Exploratory or Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Gary, NC: SAS Institute.
110.
TavakolMohsenDennickReg. 2011. “Making Sense of Cronbach’s Alpha.” International Journal of Medical Education2:53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
111.
TavakolMohsenWetzelAngela. 2020. “Factor Analysis: A Means for Theory and Instrument Development in Support of Construct Validity.” International Journal of Medical Education11:245–47. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5f96.0f4a.
112.
TavantiM.2011. “Managing Toxic Leaders: Dysfunctional Patterns in Organizational Leadership and How to Deal with Them.” Human Resource Management6(83):127–36.
113.
TehseenS.RamayahT.Sajilan.S.2017. “Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods.” Journal of Management Sciences4(2):146–75. doi: 10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
114.
TepperB.2000. “Consequences of Abusive Supervision.”Academy of Management Journal43(2): 178–90. doi: 10.5465/1556375.
115.
TepperB.MossS.LockhartD.CarrJ.2007. “Abusive Supervision, Upward Maintenance Communication, and Subordinates’ Psychological Distress.”Academy of Management Journal50: 1169–80.
116.
TepperB.MossS.DuffyM.2011. “Predictors of Abusive Supervision: Supervisorn Perception of Deep-Level Dissimiularity Relationship Conflict, and Subordinate Performance.”Academy of Management Journal54(2): 279–94.
117.
TjosvoldD.ChenG.LiuC.2001, July. Interdependence, Mutual Enhancement and Strategic Advantage: Top Management Teams in China. [Paper presentation]. Social Interdependence Theory Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
118.
ToboreOnojighofia. 2023. “On Power and Its Corrupting Effects: The Effects of Power on Human Behavior and the Limits of Accountability Systems.” Communicative & Integrative Biology16(1):Article 2246793. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2023.2246793.
Van KleefGerbenLange.Jens2020. “How Hierarchy Shapes Our Emotional Lives: Effects of Power and Status on Emotional Experience, Expression and Responsiveness.” Current Opinion in Psychology33:148–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.009.
121.
Van KleefGerbenOveisChristophervan der LoweIlmoLuoKoganAleksandrGoetzJenniferKeltnerDacher. 2008. “Power, Distress and Compassion: Turning a Blind Eye to the Suffering of Others.” Psychological Science19(12):1315–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02241.x.
122.
VerkhohlyadO.McLeanG.2023. “Power Misuse: How Top-Managers Can Reduce The Level of Performance of Their Organizations Without Knowing It.”Business, Economics, Sustainabilty, Leadership, and Innovation11: 39–53.
123.
VittinghoffE.McCullochC.2007. “Relaxing the Rule of Ten Events Per Variable in Logistic and Cox Regression.” American Journal of Epidemiology165(6):710–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwk052.
124.
VredenburghDonaldBrenderYael. 1998. “The Hierarchical Abuse of Power in Work Organizations.” Journal of Business Ethics17(12):1337–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005775326249.
125.
WeeE. X. M.LiaoH.LiuD.LiuJ.2017. “Moving from Abuse to Reconciliation: A Power Dependency Perspective on When and How a Follow Can Break the Spiral of Abuse.” Academy of Management Journal60:2352–80. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0866.
126.
WestenD.Rosenthal.R.2003. “Quantifying Construct Validity: Two Simple Measures.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(3):608–18.
127.
WillardtR.Schmid.P.2024. “The Threat of Powerlessness: Consequences for Affect and Social Cognition.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology111:Article 104576.
128.
WillimackDianeRidolfoHeatherRiemerAmyCidadeMelissaOttKathy. 2023. Advances in Question (naire) Development, Pretesting, and Evaluation. Pp.387–
411 in Advances in Business Statistics, Methods and Data Collection, edited by SnijkersG.BavdašM.BenderS.JonesJ.MacFeelyS.SakshaugJ.ThompsonK.van Delden.A.John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
129.
WuM. -. J.ZhaoK.Fils-AimeF.2022. “Response Rates of Online Surveys in Published Research: A Meta-analysis.” Computers in Human Behavior Reports7:Article 100206.
130.
WylezalekJoannaPodkowinskaMonika. 2018. Pathological Mechanisms of Human Resource Management. Pp. 83–102 in Communication, Education, Culture, edited by Podkowinska.M.University of Presov Pro Communio.
ZhangB.WisseB.LordR.2023. “How Objectifiers Are Granted Power in the Workplace.” European Journal of Social Psychology, Article 2930. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp2930.
133.
ZiemianskiPawel. 2022. “Identifying and Mitigating the Negative Effects of Power in Organizations.” Journal of Applied Social Science16(1):140–50. doi: 10.1177/19367244211014789.
134.
ZernigGeraldHiemkeChristoph. 2017. “Making the Case for ‘Power Misuse Disorder” as a Nosologic Entity.”Pharmacology100: 50–63. doi: 10.1159/000475600.
