Oregon’s Highway Construction Workforce Development Program aims to improve the recruitment and retention of a diverse construction workforce, through pre-apprenticeships that provide alternative pathways into apprenticeship as well as financial and non-financial retention services that aim to help apprentices complete their apprenticeships. This evaluation research examines the impact of the Program on recruitment and retention trends, drawing on administrative data from the Program as well as interviews with program participants. We find pre-apprenticeship programs have improved the recruitment of women into the trades. We further find that non-financial services, ready supplies, and childcare services have a positive impact on completion, with receipt of non-financial support having the largest impact on completion. Gas/travel services are positively associated with completion among apprentices of color. Interview data suggest that additional support services for apprentices as well as structural changes to the industry are needed to achieve construction workforce diversity goals.
BechtoldtFelicia. 2020. Oregon Jobs Projected to Increase by 9 Percent by 2029. State of Oregon Employment Department. Retrieved February 21, 2022 (www.qualityinfo.org/projections).
3.
BergmanMathewGrossJacob P. K.BerryMattShuckBrad. 2014. “If Life Happened but a Degree Didn’t: Examining Factors that Impact Adult Student Persistence.” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education62(2):90–101.
4.
BerikGunseliBilginsoyCihanWilliamsLarry S.2011. “Gender and Racial Training Gaps in Oregon Apprenticeship Programs.” Labor Studies Journal36(2):221–44.
5.
BridgesDonnaKrivokapic-SkokoBrankaBamberryLarissaJenkinsStaceyWulffElizabeth. 2019. A Trade of One’s Own: Regional NSW Stakeholder Findings—The Barriers and Proposed Solutions for Women in Non-traditional Male Dominated Trades. Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia: Charles Sturt University.
6.
BridgesDonnaWulffElizabethBamberryLarissaKrivokapic-SkokoBrankaJenkinsStacey. 2020. “Negotiating Gender in the Male-dominated Skilled Trades: A Systematic Literature Review.” Construction Management and Economics38(10):894–916.
7.
DenissenAmy M.SaguyAbigail C.2014. “Gendered Homophobia and the Contradictions of Workplace Discrimination for Women in the Building Trades.” Gender & Society28(3):381–403.
8.
DukeMichaelBergmannLukeCunradiCarolAmesGenevieve. 2013. “Like Swallowing a Butcher Knife: Layoffs, Masculinity, and Couple Conflict in the United States Construction Industry.” Human Organization72(4):293–301.
9.
GaleaNataliePowellAbigailLoosemoreMartinChappellLouise. 2015. “Designing Robust and Revisable Policies for Gender Equality: Lessons from the Australian Construction Industry.” Construction Management and Economics33(5–6):375–89.
10.
HainesKellyBarreraClaireBouchaneAaronBurchMichaelCamarilloRobertCardenasJohnDespositoAngelaGronauerAidanHeinGerryKellyMauraKupcakKellyOnyeagusiKenechiQuinnBridgetRameshbabuAnjaliRichmondJayThompsonTiffanyWilliamsLarry. 2020. Regional Respectful Workplace Model Review Committee Recommendations: Tools to Address Jobsite Culture in Construction. Final report from the Respectful Workplace Model Review Committee.
11.
HainesKellyWooleyJeanaThompsonTiffanyAshbrookConnieKellyMaura. 2018. Portland Metro Region Construction Workforce Market Study
12.
HegewischAriane. 2020. Child Care Supports for the Construction Trades: Building and Sustaining Diversity in Oregon. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Retrieved February 21, 2022 (https://iwpr.org/research/).
13.
HegewischArianeHenriciJane M.ShawElyseHooperThomas. 2014. Untapped Resources, Untapped Labor Pool: Using Federal Highway Funds to Prepare Women for Careers in Construction. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Retrieved February 21, 2022 (https://iwpr.org/research/).
14.
HegewischArianeO’FarrellBrigid. 2014. Women in Construction and the Economic Recovery Results from the 2013 IWPR Tradeswomen Survey. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Retrieved February 21, 2022 (https://iwpr.org/research/).
15.
HegewischArianeO’FarrellBrigid. 2015. Women in the Construction Trades: Earnings, Workplace Discrimination, and the Promise of Green Jobs. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. Retrieved February 21, 2022 (https://iwpr.org/research/).
16.
HunteRoberta. 2016. “Black Women and Race and Gender Tensions in the Trades.” Peace Review28(4):436–43.
17.
IbanezMarta. 2017. “Women in the Construction Trades: Career Types and Associated Barriers.” Women’s Studies International Forum60:39–48.
18.
JenkinsStaceyBamberryLarissaBridgesDonnaKrivokapic-SkokoBranka. 2019. “Skills for Women Trades in Regional Australia: A Global Future.” International Journal of Training Research16(3):278–85.
19.
JohanssonErinWoodsBenjamin. 2016. Building Career Opportunities for Women and People of Color: Breakthroughs in Construction. Washington, DC: Jobs With Justice Education Fund and North America’s Building Trades Unions Tradeswomen Committee.
20.
KellyMauraWilkinsonLindseyPisciottaMauraWilliamsLarry S.2015. “When Working Hard is not enough for Female and Racial/Ethnic Minority Apprentices in the Highway Trades”. Sociological Forum30(2):415–438.
21.
KellyMauraWilkinsonLindsey. 2020. 2020 Evaluation of the Highway Construction Workforce Development Program. Final report submitted to Oregon Labor and Industries and Oregon Department of Transportation.
MacIsaacKatherine M. R.DomeneJose F.2014. “Learning the Tricks of the Trades: Women’s Experiences.” Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy48(1):1–21.
25.
MantzYorkeThomasLiz. 2003. “Improving the Retention of Students from Lower Socio-economic Groups.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management25(1):63–74.
National Women’s Law Center. 2014. Women in Construction: Still Breaking Ground. National Women’s Law Center. Retrieved February 21, 2022 (http://www.nwlc.org/).
29.
NessKate. 2012. “Constructing Masculinity in the Building Trades: ‘Most Jobs in the Construction Industry Can Be Done by Women.’” Gender, Work & Organization19(6):654–76.
30.
Policy Group on Tradeswomen’s Issues. 2016. Finishing the Job: Best Practices for a Diverse Workforce in the Construction Industry. Boston, MA: Policy Group on Tradeswomen’s Issues. Retrieved February 21, 2022 (https://pgtiblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/ftj-v-6-1.pdf).
31.
SimonLindaClarkeKira. 2016. “Apprenticeships Should Work for Women Too!” Education + Training58(6):578–96.
32.
TaylorAlisonHammZaneRaykovMilosh. 2015. “The Experiences of Female Youth Apprentices in Canada: Just Passing Through?” Journal of Vocational Education & Training67(1):93–108.
33.
ValenzuelaAngela. 1999. Subtractive Schooling: U.S.-Mexican Youth and the Politics of Caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
34.
WrightTessa. 2013. “Uncovering Sexuality and Gender: An Intersectional Examination of Women’s Experience in UK Construction.” Construction Management and Economics31(8):832–44.
35.
WrightTessa. 2016. “Women’s Experience of Workplace Interactions in Male-dominated Work: The Intersections of Gender, Sexuality and Occupational Group.” Gender, Work & Organization23(3):348–62.
