This paper explores the role of homophily with respect to demographic attributes on the formation of friendships, focusing on the moderating effect of attribute salience and time effect. To address the research questions, we explored a data set collected from Master of Public Administration (MPA) students in four waves over a period of nearly a year. An actor-based model was employed to test various research hypotheses concerning the longitudinal evolution of a friendship network. As a result, we found that (1) salience of demographic attributes does not moderate the relationship between the attributes and friendship ties and (2) age homophily is associated with friendship formation only in the initial stage.
AllanGraham. 1998. “Friendship, Sociology and Social Structure.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships15(5):685–702. doi:10.1177/0265407598155007.
2.
AndrewsNaomi C. Z.SantosCarlos E.CookRachel E.MartinCarol Lynn. 2018. “Gender Discrimination Hinders Other-gender Friendship Formation in Diverse Youth.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology59:16–25. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2018.02.006.
3.
AmirY.1994 “The Contact Hypothesis in Intergroup Relations.” In Psychology and Culture, edited by LonnerW. J.MalpassR. S.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
AshforthBlake E.MaelFred. 1989. “Social Identity Theory and the Organization.” Academy of Management Review14(1):20–39.
5.
BahnsAngela J.CrandallChris S.GillathOmriPreacherKristopher J.2017. “Similarity in Relationships as Niche Construction: Choice, Stability, and Influence within Dyads in a Free Choice Environment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology112(2):329–55.
6.
BergerCharles R.1973. “Task Performance and Attributional Communication as Determinants of Interpersonal Attraction.” Speech Monographs40(4):280–86.
7.
BerryJohn Widdup. 1983. “Acculturation: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Forms.” Pp. 65–78 in Perspectives in Immigrant and Minority Education, edited by WoodsS. L.New York: University Press of America.
8.
BilligMichaelTajfelHenri. 1973. “Social Categorization and Similarity in Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology3(1):27–52.
9.
BrassDaniel J.1984. “Being in the Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influence in an Organization.” Administrative Science Quarterly29(4):518–39.
10.
ByrneDonn. 1969. “Attitudes and Attraction.” Pp. 36–87, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by BerkowitzL.New York: Academic Press.
11.
ByrneDonn. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
ByrneDonnRhameyRay. 1965. “Magnitude of Positive and Negative Reinforcements as a Determinant of Attraction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology2(6):884–89.
13.
CarleyKathleen M.KrackhardtDavid. 1996. “Cognitive Inconsistencies and Non-symmetric Friendship.” Social Networks18(1):1–27.
14.
ChatmanJennifer A.PolzerJeffrey T.BarsadeSigal G.NealeMargaret A.1998. “Being Different yet Feeling Similar: The Influence of Demographic Composition and Organizational Culture on Work Processes and Outcomes.” Administrative Science Quarterly43(4):749–80.
15.
ChengSiweiXieYu. 2013. “Structural Effect of Size on Interracial Friendship.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110(18):7165–69. doi:10.1073/pnas.1303748110.
16.
CooheyCarol. 2007. “The Relationship between Mothers’ Social Networks and Severe Domestic Violence: A Test of the Social Isolation Hypothesis.” Violence and Victims22(4):120–29.
17.
CrosnoeRobertCavanaghShannonElderGlen H.2003. “Adolescent Friendships as Academic Resources: The Intersection of Friendship, Race, and School Disadvantage.” Sociological Perspectives46(3):331–52. doi:10.1525/sop.2003.46.3.331.
18.
CurrariniSergioJacksonMatthew O.PinPaolo. 2010. “Identifying the Roles of Race-based Choice and Chance in High School Friendship Network Formation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107(11):4857–61. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911793107.
19.
de KlepperMauritsSleebosEdvan de BuntGerhardAgneessensFilip. 2010. “Similarity in Friendship Networks: Selection or Influence? The Effect of Constraining Contexts and Non-visible Individual Attributes.” Social Networks32:82–90.
20.
DemoDavid H.1992. “The Self-concept over Time: Research Issues and Directions.” Annual Review of Sociology18(1):303–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001511.
21.
EderDonnaHallinanMaureen T.1978. “Sex Differences in Children’s Friendships.” American Sociological Review43(2):237–50.
22.
EllisonNicole B.2007. “Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. “The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites.”” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–68.
23.
GremmenMariola ClaudiaDijkstraJan KornelisSteglichChristianVeenstraRené. 2017. “First Selection, Then Influence: Developmental Differences in Friendship Dynamics regarding Academic Achievement.” Developmental Psychology53(7):1356–70. doi:10.1037/dev0000314.
24.
HoggMichael A.2003. “Social Identity.” Pp. 462–479, in Handbook of Self and Identity, edited by LearyR.TangneyJune Price. New York: Guildford Press.
25.
HoggMichael A.TerryDeborah J.WhiteKatherine M.1995. “A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly58(4):255–69.
26.
HoggMichael A.TurnerJohn C.1987. “Intergroup Behaviour, Self-stereotyping and the Salience of Social Categories.” British Journal of Social Psychology26(4):325–40. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x.
27.
IbarraHerminia. 1992. “Homophily and Differential Returns: Sex Differences in Network Structure and Access in an Advertising Firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly37(3):422–47.
28.
IbarraHerminia. 1995. “Race, Opportunity, and Diversity of Social Circles in Managerial Networks.” Academy of Management Journal38(3):673–703.
29.
KalmijnMatthijs. 1998. “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology24(1):395–421.
30.
KandelDenise B.1978. “Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships.” American Journal of Sociology84(2):427–36. doi:10.1086/226792.
31.
LewisGregory B.FrankSue A.2002. “Who Wants to Work for the Government?” Public Administration Review62(4):395–404.
32.
LincolnJames R.MillerJon. 1979. “Work and Friendship Ties in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Relation Networks.” Administrative Science Quarterly24(2):181–99.
33.
LospinosoJoshua A.SchweinbergerMichaelSnijdersTom A. BRipleyRuth M.2011. “Assessing and Accounting for Time Heterogeneity in Stochastic Actor Oriented Models.” Advances in Data Analysis and Classification5(2):147–76.
34.
McGuireWilliam J.1984. “Search for the Self: Going beyond Self-esteem and Reactive Self.” Pp.73–120 in Personality and the Prediction of Behavior, edited by ZuckerR. A.AronoffJ.RabinA. I.New York: Academy Press.
35.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27(1):415–44.
36.
MehraAjayKilduffMartinBrassDaniel J.1998. “At the Margins: A Distinctiveness Approach to the Social Identity and Social Networks of Underrepresented Groups.” Academy of Management Journal41(4):441–52.
37.
MessickDavid M.MackieDiane M.1989. “Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology40(1):45–81.
38.
MollicaKelly A.GrayBarbaraTreviñoLinda K.2003. “Racial Homophily and Its Persistence in Newcomers’ Social Networks.” Organization Science14(2):123–36.
39.
MontoyaR. MatthewHortonRobert S.KirchnerJeffrey. 2008. “Is Actual Similarity Necessary for Attraction? A Meta-analysis of Actual and Perceived Similarity.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships25(6):889–922.
40.
MullenBrianBrownRupertSmithColleen. 1992. “Ingroup Bias as a Function of Salience, Relevance, and Status: An Integration.” European Journal of Social Psychology22(2):103–22. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220202.
41.
OakesPenelope J.1987. “The Salience of Social Categories.” Pp. 117–41 in Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory, edited by TurnerJohn C.New York: Basil Blackwell.
42.
OakesPenelope J.HaslamS. AlexanderTurnerJohn C.1994. Stereotyping and Social Reality. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
43.
PaternosterRayJaynesChae MamayekWilsonTheodore. 2017. “Rational Choice Theory and Interest in the “Fortune of Others.”” Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency54(6):847–68. doi:10.1177/0022427817707240.
44.
RambaranJ. A., et al. (2017). “Academic Functioning and Peer Influences: A Short-Term Longitudinal Study of Network–Behavior Dynamics in Middle Adolescence.” Child Development88(2):523–543.
45.
RavlinElizabeth C.MeglinoBruce M.1987. “Effect of Values on Perception and Decision Making: A Study of Alternative Work Values Measures.” Journal of Applied Psychology72(4):666–73.
46.
ReederHeidi M.2003. “The Effect of Gender Role Orientation on Same- and Cross-sex Friendship Formation.” Sex Roles49(3):143–52. doi:10.1023/A:1024408913880.
47.
RipleyRuth M.SnijdersTom A. BBodaZsofiaVorosAndrasPreciadoPaulina. 2017. “Manual for Siena.” Oxford, England: Department of Statistics, University of Oxford.
48.
RobinsGarryPattisonPipKalishYuvalLusherDean. 2007. “An Introduction to Exponential Random Graph (P*) Models for Social Networks.” Social Networks29(2):173–91.
49.
SelfhoutMaartenBurkWilliamBranjeSusanDenissenJaapVan AkenMarcelMeeusWim. 2010. “Emerging Late Adolescent Friendship Networks and Big Five Personality Traits: A Social Network Approach.” Journal of Personality 78, no. 2: 509–38.
50.
ShrumWesleJrCheekNeil H.HunterSaundra MacD. 1988. “Friendship in School: Gender and Racial Homophily.” Sociology of Education61(4):227–39.
51.
SmithJeffrey A.McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynn. 2014. “Social Distance in the United States: Sex, Race, Religion, Age, and Education Homophily among Confidants, 1985 to 2004.” American Sociological Review79(3):432–56. doi:10.1177/0003122414531776.
52.
SnijdersTom A. B.SteglichChristian E. G.SchweinbergerMichael. 2007. “Modeling the Co-evolution of Networks and Behavior.” Pp. 215–247 in Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences, edited by Kessvan MontfortOudJohanSatorraAlbert. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
SnijdersTom A. B.van de BuntGerhard G.SteglichChristian E. G. 2010. “Introduction to Stochastic Actor-based Models for Network Dynamics.” Social Networks32(1):44–60. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.
54.
StroessnerSteven J.1996. “Social Categorization by Race or Sex: Effects of Perceived Non-normalcy on Response Times.” Social Cognition14(3):247–76.
55.
TajfelHenri. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology33(1):1–39.
56.
TurnerJohn C.1985. “Social Categorization and the Self Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior.” Pp. 243–272 in Advances in Group Processes, edited by LawlerEdward J.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
57.
TurnerJohn C.OakesPenelope J.HaslamS. AlexanderMcGartyCraig. 1994. “Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20(5):454–63.
58.
VaiseyStephenLizardoOmar. 2010. “Can Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition?” Social Forces88(4):1595–618. doi:10.1353/sof.2010.0009.
59.
van de BuntGerhard. G. 1999. Friends by Choice: An Actor-oriented Statistical Network Model for Friendship Networks through Time. Groningen, The Netherlands: Thela Thesis.
60.
van de BuntGerhard G.GroenewegenPeter. 2007. “An Actor-oriented Dynamic Network Approach: The Case of Interorganizational Network Evolution.” Organizational Research Methods10(3):463–82.
61.
van DuijnMarijtje A. J.ZeggelinkEvelien P. H.HuismanJ. MarkStokmanFrans N.WasseurFrans W.2003. “Evolution of Sociology Freshmen into a Friendship Network.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology27:153–91.
62.
VerbruggeLois M.1977. “The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices.” Social Forces56(2):576–97.
63.
WimmerAndreasLewisKevin. 2010. “Beyond and Below Racial Homophily: Erg Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook.” American Journal of Sociology116(2):583–642.
64.
YilmazGamzePeñaJorge. 2014. “The Influence of Social Categories and Interpersonal Behaviors on Future Intentions and Attitudes to Form Subgroups in Virtual Teams.” Communication Research41(3):333–52. doi:10.1177/0093650212443696.
65.
ZhuDavid H.ShenWeiHillmanAmy J.2014. “Recategorization into the in-group: The Appointment of Demographically Different New Directors and Their Subsequent Positions on Corporate Boards.” Administrative Science Quarterly59(2):240–70. doi:10.1177/0001839214530951.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
