This study aims to investigate the correlation of Doppler ultrasound indices of umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), cerebro-placental ratio (CPR), length of umbilical cord (UC) coiling, and birthweight, as well as the predictors of these parameters for small for gestational age (SGA).
Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted between June 2022 and June 2024 at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Vietnam. The study enrolled 337 full-term primigravida with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies who underwent Doppler transabdominal ultrasound between 37+0 and 41+0 weeks of gestation to assess fetal Doppler indices and length of UC coiling. Birthweight was collected at delivery.
Results
The study found significant differences relating birthweight and resistance index of umbilical artery (RI-UA) between abnormal and normal coiling groups (3028.83 ± 469.81 vs 3129.52 ± 378.82 and 0.604 ± 0.087 vs 0.579 ± 0.073). There was a significantly weak negative correlation between RI of umbilical artery Doppler and birth weight (r = −0.178). Additionally, a significantly weak positive correlation coefficient between CPR and birth weight (r = 0.111) was found. Length of umbilical cord coiling had a weak positive correlation with pulsatility index of uterine artery (PI-UA). RI of umbilical artery Doppler helps in predicting the small gestational age at birth with AUC: 0.72 (0.57–0.87).
Conclusion
RI-UA and birthweight were significantly different between abnormal and normal coiling pregnancies. The higher RI-UA is more related to lower birthweight. RI-UA helps in predicting the small gestational age at birth better than other parameters.
NguyenPNNguyenVT. Endometrial thickness and uterine artery Doppler parameters as soft markers for prediction of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal bleeding women: a cross-sectional study at tertiary referral hospitals from Vietnam. Obstet Gynecol Sci2022; 65(5): 430–440.
2.
NguyenPNNguyenVT. Additional value of Doppler ultrasound to B-mode ultrasound in assessing for uterine intracavitary pathologies among perimenopausal and postmenopausal bleeding women: a multicentre prospective observational study in Vietnam. J Ultrasound2023; 26(2): 459–469.
3.
SweidRZDonadonoVCasagrandiD, et al.Reproducibility of fetal ultrasound Doppler parameters used for growth assessment. Arch Gynecol Obstet2025; 311(3): 669–676. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11919989/
4.
SrikumarSDebnathJRavikumarR, et al.Doppler indices of the umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery at 18–40 weeks of normal gestation: A pilot study. Med J Armed Forces India2017; 73(3): 232–241. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377123716302076
5.
UdohBEErimAAnthonyE. Sonographic assessment of umbilical cord diameter as an indicator of fetal growth and perinatal outcome. J Diagn Med Sonogr2021; 37(1): 41–45.
6.
LimaAMHCarvalhoPRNJuniorSCG, et al.Analysis of the performance of 11 formulae for fetal weight estimation in preterm fetuses with abnormal Doppler velocimetry – a retrospective multicenter study. RBGO Gynecol Obstet2018; 40(10): 580. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10467365/
7.
MoneFMcAuliffeFMOngS. The clinical application of Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics. Obstet Gynaecol2015; 17(1): 13–19.
OlayaCMVargasWMartinezRA, et al.Impact of umbilical cord length on fetal circulatory system by Doppler assessment. J Ultrasound2020; 23(4): 585–592.
11.
RobertsLALingHZPoonLC, et al.Maternal hemodynamics, fetal biometry and Doppler indices in pregnancies followed up for suspected fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2018; 52(4): 507–514.
12.
GhalichiLGhadikolaeiOAHosseinkhanN, et al.Prediction of postnatal abnormal umbilical cord coiling by antenatal evaluation in pregnant women: diagnostic accuracy study; a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res2023; 49(11): 2692–2699.
13.
SubashiniGAnithaCGopinathG, et al.A longitudinal analytical Study on umbilical cord coiling index as a predictor of pregnancy outcome. Cureus2023; 15(3): e35680.
14.
Nguyen TranTNNguyenHTCaoNT, et al.Umbilical cord coiling index in predicting neonatal outcomes: a single-center cross-sectional study from Vietnam. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025 Dec; 38(1): 2517763. doi:10.1080/14767058.2025.2517763.
15.
CiobanuAWrightASyngelakiA, et al.Fetal medicine foundation reference ranges for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2019; 53(4): 465–472.
16.
PredanicMPerniSCChasenST, et al.Assessment of umbilical cord coiling during the routine fetal sonographic anatomic survey in the second trimester. J Ultrasound Med2005; 24(2): 185–191.
17.
Pavan Kumar Reddy KalluruHRK. Abnormal umbilical cord coiling and association with pregnancy factors. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc2024; 25(1): 44–52.
18.
ChitraTSushanthYSRaghavanS. Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int2012; 2012(1): 213689.
19.
MorrisRKJohnstoneELeesC, et al.Investigation and care of a small-for-gestational-age fetus and a growth restricted fetus (Green-top guideline no. 31). BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol2024; 131(9): e31–e80.
SingireddyNChughABalH, et al.Re-evaluation of umbilical cord coiling index in adverse pregnancy outcome – does it have role in obstetric management?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X2024; 21: 100265, Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161323000911
24.
PinsutiEMBrunsRFKulak JúniorJ, et al.Analysis of the Correlation/Agreement of Maternal-fetal Doppler Parameters in Normal and Growth-Restricted Fetuses. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Feb; 44(2): 118–124. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1741453.
25.
KulsengCPSSommerfeltSFloK, et al.Placental size at gestational week 27 and 37: the associations with pulsatility index in the uterine and the fetal-placental arteries. Placenta2024; 145: 45–50. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143400423006100
26.
FloKKulsengCPSPetersonHF, et al.Placental size and umbilical vein volume blood flow. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2025; 104(6): 1135–1142. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12087527/
Heidweiller‐SchreursCAVBoerMADHeymansMW, et al.Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2018; 51(3): 313. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5873403/
29.
Bahado-SinghROKovanciEJeffresA, et al.The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; Mar;180(3 Pt 1):: 750–6. doi:10.1016/s00029378(99)70283-8.
30.
El-DemiryNMMagedAMGaafarHM, et al.The value of fetal Doppler indices as predictors of perinatal outcome in women with preeclampsia with severe features. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2020 May; 39(2): 95–102. doi:10.1080/10641955.2020.1732406.
31.
Vollgraff Heidweiller-SchreursCADe BoerMAHeymansMW, et al.Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery Doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2018; 51(3): 313–322.
32.
AyaadMRomeihMEl-EtribyK, et al.Analysis of the effect of sampling site of umbilical artery Doppler on the variability of umbilical artery pulsatility index. Evid Based Womens Health J2021; 11(3): 264–272. Available from: https://ebwhj.journals.ekb.eg/article_194746.html
PredanicMPerniSCChervenakFA. Antenatal umbilical coiling index and Doppler flow characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2006; 28(5): 699–703.
35.
GoffinetFParisJHeimN, et al.Predictive value of Doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in a low risk population with normal fetal biometry. A prospective study of 2016 women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol1997; 71(1): 11–19. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211596026061
36.
Al HamayelNABaghlafHBlakemoreK, et al.Significance of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies in normally grown fetuses. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol2020; 6(1): 1.
37.
MarcoLVMTRonsiniCRiemmaG, et al.The association between fetal Doppler and uterine artery blood volume flow in term pregnancies: a pilot study. Ultraschall Med - Eur J Ultrasound2023; 45(02): 184–189.
38.
RochaASAndradeARAMoleiroML, et al.Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery: clinical application. RBGO Gynecol Obstet2022; 44(5): 519–531. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9948152/
39.
OrosDFiguerasFCruz-MartinezR, et al.Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late-onset small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2011; 37(2): 191–195.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
