Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The pericarp of Garcinia mangostana L. is a rich source of α-mangostin, which exhibits a wide range of pharmacological and biological activities. However, clinical use of this compound is limited due to its low water solubility. Therefore, its formulation with various delivery systems has been developed. In the present study, α-mangostin was isolated from G. mangostana pericarp extract and loaded onto newly synthesized liposomes. The system was evaluated for in vitro drug release at pH 5.5 and 7.4 during 96 hours of experiment, followed by cytotoxicity measurement against Hep-G2 cells. α-Mangostin was obtained in a high yield (1.86%) and its chemical structure was confirmed using nuclear magnetic resonance and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The compound was then loaded onto liposomes with relatively high efficiency (55.3% ± 2.3%). The compound was released in a sustained manner and exhibited significant cytotoxic activity against Hep-G2 cells. The present study provides important insights into liposome applications for α-mangostin delivery, thus improving the compound’s limitations and enabling further in vivo studies on its safety and efficacy.

Keywords

α-mangostin cancer therapy drug delivery system liposome

α-Mangostin is a xanthone derivative present in the pericarp of Garcinia mangostana L., which is widely cultivated in tropical countries such as Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand.^1

-10 Previously, numerous studies have demonstrated a variety of pharmacological activities of α-mangostin, including antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-aging, anticarcinogenic, anti-obesity, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective.^11

-14 Among these activities, α-mangostin is mostly well-known for its anticancer activity, and has been reported to be able to inhibit human leukemia cells,¹⁵ rat pheochromocytoma,¹⁶ and human colon cancer.¹⁷ Antiproliferative properties of α-mangostin have also been found against colon cancer and canine osteosarcoma cells.^18,19 The compound has also exhibited antimetastatic activity in human prostate carcinoma cells and human lung adenocarcinoma.^20
-22 However, the extraction of α-mangostin suffers from some several shortcomings, including limited extraction yield and the requirement for the large-scale collection of G. mangostana pericarps, thus reducing the availability of the plant and adding to the production cost.^23,24 Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an effective extraction method to preserve both α-mangostin and its material source for future exploitation and utilization.

The use of α-mangostin is limited due to its low water solubility, low bioavailability, and poor blood penetration.²⁵ As a result, several attempts have been made to improve these limitations, including co-solvation, structure modification, solid dispersion, and nano-sized drug delivery systems.^26

-29 Recently, nanotechnology has allowed effective and sustained delivery of a large number of high-value compounds, either by conjugating or encapsulating them into various carrier systems such as nanopolymerics, nanoliposomes, and metal nanoparticles.^30
-32 Particularly, due to several advantages such as versatility, high stability in various biological environments, high agent-loading efficiency, low toxicity, and long circulation time, liposomes are considered as an excellent delivery agent for several antioxidant and anti-cancer agents of high importance.^33,34 For example, low water-soluble curcumin released from liposome formulations has exhibited significant cytotoxicity against bone cancer cells.³⁵ Similarly, butyric acid, which is mainly involved in reducing inflammation and cancer in liver, was loaded onto chitosan-coated liposomesand showed improvements in terms of oral bioavailability and cytotoxicity to Hep-G2 hepatoblastoma cells.³⁶ Previous studies have also shown that liposome formulation has enhanced the solubility and in vitro penetration of α-mangostin, as compared to the unloaded compound.^37,38 However, to our best knowledge, the cytotoxic effect of α-mangostin-loaded liposomes has not been addressed in these studies, which challenges the potential applications of the nanocompound in inhibiting cell proliferation and cancer development.

In the present study, α-mangostin was isolated and its identity was verified by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The compound was then loaded onto newly synthesized liposomes and evaluated for in vitro drug release and cytotoxicity against Hep-G2 cells. Such findings could contribute to further exploitation of in vivo applications and administration of α-mangostin-loaded liposome systems to treat human infections.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Healthy mangosteen fruits were collected at Cau Giay District, Hanoi, Vietnam in April 2019. The pericarps were removed from the seeds, dried and milled into fine powder before extraction. Methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), chloroform, n-hexane, and ethyl acetate (EtOAc) were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC), cholesterol (Chol), and polycarbonate membranes (100 nm) from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA), phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) and MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)−2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) was prepared from 100 IU mL^-1 penicillin, 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, CA, USA), and 100 mg mL^-1 streptomycin (Mediatech, Inc., Manassas, VA, USA). All chemicals and reagents used were of analytical scale.

Extraction of α-Mangostin

Powdered mangosteen fruit pericarps (1 kg) were macerated with ethanol (2 L × 3 times) at room temperature for 6 days. The combined extracts were filtered and evaporated under reduced pressure to form 144.9 g of dark brown residue. After dispersing in purified water, the mixture was extracted with n-hexane (2 × 250 mL) and EtOAc (4 × 250 mL).

The n-hexane and EtOAc extracts were pre-adsorbed on SiO₂ and chromatographed with n-hexane/EtOAc (from 10:0 to 2:1) to give 4 fractions (E1-E4). The E3 fraction (38 g) was recrystallized to produce α-mangostin (2.2 g) and 2 fractions (E-3.2; E-3.3). E-3.2 (4.26 g) was chromatographed with an isocratic mixture of n-hexane/EtOAc (3: 1), producing 4.26 g of α-mangostin, while the E-3.3 fraction (7.15 g) was separated by silica gel column chromatography with n-hexane/acetone (5: 1) to produce α-mangostin. The extraction scheme is shown in Figure 1. The chemical structure of the obtained α-mangostin was confirmed by NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. The yield of isolated α-mangostin was calculated using Eq. (1), as described previously by Guo et al.³⁹

Figure 1

Isolation of α-mangostin from mangosteen pericarps.

Y i e l d (%) = \frac{m a s s o f c o l l e c t e d α - m a n g o s t i n}{m a s s o f i n i t i a l d r y p e r i c a r p} \times 100

(1)

Synthesis of Liposome

Briefly, a mixture was prepared by combining 800 µL stock DOPC (0.025 M; 20 µmol) with 100 µL stock Chol solution (0.01 M; 1 µmol) and 500 µL stock α-mangostin (0.02 M; 10 µmol). The solvent in the mixture was removed slowly by rotary evaporation in a water bath at 30 °C, with a flask pressure of 250 mbar, and rotational speed at level 2, leaving a thin membrane composed of DOPC, Chol, and α-mangostin. Distilled water (4 mL) was added to peel off the membrane, forming α-mangostin-loaded liposomes of varying sizes. In order to reduce polydispersity and assimilate the liposomes into defined size ranges, a mini extruder was used with 100 nm polycarbonate membranes. Each sample was subjected to 50 rounds of extrusion, with each round counted as one passing of the suspension through the polycarbonate membrane. Once extrusion was finished, the samples were transferred to a new Eppendorf flask, which was capped and stored at room temperature (25 °C).

Unencapsulated α-mangostin was removed by dialyzing the liposome suspension obtained from thin film hydration. A square of dialysis tubing (14 000 Da, 10 cm × 10 cm) was hydrated in distilled water and used to cap the dram vial. To prevent leakage of the suspension, circular rubber washers and rubber bands were used to tighten the cap. The suspension was dialyzed for 24 hours against 1 L of distilled water. The distilled water was changed every 2 hours from the start, for 4 times.

Characterization of Liposome

The z-average, mean size, and polydispersity index (PDI) of the liposome samples were monitored at room temperature (25 °C) using a SZ-100 nanoparticle size and zeta potential analyzer (Horiba, Japan) with a He/Ne laser (λ = 633 nm) and scattering angle 90°. The results were the mean of 3 measurements.

To determine the encapsulation efficiency (EE%) and drug loading content (DL%), the samples were transferred to a 100-mL round-bottom flask to perform rotary evaporation (bath temperature of 45 °C, flask pressure of 0 mbar, rotational speed at level 3) until all the water had been removed and a thin film was left in the flask. The lipids/α-mangostin film was dissolved in 3.5 mL of MeOH/CHCl₃ (3:1 [v/v]) and sonicated in a bath for 2 minutes to destroy the liposomal suspensions and release the entrapped α-mangostin. Then, 100 µL of this solution was pipetted from the flask, added to 2900 µL of MeOH/CHCl₃ (3:1 [v/v]) in an Eppendorf tube, and vortexed for 30 seconds. The mixture was then transferred to a glass cuvette. The absorbance of the sample was determined at 243 nm against a MeOH/CHCl₃ (3:1 [v/v]) standard with a Hitachi U-2900 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The EE% and DL% could be calculated following the equations.

E E % = \frac{t h e a m o u n t o f α - m a n g o s t i n i n t h e l i p o s o m e s}{t h e t o t a l a m o u n t o f α - m a n g o s t i n} \times 100

(2)

D L % = \frac{m a s s o f α - m a n g o s t i n i n t h e l i p o s o m e s}{m a s s o f α - m a n g o s t i n ∕ l i p o s o m e s} \times 100

(3)

In Vitro Drug Release

The release profile of α-mangostin from α-mangostin-loaded liposomes was investigated using a dialysis method. Liposomes loaded with α-mangostin were placed into dialysis bags with a molecular weight cutoff of 14 000 Da, then incubated in PBS at pH 5.5 and 7.4% and 0.5% Tween 80 with agitation (100 rotations/min) at 37 °C. At an appropriate time interval, aliquots (1 mL) were withdrawn and replaced with the same volume of fresh buffer. The samples were subjected to analysis using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer to calculate the cumulative amount of released α-mangostin. All data were the mean value of 3 replicates and shown as mean ± SD.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

A single layer of human hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep-G2) cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) was cultured in DMEM. The conditions to maintain the cells included 37 °C with a 5% CO₂ atmosphere. Exponentially growing cells were used for further experiments.

Free α-mangostin, blank liposome, and α-mangostin-loaded liposomes were evaluated for their cytotoxicity by using MTT assay. Briefly, cells were seeded and incubated in DMEM (100 µL) for 24 hours in order to allow cell growth and adherence to the plate surface. The grown cells were treated with various concentrations of free α-mangostin, blank liposome, and α-mangostin-loaded liposomes (0- 20 µM) and incubated for 96 hours. Then, MTT reagent (5 mg mL^-1) was added and incubated for another 4 hours at 37 °C. The medium in each well was removed and the formazan crystals were dissolved by dimethyl sulfoxide. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a Spectramax M5 Microtiter Plate Luminometer (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Two-tailed Student’s test was used to compare the statistical significance between pairs of samples. P <.05 indicates statistical significance.

Results and Discussion

Extraction of α-Mangostin

The yield of α-mangostin isolated from 1 kg of dry pericarp of G. mangostana was calculated as 1.86%. The melting point, NMR and infrared spectroscopic, and mass spectrometry data were in accordance with previous reports,^39,40 conclusively confirming the sample structure.

Synthesis of Liposome

Liposomes were produced by the thin-film hydration method, combined with extrusion through a polycarbonate membrane (0.1 µm). The physicochemical properties of the optimal blank liposome and α-mangostin-loaded liposome formulation were studied. The mean size of the blank liposome was 106.4 ± 9.1 (nm) and the α-mangostin-loaded liposome 109.3 ± 7.2 (nm). The PDI of the blank liposome was 0.185 ± 0.015 (nm) and the α-mangostin-loaded liposome 0.181 ± 0.017 (nm). The differences between the mean size and PDI of the blank liposomes and α-mangostin-loaded liposomes were insignificantly different.

The DL% and EE% of α-mangostin-loaded liposomes were 2.39% ± 0.23% and 55.3% ± 2.3%, respectively, while the particle size was around 100 nm with a PDI <0.02, indicating high entrapment efficiency and narrow distribution. These findings for the liposome model suggest its potential to improve the therapeutic efficacy of α-mangostin.

As the internal environments of tumors and several cell compartments have been previously shown to have a relatively low pH, this factor was also taken into consideration when assessing the in vitro release of α-mangostin-contained liposomes and blank liposomes.⁴¹ In this present study, pH 7.4 and 5.5 were selected and the experiment was performed at 37 °C for 96 hours. As shown in Figure 2, the release rate of α-mangostin from the loaded liposomes was insignificantly different at the different pH levels (P > .05). Within the first 24 hours, 40% and less than 50% of α-mangostin were released from the liposomes at pH 7.4 and 5.5, respectively. However, the release of α-mangostin at both pH levels was then slowed down and maintained at a sustained rate for at least 96 hours. Therefore, encapsulation of α-mangostin in liposomes allows the release of the compound at a constant rate throughout an extended period of time.

Figure 2

In vitro release profile of α-mangostin from α-mangostin-loaded liposomes in phosphate-buffered saline at pH 7.4 and 5.5 by dialysis method.

MTT Viability Assay

The cytotoxicity of α-mangostin-loaded liposomes, blank liposomes, and free α-mangostin was tested on Hep-G2 cells using standard MTT assay during 96 hours of experiment. As can be seen in Figure 3, the blank liposomes showed no apparent cytotoxicity with more than 80% of cells surviving when testing up to 20 µM blank liposome. In contrast, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration value of α-mangostin-loaded liposomes was decreased to 1.9 µM, as compared with 4.6 µM for free α-mangostin. Apparently, there were significant differences in cell viability between α-mangostin-loaded liposomes and blank liposomes, as well as free α-mangostin and blank liposomes at both 10 and 20 µM (P < .05). Although there was no difference between the free and liposome-loaded α-mangostin, the cell viabilities were reduced when treated with α-mangostin-loaded liposomes, as compared to free α-mangostin. By increasing the solubility of poorly soluble α-mangostin, loading onto a liposome delivery system has aided the compound to be persistently released with a high level of cytotoxicity.

Figure 3

Cytotoxic effects of free α-mangostin, blank liposomes, and α-mangostin-loaded liposomes on HepG2 cells (*P < .05 indicated statistical significance).

The cytotoxicity investigation of α-mangostin was extended to different time points, including 2 (after incubation), 12, 24, and 96 hours culture (Figure 4). Without treatment, the cell number increased gradually from 2 to 12 hours, then it peaked at 48 hours (Figure 4(A1-C1)). However, cells started to decrease steeply after 96 hours due to confluence and nutritional deficiencies after prolonged culture time.

Figure 4

Effects of different concentrations of blank liposome, free α-mangostin, and α-mangostin-loaded liposome on Hep-G2 cell proliferation during 96 h of incubation. Data presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3).

The blank liposomes exhibited no apparent cytotoxicity to Hep-G2 cells, even at a high concentration (20 µM), and cell viability was not significantly different from the control (Figure 4(A1-6)). In the presence of free α-mangostin (0.1, 20 µM), the cell viability was found to vary with concentrations during the first 24 hours, yet as α-mangostin was absorbed expeditiously, the cells rehabilitated promptly at 96 hours culture (Figure 4(B2-6)). Furthermore, the cells were significantly damaged and unable to recover when treated with 20 µM of free α-mangostin. In the α-mangostin-loaded liposome group, α-mangostin was released slowly and the cells absorbed it gradually (Figure 4(C2-6)). At the same concentration, the α-mangostin-loaded liposomes killed less cells than the free α-mangostin within 24 hours of treatment. Nevertheless, as α-mangostin was continually liberated from liposomes, the cell viability was reduced markedly after 48 and 96 hours, especially at 10 and 20 µM of treatment. Therefore, by loading α-mangostin onto liposomes, α-mangostin exhibited an enhanced cytotoxic effect against Hep-G2 cells.

Conclusions

In the present study, α-mangostin was obtained from mangosteen pericarps with the yield of 1.86%. The obtained α-mangostin was then loaded onto liposomes and showed good results in terms of compound release and EE%. The α-mangostin-loaded liposomes also exhibited a more effective cytotoxic effect against Hep-G2 cells (1.9 mΜ), as compared with free α-mangostin (4.6 mM). Current results suggested that the utilization of liposomes for α-mangostin delivery is a promising method to enable the development of α-mangostin into a more efficient chemotherapeutic agent in the future.

Footnotes

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support by project code QTBY01.03/20-21.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

Chopra

. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (India); Publications & Information Directorate Second Supplement to Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants with Active Principles. Publications & Information Directorate, CSIR; 1992; ISBN 9788172360481.

Garnett

Sturton

. Garcinia mangostana in the treatment of amoebic dysentery. Chin Med J. 1932;46:969-973.

Mahabusarakam

Wiriyachitra

Taylor

. Chemical constituents of Garcinia mangostana . J Nat Prod. 1987;50(3):474-478.doi:10.1021/np50051a021

Zarena

AS.

Udaya Sankar

. Isolation and identification of pelargonidin 3-glucoside in mangosteen pericarp. Food Chem. 2012;130(3):665-670.doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.07.106

Weecharangsan

Opanasopit

Sukma

Ngawhirunpat

Sotanaphun

Siripong

. Antioxidative and neuroprotective activities of extracts from the fruit hull of mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.). Med Princ Pract. 2006;15(4):281-287.doi:10.1159/000092991

16763395

Moongkarndi

Jaisupa

Samer

et al. Comparison of the biological activity of two different isolates from mangosteen: biological activity of mangosteen. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2014;̉66(8):1171-1179.doi:10.1111/jphp.12239

LM.

Liu

JM.

Feng

WH.

Bai

. Changes of the active ingredients of mangostana wine during fermentation and aroma components of finished wine. Xiandai Shipin Keji. 2014;30:287-291.

Kosem

Ichikawa

Utsumi

Moongkarndi

. In vivo toxicity and antitumor activity of mangosteen extract. J Nat Med. 2013;67(2):255-263.doi:10.1007/s11418-012-0673-8

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22622784

Ketsa

Paull

. Mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.). In: Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits [Internet]. Elsevier; 2011 [cited July 3, 2020]. 1–32e. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780857090904500019

10.

Zhang

. The Effect of α-Mangostin on Metabolic Disease. Master thesis. Jilin Agriculture University; 2011.

11.

Ibrahim

MY.

Hashim

NM.

Mariod

et al. α-Mangostin from Garcinia mangostana L.: an updated review of its pharmacological properties. Arab J Chem. 2016;9(3):317-329.doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.02.011

12.

Lee

HN.

Jang

HY.

Kim

et al. Antitumor and apoptosis-inducing effects of α-mangostin extracted from the pericarp of the mangosteen fruit (Garcinia mangostana L.) in YD-15 tongue mucoepidermoid carcinoma cells. Int J Mol Med. 2016;37(4):939-948.doi:10.3892/ijmm.2016.2517

26951885

13.

Upegui

Robledo

SM.

Gil Romero

et al. In vivo antimalarial activity of α-mangostin and the new xanthone δ-mangostin: antimalarial activity of a new xanthone. Phytother Res. 2015;29(8):1195-1201.doi:10.1002/ptr.5362

14.

Wang

S-N.

Jing

M-H

et al. Natural xanthones from Garcinia mangostana with multifunctional activities for the therapy of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Res. 2016;41(7):1806-1817.doi:10.1007/s11064-016-1896-y

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27038926

15.

Matsumoto

Akao

Kobayashi

et al. Induction of apoptosis by xanthones from mangosteen in human leukemia cell lines. J Nat Prod. 2003;66(8):1124-1127.doi:10.1021/np020546u

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12932141

16.

Sato

Fujiwara

Oku

Ishiguro

Ohizumi

. Alpha-mangostin induces Ca²⁺-atpase-dependent apoptosis via mitochondrial pathway in PC12 cells. J Pharmacol Sci. 2004;95(1):33-40.doi:10.1254/jphs.95.33

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15153648

17.

Matsumoto

Akao

Ohguchi

et al. Xanthones induce cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in human colon cancer DLD-1 cells. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005;13(21):6064-6069.doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2005.06.065

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16112579

18.

Yoo

J-H.

Kang

Jho

EH.

Chin

Y-W.

Kim

Nho

. α- and γ-Mangostin inhibit the proliferation of colon cancer cells via β-catenin gene regulation in Wnt/cGMP signalling. Food Chem. 2011;129(4):1559-1566.doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.007

19.

Krajarng

Nilwarankoon

Suksamrarn

Watanapokasin

. Antiproliferative effect of α-mangostin on canine osteosarcoma cells. Res Vet Sci. 2012;93(2):788-794.doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.01.015

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22342127

20.

Hung

S-H.

Shen

K-H.

C-H.

Liu

C-L.

Shih

Y-W

. Alpha-mangostin suppresses PC-3 human prostate carcinoma cell metastasis by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase-2/9 and urokinase-plasminogen expression through the JNK signaling pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(4):1291-1298.doi:10.1021/jf8032683

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19178296

21.

Shih

Y-W.

Chien

S-T.

Chen

P-S.

Lee

J-H.

S-H.

Yin

L-T

. Alpha-mangostin suppresses phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced MMP-2/MMP-9 expressions via alphavbeta3 integrin/FAK/ERK and NF-kappaB signaling pathway in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2010;58(1):31-44.doi:10.1007/s12013-010-9091-2

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20652762

22.

Phan

TKT.

Shahbazzadeh

Pham

TTH.

Kihara

. Alpha-Mangostin inhibits the migration and invasion of A549 lung cancer cells. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5027 doi:10.7717/peerj.5027

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29967723

23.

Brunner

Han

A-R

et al. Pharmacokinetics of α-mangostin in rats after intravenous and oral application. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011;55(Suppl 1):S67-S74.doi:10.1002/mnfr.201000511

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21254395

24.

Mulia

Krisanti

Terahadi

Putri

. Selected natural deep eutectic solvents for the extraction of α-mangostin from mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) pericarp. IJTech. 2015;6(7):1211.doi:10.14716/ijtech.v6i7.1984

25.

Chen

Wang

Deng

. Bioactivity and pharmacological properties of α-mangostin from the mangosteen fruit: a review. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2018;28(5):415-427.doi:10.1080/13543776.2018.1455829

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29558225

26.

Rungnim

Phunpee

Kunaseth

et al. Co-solvation effect on the binding mode of the α-mangostin/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2015;11:2306-2317.doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.251

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26734079

27.

Zarena

AS.

Sankar

. Synthesis of α-mangostin-D-glucoside in supercritical carbon dioxide media. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(10):6547-6555.doi:10.1007/s13197-014-1705-z

26396400

28.

Elsaid Ali

AA.

Taher

Mohamed

. Microencapsulation of alpha-mangostin into PLGA microspheres and optimization using response surface methodology intended for pulmonary delivery. J Microencapsul. 2013;30(8):728-740.doi:10.3109/02652048.2013.788081

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23631380

29.

Agarwal

Toshniwal

Smith

et al. Enhancing the efficacy of cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor inhibitors by intracellular delivery. Chem Commun. 2016;52(2):327-330.doi:10.1039/C5CC06826F

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26514404

30.

Agarwal

Toshniwal

Smith

et al. Enhancing the efficacy of cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor inhibitors by intracellular delivery. Chem Commun. 2016;52(2):327-330.doi:10.1039/C5CC06826F

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26514404

31.

Veeraraghavan

VP.

Mohan

et al. Apoptotic induction and anti-metastatic activity of eugenol encapsulated chitosan nanopolymer on rat glioma C6 cells via alleviating the MMP signaling pathway. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2020;203:111773.doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111773

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31931385

32.

Emami

Azadmard-Damirchi

Peighambardoust

SH.

Valizadeh

Hesari

. Liposomes as carrier vehicles for functional compounds in food sector. J Exp Nanosci. 2016;11(9):737-759.doi:10.1080/17458080.2016.1148273

33.

Brandelli

Brum

LFW.

dos Santos

JHZ

. Nanostructured bioactive compounds for ecological food packaging. Environ Chem Lett. 2017;15(2):193-204.doi:10.1007/s10311-017-0621-7

34.

Deamer

. From “banghasomes” to liposomes: a memoir of Alec Bangham, 1921-2010. Faseb J. 2010;24(5):1308-1310.doi:10.1096/fj.10-0503

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20430797

35.

Franco

MS.

Oliveira

. Liposomes CO-encapsulating anticancer drugs in synergistic ratios as an approach to promote increased efficacy and greater safety. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2019;19(1):17-28.doi:10.2174/1871520618666180420170124

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29692263

36.

Sarkar

Bose

. Liposome-encapsulated curcumin-loaded 3D printed scaffold for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(19):17184-17192.doi:10.1021/acsami.9b01218

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30924639

37.

Quagliariello

Masarone

Armenia

et al. Chitosan-coated liposomes loaded with butyric acid demonstrate anticancer and anti-inflammatory activity in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Oncol Rep. 2019;41(3):1476-1486.doi:10.3892/or.2018.6932

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30569138

38.

Widyanati

Jufri

Elya

. Formulation and penetration study of liposome gel xanthone of extract mangosteen pericarp (Garcinia mangostana L.). Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2014;27(2):1-6.

39.

Guo

Wang

Brodelius

. α-Mangostin extraction from the native mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) and the binding mechanisms of α-mangostin to HSA or TRF. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0161566. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161566

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27584012

40.

Anggia

Bakhtiar

Arbain

. The isolation of xanthones from trunk latex of Garcinia mangostana L. and their antimicrobial activities. Indones J Chem.. 2015;15(2):187-193.doi:10.22146/ijc.21213

41.

Yadav

Sandeep

Pandey

Dutta

. Liposomes for drug delivery. J Biotechnol Biomater. 2017;07(04)doi:10.4172/2155-952X.1000276

Characterization,Release Pattern,and Cytotoxicity of Liposomes Loaded With α-Mangostin Isolated From Pericarp of Mangosteen ( Garcinia mangostana L.)

Abstract

Keywords

Materials and Methods

Materials

Extraction of α-Mangostin

Synthesis of Liposome

Characterization of Liposome

In Vitro Drug Release

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

Statistical Analysis

Results and Discussion

Extraction of α-Mangostin

Synthesis of Liposome

MTT Viability Assay

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgment

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References