Increased behavioral sensitivity to the pheromone after brief exposure of the whole insect to the sex pheromone has been documented in antennal lobe neurons of Spodoptera littoralis. We investigated whether a brief stimulus of the major component of the pheromone on naïve antenna separated from the head increased the electroantennographic responses after successive stimulations at different times. The response increase was clear 30 min after the first stimulation, and this effect lasted at least 60 min, the average life time of the antenna. Our results suggest that the olfactory receptor neurons, and not only the neurons in the antennal lobe, may be involved in the increased antennal response after a single pheromone pulse.
AndersonP., SadekM.M., HanssonB.S. (2003) Pre-exposure modulates attraction to sex pheromone in a moth. Chemical Senses, 28, 285–291.
2.
KuenenL.P.S., BakerT.C. (1981) Habituation versus sensory adaptation as the cause of reduced attraction following pulsed and constant sex pheromone pre-exposure in Trichopolusia ni. Journal of Insect Physiology, 27, 721–726.
3.
DuerrJ., QuinnW. (1982) Three Drosophila mutations that block associative learning also affect habituation and sensitization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 79, 3646–3650.
4.
GrubbM., ThompsonI. (2004) The influence of early experience on the development of sensory systems. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 503–512.
5.
WaltersE., IllichP., WeeksJ., LewinM. (2001) Defensive responses of larval Manduca sexta and their sensitization by noxious stimuli in the laboratory and field. Journal of Experimental Biology, 204, 457–469.
6.
AndersonP., HanssonB., NilssonU., HanQ., SjoholmM. (2007) Increased behavioral and neuronal sensitivity to sex pheromone after brief odor experience in a moth. Chemical Senses, 32, 483–491.
7.
GuerrieriF., GemenoC., MonsempesC., AntonS., Jacquin-JolyE., LucasP., DevaudJ-M. (2012) Experience-dependent modulation of antennal sensitivity and input to antennal lobes in male moths (Spodoptera littoralis) pre-exposed to sex pheromone. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 215, 2334–2341.
8.
LucasP., RenouM. (1989) Responses to pheromone compounds in Mamestra suasa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) olfactory neurones. Journal of Insect Physiology, 35, 837–845.
9.
MuñozL., RosellG., QueroC., GuerreroA. (2008) Biosynthetic pathways of the Egyptian armyworm: An update. Physiological Entomology, 33, 275–290.
10.
QueroC., LucasP., RenouM., GuerreroA. (1996) Behavioral responses of Spodoptera littoralis males to sex pheromone components and virgin females in wind tunnel. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22, 1087–1102.
11.
MaloE.A., RenouM., GuerreroA. (2000) Analytical studies of Spodoptera littoralis sex pheromone components by electroantennography and coupled gas chromatography–electroantennographic detection. Talanta, 52, 525–532.
12.
PoitoutS., BuesR. (1974) Élevage des chenilles de vingt-huit éspèces de lepidoptères Noctuidae et deux éspèces d'Arctiidae sur milieu artificiel simple. Particularités de l'élevage selon les éspèces. Annales de Zoologie Ecologie Animale, 6, 431–441.
