The composition of varieties of Taxus growing in Estonia was analyzed by capillary electrophoresis with diode array detection (CE-DAD) for the separation of phenolic compounds, and by high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) for the determination of taxoids. The main purpose of this study was the chemotaxonomic differentiation of varieties of Taxus by using data from these analyses. Fingerprints scanned at 214 nm on the basis of CE separation at pH 9.3 were used to characterize seven varieties of yew. The contents of four key taxoids (10-deacetylbaccatin, baccatin III, cephalomannine and paclitaxel) in six Taxus varieties were comparatively determined by HPLC-MS. The set of electropherograms/chromatograms of the various Taxus extracts were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA), using the peak areas of 16 phenolic compounds and 14 taxoids as characteristics. The formation of distinct clusters in accordance with botanical classification proves the suitability of PCA for differentiating varieties of Taxus.
ParmarVS, JhaA, BishtKS, TanejaP, SinghSK, KumarA, PoonamRJ, OlsenCE. (1999) Constituents of the yew trees. Phytochemistry, 50, 1267–1304.
2.
LiC, HuoC, ZhangM, ShiQ. (2008) Chemistry of Chinese yew, Taxus chinensis var. mairei. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 36, 266–282.
3.
SpjutRW. (2007) Taxonomy and nomenclature of Taxus (Taxaceae). Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 1, 203–289.
4.
CPMP/CVMP. (2006) Note for guidance on specifications: test procedures and acceptance criterion for herbal drugs, herbal drug preparations, and herbal medicinal products. European Medicines Agency, 4–21.
5.
Wei JunK, Yan LingZ, Xiao HeX, ChengJ, Zu LunL. (2009) Quantitative and chemical fingerprint analysis for quality control of Rhizoma Coptidis Chinensis based on UPLC-PAD combined with chemometrics methods. Phytomedicine, 16, 950–959.
6.
Gil-MuňozR, Fernández-FernándezJI, Vila-LópezR, Martinez-CutillasA. (2010) Anthocyanin profile in Monastrell grapes in six different areas from Denomination of Origen Jumilla during ripening stage. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 45, 1870–1877.
7.
Garrido-DelgadoR, López-VidalS, ArceL, ValcárcalM. (2009) Differentiation and identification of white wine varieties by using electropherogram fingerprints obtained with CE. Journal of Separation Science, 32, 3809–3816.
8.
TistaertC, DejaegherB, HeydenYV. (2011) Chromatographic separation techniques and data handling methods for herbal fingerprints: a review. Analytica Chimica Acta, 690, 148–161.
LeeMK, AhnYM, LeeKR, JungJH, JungOS, HongJ. (2009) Development of a validated liquid chromatographic method for the quality control of Prunellae spica: determination of triterpenic acids. Analytica Chimica Acta, 633, 271–277.
11.
ChenCY, QiLW, LiHJ, LiP, YiL, MaHM, TangD. (2007) Simultaneous determination of iridoids, phenolic acids, flavonoids, and saponins in Flos Lonicerae and Flos Lonicerae Japonicae by HPLC-DAD-ELSD coupled with principal component analysis. Journal of Separation Science, 30, 3181–3192.
12.
YanS, LuoG, WangY, ChengY. (2006) Simultaneous determination of nine components in Qingkailing injection by HPLC/ELSD/DAD and its application to the quality control. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 40, 889–895.
13.
LevandiT, LeonC, KaljurandM, Garcia-CaňasV, CifuentesA. (2008) Capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry for comparative metabolomics of transgenic versus conventional maize. Analytical Chemistry, 80, 6329–6335.
14.
van RozendaalELM, KurstjensSJL, van BeekTA, van den BergRG. (1999) Chemotaxonomy of Taxus. Phytochemistry, 52, 427–433.
15.
GeG-B, ZhangY-Y, HaoDC, HuY, LuanH-W, LiuX-B, HeY-Q, WangZ-T, YangL. (2008) Chemotaxonomic study of medicinal Taxus species with fingerprint and multivariate analysis. Planta Medica, 74, 773–779.
16.
GrayerRJ, ChaseMW, SimmondsMSJ. (1999) A comparison between chemical and molecular characters for the determination of phylogenetic relationships among plant families: an appreciation of Hegnauer's “Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen”. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 27, 369–393.
17.
WinkM. (2003) Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry, 64, 3–19.
18.
VieiraRF, GrayerRJ, PatonAJ. (2003) Chemical profiling of Ocimum americanum using external flavonoids. Phytochemistry, 63, 555–567.
19.
Krauze-BaranowskaM. (2004) Flavonoids from the genus Taxus. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 59c, 43–47.
20.
HookI, PoupatC, AhondA, GuénardD, GuéritteF, AdelineM-T, WangX-P, DempseyD, BreuilletS, PotierP. (1999) Seasonal variation of neutral and basic taxoid contents in shoots of European yew (Taxus baccata). Phytochemistry, 52, 1041–1045.
21.
HookI, DempseyD. (2003) Paclitaxel content of yews in Ireland. In Taxus: The Genus Taxus, ItokawaH, LeeK-H (Eds). Taylor & Francis, London, New York, 436–442.
22.
BalleroM., LoiMC., van RozendaalELM, van BeekA, van de HaarC, PoliF, AppendinoG. (2003) Analysis of pharmaceutically relevant taxoids in wild yew trees from Sardinia. Fitoterapia, 74, 34–39.
23.
HelmjaK, VaherM, PüssaT, KamsolK, OravA, KaljurandM. (2007) Bioactive components of the hop strobilus: comparison of different extraction methods by capillary electrophoretic and chromatographic methods. Journal of Chromatography A, 1155, 222–229.
24.
OravA, ViitakA, VaherM. (2010) Identification of bioactive compounds in the leaves and stems of Aegopodium podagraria by various analytical techniques. Procedia Chemistry, 2, 152–160.
