This experiment investigated the optimal time required for cryopreserved human oocytes to reform their spindles upon re-warming. Metaphase II oocytes were cryopreserved with a slow freezing method. Oocytes from each patient were randomly allocated into one of the 3 groups with different culture periods: 1, 3, or 5 hours, respectively, after thawing. Tubulin and chromosome configurations were visualized by confocal microscopy after immunostainings. By morphological assessment, 87.3% oocytes survived the process of freezing and thawing. Oocytes with normal spindle configuration increased significantly after 3 or 5 hours of incubation compared to those incubated for only 1 hour ( P < 0.05). There were no differences in the chromosome configurations among the treatment groups ( P > 0.05). This experiment demonstrated that cryopreserved human oocytes need a certain minimum period of incubation time (3 h) to recover their disrupted MII spindles and this information can be used in development of human IVF protocols with frozen oocytes.
Oktay K., Cil AP, Bang H.Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004;86:70-80.
2.
Borini A., Sciajno R., Bianchi V., Sereni E., Flamigni C., Coticchio G.Clinical outcome of oocyte cryopreservation after slow cooling with a protocol utilizing a high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod. 2006;126:443-450.
3.
Levi Setti PE , Albani E., Novara PV, Cesana A., Morreale G.Cryopreservation of supernumerary oocytes in IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:370-375.
4.
Ford P., Merot J., Jawerbaum A., Gimeno MA, Capurro C., Parisi M.Water permeability in rat oocytes at different maturity stages: aquaporin-9 expression. J Membr Biol. 2000;176: 151-158.
5.
Wang WH, Meng L., Hackett RJ, Odenbourg R., Keefe DLLimited recovery of meiotic spindles in living human oocytes after cooling-rewarming observed using polarized light microscopy. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2374-2378.
6.
Jones A., Van Blerkom J., Davis P., Toledo AACryopreservation of metaphase II human oocytes effects mitochondrial membrane potential: implication for developmental competence. Hum Reprod . 2004;19:1861-1866.
7.
Zeron Y., Tomczak M., Crowe J., Arav A.The effect of liposomes on thermotropic membrane phase transitions of bovine spermatozoa and oocytes: implications for reducing chilling sensitivity. Cryobiology. 2002;45:143-152.
8.
Schatten G., Simerly C., Schatten H.Microtubule configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:4152-4156.
9.
Pickering SJ , Braude PR, Johnson MHTransient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption to the meiotic spindle in human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1990;54: 102-108.
10.
Mullen SF, Agca Y., Broermann DC, Jenkins CL, Johnson CA, Crister JKThe effect of osmotic stress on the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes, and the relevance to cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1148-1154.
11.
Rienzi L., Martinez F., Ubaldi F., et al. Polscope analysis of meiotic spindle changes in living metaphase II human oocytes during the freezing and thawing procedures. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:655-659.
12.
Boiso I., Marti M., Santalo J., Ponsa M., Barri PN, Veiga A.A confocal microscopy analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of human oocytes cryopreserved at the germinal vesicle and metaphase II stage . Hum Reprod. 2002;17: 1885-1891.
13.
Eroglu A., Toth TL, Toner M.Alterations of the cytoskeleton and polyploidy induced by cryopreservation of metaphase II mouse oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:944-957.
14.
Chen SU, Lien YR, Chao KH, Ho HN, Yang YS, Lee TYEffects of cryopreservation on meiotic spindles of oocytes and its dynamics after thawing: clinical implications in oocyte freezing-a review article. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;202: 101-107.
15.
Boldt J., Tidswell N., Sayers A., Kilani R., Cline D.Human oocyte cryopreservation: 5-year experience with a sodium-depleted slow freezing method. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 ;13:96-100.
16.
Chamayou S. , Alecci C., Ragolia C., et al. Comparison of in-vitro outcomes from cryopreserved oocytes and sibling fresh oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:730-736.
17.
Chen SU, Lien YR, Chen HF, Chang LJ, Tsai YY, Yang YSObservational clinical follow-up of oocyte cryopreservation using a slow-freezing method with 1,2-propanediol plus sucrose followed by ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1975-1980.
18.
Fabbri R., Porcu E., Marsella T., Rocchetta G., Ventrouli S., Flamigni C.Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival . Hum Reprod. 2001;16:411-416.
19.
Fosas N., Marina F., Torres PJ, et al. The births of five Spanish babies from cryopreserved donated oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1417-1421.
20.
Lucena E., Bernal DP, Lucena C., Rojas A., Moran A., Lucena A.Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:108-111.
21.
Bianchi V., Coticchio G., Fava L., Flamigni C., Borini A.Meiotic spindle imaging in human oocytes frozen with a slow freezing procedure involving high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1078-1083.
22.
Gook DA, Osborn SM, Johnston WLCryopreservation of mouse and human oocyte using 1,2-propanediol and the configuration of the meiotic spindle. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1101-1109.
23.
Mandelbaum J., Junca AM, Plachot M., et al. Human embryo cryopreservation, extrinsic and intrinsic parameters of success. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:709-715.
24.
Joly C., Bchini O., Boulekbache H.Effects of 1,2-propanediol on the cytoskeletal organization of the mouse oocyte . Hum Reprod. 1992;7:374-378.
25.
Coticchio G. , Santis LD, Rossi G., et al. Sucrose concentration influences the rate of human oocytes with normal spindle and chromosome configurations after slow-cooling cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1771-1776.
26.
Cobo A., Ruubio C., Gerli S.Use of fluorescence in situ hybidization to assess the chromosomal status of embryos obtained from cryopreserved oocytes. Fertil Steril . 2001;75: 354-360.
27.
Gook DA, Osborn SM, Bourne H., Johnston WIFertilization of human oocytes following cryopreservation: normal karyotypes and absence of stray chromosomes. Hum Reprod. 1994;9: 684-691.
28.
Winslow KL, Yang D., Blohm PL, Brown SE, Jossim P., Nguyen K.Oocyte cryopreservation/a three year follow up of sixteen births. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(suppl1):120-121.
