Virtual reality and other avatar-based technologies are potential methods for demonstrating and modeling weight loss behaviors. This study examined avatar-based technology as a tool for modeling weight loss behaviors.
Methods:
This study consisted of two phases: (1) an online survey to obtain feedback about using avatars for modeling weight loss behaviors and (2) technology development and usability testing to create an avatar-based technology program for modeling weight loss behaviors.
Results:
Results of phase 1 (n = 128) revealed that interest was high, with 88.3% stating that they would participate in a program that used an avatar to help practice weight loss skills in a virtual environment. In phase 2, avatars and modules to model weight loss skills were developed. Eight women were recruited to participate in a 4-week usability test, with 100% reporting they would recommend the program and that it influenced their diet/exercise behavior. Most women (87.5%) indicated that the virtual models were helpful. After 4 weeks, average weight loss was 1.6 kg (standard deviation = 1.7).
Conclusions:
This investigation revealed a high level of interest in an avatar-based program, with formative work indicating promise. Given the high costs associated with in vivo exposure and practice, this study demonstrates the potential use of avatar-based technology as a tool for modeling weight loss behaviors.
FlegalKMCarrollMDOgdenCLCurtinLR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010; 303 (3): 235–41.
2.
BlaineBERodmanJNewmanJM. Weight loss treatment and psychological well-being: A review and meta-analysis. J Health Psychol. 2007; 12 (1): 66–82.
3.
Laederach-HofmannKMesserli-BurgyNMeyerK. Long-term effects of non-surgical therapy for obesity on cardiovascular risk management: A weighted empirical review. Am J Public Health. 2008; 16 (1): 21–9.
4.
VidalJ. Updated review on the benefits of weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002; 26Suppl 4: S25–8.
5.
FosterGDMakrisAPBailerBA. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82 (1Suppl), 230S–5S.
6.
WingR. Behavioral approaches to the treatment of obesity. In: BrayGBouchardC, eds. Handbook of obesity: Clinical applications. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2008, 147–68.
7.
DonnellyJEBlairSNJakicicJMManoreMMRankinJWSmithBK; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41 (2): 459–71.
8.
CoonsMJRoehrigMSpringB. The potential of virtual reality technologies to improve adherence to weight loss behaviors. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011; 5 (2): 340–4.
9.
BurkeLEWangJSevickMA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: A systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111 (1): 92–102.
10.
Turner-McGrievyGMCampbellMKTateDFTruesdaleKPBowlingJMCrosbyL. Pounds off digitally study: A randomized podcasting weight-loss intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37 (4): 263–9.
11.
TateDFWingRRWinettRA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001; 285 (9): 1172–7.
12.
TateDFJackvonyEHWingRR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166 (15): 1620–5.
13.
KingACFriedmanRMarcusBCastroCNapolitanoMAhnDBakerL. Ongoing physical activity advice by humans versus computers: The Community Health Advice by Telephone (CHAT) trial. Health Psychol. 2007; 26 (6): 718–27.
14.
RizzoSkip ALangeBSumaEABolasM. Virtual reality and interactive digital game technology: New tools to address obesity and diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011; 5 (2): 256–64.
15.
RivaGWiederholdBKMantovaniFGaggioliA. Interreality: The experiential use of technology in the treatment of obesity. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2011; 7: 51–61.
16.
ReadyDJPollackSRothbaumBOAlarconRD. Virtual reality exposure for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2006; 12 (2): 199–220.
17.
BordnickPSCarterBLTraylorAC. What virtual reality research in addictions can tell us about the future of obesity assessment and treatment. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011; 5 (2): 265–71.
18.
BordnickPSGraapKMCoppHBrooksJFerrerMLogueB. Utilizing virtual reality to standardize nicotine craving research: A pilot study. Addict Behav. 2004; 29 (9): 1889–94.
RivaGBacchettaMBaruffiMMolinariE. Virtual reality-based multidimensional therapy for the treatment of body image disturbances in obesity: A controlled study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2001; 4 (4): 511–26.
21.
RivaGBacchettaMCesaGContiSMolinariE. Six-month follow-up of in-patient experiential cognitive therapy for binge eating disorders. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003; 6 (3): 251–8.
22.
BailensonJNBeallACBlascovichJWeisbuchMRaimmundoR. Intelligent agents who wear your face: Users' reactions to the virtual self. Lecture Notes Art Intel. 2001; 2190: 86–99.
FeltzDLKerrNLIrwinBC. Buddy up: The Köhler effect applied to health games. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011; 33 (4): 506–26.
25.
FoxJBailensonJN. Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychol. 2009; 12 (1): 1–25.
26.
RuizJGAndradeADAnamRAguiarRSunHRoosBA. Using anthropomorphic avatars resembling sedentary older individuals as models to enhance self-efficacy and adherence to physical activity: Psychophysiological correlates. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012; 173: 405–11.
27.
RivaGBacchettaMCesaGContiSCastelnuovoGMantovaniFMolinariE. Is severe obesity a form of addiction? Rationale, clinical approach, and controlled clinical trial. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006; 9 (4): 457–79.
28.
JohnstonJDMasseyAPDevaneauxCA. Innovation in weight loss programs: A 3-dimensional virtual-world approach. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14 (5): e120.
29.
RosenthalTLBanduraA. Psychological modeling: Theory and practice. In: GarfieldSLBerginAE, eds. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis. 2nd ed.New York: Wiley; 1978, 621–58.
30.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84 (2): 191–215.
31.
PerskyS. Application of virtual reality methods to obesity prevention and management research. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011; 5 (2): 333–9.
32.
ErshowAGPetersonCMRileyWTRizzoASWansinkB. Virtual reality technologies for research and education in obesity and diabetes: Research needs and opportunities. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011; 5 (2): 212–24.
33.
ThompsonMAGrayJJ. Development and validation of a new body-image assessment scale. J Pers Assess. 1995; 64 (2): 258–69.
34.
FallonAERozinP. Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. J Abnorm Psychol. 1985; 94 (1): 102–5.
Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): Description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25 (12): 2165–71.
37.
StunkardAJSørensenTSchulsingerF. Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1983; 60: 115–20.
BoulosMNHetheringtonLWheelerS. Second Life: An overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Info Libr J. 2007; 24 (4): 233–45.
40.
BanduraA. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentiss-Hall; 1986.
41.
ProchaskaJODiClementeCC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983; 51 (3): 390–5.
42.
PintoAMGokee-LaroseJWingRR. Behavioral approaches to weight control: A review of current research. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2007; 3 (3): 341–53.
43.
MarcusBHSelbyVCNiauraRSRossiJS. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992; 63 (1): 60–6.
44.
YoonSYLaffeyJOhH. Understanding usability and user experience of web-based 3D graphics technology. Int J Hum Comput Int. 2008; 24 (3): 288–306.
RovniakLSAndersonESWinettRAStephensRS. Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: A prospective structural equation analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2002; 24 (2): 149–56.
47.
BorgGV. Psychological basis of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 14: 377–81.
48.
HaskellWLLeeIMPateRRPowellKEBlairSNFranklinBAMacEraCAHeathGWThompsonPDBaumanA; American College of Sports Medicine; American Heart Association. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007; 116 (9): 1081–93.
49.
Gokee-LaRoseJGorinAARaynorHALaskaMNJefferyRWLevyRLWingRR. Are standard behavioral weight loss programs effective for young adults?. Int Int J Obes (Lond). 2009; 33 (12): 1374–80.
50.
WyattSBWintersKPDubbertPM. Overweight and obesity: Prevalence, consequences, and causes of a growing public health problem. Am J Med Sci. 2006; 331 (4): 166–74.
51.
Gokee-LaroseJGorinAAWingRR. Behavioral self-regulation for weight loss in young adults: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6: 10.
