Integrated Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose System: Handling Step Analysis

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) implicates a number of handling steps with the meter and the lancing device. Numerous user errors can occur during SMBG, and each step adds to the complexity of use. This report compares the required steps to perform SMBG of one fully integrated (the second generation of the Accu-Chek® Mobile), three partly integrated (Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia® Breeze®2, and Accu-Chek Aviva), and six conventional (Bayer Contour®, Bayer Contour USB, BGStar™, FreeStyle Lite®, OneTouch® Ultra® 2, and OneTouch Verio™Pro) systems. The results show that the fully integrated system reduces the number of steps to perform SMBG. The mean decrease is approximately 70% compared with the other systems. We assume that a reduction of handling steps also reduces the risk of potential user errors and improves the user-friendliness of the system.

Keywords

handling steps integrated blood glucose measurement system potential user errors self-monitoring of blood glucose user-friendliness

References

Skeie

Thue

Nerhus

Sandberg

. Instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose: Comparisons of testing quality achieved by patients and a technician. Clin Chem. 2002;48 (7): 994–1003.

Müller

Hämmerlein

Casper

Schulz

. Evaluation der Durchführung von Glukoseselbstkontrollen in Apotheken (EDGAr). Diabetes Stoffwechsel Herz. 2006;15 (4): 9–17.

Fruhstorfer

Schmelzeisen-Redeker

Weiss

. Capillary blood sampling: Relation between lancet diameter, lancing pain and blood volume. Eur J Pain. 1999;3 (3): 283–6.

Fruhstorfer

Schmelzeisen-Redeker

Weiss

. Capillary blood volume and pain intensity depend on lancet penetration. Diabetes Care. 2000;23 (4): 562–3.

Hönes

Müller

Surridge

. The technology behind glucose meters: Test strips. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10 Suppl 1: S10–26

Westhoff

Jendricke

Haug

Freckmann

. Schmerzempfinden an Finger und Handballen bei Verwendung verschiedener Blutzuckermesssysteme. Diabetologie Stoffwechsel. 2010;5: 41.

Hansen

Pedersen-Bjergaard

Heller

Wallace

Rasmussen

Jorgensen

Pramming

Thorsteinsson

. Frequency and motives of blood glucose self-monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;85 (2): 183–8.

Bergenstal

Pearson

Cembrowski

Bina

Davidson

List

. Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: Proposed guidelines to improve accuracy. Diabetes Educ. 2000;26 (6): 981–9.

Ginsberg

. Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: Sources of errors in measurement. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3 (4): 903–13.

10.

Bamberg

Schulman

MacKenzie

Moore

Olchesky

. Effect of adverse storage conditions on performance of glucometer test strips. Clin Lab Sci. 2005;18 (4): 203–9.

11.

Raine

3rd Schrock

Edelman

Mudaliar

Zhong

Proud

Parkes

. Significant insulin dose errors may occur if blood glucose results are obtained from miscoded meters. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1 (2): 205–10.

12.

Raine

3rd Pardo

Parkes

. Predicted blood glucose from insulin administration based on values from miscoded glucose meters. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2 (4): 557–62.

13.

Baum

Monhaut

Parker

Price

. Improving the quality of self-monitoring blood glucose measurement: A study in reducing calibration errors. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006;8 (3): 347–57.