Serious video games for health are designed to entertain while changing a specific health behavior. This article identifies behavioral principles that can guide the development of serious video games focused on changing a variety of health behaviors, including those attempting to decrease risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Guidelines discussed include how to develop video games that provide a solid foundation for behavior change by enhancing a player's knowledge and skill, ways in which personal mastery experiences can be incorporated into a video game environment, using game characters and avatars to promote observational learning, creating personalized experiences through tailoring, and the importance of achieving a balance between “fun-ness” and “seriousness.” The article concludes with suggestions for future research needed to inform this rapidly growing field.
LiebermanD. What can we learn from playing interactive games? In: VordererPBryantJ, eds. Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006.
4.
BaranowskiTBudayRThompsonDIBaranowskiJ. Playing for real: Video games and stories for health-related behavior change. Am J Prev Med.2008;34 (1): 74–82.
5.
ThompsonDBaranowskiTBudayRBaranowskiJThompsonVJagoRGriffithMJ. Serious video games for health how behavioral science guided the development of a serious video game. Simul Gaming.2010;41 (4): 587–606.
6.
BaranowskiTLinLSWetterDWResnicowKHearnMD. Theory as mediating variables: Why aren't community interventions working as desired?. Ann Epidemiol.1997;7: S89–95.
7.
ThompsonDBaranowskiTBudayRBaranowskiJJulianoMFraziorMWilsdonJJagoR. In pursuit of change: Youth response to intensive goal setting embedded in a serious video game. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2007;1 (6): 907–17.
8.
BanduraA. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.
9.
BaranowskiTBaranowskiJCullenKWMarshTIslamNZakeriIHoness-MorrealeLdeMoorC. Squire's Quest! Dietary outcome evaluation of a multimedia game. Am J Prev Med.2003;24 (1): 52–61.
10.
SchunkD. Self-regulation through goal setting. ED462671. Washington DC: ERIC/CASS Digest; 2001.
11.
FrauenknechtMBlackD. The Social Problem Solving Inventory for Adolescents (SPSI-A): A manual for application, interpretation, and psychometric evaluation. Morgantown: PNG Publications; 2003.
12.
BaranowskiTBaranowskiJThompsonDBudayRJagoRGriffithMJIslamNNguyenNWatsonKB. Video game play, child diet, and physical activity behavior change a randomized clinical trial. Am J Prev Med.2011;40 (1): 33–8.
13.
LiebermanDA. Management of chronic pediatric diseases with interactive health games: Theory and research findings. J Ambul Care Manage.2001;24 (1): 26–38.
14.
KatoPMColeSWBradlynASPollockBH. A video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: A randomized trial. Pediatrics.2008;122 (2): e305–17.
15.
GabaDMHowardSKFishKJSmithBESowbYA. Simulation-based training in anesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): A decade of experience. Sim Gaming.2001;32 (2): 175–93.
16.
ChildressMBraswellR. Using massively multiplayer online role-playing games for online learning. Distance Educ.2006;27 (2): 187–96.
17.
NowakKRauhC. The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. J Comput Mediat Comm.2005;11 (1): article 8. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/nowak.html.
18.
BailensonJSegoviaK. Virtual doppelgangers: Psychological effects of avatars who ignore their owners. In: BainbridgeW, ed. Online worlds: Convergence of the real and the virtual. London: Springer-Verlag; 2010.
19.
FoxJABailensonJN. Virtual self-modeling: The effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychol.2009;12 (1): 1–25.
20.
SchunkD. Vicarious influences on self-efficacy for cognitive skill learning. J Soc Clin Psychol.1986;4 (3): 316–27.
ThompsonDBaranowskiTBudayR. Conceptual model for the design of a serious video game promoting self-management among youth with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2010;4 (3): 744–9.
23.
PettyRECacioppoJT. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
24.
StecklerALinnanL, eds. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
25.
KreuterMWStrecherVJGlassmanB. One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials. Ann Behav Med.1999;21 (4): 276–83.
26.
KroezeWWerkmanABrugJ. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med.2006;31 (3): 205–23.
27.
OgilvieDFosterCERothnieHCavillNHamiltonVFitzsimonsCFMutrieN; Scottish Physical Activity Research Collaboration. Interventions to promote walking: Systematic review. BMJ.2007;334 (7605): 1204.
28.
DunneW. The Dramatic Writer's Companion: Tools to Develop Characters, Cause Scenes, and Build Stories (Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2009. ISBN-13: 978-0226172538.
29.
ThompsonDBaranowskiTCullenKWatsonKCanadaABhattRLiuYZakeriI. Food, Fun and Fitness Internet program for girls: Influencing log-on rate. Health Educ Res.2008;23 (2): 228–37.
