In this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Keenan and colleagues used archival data from the STAR 1 clinical trial (Medtronic Diabetes) to support the claim that the new Veo™ calibration algorithm improves the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring, particularly in the critical hypoglycemic range. Extensive data analyses are presented to support this claim; the results are convincing, and the estimated improvement in hypoglycemic detection from 55% for the standard calibration to 82% for the Veo is particularly impressive. We can therefore conclude that the Veo algorithm has the potential to improve the accuracy of hypoglycemia alarms and ultimately contribute to closed-loop control. However, the presented results should be interpreted cautiously because they are based on retrospective analysis and are heavily dependent on the distribution of blood glucose levels observed in a particular data set.
DeissDBolinderJRivelineJPBattelinoTBosiETubiana-RufiNKerrDPhillipM.Improved glycemic control in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care.2006;29 (12): 2730–2.
2.
GargSZisserHSchwartzSBaileyTKaplanREllisSJovanovicL.Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-time continuous glucose sensor: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care.2006;29 (1): 44–50.
3.
The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group, TamborlaneWVBeckRWBodeBWBuckinghamBChaseHPClemonsRFiallo-ScharerRFoxLAGilliamLKHirschIBHuangESKollmanCKowalskiAJLaffelLLawrenceJMLeeJMaurasNO'GradyMRuedyKJTanseyMTsalikianEWeinzimerSWilsonDMWolpertHWysockiTXingD.Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med.2008;359 (14): 1464–76.
4.
KlonoffDC.Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care.2005;28 (5): 1231–9.
5.
HirschIBArmstrongDBergenstalRMBuckinghamBChildsBPClarkeWLPetersAWolpertH.Clinical application of emerging sensor technologies in diabetes management: consensus guidelines for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Diabetes Technol Ther.2008;10 (4): 232–46.
RebrinKSteilGMvan AntwerpWPMastrototaroJJ.Subcutaneous glucose predicts plasma glucose independent of insulin: implications for continuous monitoring. Am J Physiol.1999;277 (3Pt 1):E561–71.
8.
SteilGMRebrinKHaririFJinagondaSTadrosSDarwinCSaadMF.Interstitial fluid glucose dynamics during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. Diabetologia.2005;48 (9): 1833–40.
9.
BoyneMSSilverDMKaplanJSaudekCD.Timing of changes in interstitial and venous blood glucose measured with a continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor. Diabetes.2003;52 (11): 2790–4.
10.
KulcuETamadaJAReachGPottsROLeshoMJ.Physiological differences between interstitial glucose and blood glucose measured in human subjects. Diabetes Care.2003;26 (8): 2405–9.
11.
WentholtIMHartAAHoekstraJBDevriesJH.Relationship between interstitial and blood glucose in type 1 diabetes patients: delay and the push-pull phenomenon revisited. Diabetes Technol Ther.2007;9 (2): 169–75.
12.
AussedatBDupire-AngelMGiffordRKleinJCWilsonGSReachG.Interstitial glucose concentration and glycemia: implications for continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab.2000;278 (4): E716–28.
13.
KovatchevBClarkeW.Peculiarities of the continuous glucose monitoring data stream and their impact on developing closed-loop control technology. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2008;2 (1): 158–63.
14.
ClarkeWLAndersonSFarhyLBretonMGonder-FrederickLCoxDKovatchevB.Evaluating the clinical accuracy of two continuous glucose sensors using continuous glucose-error grid analysis. Diabetes Care.2005;28 (10): 2412–7.
KovatchevBAndersonSHeinemannLClarkeW.Comparison of the numerical and clinical accuracy of four continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Care.2008;31 (6): 1160–4.
17.
KovatchevBPGonder-FrederickLACoxDJClarkeWL.Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: continuous glucose error-grid analysis illustrated by Therasense Freestyle Navigator data. Diabetes Care.2004;27 (8): 1922–8.
18.
Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. The accuracy of the Guardian RT continuous glucose monitor in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther.2008;10 (4): 266–72.
19.
KeenanDCartayaRMastrototaroJJ.The accuracy of a new real-time continuous glucose monitoring algorithm. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2009;4 (1): 111–8.
20.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance metrics for continuous interstitial glucose monitoring; approved guideline. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document POCT05-A. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.
