Insulin-based regimens decrease morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients by way of keeping glucose at tight control. Utilizing these regimens involves multiple measurements of glucose by way of finger pricking or through indwelling vascular catheters in order to adjust insulin doses. The limitations and risks of these methods of glucose monitoring are related to potential erroneous measurements, increased risk of infection, and a significant excess workload. An automated blood glucose monitoring device for glucose monitoring of critically ill patients is needed to improve patient care while avoiding the disadvantages of currently used glucose monitoring methodologies.
VogelzangMNijboerJMvan der HorstICZijlstraFten DuisHJNijstenMW.Hyperglycemia has a stronger relation with outcome in trauma patients than in other critically ill patients. J Trauma.2006 Apr; 60 (4): 873–7.
Van den BergheGWilmerAHermansGMeerssemanWWoutersPJMilantsIVan WijngaerdenEBobbaersHBouillonR.Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med.2006 Feb 2; 354 (5): 449–61.
4.
Van den BergheGWoutersPWeekersFVerwaestCBruyninckxFSchetzMVlasselaersDFerdinandePLauwersPBouillonR.Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med.2001 Nov 8; 345 (19): 1359–67.
5.
Van den BergheGWilmerAMilantsIWoutersPJBouckaertBBruyninckxFBouillonRSchetzM.Intensive insulin therapy in mixed medical/surgical intensive care units: benefit versus harm. Diabetes.2006 Nov; 55 (11): 3151–9.
6.
LangleyJAdamsG.Insulin-based regimens decrease mortality rates in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev.2006 Nov 6; 23 (3): 184–192.
7.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. 2006, Diabetes Care29;(suppl. 1): S4–42.
8.
GarberAJMoghissiESBransomeEDJrClarkNGClementSCobinRHFurnaryAPHirschIBLevyPRobertsRVan den BergheGZamudioV; American College of Endocrinology Task Force on Inpatient Diabetes Metabolic Control. American College of Endocrinology position statement on inpatient diabetes and metabolic control. Endocr Pract.2004 Mar-Apr; 10Suppl 2: 4–9.
9.
KrinsleyJSJonesRL.Cost analysis of intensive glycemic control in critically ill adult patients. Chest.2006 Mar; 129 (3): 644–50.
10.
Van den BergheGWoutersPJKestelootKHillemanDE.Analysis of healthcare resource utilization with intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med.2006 Mar; 34 (3): 612–6.
11.
GoldbergPASiegelMDSherwinRSHalickmanJILeeMBaileyVALeeSLDziuraJDInzucchiSE.Implementation of a safe and effective insulin infusion protocol in a medical intensive care unit. Diabetes Care.2004 Feb; 27 (2): 461–7.
12.
TingCNanjiAA.Evaluation of the quality of bedside monitoring of the blood glucose level in a teaching hospital. CMAJ.1988 Jan 1; 138 (1): 23–6.
13.
AtkinSHDasmahapatraAJakerMAChorostMIReddyS.Fingerstick glucose determination in shock. Ann Intern Med.1991 Jun 15; 114 (12): 1020–4.
14.
HauptABergBPaschenPDreyerMHaringHUSmedegaardJMatthaeiS.The effects of skin temperature and testing site on blood glucose measurements taken by a modern blood glucose monitoring device. Diabetes Technol Ther.2005 Aug; 7 (4): 597–601.
15.
BodeBGrossKRikaloNSchwartzSWahlTPageCGrossTMastrototaroJ.Alarms based on real-time sensor glucose values alert patients to hypo- and hyperglycemia: the guardian continuous monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther.2004 Apr; 6 (2): 105–13.
16.
GoldbergPASiegelMDRussellRRSherwinRSHalickmanJICooperDADziuraJDInzucchiSE.Experience with the continuous glucose monitoring system in a medical intensive care unit. Diabetes Technol Ther.2004 Jun; 6 (3): 339–47.
17.
HeinemannL; Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Continuous glucose monitoring by means of the microdialysis technique: underlying fundamental aspects. Diabetes Technol Ther.2003;5 (4): 545–61.
18.
KlonoffDC.Technology to treat hyperglycemia in trauma patients. J Diabetes Sci Technol.2007 Mar; 1 (2): 151–2.
