In this study, the mathematical creativity of gifted primary school students aged 10–11 was examined, with an emphasis on fluency, flexibility, and originality. Fifty students from a Science and Art Center participated, with data collected via the Mathematical Creativity Problem-Solving Test containing four open-ended questions. Descriptive and correlational analyses were used. Results showed that problem type influenced creativity components differently. Algorithmic problems were associated with lower originality, while open-ended, visually rich tasks encouraged more original responses. A moderate correlation existed between fluency (response quantity) and flexibility (strategy variety), with greater flexibility associated with more original answers. This finding highlights the importance of flexible thinking in supporting originality. Overall, the study emphasizes that both problem type and the ability to think in varied ways play critical roles in enhancing mathematical creativity among gifted students. These insights can guide future instructional designs to better foster creative thinking in mathematics.
AbellanaA. A. A.FaburadaM. J. L.RuizV. C.LenizoA. A.PerezR. L. S. (2025). Promoting mathematical achievement through creative thinking and structured activity exposure in high school education. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(11), 136–158. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i11.6274
2.
AçıkgülK.BakanS.AslanerR. (2023). Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Matematiksel Yaratıcılık Düzeyleri ile Matematiksel Yaratıcılıklarına İlişkin Öz-Yeterlik Algı Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.17539/amauefd.1388796
3.
AltunA. (2025). Akıl yürütme ve işlem oyunları ile strateji oyunlarının ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin matematiğe yönelik tutumlarına ve problem çözme becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi [Master's thesis]. Bartın Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
4.
ArikanE. E. (2017). Is there a relationship between creativity and mathematical creativity?Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p239
5.
AssmusD.FritzlarT. (2018). Mathematical giftedness and creativity in primary grades. In SingerF. M. (Ed.), Mathematical creativity and mathematical giftedness: Enhancing creative capacities in mathematically promising students (pp. 55–81). Springer.
6.
AssmusD.FritzlarT. (2022). Mathematical creativity and mathematical giftedness in the primary school age range: An interview study on creating figural patterns. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01328-8
7.
BaharA. K.CanI.MakerC. J. (2024). What does it take to be original? An examination of mathematical problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101592
BicerA.AldemirT.KrallG.QuirozF.ChamberlinS.NelsonJ. L.LeeY.KwonH. (2024). Exploring creativity in mathematics assessment: An analysis of standardized tests. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101652
10.
BicerA.BicerA.PerihanC.LeeY. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ preparations for designing and implementing creativity-directed mathematical tasks and instructional practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(3), 491–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00409-x
11.
BicerA.ChamberlinS.PerihanC. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relationship between mathematics achievement and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.474
12.
BingolB.ÖzyaprakM. (2025). Enhancing higher education: Differentiating the curriculum and instruction to foster mathematical creativity and motivation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 59(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.70000
13.
BoldenD. S.HarriesT. V.NewtonD. P. (2010). Pre-service primary teachers’ conceptions of creativity in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9207-z
14.
BruhnS.LükenM. M. (2023). A framework to characterize young school children's individual mathematical creativity—an integrative review. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(1), 116–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231163267
15.
BüyüköztürkŞKılıç ÇakmakE.AkgünÖEKaradenizŞDemirelF. (2020). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (28. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
ChamberlinS. A.MoonS. M. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-3
18.
de VinkI. C.WillemsenR. H.LazonderA. W.KroesbergenE. H. (2022). Creativity in mathematics performance: The role of divergent and convergent thinking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12459
19.
ElgrablyH.LeikinR. (2021). Creativity as a function of problem-solving expertise: Posing new problems through investigations. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53, 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01228-3
HongW.StarJ. R.LiuR. D.ZhangD. (2023). A systematic review of mathematical flexibility: Concepts, measurements, and related research. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09825-2
22.
JankowskaD. M.KarwowskiM. (2025). The trajectories of creativity development in childhood. Learning and Individual Differences, 119, 102644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102644
23.
JoklitschkeJ.RottB.SchindlerM. (2022). Notions of creativity in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 1161–1181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10192-z
24.
KarasarN. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi (31. baskı). Nobel Yayıncılık.
KhalidM.SaadS.HamidS. R. A.AbdullahM. R.IbrahimH.ShahrillM. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
27.
KimH.ChoS.AhnD. (2003). Development of mathematical creative problem solving ability test for identification of the gifted in math. Gifted Education International, 18(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940301800206
28.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
29.
KroesbergenE. H.van HooijdonkM.Van ViersenS.Middel-LallemanM. M.ReijndersJ. J. (2017). The psychological well-being of early identified gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216679815
30.
KrutetskiiV. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren (J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirszup, Eds.). University of Chicago Press.
31.
LeikinR. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In LeikinR.BermanA.KoichuB. (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909352_009
LeikinR.ElgrablyH. (2020). Developing and assessing proof and creativity skills of high school teachers through problem-posing tasks. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.04.002
34.
LeikinR.GubermanR. (2023). Creativity and challenge: Task complexity as a function of insight and multiplicity of solutions. In LeikinR. (Ed.), Mathematical challenges for all (pp. 325–342). Springer.
35.
LeikinR.LeikinM.Paz-BaruchN.WaismanI.LevM. (2017). On the four types of characteristics of super mathematically gifted students. High Ability Studies, 28(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2017.1305330
36.
LeikinR.LevM. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In WooJ.-H.LewH.-C.ParkK.-S.SeoD.-Y. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 161–168). PME.
37.
LeikinR.SriramanB. (2022). Empirical research on creativity in mathematics (education): From the wastelands of psychology to the current state of the art. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01340-y
38.
LeungS. S.SilverE. A. (1997). The role of task format, mathematics knowledge and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing on prospective elementary school teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217299
39.
LevM.LeikinR. (2017). The interplay between excellence in school mathematics and general giftedness: Focusing on mathematical creativity. In LeikinR.SriramanB. (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond (pp. 225–238). Springer.
40.
Levav-WaynbergA.LeikinR. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 31(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.001
41.
MakerC. J. (2005). The DISCOVER project: Improving assessment and curriculum for diverse gifted learners (RM05206). National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. https://nrcgt.uconn.edu/newsletters/fall053/
42.
MannE. L.ChamberlinS. A.GraefeA. K. (2016). The prominence of affect in creativity: Expanding the conception of creativity in mathematical problem solving. In SingerF. M. (Ed.), Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond (pp. 57–73). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_5
43.
NolteM.PamperienK. (2017). Challenging problems in a regular classroom setting and in a special course for the gifted. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0815-7
44.
PiagetJ. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
45.
Pitta-PantaziD.ChristouC.KontoyianniK.KattouM. (2011). A model of mathematical giftedness: Integrating natural, creative, and mathematical abilities. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.548900
46.
Pitta-PantaziD.KattouM.ChristouC. (2018). Mathematical creativity: Product, person, process and press. In SingerF. M. (Ed.), Mathematical creativity and mathematical giftedness: Enhancing creative capacities in mathematically promising students (pp. 27–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_2
47.
SadakM.IncikabiL.UlusoyF.PektasM. (2022). Investigating mathematical creativity through the connection between creative abilities in problem posing and problemsolving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101108
Samnia HammodH.Paz-BaruchN. (2024). Self-regulated learning while solving mathematical problems among mathematically gifted and talented students. High Ability Studies, 35(2), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2024.2374715
51.
SchindlerM.BakkerA. (2020). Affective field during collaborative problem posing and problem solving: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09973-0
52.
SchoeversE. M.KroesbergenE. H.KattouM. (2018). Mathematical creativity: A combination of domain-general creative and domain-specific mathematical skills. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.361
53.
SchrauthM. A. (2014). Fostering mathematical creativity in the middle grades: Pedagogical & mathematical practices [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Graduate Council of Texas State University.
54.
SilverE. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM Mathematics Education, 29(3), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
55.
SingerF. M.VoicaC. (2015). Is problem posing a tool for identifying and developing mathematical creativity? In SingerF. M.EllertonN. F.CaiJ. (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing (pp. 141–174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_7
56.
SriramanB. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics?Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-389
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
59.
SternbergR. J.O'HaraL. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). Cambridge University Press.
60.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
61.
TuranM.Sengil-AkarS.SaygıE. (2025). Fostering mathematical creativity: A case study of middle school teachers’ classroom practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57, 101848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101848
62.
UğurA. (2020). Critical, reflective, creative thinking and their reflections on academic achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683
63.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.BrownE. F. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306323
64.
YerushalmyM. (2009). Educational technology and curricular design: Promoting mathematical creativity for all students. In LeikinR.BermanA.KoichuB. (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 101–113). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909352_007
