An Exploration of Principal Leadership Practices for Gifted Learners in the Transition from Elementary to Middle School

Abstract

Grounded in transformational leadership models, this multiple case study explored how elementary and middle school principals perceived the problem of the decline in gifted learners’ academic performance in the transition from elementary to middle school. Overwhelmingly, the elementary and middle school principals attributed the pattern of decline in gifted learners’ academic performance in the transition to middle school to limited teacher capacity to differentiate instruction. Elementary principals were found to adopt a hands-on approach with individualized support, goal setting, and high expectations, compared to middle school principals who delegated more responsibility and enabled others to lead. Interview data and a document analysis of campus improvement plans indicated that the leadership practices have yet to reverse gifted underachievement during the elementary to middle school transition. The findings offer direction for further exploration as gifted education practitioners and stakeholders advocate for gifted learners during the pivotal transition from elementary to middle school.

Keywords

case study principal leadership gifted underachievement middle school transition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acton

K. S

. (2021). School leaders as change agents: Do principals have the tools they need? Management in Education, 35(1), 43–51. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0892020620927415 https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620927415

Adriantoni

Komariah

Nurdin

Herawan

(2023). The effect of transformational leadership and madrasah climate on elementary school teacher performance. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 4(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v4i2.647

Anney

V. N

. (2014). Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 5(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/3594403

Aziz

C. N.

Rahyasih

Abubakar

Nurdin

. (2025). Transformational leadership and the development of professional learning communities in elementary schools. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction, 5(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v5i19930

Banks

D. M.

(2019). Identifying principal leadership practices to effectively support gifted learners and gifted programs: A Delphi study. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University). http://hdl.handle.net/10919/102578

Barbier

Donche

Verschueren

. (2019). Academic (under)achievement of intellectually gifted students in the transition between primary and secondary education: An individual learner perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–12. https://doaj.org/article/d2bdfd1b0a8b4b1889c6ca18d975c10b https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02533

Bass

B. M.

Avolio

B. J.

(1994). Improving organizational effectiveness: Through transformational leadership. Sage Publishing.

Bryant

J. B.

Escalante

Selva

. (2017). Promising practices: Building the next generation of school leaders. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 2(1), 32–41. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1158096.pdf https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v2i1.1924

Burkholder

G. J.

Cox

K. A.

Crawford

L. M.

Hitchcock

J. H.

(Eds.) (2020). Research designs and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner. Sage Publishing.

10.

Burns

J. M.

(1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

11.

Carpenter

A. Y.

Lockhart

D. L.

(2025). Fostering tomorrow’s leaders in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 48(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175241286163

12.

Coelho

V. A.

Marchante

Jimerson

S. R.

(2017). Promoting a positive middle school transition: A randomized-controlled treatment study examining self-concept and self-esteem. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 46(3), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0510-6

13.

Cornejo-Araya

C. A.

Gómez-Araya

C. A.

Muñoz-Huerta

Y. P.

Reyes-Vergara

C. P.

(2021). What do we know about giftedness and underachievement? A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(2), 400–411. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1481

14.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publishing.

15.

Desmet

Pereira

(2022). Gifted boys’ perceptions of their academic underachievement. Gifted Education International, 38(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211050294

16.

Dhuey

Smith

(2018). How school principals influence student learning. Empirical Economics, 54(2), 851–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1259-9

17.

Evans

Borriello

G. A.

Field

A. P

. (2018). A review of the academic and psychological impact of the transition to secondary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–18. https://doaj.org/article/2556927279b64f25a31d4a23a0a279c7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01482

18.

Geesa

Stith

K. M.

(2024). Exploring school leaders’ perceptions of gifted education educator and gifted program evaluation. Journal of Organizational & Educational Leadership, 9(2). https://digitalcommons.gardener-webb.edu/joel/vol9/iss2/2

19.

Grissom

J. A.

Egalite

A. J.

Lindsay

C. A.

(2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://wallacefoundation.org/report/how-principals-affect-students-and-schools-systematic-synthesis-two-decades-research

20.

Guilbault

K. M.

Kirsch

L. B.

(2020). Administrative leadership. In Plucker

J. A.

Callahan

C. M.

(Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: A survey of current research on giftedness and talent development (3rd ed., pp. 23–35). Prufrock Press.

21.

Hallinger

(2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005

22.

Handa

M. C.

(2019). Leading differentiated learning for the gifted. Roeper Review, 41(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2019.1585213

23.

Hately

Townend

. (2020). A qualitative meta-analysis of research into the underachievement of gifted boys. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 29(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2020.0002

24.

Hauserman

C. P.

Stick

S. L

. (2013). The leadership teachers want from principals: Transformational. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(3), 184–203. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057940.pdf

25.

Hertberg-Davis

H. L.

Brighton

C. M.

(2006). Supporting and sabotage: Principal’s influence on middle school teachers’ responses to differentiation. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(2), 90–122. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2006-685

26.

Johnsen

S. K.

(2013). Addressing the challenge of administrator support of gifted education programming. Gifted Child Today, 36(4), 221–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217513498219

27.

Kitsantas

Bland

Chirinos

D. S

. (2017). Gifted students’ perceptions of gifted programs: An inquiry into their academic and social-emotional functioning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(3), 266–288. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0162353217717033 https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217717033

28.

Kouzes

J. M.

Posner

B. Z.

(2008). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

29.

Kouzes

J. M.

Posner

B. Z.

(2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

30.

Leithwood

(1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X94030004006

31.

Lewis

J. D.

Cruzerio

P. A.

Hall

C. A

. (2007). Impact of two elementary principals in their buildings. Gifted Child Today, 30(2), 56–62. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ756555.pdf https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2007-35

32.

Karanxcha

. (2022). Literature review of transformational school leadership: Models and effects on student achievement (2006–2019). Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221077157

33.

Litchka

P. R.

Shapira-Lishchinsky

(2016). Planning educational policy: Teacher perceptions of school principal transformational leadership in Israel and the United States. Educational Planning, 23(2), 45–58. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1208277.pdf

34.

Lovette-Wilson

Orange

Corrales

(2020). Factors influencing student transition from elementary to middle school. Educational Studies, 48(3), 424–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1767039

35.

Metz

Piro

J. S.

Nitowski

Cosentino

(2019). Transformational leadership: Perceptions of building-level leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 29(5), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684619858843

36.

Mofield

(2020). Benefits and barriers to collaboration and co-teaching: Examining perspectives of gifted education teachers and general education teachers. Gifted Child Today, 43(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519880588

37.

Mofield

Petters

M. P.

(2019). Understanding underachievement: Mindset, perfectionism, and achievement attitudes among gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219836737

38.

Nash

. (2010). Transformational school leadership and student achievement: A case study. Southeastern Teacher Education Journal, 3(1), 55–66. https://research.ebsco.com/c/4wdw3l/viewer/pdf/g3ndqlfb3v

39.

National Association for Gifted Children. (2015). Addressing excellence gaps in K-12 education. https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Position%20Statement/Excellence%20Gaps%20Position%20Statement.pdf

40.

Novak

A. M.

Jen

(2024). The editorial word: Trustworthiness. Journal of Advanced Academics, 35(4), 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X241288384

41.

Nowell

L. S.

Norris

J. M.

White

D. E.

Moules

N. J.

(2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

42.

Obergriesser

Stoeger

(2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003

43.

Peters

S. J.

Jolly

J. L.

(2018). The influence of professional development in gifted education on the frequency of instructional practices. Australian Educational Researcher, 45(4), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0260-4

44.

Quin

Deris

Bischoff

Johnson

J. T.

(2015). Comparison of transformational leadership practices: Implications for school districts and principal preparation programs. Journal of Leadership Education, 14(3), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.12806/V14/I3/R5

45.

Raoof

Shokri

Fathabadi

Panaghi

(2024). Unpacking the underachievement of gifted students: A systematic review of internal and external factors. Heliyon, 10(17), 1–22. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(24)12939-8.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36908

46.

Razali

Majid

N. A.

Azrin

A. A. M.

Quah

W. B.

(2024). Exploring academic performance among gifted and talented students: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(1), 334–347. 10.6007/lJARPED/v13-i1/20144

47.

Reis

S. M.

McCoach

D. B.

(2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400302

48.

Rinn

A. N.

Mun

R. U.

Hodges

(2022). 2020-2021 State of the states in gifted education. National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://www.giftedpage.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2020-21-State-of-the-States-in-Gifted-Education-Final.pdf

49.

Ritchotte

Rubenstein

Mury

(2016). Reversing the underachievement of gifted middle school students. Gifted Child Today, 38(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514568559

50.

Robinson

(2021). An administrators’ association partnership translates to gifted education advocacy. Gifted Child Today, 44(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520963632

51.

Ronksley-Pavia

Neumann

M. M.

(2022). Exploring educator leadership practices in gifted education to facilitate online learning experiences for (re)engaging gifted students. Education Sciences, 12(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020099

52.

Sanchez

J. E.

Usinger

Thornton

B. W.

Sparkman

W. E

. (2017). I’m paying the time for someone else’s crime: Principals and core teachers at rural middle schools under chronic academic stress. Rural Educator, 38(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v38i3.216

53.

Scott

. (2024). Association between principal leadership styles and academic achievement in gifted education schools (Order No. 31302200). Available from ProQuest One Academic (3062328108). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/association-between-principal-leadership-styles/docview/3062328108/se-2

54.

Sewell

C. J. P.

Goings

R. B.

(2019). Navigating the gifted bubble: Black adults reflecting on their transition experiences in NYC gifted programs. Roeper Review, 41(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1553218

55.

Siegle

Rubenstein

L. D.

McCoach

D. B.

(2020). Do you know what I’m thinking?: A comparison of teacher and parent perspectives of underachieving gifted students’ attitudes. Psychology in Schools, 57(10), 1596–1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22345

56.

Steenbergen-Hu

Olszewski-Kubilius

Calvert

(2020). The effectiveness of current interventions to reverse the underachievement of gifted students: Findings of a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 132–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220908601

57.

Texas Education Agency. (2022). Texas Academic Performance Report. https://tea/texas.gov/perfreport/tapr/index.html

58.

VanTassel-Baska

Brown

. (2022). An analysis of stakeholder perceptions of gifted programs: A report card on gifted program performance. Gifted Child Today, 45(3), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221091859

59.

Weber

C. L.

Colarulli-Daniels

Leinhauser

J. A

. (2003). A tale of two principals. Gifted Child Today, 26(4), 55–65. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ787958.pdf https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2003-112

60.

White

S. L. J.

Graham

L. J.

Blaas

(2018). Why do we know so little about the factors associated with gifted underachievement? A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 24, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.001

61.

Williams

T. D.

(2022). An exploration of principal leadership practices to support gifted and talented programming and academic performance. (Publication No. 29991660). [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/exploration-principal-leadeship-practices/docview/273066418/se-2

62.

Yin

R. K.

(2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publishing.

63.

Yin

R. K.

(2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

64.

Zabloski

Milacci

(2012). Gifted dropouts: Phenomenological case studies of rural gifted students. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 6(3), 175–190.