School attachment encompasses students’ interrelated emotional, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions. Self-regulation involves setting goals and activating self-monitoring and self-reinforcement processes. Social skills refer to specific verbal and nonverbal behaviors essential for effective interpersonal interactions. In this study, we examined the mediating effects of social skills and perceived self-regulation on the school attachment levels of gifted students. We also investigated whether school attachment levels differed by gender and grade level. The sample consisted of 347 gifted middle school students (180 girls). We conducted a mediation analysis in Jamovi using 5,000 bootstrap samples. We used independent-samples t-tests and one-way analysis of variance to analyze gender and grade-level differences in school attachment, respectively. We applied the Gabriel post hoc test to identify the source of significant differences between grade levels. We found no significant differences in school attachment levels based on gender. However, grade level significantly influenced school attachment, with 7th graders exhibiting higher attachment levels than 6th graders; other grade comparisons were not statistically significant. Furthermore, self-regulation skills mediated the relationship between social skills and school attachment among gifted students. This study contributes to the gifted education literature by highlighting the role of personal competencies specifically, social skills and self-regulation in shaping students’ connection to school. Our findings suggest that strengthening these individual skills may foster a greater sense of school belonging among gifted learners, offering practical implications for educators and program designers.
AğayaA. (2021). Ergenlerde duygu düzenleme becerisi, algılanan ebeveyn kontrolü ve siber (sanal) zorbalik statülerinin okula bağlanma düzeylerini yordayılığı [Unpublished master’s thesis]. (The predictors of emotion regulation skills, perceived parental control and cyber (Virtual) bullying status on school attachment levels in adolescents). Anadolu University.
2.
Aldan-KarademirÇ.DeveciÖ.ÇaylıB. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin öz-düzenlemeleri ve akademik öz-yeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of secondary school students’ self-regulation and academic self-efficacy]. E-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.30900/ kafkasegt.446793
3.
AllisonP. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer (Research Methods and Statistics) (1st ed.). Pine Forge Press.
4.
Al-RaeeiM.AzmehC.AlDakakH. (2024). Enriching minds: The gifted education landscape in the Syrian Arab Republic. Journal of Advanced Academics, 35(4), 729–751. https://doi.org/ 0.1177/1932202X241244881
5.
AndermanE. M. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 795–809.https://doi.org/10.1037/00220663.94.4.795
6.
ArslanS.GelişliY. (2015). Algilanan öz-düzenleme ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik calişmasi [Development of perceived self-regulation scale: Validity and reliability study]. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(3), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.91303
7.
BainS. K.BourgeoisS. J.PappasD. N. (2003). Linking theoretical models to actual practices: A survey of teachers in gifted education. Roeper Review, 25(4), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554224
8.
BaysalA.ÖzgenelM. (2019). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin bağlanma stilleri ve öz-düzenleme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between secondary school students’ attachment styles and self-regulation levels]. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 15(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.507650
9.
BennerA. D.GrahamS. (2009). The transition to high school as a developmental process among multiethnic urban youth. Child Development, 80(2), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01265.x
10.
BlackettR.WebbJ. T. (2011). The social-emotional dimension of giftedness: The SENG support model. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 20(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.063962285753287
11.
BlassS. (2014). The relationship between social-emotional difficulties and underachievement of gifted students. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 24(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2014.1
12.
BoekaertsM.CornoL. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
13.
BonnyA. E.BrittoM. T.KlostermannB. K.HornungR. W.SlapG. B. (2000). School disconnectedness: Identifying adolescents at risk. Pediatrics, 106(5), 1017–1021. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.5.1017
14.
ClearyT. J.ZimmermanB. J. (2012). A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: Theoretical foundations and applications. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyL. A.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 237–257). Springer.
15.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
CrossT. L.ColemanL. J. (2014). School-based conception of giftedness. In CrossT. L.ColemanL. J. (Eds.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psycho-educational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 159–174). Springer.
17.
DatuJ. A. D.ZhangJ.LeeS. M.EricF. (2025). The academic benefits of social connections: Relatedness, competence needs satisfaction, and science motivation among Hong Kong gifted children. Journal of Advanced Academics, 36(3), 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X251320474
18.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
19.
DemirH.YıldızM. (2023). Ortaokul öğrencilerinde öz yeterlik ve yaşam doyumu arasında okula bağlanmanın çoklu aracılığı [Multiple mediation of school attachment between self-efficacy and life satisfaction in middle school students]. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), 696–707. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1338002
20.
DixonF. A. (2022). Social emotional support structures to facilitate talent development. In Vantassel-BaskaJ. (Ed.), Talent development in gifted education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 147–164). Routledge.
21.
DrakeK.BelskyJ.FearonR. M. (2014). From early attachment to engagement with learning in school: The role of self-regulation and persistence. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1350. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032779
ElliottS. N.GreshamF. M. (1987). Children’s social skills: Assessment and classification practices. Journal of Counseling and Development, 66(2), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1987.tb00808.x
24.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
27.
GarvikM.IdsoeT.BruE. (2014). Depression and school engagement among Norwegian upper secondary vocational school students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(5), 592–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.798835
28.
GoodenowC.GradyK. E. (1993). The relationship of school belonging and friends’ values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1993.9943831
29.
GrossM. U. M. (2002). Social and emotional issues for exceptionally intellectually gifted students. In NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 19–29). Prufrock Press.
30.
GuignardJ. H.BacroF.GuimardP. (2021). School life satisfaction and peer connectedness of intellectually gifted adolescents in France: Is there a labeling effect?New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2021(179), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20448
31.
GuoW. (2020). Grade-level differences in teacher feedback and students’ self-regulated learning. Frontier in Psychology, 11, 783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00783
32.
HagborgW. J. (1994). An exploration of school membership among middle and high-school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12(4), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299401200401
33.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
34.
HansenJ. B.TosoS. J. (2007). Gifted dropouts: Personality, family, social, and school factors. Gifted Child Today, 30(4), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2007-488
35.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
36.
HebertT. P. (2020). Understanding the social and emotional lives of gifted students (2nd ed.). Prufrock Press.
37.
HillL. G.WernerN. E. (2006). Affiliative motivation, school attachment, and aggression in school. Psychology in the School, 43(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20140
38.
İpekH. (2019). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik kaygılarının matematik öz yeterlik inançlarının ve matematik dersine yönelik öz düzenleme becerilerinin incelenmesi (Investigation of middle school students' mathematics anxiety mathematics self efficacy beliefs and self-regulation skills toward mathematics course) [Unpublished master's thesis. Marmara University.
39.
JimersonS. R.CamposE.GreifJ. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340893
40.
JungJ. Y.TownendG.HayP. K.SmithS. R. (2022). The state of knowledge in rural gifted education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(3), 315–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221076385
41.
KaraşarB.KapçıE. G. (2016). Lise öğrencilerinde okula bağlanma ve akademik başarinin çeşitli değişkenler açisindan incelenmesi [An investigation of school attachment and academic achievement among high school students in terms of various variables]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 49(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001373
42.
KarataşZ.TagayO. (2021). Özel/üstün yetenekli ortaokula devam eden ön ergenler için sosyal beceri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi [Development of a social skills scale for pre-adolescents attending special/gifted middle schools and examination of its psychometric properties]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi51), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.746428
43.
KoegelL. K.KoegelR. L.HurleyC.FreaW. D. (1992). Improving social skills and disruptive behavior in children with autism through self-management. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-341
44.
KrauseK. L.CoatesH. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892
45.
LandisR. N.ReschlyA. L. (2013). Reexamining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(2), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213480864
46.
LeeS. Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2006). The emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of academically gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(1), 29–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320603000103
47.
LeeS. Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.ThomsonD. T. (2012). Academically gifted students’ perceived interpersonal competence and peer relationships. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212442568
48.
MartinsJ.CunhaJ.LopesS.MoreiraT.RosárioP. (2022). School engagement in elementary school: A systematic review of 35 years of research. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 793–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09642-5
49.
McLoughlinC.LeeM. J. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1100
50.
McNeelyC. A.NonnemakerJ. M.BlumR. W. (2002). Promoting school connectedness: Evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Journal of School Health, 72(4), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb06533.x
51.
Mihalec-AdkinsB. P.CooleyM. E. (2020). Examining individual-level academic risk and protective factors for foster youth: School engagement, behaviors, self-esteem, and social skills. Child & Family Social Work, 25(2), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12681
52.
MoonS. M.DixonF. A. (2015). Conceptions of giftedness in adolescence. In DixonF. A.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (1st ed., pp. 249–280). Prufrock Press.
53.
MorawskaA.SandersM. R. (2008). Parenting gifted and talented children: What are the key child behavior and parenting issues?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42(9), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670802277271
54.
MoutonS. G.HawkinsJ.McPhersonR. H.CopleyJ. (1996). School attachment: Perspectives of low-attached high school students. Educational Psychology, 16(3), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341960160306
55.
NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?Prufrock Press.
56.
OnukT. (2017). Ergenlerde kişilik özelliklerinin sinav kaygisi ve okula bağlanma stilleri üzerinde etkisi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. (The effects of personality traits in adolescents on exam anxiety and school attachment styles). Işik University.
57.
OstermanK. F. (2000). Student’s need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003323
PfeifferS. I. (2013). Serving the gifted: Evidence-based clinical and psychoeducational practice (1st ed.). Routledge.
60.
ReeveJ. (2008). Engagement and motivation in reading. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement (pp. 149–172). Routledge.
61.
ReisS. M.RenzulliJ. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.012
62.
RenzulliJ. S.ParkS. (2002). Giftedness and high school dropouts: Personal, family, and school-related factors (Report No. RM02168). The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED480177
63.
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In ChristensonS. ReschlyA. WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
64.
Riksen-WalravenJ. M.MeijH. T.van RoozendaalJ.KoksJ. (1993). Mastery motivation in toddlers as related to quality of attachment. In MesserD. (Ed.), Mastery motivation in early childhood: Development, measurement and social processes (pp. 189–204). Routledge.
65.
RobinsonN. M. (2008). The social world of gifted children and youth: A historical perspective. In PfeifferS. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 33–51). Springer.
RudasillK. M.CallahanC. M. (2008). Psychometric characteristics of the Harter self perception profiles for adolescents and children for use with gifted populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207311056
68.
ŞahanB.DuyB. (2017). Okul tükenmişliği: Öz-yeterlik, okula bağlanma ve sosyal desteğin yordayici rolü [School burnout: Predictive role of self-efficacy, school attachment and social support]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 1249–1270. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.297590
69.
SamdalO.WoldB.BronisM. (1999). Relationship between students’ perceptions of school environment, their satisfaction with school and perceived academic achievement: An international study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(3), 296–320. https://www.https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.10.3.296.3502
70.
SarıM. (2013). Lise öğrencilerinde okula aidiyet duygusu [Sense of belonging to school among high school students]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 147–160. https://kutuphane.dogus.edu.tr/mvt/pdf.php
71.
SaviF. (2011). Çocuk ve ergenler için okula bağlanma ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalişmasi [School attachment scale for children and adolescents: Validity and reliability study]. İlköğretim Online, 10(1), 80–90. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ilkonline/issue/8593/106848
72.
SektnanM.McClellandM. M.AcockA.MorrisonF. (2010). Relations between early family risk, children’s behavioral regulation, and academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.02.005
73.
SeongD. G.KimC. K. (2016). The effects of parental attachment, peer attachment, and teacher attachment on children’s happiness in elementary school students in higher grades: With a focusing on the mediating effect of self-regulation abilities. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 36(4), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.5723/KJCS.2015.36.4.129
74.
SiegleD.McCoachD. B. (2005). Making a difference: Motivating gifted students who are not achieving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503800104
SilvermanL. K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 54–60). Prufrock Press.
77.
SkinnerE. A.FurrerC.MarchandG.KindermannT. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
78.
StefanssonK. K.GestsdottirS.BirgisdottirF.LernerR. M. (2018). School engagement and intentional self-regulation: A reciprocal relation in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 64(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.01.005
79.
SucuoğluB., & Çifci, İ. (2010). Bilişsel süreç yaklaşimiyla sosyal beceri öğretimi (7.baski). Kök Yayincilik.
80.
TurgutÖ. (2015). Ergenlerin psikolojik sağlamlik düzeylerinin, önemli yaşam olaylari, algilanan sosyal destek ve okul bağliliği açisindan incelenmesi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. (Investigation of resilience of adolescents in terms of major life events, perceived social support and school engagement). Anadolu University.
81.
WangM. T.ChowA.HofkensT.Salmela-AroK. (2015). The trajectories of student emotional engagement and school burnout with academic and psychological development: Findings from Finnish adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 36, 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.004
82.
WangM. T.DegolJ. L.HenryD. A. (2019). An integrative development-in sociocultural context model for children’s engagement in learning. American Psychologist, 74(9), 1086–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000522
83.
WeiH. S.ChenJ. K. (2010). School attachment among Taiwanese adolescents: The roles of individual characteristics, peer relationships, and teacher well-being. Social Indicators Research, 95(3), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9529-3
84.
WoltersC. A.TaylorD. J. (2012). A self-regulated learning perspective on student engagement. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyL. A.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 635–651). Springer Science & Business Media.
85.
YaldıranA. (2019). Lise öğrencilerinde siber zorbaliğa maruz kalma ve okula bağlanma arasindaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Bolu ili örneği) [Unpublished master’s thesis](Investigation of the relationship between cyber victimization and school attachment among high school students (Example of Bolu province). Sakarya University.
