Current studies in innovation are often siloed to specific disciplines, precluding a generalizable understanding useful to understanding the factors that promote and hinder individual motivation to innovate. This study integrates analysis of 30 interviews and 500 surveys of Canadian innovators from a variety of disciplines as a means of understanding the avenues that education could use to develop innovation talent. The results of this study point to the overstated role of rewards as drivers of developing innovation talent. These findings support the idea that programs that wish to support innovation for all learners should be guided by the primacy of decisions that build confidence and fulfill interest and perceived importance of the task at hand, as well as those mitigating the costs of innovating. The implementation of promotive and cost-mitigating strategies should be a high priority for educational efforts to stoke the development of innovation talent for learners in many contexts.
Aarikka-StenroosL.JaakkolaE.HarrisonD.Mäkitalo-KeinonenT. (2017). How to manage innovation processes in extensive networks: A longitudinal study. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 88–105. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.014
2.
AntikainenM. J.MäkipääM.AhonenM. (2010). Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/14601061011013258
BarronK. E.HullemanC. S. (2015). Expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In EcclesJ. S.Salmelo-AroK. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) (Vol. 8, pp. 503–509). Elsevier.
5.
BasitT. N. (2010). Conducting research in educational contexts. Continuum.
6.
BendellJ.ThomasL. (2013). The appearance of elegant disruption: Theorising sustainable luxury entrepreneurship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2013(52), 9–24. https://doi.org/doi:10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2013.de.00004
BhaduriS.KumarH. (2011). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: Tracing the motivation of “grassroot” innovators in India. Mind & Society, 10(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s11299-010-0081-2
9.
BolderdijkJ. W.BrouwerC.CornelissenG. (2018). When do morally motivated innovators elicit inspiration instead of irritation?Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02362
CarrK.KendalR. L.FlynnE. G. (2016). Eureka!: What is innovation, how does it develop, and who does it?Child Development, 87(5), 1505–1519. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/cdev.12549
CsikszentmihalyiM.AbuhamdehS.NakamuraJ. (2013). Flow. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–608). The Guilford Press.
17.
CurranB.WalsworthS. (2014). Can you pay employees to innovate? Evidence from the Canadian private sector. Human Resource Management Journal, 24(3), 290–306. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12036
18.
DeweyJ. (1997). Experience and education. Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1938)
DodgsonM.GannD. M.PhillipsN. (2013). Perspectives on innovation management. In DodgsonM.GannD. M.PhillipsN. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 3–25). London, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.037
21.
EcclesJ. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). Freeman.
FischerC.MalychaC. P.SchafmannE. (2019). The influence of intrinsic motivation and synergistic extrinsic motivators on creativity and innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137
24.
FlakeJ. K.BarronK. E.HullemanC.McCoachD. B.WelshM. E.McCoachB. D.WelshM. E. (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002
25.
FredricksJ. A.AlfeldC.EcclesJ. (2010). Developing and fostering passion in academic and nonacademic domains. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 18–30. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0016986209352683
26.
GaliaF. (2008). Intrinsic-extrinsic motivations and knowledge sharing in French firms. ICFAI Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 56–80.
JääskeläinenR. (2010). Think-aloud protocol. In GambierY.van DoorslaerL. (Eds.), Handbook of translation studies (Vol. 1, pp. 371–374). John Benjamins.
29.
KaufmanJ. C.BeghettoR. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
Maria StockR.ZachariasN. A.SchnellbaecherA. (2017). How do strategy and leadership styles jointly affect co-development and its innovation outcomes?Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12332
NoonanS. J. (2013). Educating wizards: Developing talent through innovation education. In ShavininaL. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of innovation education (pp. 237–247). Routledge.
38.
PavittK. (2005). Innovation processes. In FagersbergJ.MoweryD.NelsonR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation (Vol. 18, pp. 86–114). Oxford University Press.
PihlajamaaM. (2017). Going the extra mile: Managing individual motivation in radical innovation development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 43, 48–66. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.01.003
41.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.
42.
ShavininaL. (2013a). Innovation education: The emergence of a new discipline. In ShavininaL. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of innovation education (pp. 28–36). Routledge.
43.
ShavininaL. (2013b). The trajectory of early development of prominent innovators. In ShavininaL. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of innovation education (pp. 223–235). Routledge.
44.
ShavininaL. (2013c). Where did all great innovators come from? Lessons from early childhood and adolescent education of Nobel laureates in science. In ShavininaL. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of innovation education (pp. 248–261). Routledge.
45.
SoleasE. K. (2018a). Get off my lawn: Why capitalism’s monopoly on innovation is bad for us all and what educators can do about it. Graduate Student Symposium Selected Papers, 12, 91–107.
SoleasE. K. (in review). Leader strategies for motivating innovation: A systematic review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
48.
van SomerenM. W.BarnardY. F.SandbergJ. A. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes: Knowledge-based systems. Academic Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/0306-4573(95)90031-4
49.
WigfieldA.TonksS.KlaudaS. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 55–75). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
50.
Yun DaiD. (2013). How advances in gifted education contribute to innovation education, and vice versa. In ShavininaL. (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of innovation education (pp. 70–83). London: UK: Routledge.
51.
ZhengH.LiD.HouW. (2011). Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(4), 57–88. https://doi.org/doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415150402
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
