Interventions for Postsecondary Success for Low-Income and High-Potential Students: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Research indicates that high-potential students from low-income backgrounds have decreased educational attainment and success in college compared with their higher income peers. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the interventions that support postsecondary success for this group. Using a systematic review protocol, we identified five categories of support for these students: a summer intervention, advanced coursework, financial aid, college information, and a program that provides year-round supports. Findings suggest these programs differentially help certain groups, but can provide support in accessing college, persisting and attaining degrees, and helping with noncognitive supports such as peer support.

Keywords

low-income high achieving students educational equity college access systematic review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Dadgar

(2012). Does dual enrollment increase students’ success in college? Evidence from a quasi-experimental analysis of dual enrollment in New York City. New Directions for Higher Education, 158, 11-19.

B. P.

(2013). The impact of dual enrollment on college degree attainment: Do low-SES students benefit? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 57-75.

Bell

A. M.

Chetty

Jaravel

Petkova

Van Reenen

. (2017). Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation (No. w24062). National Bureau of Economic Research.

*Boatman

Long

B. T.

(2016). Does financial aid impact college student engagement? Research in Higher Education, 57, 653-681. doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9402-y

Breakthrough Collaborative. (2018). Our program. Retrieved from https://www.breakthroughcollaborative.org/program/

Burney

V. H.

Beilke

J. R.

(2008). The constraints of poverty on high achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 295-321.

Callahan

C. M.

Moon

T. R.

(2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40, 20-49.

*Cohodes

Goodman

(2014). Merit aid, college quality and college completion: Massachusetts’ Adams scholarship as an in-kind subsidy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6, 251-285.

The College Board. (2018). Resources for parents and families. Retrieved from https://apstudent.collegeboard.org/exploreap/for-parents

10.

The CollegeBound Foundation. (2018). Urban scholars program. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboundfoundation.org/urban-scholars-program

11.

Contreras

(2011). Strengthening the bridge to higher education for academically promising underrepresented students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 500-526.

12.

*Davis

R. J.

Nagle

Richards

D. A.

Awokoya

J. T.

(2013). The impact of the Gates Millennium Scholars Program on college choice for high-achieving, low-income African American students. The Journal of Negro Education, 82, 226-357. doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.82.3.0226

13.

*DesJardins

S. L.

McCall

B. P.

(2014). The impact of the Gates Millennium Scholars Program on college and post-college related choices of high ability, low-income minority students. Economics of Education Review, 38, 124-138. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.11.004

14.

*DesJardins

S. L.

McCall

B. P.

Ott

Kim

(2010). A quasi-experimental investigation of how the Gates Millennium Scholars Program is related to college students’ time use and activities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 456-475. doi:10.3102/0162373710380739

15.

Dixon-Woods

Agarwal

Jones

Young

Sutton

(2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10, 45-53.

16.

*Domina

(2014). Does merit aid program design matter? A cross-cohort analysis. Research in Higher Education, 55, 1-26. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9302-y

17.

Ecker-Lyster

Niileksela

(2017). Enhancing gifted education for underrepresented students: Promising recruitment and programming strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40, 79-95.

18.

Engle

(2011, August). Priced out: How the wrong financial-aid policies hurt low-income students. Presented at Education Week Webinar, “Helping Low-Income Students Get Into College.” Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/media/2011-08-17lowincomestudents.pdf

19.

Gagnon

D. J.

Mattingly

M. J

. (2016). Advanced placement and rural schools: access, success, and exploring alternatives. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(4), 266-284.

20.

Goings

R. B.

Ford

D. Y.

(2018). Investigating the intersection of poverty and race in gifted education journals: A 15-year analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 25-36.

21.

*Hallett

R. E.

Venegas

K. M.

(2011). Is increased access enough? Advanced Placement courses, quality, and success in low-income urban schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 468-487.

22.

*Hertberg-Davis

Callahan

C. M.

(2008). A narrow escape: Gifted students’ perceptions of Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 199-216.

23.

Howley

M. D.

Howley

C. B.

Duncan

(2013). Early college and dual enrollment challenges: Inroads and impediments to access. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 77-107.

24.

Hoxby

C. M.

Avery

(2013). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low-income students. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

25.

*Hoxby

C. M.

Turner

(2013). Expanding college opportunities for high-achieving, low income students. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

26.

Hoxby

C. M.

Turner

(2015). What high-achieving low-income students know about college. American Economic Review, 105, 514-517.

27.

International Baccalaureate. (2018). Benefits for schools. Retrieved from https://www.ibo.org/benefits/benefits-for-schools/

28.

Jack Kent Cooke Foundation. (2015). What is the excellence gap? Lansdowne, VA. Retrieved from http://www.excellencegap.org/what-is-the-excellence-gap/

29.

Johnsen

S. K.

(2017). Equality of educational opportunity. Gifted Child Today, 40(1), 5.

30.

*Kaul

C. R.

Johnsen

S. K.

Saxon

T. F.

Witte

M. M.

(2016). Project promise: A long-term follow-up of low-income gifted students who participated in a summer enrichment program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39, 83-102.

31.

Kaul

C. R.

Renbarger

Gardner

Johnsen

S. K.

(2016). What the research says about influences on gifted students’ academic success transitioning from secondary schools to higher education institutions. Tempo, 37(2), 22-33.

32.

Kim

(2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 102-116. doi:10.1177/0016986216630607

33.

Kolluri

(2018). Advanced Placement: The dual challenge of equal access and effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 88, 671-711.

34.

*Mayer

A. P.

(2008). Expanding opportunities for high academic achievement: An International Baccalaureate diploma program in an urban high school. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 202-235.

35.

*Melguizo

(2010). Are students of color more likely to graduate from college if they attend more selective institutions? Evidence from a cohort of recipients and nonrecipients of the Gates Millennium Scholarship program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 230-248. doi:10.3102/0162373710367681

36.

*Mendez

J. P.

Mendoza

Malcolm

(2011). The impact of financial aid on Native American students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4, 12-25.

37.

Millett

C. M.

Saunders

S. R.

Fishtein

(2018). Examining how college promise programs promote student academic and financial readiness. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

38.

*Missett

T. C.

Reed

C. B.

Scot

T. P.

Callahan

C. M.

Slade

(2010). Describing learning in an advanced online case-based course in environmental science. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 10-50.

39.

Mullet

D. R.

Rinn

A. N.

Kettler

(2017). Catalysts of women’s talent development in STEM: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28, 253-289. doi:10.1177/1932202x17735305

40.

*Ness

E. C.

Tucker

(2008). Eligibility effects on college access: Under-represented student perceptions of Tennessee’s merit aid program. Research in Higher Education, 49, 569-588. doi:10.1007/s11162-008-9096-5

41.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Clarenbach

(2012). Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low-income, high ability students. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.

42.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Corwith

(2018). Poverty, academic achievement, and giftedness: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 37-55.

43.

Park

Caine

Wimmer

(2014). The experiences of Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate diploma program participants: A systematic review of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25, 129-153.

44.

Plucker

J. A.

Burroughs

N. A.

Song

(2010). Mind the (other) gap! The growing excellence gap in K-12 education. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.

45.

Plucker

J. A.

Hardesty

Burroughs

(2013). Talent on the sidelines: Excellence gaps and America’s persistent talent underclass. Storrs: Center for Education Policy Analysis, University of Connecticut. Retrieved from http://www.cepa.uconn.edu/research/mindthegap

46.

Plucker

J. A.

Peters

S. J.

(2018). Closing poverty-based excellence gaps: Conceptual, measurement, and educational issues. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 56-67.

47.

Ramsey

(2010). Expanding access and opportunity: The impact of the Gates Millennium Scholars Program. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.

48.

Sablan

J. R.

(2014). The challenge of summer bridge programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1035-1050. doi:10.1177/0002764213515234

49.

Swanson

Watson

Ritter

Nichols

(2017). Promises fulfilled? A systematic review of the impacts of promise programs. Fayetteville: Department of Education Reform, University of Arkansas.

50.

*Taylor

J. L.

(2015). Accelerating pathways to college: The (in)equitable effects of community college dual credit. Community College Review, 43, 355-379.

51.

Thomas

Harden

(2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), Article 45. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

52.

VanTassel-Baska

(2018). Achievement unlocked: Effective curriculum interventions with low-income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 68-82.

53.

Worrell

F. C.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Dixson

D. D.

(2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 551-576. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846

54.

Wyner

J. S.

Bridgeland

J. M.

DiIulio

J. J.

(2007). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. Lansdowne, VA: Jack Kent Cooke Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.jkcf.org/research/achievement-trap-how-america-is-failing-millions-of-high-achieving-students-from-lower-income-families/

55.

Xiang

Dahlin

Cronin

Theaker

Durant

(2011). Do high flyers maintain their altitude? Performance trends of top students Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from http://www.edexcellence.net/publications/high-flyers.html