The effects of working memory (WM) demand and reminders on an event-based prospective memory (PM) task were compared between students with low and high achievement in math. WM load (1- and 2-back tasks) was manipulated as a within-subject factor and reminder (with or without reminder) as a between-subject factor. Results showed that high-achieving students outperformed low-achieving students on all PM and n-back tasks. Use of a reminder improved PM performance and thus reduced prospective interference; the performance of ongoing tasks also improved for all students. Both PM and n-back performances in low WM load were better than in high WM load. High WM load had more influence on low-achieving students than on high-achieving students. Results suggest that low-achieving students in math were weak at PM and influenced more by high WM load. Thus, it is important to train these students to set up an obvious reminder for their PM and improve their WM.
CaiD.LiQ.DengC. (2013). Working memory features of low-achieving students in math: Domain general or domain specific?Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(2), 193–205.
2.
CarteeN.FinkN.PakR. (2013). The effects of reminder type and anticipatory interval on prospective memory. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57, 1750–1754.
3.
ChathamC. H.HerdS. A.BrantA. M.HazyT. E.MiyakeA.O’ReillyR.FriedmanN. P. (2011). From an executive network to executive control: A computational model of the n-back task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3598–3619.
4.
ChenX.LiuL.WangY.ShumD.ChanR. (2014). Self- and other-reported prospective memory problems in everyday life: A lifespan perspective. Poster of the Fourth Mental Health Annual Meeting, Jiangsu, China.
5.
DongY.ZhouR.GuoX. (2008). An experimental research on prospective memory in children with learning disabilities. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 7, 68–74.
6.
EinsteinG. O.McDanielM. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 717.
7.
EinsteinG. O.McDanielM. A.ScullinM. K. (2012). Memory and aging: Current issues and future directions. Milton Park, UK: Psychology Press.
8.
GathercoleS. E.PickeringS. J. (2000). Working memory deficits in children with low achievements in the national curriculum at 7 years of age. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 177–194.
9.
GuoY.ChenY. (2016). Event-based and time-based prospective memory in students with learning disabilities and low achievers. Unpublished manuscript.
10.
GuynnM. J.McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O. (1998). Prospective memory: When reminders fail. Memory and Cognition, 26(2), 287–298.
11.
HenryJ. D.RendellP. G.PhillipsL. H.DunlopL.KliegelM. (2012). Prospective memory reminders: A laboratory investigation of initiation source and age effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(7), 1274–1287.
12.
JiL. L. (2012). An ERP study on prospective memory of children with learning disability (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Henan, Henan, China.
13.
KvavilashviliL.EllisJ. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some directions and classifications. In BrandimonteM. A.EinsteinG. O.McDanielM. A. (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 23–51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
LourençoJ. S.MaylorE. A. (2014). Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(4), 687–702.
15.
MahyC. E.MosesL. J. (2011). Executive functioning and prospective memory in young children. Cognitive Development, 26(3), 269–281.
16.
MahyC. E.MosesL. J.KliegelM. (2014). The development of prospective memory in children: An executive framework. Developmental Review, 34(4), 305–326.
17.
MaylorE. A. (1996). Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective-memory task. Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 74.
18.
McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1(1), 23–41.
19.
ScullinM. K.BuggJ. M.McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O. (2011). Prospective memory and aging: Preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1232–1240.
20.
UttlB. (2011). Transparent meta-analysis: Does aging spare prospective memory with focal vs. non-focal cues?PloS One, 6(2), e16618.
21.
ZhangH.WangX. (1989). Standardization research on Raven’s standard progressive matrices in China. Acta Psychological Sinica, 21(2), 113–120.
22.
ZhouB. (2008). Metamemory monitoring, controlling features and learning effect of low-achieving students in math in junior middle school (Master’s thesis). East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
23.
ZhouL. (2012). Research on visual-spacial working memory of low-achieving students in math in junior middle school (Master’s thesis). East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
