The relations of academic and social goal orientations to academic and social behaviors and self-concept were investigated among academically talented adolescents (N = 1,218) attending a mastery-oriented academic residential summer program. Results supported context effects in that academic mastery goal orientations predicted academic (in-class engagement, scholastic self-concept) and general outcomes (global self-worth self-concept) more than any other goal orientation. There were also gender differences such that academic mastery goal orientations predicted course performance and responsible classroom behavior only for girls, whereas for boys, academic mastery goal orientations were positively related to close friendship self-concept. The relation of social goal orientations to social outcomes also varied by gender. For instance, social development goal orientations were uniquely associated with social self-concept for girls, whereas there were some unique patterns regarding social demonstration-avoidance goal orientations for boys. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AlexanderJ. M.SchnickA. K. (2008). Motivation. In PluckerJ. A.CallananC. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 383-407). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
2.
AlkharusiH. (2012). Categorical variables in regression analysis: A comparison of dummy and effect coding. International Journal of Education, 4, 202-210.
3.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
4.
AwadG. H. (2007). The role of racial identity, academic self-concept, and self-esteem in the prediction of academic outcomes for African American students. Journal of Black Psychology, 33, 188-207.
5.
Ben-EliyahuA. (in press). Individual differences and learning contexts: A self-regulated learning perspective. In MichalskyT.SchechterC. (Eds.), National Society for the Studies of Education Yearbook. Self-regulated learning: Conceptualization, contribution, and empirically based models for teaching and learning. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University Press.
6.
Ben-EliyahuA.BernackiM. L. (2015). Addressing complexities in self-regulated learning: A focus on contextual factors, contingencies, and dynamic relations. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 1-13.
7.
Ben-EliyahuA.KaplanA. (2015). Social and academic coping: Using growth curve modeling to examine third through sixth grade. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 41, 99-109.
8.
Ben-EliyahuA.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2013). Extending self-regulated learning to include self-regulated emotion strategies. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 558-573.
9.
Ben-EliyahuA.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2015). Integrating the regulation of affect, behavior, and cognition into self-regulated learning paradigms among secondary and post-secondary students. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 15-42.
10.
BiermanK. L. (2004). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
BongM. (2008). Effects of parent-child relationships and classroom goal structures on motivation, help-seeking avoidance, and cheating. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 191-217.
13.
BouffardT.BoisvertJ.VezeauC.LaroucheC. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 317-329.
14.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CokleyK. (2000). An investigation of academic self-concept and its relationship to academic achievement in African American college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 26, 148-164.
16.
DaiD. Y. (2000). To be or not to be (challenged), that is the question: Task and ego orientations among high-ability, high-achieving adolescents. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 311-330.
17.
DaiD. Y.MoonS. M.FeldhusenJ. F. (1998). Achievement motivation and gifted students: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 45-63.
18.
DudaJ. L.NichollsJ. G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290-299.
19.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
20.
EcclesJ. S.MidgleyC. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In AmesR.AmesC. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139-181). New York, NY: Academic Press.
21.
ElliotA. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
22.
ElliotA. J.ChurchM. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
23.
ElliotA. J.FryerJ. (2008). The goal construct in psychology. In ShahJ.GardnerW. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 235-250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
ElliotA. J.MurayamaK. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613-628.
25.
ElliotA. J.MurayamaK.PekrunR. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632-648.
26.
GrossM. U. M. (2002). Social and emotional issues of exceptionally intellectually gifted students. In NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 19-29). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
27.
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK. E.PintrichP. R.ElliotA. J.ThrashT. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
28.
HarackiewiczJ. M.SansoneC. (1991). Goals and intrinsic motivation: You can get there from here. In MaehrM. L.PintrichP. R. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 21-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29.
HarterS. (1988). The self-perception profile for adolescents. Unpublished manual, University of Denver, CO.
30.
HerreraC.GrossmanJ. B.KauhT. J.McMakenJ. (2011). Mentoring in schools: An impact study of big brothers big sisters school-based mentoring. Child Development, 82, 346-361.
31.
HoyleR. H. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of personality and self-regulation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
32.
HuangC. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 359-388.
33.
HullemanC. S.SchragerS. M.BodmannS. M.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422-449.
34.
IsiksalM. (2010). A comparative study on undergraduate students’ academic motivation and academic self-concept. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 572-585.
35.
JärveläS.VoletS.JärvenojaH. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45, 15-27.
36.
KaplanA.MaehrM. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141-184.
37.
KaplanA.MiddletonM. J.UrdanT.MidgleyC. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. In MidgleyC. (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
LearyM. R. (2004). The sociometer, self-esteem, and the regulation of interpersonal behavior. In BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 373-391). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.GoreP. A.Jr. (1997). Discriminant and predictive validity of academic self-concept, academic self-efficacy, and mathematics-specific self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 307-315.
40.
LiemG. A. (2016). Academic and social achievement goals: Their additive, interactive, and specialized effects on school functioning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 37-56.
41.
Linnenbrink-GarciaL.MiddletonM. J.CianiK. D.EasterM. A.O’KeefeP. A.ZushoA. (2012). The strength of the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations: Theoretical, methodological, and instructional implications. Educational Psychologist, 47, 281-301.
42.
Linnenbrink-GarciaL.RogatT. K.KoskeyK. L. K. (2011). Affect and engagement during small group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 13-24.
43.
Linnenbrink-GarciaL.TysonD. F.PatallE. A. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 21, 19-70.
44.
LüfteneggerM.KollmayerM.BergsmannE.JöstlG.SpielC.SchobeB. (2015). Mathematically gifted students and high achievement: The role of motivation and classroom structure. High Ability Studies, 26, 227-243. doi:10.1080/13598139.2015.1095075
45.
LuftigR. L.NicholsM. L. (1990). Assessing the social status of gifted students by their age peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 111-115.
46.
MaehrM. L.ZushoA. (2009). Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. In WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 77-104). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
47.
MakelM. C.LeeS. Y.Olszewski-KubliusP.PutallazM. (2012). Changing the pond, not the fish: Following high ability students across different educational environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 778-792. doi:10.1037/a0027558
48.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163.
49.
MarshH. W.SeatonM.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.HauK.O’MaraA.CravenR. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350.
50.
McInerneyD. M.ChengR. W.Mo Ching MokM.Kwok Hap LamA. (2012). Academic self-concept and learning strategies: Direction of effect on student academic achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23, 249-269.
51.
McNabbT. (2003). Motivational issues: Potential to performance. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 417-423). Boston, MA: Merrill.
52.
MiddletonM.MidgleyC. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
53.
MidgleyC.KaplanA.MiddletonM. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
54.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE.AndermanL.FreemanK. E.. . . UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
55.
MundfromD. J.PerrettJ. J.SchafferJ.PicconeA.RoozeboomM. (2006). Bonferroni adjustments in tests for regression coefficients. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 32, 1-6.
56.
NeihartM. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say?Roeper Review, 22, 10-17. doi:10.1080/02783199909553991
57.
O’KeefeP. A.Ben-EliyahuA.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2013). Shaping Achievement Goal Orientations in a Mastery-Structured Environment and Concomitant Changes in Related Contingencies of Self-Worth. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 50-64.
58.
OlszewskiP.KuliekeM. J.WillisG. B. (1987). Changes in the self-perceptions of gifted students who participate in rigorous academic programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 287-303.
59.
ParkerJ. G.AsherS. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk?Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389.
60.
ParkerJ. G.RubinK. H.PriceJ. M.DeRosierM. E. (1995). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In CicchettiD.CohenD. (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adoption (Vol. 2, pp. 96-161). New York, NY: John Wiley.
61.
PatrickH. (1997). Social self-regulation: Exploring the relations between children’s social relationships, academic self-regulation, and school performance. Educational Psychologist, 32, 209-220.
62.
PatrickH.HicksL.RyanA. M. (1997). Relations of perceived social efficacy and social goal pursuit to self-efficacy for academic work. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 109-128.
63.
PatrickH.KaplanA.RyanA. M. (2011). Positive classroom motivational environments: Convergence between mastery goal structure and classroom social climate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 367-382.
64.
PatrickH.RyanA. M.KaplanA. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 83-98.
65.
PekrunR.ElliotA. J.MaierM. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing of a model of their joint relations to academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115-135.
66.
PintrichP. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
67.
PintrichP. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
68.
PutallazM.BaldwinJ.SelphH. (2005). The Duke University talent identification program. High Ability Studies, 16, 41-54.
69.
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-169.
70.
RhodesJ. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71.
RimmS. (2002). Peer pressures and social acceptance of gifted students. In NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 13-18). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
72.
RodkinP. C.RyanA. M.JamisonR.WilsonT. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1139-1150.
73.
RudasillK.CallahanC. M. (2008). Psychometric characteristics of the Harter Self-Perception Profiles for Adolescents and Children for use with gifted populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 70-86.
74.
RudolphK. D.AbaiedJ. L.FlynnM.SugimuraN.AgostonA. M. (2011). Developing relationships, being cool, and not looking like a loser: Social goal orientation predicts children’s responses to peer aggression. Child Development, 82, 1518-1530.
75.
RyanA. M.ShimS. S. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1246-1263.
76.
RyanA. M.ShimS. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents’ social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 672-687.
77.
SebancA. M.GuimondA. B.LutgenJ. (2016). Transactional relationships between Latinos’ friendship quality and academic achievement during the transition to middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 36, 108-138.
78.
SenkoC.HullemanC. S.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26-47.
79.
ShimS. S.RyanA. M.AndersonC. J. (2008). Achievement goals and achievement during early adolescence: Examining time-varying predictor and outcome variables in growth-curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 655-671.
80.
SnyderK. E.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2013). A developmental, person-centered approach to exploring multiple motivational pathways in gifted underachievement. Educational Psychologist, 48, 209-228.
81.
SongJ.BongM.LeeK.KimS. (2015). Longitudinal investigation into the role of perceived social support in adolescents’ academic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 821-841.
82.
ThomasD. E.BiermanK. L.PowersC. J. (2011). The influence of classroom aggression and classroom climate on aggressive–disruptive behavior. Child Development, 82, 751-757.
83.
UrdanT. C. (1997). Examining the Relations among Early Adolescent Students’ Goals and Friends’ Orientation toward Effort and Achievement in School. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 165-191.
84.
UrdanT. C.MaehrM. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65, 213-243.
85.
ValentineJ. C.DuBoisD. L.CooperH. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A systematic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111-133.
86.
WaiJ.CacchioM.PutallazM.MakelM. (2010). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30-year examination. Intelligence, 38, 412-423.
87.
WentzelK. R. (1989). Adolescent classroom goals, standards for performance, and academic achievement: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 131-142.
88.
WentzelK. R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62, 1066-1078.
89.
WentzelK. R. (1993a). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357-364.
90.
WentzelK. R. (1993b). Motivation and achievement in early adolescence: The role of multiple classroom goals. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 4-20.
91.
WentzelK. R. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76-97.
92.
WentzelK. R.AsherS. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66, 754-763.
93.
WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (1998). Academic and social motivational influences on students’ academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 155-175.
94.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
