This exploratory study investigated the social and affective concerns of 280 high-ability students in Grades 5 through 12 who participated in a summer residential program. Content analysis of responses from an open-ended survey indicated that high-ability adolescents expressed concerns regarding feelings and emotions, future aspirations, and relationships. How these social and affective concerns differed across gender, age, and among U.S. students, international students, and Native American subgroups were also investigated. Boys would like to discuss puberty and maturity more than girls; students in early adolescence cared about feelings, whereas those in late adolescence wanted to discuss future aspirations; Native American students had similar concerns to those of other students; however, Diné students were concerned about personal issues and bullying. These findings provide researchers and educators in the field of gifted education with new perspectives regarding social and affective concerns of high-ability students.
BellR.ArnoldE.GoldenS.LangdonS.AndersonA.BryantA. (2014). Perceptions and psychosocial correlates of bullying among Lumbee Indian youth. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research: The Journal of the National Center, 21, 1-17. doi:10.5820/aian.2101.2014.1
2.
BroderickP. C.BlewittP. (2010). The life span: Human development for helping professionals (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BrownB. B.ClasenD. R.EicherS. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521-530. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.521
4.
CarlyleK. E.SteinmanK. J. (2007). Demographic differences in the prevalence, co-occurrence, and correlates of adolescent bullying at school. Journal of School Health, 77, 623-629. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00242.x
5.
ColangeloN. (2003). Counseling gifted students. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 373-387). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
8.
ErfordB. T. (2010). Transforming the school counseling profession (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
EricksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
10.
Garces-BacsalR. (2010). Tales gifted children tell: Exploring PTAT responses as pathways to socio-affective concerns. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 138-151. doi:10.1177/0016986209358616
11.
GentryM. (2011). Project HOPE+ (Having Opportunities Promotes Excellence for secondary students): Providing high-ability Native American youth with quality summer enrichment (Unpublished grant proposal for Jack Kent Cooke Foundation, 2012-2014).
12.
GentryM.FugateC. M.WuJ.CastellanoJ. (2014). Gifted Native American students: Literature, lessons, and future directions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 98-110. doi:10.1177/0016986214521660
13.
Gifted Education Resource Institute. (2015). Summer residential. Retrieved from the Center’s youth program website.
14.
GreensponT. S. (2000). “Healthy perfectionism” is an oxymoron! Reflections on the psychology of perfectionism and the sociology of science. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 197-208. doi:10.4219/jsge-2000-631
15.
GrobmanJ. (2006). Underachievement in exceptionally gifted adolescents and young adults: A psychiatrist’s view. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 199-210. doi:10.4219/jsge-2006-408
16.
GustK. L. (1996). Assessing the social and emotional needs of the gifted: Using the Children’s Self-Report and Projective Inventory as a potential tool. Gifted Child Today, 19, 38-40. doi:10.1177/107621759601900511
17.
HébertT. P. (2011). Understanding the social and emotional lives of gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
18.
HooverJ. H.OliverR.HazlerR. J. (1992). Bullying: Perceptions of adolescent victims in the Midwestern USA. School Psychology International, 13, 5-16. doi:10.1177/0143034392131001
19.
JenE. (2014). Developing resilience among high ability learners: What we should know and what we can do. In GentryM. (with K. A. Paul, J. McIntosh, C. M. Fugate, & E. Jen), Total school cluster grouping and differentiation: A comprehensive, research-based plan for raising student achievement and improving teacher practices (2nd ed., pp. 157-172). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
20.
JenE.MoonS. M.GentryM. (2015). Incorporating a small-group affective curriculum model into a diverse summer program for talented youth: A design-based research study. Manuscript in preparation.
21.
KerrB. A.CohnS. J. (2001). Smart boys: Talent, manhood, and the search for meaning. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
22.
KerrB. A.Ghrist-PriebeS. L. (1988). Intervention for multipotentiality: Effects of a career counseling laboratory for gifted high school students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 66, 366-369. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1988.tb00888.x
23.
KerrB. A.VuykM.ReaC. (2012). Gendered practices in the education of gifted girls and boys. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 647-655. doi:10.1002/pits.21627
24.
KitanoM. (2012). Social-emotional needs of gifted students of color. In CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 209-225). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
25.
MillerP. H. (2011). Theories of development (5th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
26.
MofieldE. L.Chakraborti-GhoshS. (2010). Addressing multidimensional perfectionism in gifted adolescents with affective curriculum. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 479-513. doi:10.1177/016235321003300403
27.
MoonS. M. (2009). Myth 15: High-ability students don’t face problems and challenges. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 274-276. doi:10.1177/0016986209346943
28.
MoonS. M.DixonF. (2015). Conceptions of giftedness in adolescence. In MoonS. M.DixonF. (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 1-34). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
29.
NeffK. D.CooperC. E.WoodruffA. L. (2007). Children’s and adolescents’ developing perceptions of gender inequality. Social Development, 16, 682-699. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00411.x
30.
NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.). (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
31.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2003). Special summer and Saturday programs for gifted students. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 219-228). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
PetersM. P.BainS. K. (2011). Bullying and victimization rates among gifted and high-achieving students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 624-643. doi:10.1177/016235321103400405
33.
PetersonJ. S. (1999). Gifted—Through whose cultural lens? An application of the postpositivistic mode of inquiry. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 354-383. doi:10.1177/016235329902200403
34.
PetersonJ. S. (2000). A follow-up study of one group of achievers and underachievers four years after high-school graduation. Roeper Review, 22, 217-224. doi:10.1080/02783190009554041
35.
PetersonJ. S. (2003). An argument for proactive attention to affective concerns to gifted students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 62-70. doi:10.4219/jsge-2003-419
36.
PetersonJ. S. (2007). A developmental perspective. In MendaglioS.PetersonJ. S. (Eds.), Models of counseling gifted children, adolescents, and young adults (pp. 97-126). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
37.
PetersonJ. S. (2008). The essential guide to talking with gifted teens. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
38.
PetersonJ. S. (2009a). Focus on where they are: A clinical perspective. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.CrossT. L.OlenchakF. R. (Eds.), Social-emotional curriculum with gifted and talented students (pp. 193-226). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
39.
PetersonJ. S. (2009b). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 280-282. doi:10.1177/0016986209346946
40.
PetersonJ. S.AssoulineS. G.JenE. (2015). Responding to concerns related to the social and emotional development of gifted adolescents. In DixonF. A.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 65-90). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
41.
PetersonJ. S.BettsG.BradleyT. (2009). Discussion groups as a component of affective curriculum for gifted students. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.CrossT. L.OlenchakF. R. (Eds.), Social-emotional curriculum with gifted and talented students (pp. 289-320). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
42.
PetersonJ. S.ColangeloN. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 399-407. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01886.x
43.
PetersonJ. S.LorimerM. R. (2011). Student response to a small-group affective curriculum in a school for gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 167-180. doi:10.1177/0016986211412770
44.
PetersonJ. S.RayK. E. (2006a). Bullying among the gifted: The subjective experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 252-269. doi:10.1177/001698620605000305
45.
PetersonJ. S.RayK. E. (2006b). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, and effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 148-168. doi:10.1177/001698620605000206
ReisS. M.RenzulliJ. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 119-130. doi:10.1002/pits.10144
48.
RobinsonN. M.ReisS. M.NeihartM.MoonS. M. (2002). Social and emotional issues: What have we learned and what should we do now? In NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 267-288). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
49.
SchulerP. (2002). Perfectionism in gifted children and adolescents. In NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 71-80). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
50.
SilvermanL. K. (2012). Asychronous development: A key to counseling the gifted. In CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (pp. 261-279). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
51.
Speirs-NeumeisterK. L.WilliamsK. K.CrossT. L. (2009). Gifted high school students’ perspectives on the development of perfectionism. Roeper Review, 31, 198-206. doi:10.1080/02783190903177564
52.
StrandJ. A.PeacockT. D. (2002). Nurturing resilience and school success in American Indian and Alaska Native students (Report No. EDO-RC-02-11). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearing house on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Re-production Service No. ED471488)
53.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. L. (2009). Affective curriculum and gifted learners. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.CrossT. L.OlenchakF. R. (Eds.), Social-emotional curriculum with gifted and talented students (pp. 113-132). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
54.
WolcottH. F. (2009). Writing up qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
WoodS. (2010). Best practices in counseling the gifted in schools: What’s really happening?Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 42-58. doi:10.1177/0016986209352681
56.
WorrellF. C. (2012). Mindsets and giftedness: Assumptions and implications. In SubotnikR. F.RobinsonA.CallahanC. M.JohnsonP. (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education (pp. 153-164). Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Giftedness and Talent.
57.
WuJ.GentryM. (2014). Summer residential program experiences as perceived by gifted Diné youth. Journal of American Indian Education, 53, 66-84.
58.
YooJ. E.MoonS. M. (2006). Counseling needs of gifted students: An analysis of intake forms at a university-based counseling center. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 52-61. doi:10.1177/001698620605000106
