In recent years, some school reformers have come to see early college and dual enrollment as mechanisms for increasing the academic engagement and performance of a range of students beyond those exhibiting high academic achievement or ability. Despite purported benefits, research on the dynamics of such programs is limited. This case study adds to the relevant literature by using semistructured interviews with key participants to investigate the cross-institutional dynamics enabling and constraining the early college and dual enrollment arrangements sponsored by a consortium of high schools and colleges in a Midwestern state. Qualitative data analysis surfaced four salient themes explaining patterns of interaction across the partnering institutions: Organizational Conditions and Motives, Border Crossers, Organizational Power Dynamics, and Personal Attitudes Regarding Early College and Dual Enrollment.
AbramsonC. M. (2011, December). Qualitative research in the positivist-behavioral tradition: Resources for addressing Type I and Type II errors in code associations using ATLAS.ti. Inside ATLAS.ti, 2011(3), 5-9. Retrieved from http://www.atlasti.com/uploads/media/ATLASti_Newsletter_2011-03_02.pdf
2.
BaileyT.HughesK.KarpM. (2003). Dual enrollment programs: Erasing transitions from high school to college (Community College Research Center Brief). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
3.
BainS. K.BlissS. L.ChoateS. M.BrownK. S. (2007). Serving children who are gifted: Perceptions of undergraduates planning to become teachers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30, 450-478.
BarnettM.AndersonJ.HouleM.HigginbothamT.GatlingA. (2010). The process of trust building between university researchers and urban school personnel. Urban Education, 45, 630-660.
BlancoC. (2006). Accelerated learning options: Moving the needle on access and success: A study of state and institutional policies and practices. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, Policy Analysis, and Research Unit.
8.
BlancoC.PrescottB. (2007). The promise of dual enrollment: Assessing Ohio’s early college access policy. Cincinnati, OH: KnowledgeWorks.
9.
BosmaL. M.SievingR. E.EricsonA.RussP.CavenderL.BonineM. (2010). Elements for successful collaboration between K-8 school, community agency, and university partners: The lead peace partnership. Journal of School Health, 80, 501-507.
10.
BrewerD. J.SternS.AhnJ. (2007). An introduction to “early college.”Education Finance and Policy, 2, 175-187.
11.
BroughtonR. W. (1987). The Minnesota 11th and 12th grade post-secondary enrollment options program: Is it changing the traditional structure of secondary and post-secondary schools? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 282 600). Jefferson City, MO: Council of North Central Community and Junior Colleges.
12.
BurnellB. A. (2003). The “real world” aspirations of work-bound rural students. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18, 104-113.
13.
CarrP.KefalasM. (2009). Hollowing out the middle: The rural brain drain and what it means for America. Boston, MA: Beacon.
14.
CaryL. J. (2004). The professional development school model: Unpacking knowledge. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7, 319-337. doi:10.1080/13603120410001694522
15.
CobbP.RubinB. A. (2006). Contradictory interests, tangled power, and disorganized organization. Administration & Society, 38, 79-112. doi:10.1177/0095399705284203
16.
CohenD. K.SpillaneJ. (1992). Policy and practice: The relation between governance and instruction. In GrantG. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 3-49). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~dkcohen/Cohen_1992_Chpt1.pdf
17.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 1 & 2). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
18.
CollinsR. (1979). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. New York, NY: Academic Press.
19.
CollinsR. (2002). Credential inflation and the future of universities. In BrintS. (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect: The changing American university (pp. 23-46). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
CorbettM. (2007). Learning to leave: The irony of schooling in a coastal community. Black Point, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood.
21.
CornellD. G.CallahanC. M.LoydB. H. (1991). Socioemotional adjustment of adolescent girls enrolled in a residential acceleration program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 58-66.
22.
DeYoungA. (1995). The life and death of a rural American high school: Farewell, Little Kanawha. New York, NY: Garland.
FriedkinN. (2011). A formal theory of reflected appraisals in the evolution of power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 501-529.
29.
Fund for the Advancement of Education. (1957). They went to college early (Evaluation Report No. 2). New York, NY: Author.
30.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
31.
GrossM. (1992). The use of radical acceleration in cases of extreme intellectual precocity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 91-99.
32.
GrossM.van VlietH. E. (2005). Radical acceleration and early entry to college: A review of the research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 154-171.
33.
HektnerJ. (1995). When moving up implies moving out: Rural adolescent conflict in the transition to adulthood. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 11(1), 3-14.
34.
HoffmanN. (2005). Add and subtract: Dual enrollment as a state strategy to increase postsecondary success for underrepresented students. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future. Retrieved from http://www.jff.org/sites/default/files/Addsubtract.pdf
HowleyC.HarmonH.LeopoldG. (1996). Rural scholars or bright rednecks? Aspirations for a sense of place among rural youth in Appalachia. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12, 150-160.
37.
HowleyC.HowleyA. (1987, November). Skipping high school: Means and ends. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association for Gifted Children, New Orleans, LA.
38.
JanosP. M.RobinsonN. M.LunneborgC. E. (1989). Markedly early entrance to college: A multi-year comparative study of academic performance and psychological adjustment. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 495-518.
JohnstonG. H.KristovichS. A. R. (1999, June). Looking for the dual credit student and finding the under-aged student ones (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 433 783). Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Seattle, WA.
41.
JohnstoneD.Del GenioB. (2001). College-level learning in high school: Purposes, policies, and practical implications. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
42.
JonesE. D.SouthernW. T. (1992). Programming, grouping, and acceleration in rural school districts: A survey of attitudes and practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 112-117.
43.
KirwanW. (2009). Toward a new beginning. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 26(15), 28.
Lefever-DavisS.JohnsonC.PearmanC. (2007). Two sides of a partnership: Egalitarianism and empowerment in school-university partnerships. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 204-210.
46.
LewisM. V.OvermanL. (2008). Dual and concurrent enrollment and transition to postsecondary education. Career and Technical Education Research, 33(3), 189-202.
McCrayE. D.RosenbergM. S.BrownellM. T.deBettencourtL. U.LekoM. M.LongS. K. (2011). The role of leaders in forming school-university partnerships for special education teacher preparation. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24(1), 47-58.
49.
McKnightE.VargasJ. B. (2006). Smoothing the path; changing state policies to support early college high school: Case studies from Georgia, Ohio, Texas, and Utah. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
50.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1995). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
MorrisonM. C. (2008). The strategic value of dual enrollment programs. Techniques, 83(7), 26-27.
52.
MorrowJ.TorrezA. (2012). On track to their dreams. Educational Leadership, 69(7), 74-77.
53.
MuratoriM.ColangeloN.AssoulineS. (2003). Early-entrance students: Impressions of their first semester of college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 219-237.
54.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Table H21. Total enrollment of public high school students in dual credit courses during the 2002-03 12-month school year, by dual credit course location, focus, and school characteristics: 2003. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/inc/displaytables_inc.asp
55.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Common core of data. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/
56.
NobleK. D.ChildersS. A. (2008). A passion for learning: The theory and practice of optimal match at the University of Washington. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, 236-270.
57.
NobleK. D.ChildersS. A.VaughanR. C. (2008). A place to be celebrated and understood: The impact of early university entrance from parents’ points of view. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 256-268.
58.
NobleK. D.SmythR. K. (1995). Keeping their talents alive: Young women’s assessment of radical, post-secondary acceleration. Roeper Review, 18, 49-56.
59.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (1998). Early entrance to college: Students’ stories. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 226-248.
60.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2002). A summary of research regarding early entrance to college. Roeper Review, 24, 152-158.
61.
PeshkinA. (1978). Growing up American: Schooling and the survival of community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62.
RayL. A. (2011). The effect of studying Tech Prep in high school and college academic performance (Doctoral dissertation, Trident University International). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (No. 865037848)
63.
RobertsonP.ChapmanB.GaskinF. (2001). Systems for offering concurrent enrollment at high schools and community colleges. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64.
RogersK. B.KimpstonR. D. (1992). Acceleration: What we do vs. what we know. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 58-61.
65.
SchneiderJ. (2009). Privilege, equity, and the Advanced Placement Program: Tug of war. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41, 813-831. doi:10.1080/00220270802713613
66.
ShepherdS. J.NicponM. F.DoobayA. F. (2009). Early entrance to college and self-concept: Comparisons across the first semester of enrollment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 40-57.
67.
SpillaneJ. P.DiamondJ. B.WalkerL. J.HalversonR.JitaL. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 918-940.
StanleyJ. (1991). Critique of “socioemotional adjustment of adolescent girls enrolled in a residential acceleration program.”Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 67-70.
70.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
TheobaldN. D. (1991). Staffing, financing, and governing professional development schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 87-101.
72.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237-246.
73.
WaitsT.SetzerJ.LewisL. (2006). Dual credit and exam-based courses in U.S. public high schools: 2002–03. Education Statistics Quarterly, 7(1/2), 98-108.
74.
WeissR. S. (1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: Free Press.
75.
WhiteB. P. (2010). Power, privilege, and the public: The dynamics of community-university collaboration. New Directions for Higher Education, 152, 67-74. doi:10.1002/he.414
76.
WindhamP. (1996, August). What happens to community college dual enrollment students? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 398 950). Paper presented at the annual conference of the Southern Association for Community College Research, Panama City, FL.
77.
WoodS.PortmanT. A. A.CigrandD. L.ColangeloN. (2010). School counselors’ perceptions and experience with acceleration as a program option for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 168-178.
78.
WrightD.BogotchI. (2006). High school: Erasing borders. Journal of College Admission, 193, 19-24.
