Mixed-method evaluation of two iterations of month-long summer enrichment programs for English-learning secondary students investigated impacts on participants’ beliefs about school and academic achievement, and on actual course choices, test outcomes, and graduation rates. Students (N = 85) from one ethnically diverse, high-poverty high school in a large school district in Georgia took part in science and academic English-themed summer enrichment programs in 2006 and 2008. Questionnaires, interviews, and transcript analysis demonstrated that after taking part, students aspired to attend college, were aware of the steps necessary, and took steps such as tracking themselves into more advanced courses. Participants also were able to create and sustain peer support groups in their school, fostering a culture of academic achievement. Findings suggest that even such short-term programs can positively influence students’ attitudes, aspirations, and actual behaviors supporting academic achievement, graduation, and postsecondary education, lending promise to goals of ameliorating the academic achievement gap.
AkosP.LambieG. W.MilsomA.GilbertK. (2007). Early adolescents’ aspirations and academic tracking: An exploratory investigation. Professional School Counseling, 11(1), 57-64.
2.
BohonS. A.MacphersonH.AtilesJ. H. (2005). Educational barriers for new Latinos in Georgia. Journal of Latinos and Education, 4, 43-58.
3.
CarnevaleA. P. (1999). Education=success: Empowering Hispanic youth and adults. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
FaltisC. J.CoulterC. A. (2008). Teaching English learners and immigrant students in secondary schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
6.
Flores-GonzalezN. (2002). School kids/street kids: Identity development in Latino students. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
FreemanY. S.FreemanD. E. (with MercuriS). (2002). Closing the achievement gap: How to reach limited-formal-schooling and long-term English learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8.
FryR. (2008). The role of schools in the English language learner achievement gap. Washington, DC: The Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved from http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/89.pdf
9.
GándaraP. (2002). A study of high school puente: What we have learned about preparing Latino youth for postsecondary education. Educational Policy, 16, 474-495.
10.
GarciaE. E. (2001). Hispanic education in the United States: Raíces y alas. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
GlennieE.StearnsE. (2002). Why Hispanic students drop out of high school early: Data from North Carolina. Durham, NC: Duke University Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED498830.pdf
JewellM. (2009). Undocumented—with college dreams. Educational Leadership, 66(7), 48-52.
17.
LeeJ. (2002). Racial and Ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity?Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3-12.
18.
LockwoodA. T. (2000). Transforming education for Hispanic youth: Broad recommendations for policy and practice. Issue brief No. 1. National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
19.
MartinezM.KlopottS. (2005). The link between high school reform and college access and success for low-income and minority youth. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum & Pathways to College Network.
20.
MoralesA.HerreraS.MurryK. (2011). Navigating the waves of social and political capriciousness: Inspiring perspectives from DREAM-eligible immigrant students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10, 266-283.
21.
MusettiB.MellomP.LopezE. (2007). Evaluation of the 2006 CLASE steps to college Gwinnett pre-collegiate program (Report WR-2007-001). Davis, CA: The Wealth Research Organization.
22.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). The condition of education 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available from http://nces.ed.gov
23.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic minorities. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov
National Taskforce on Early Childhood Education for Hispanics. (2007). Para nuestros niños: Expanding and improving early education for Hispanics main report. Retrieved from http://ecehispanic.org/work/expand_MainReport.pdf
26.
Pathways to College Network. (2004). A shared agenda: A leadership challenge to improve college access and success. Boston, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.pathwaystocollege.net/
27.
PetersonJ. S.MargolinL. (1997). Naming gifted children: An example of unintended reproduction. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 82-100.
28.
PluckerJ. A.BurroughsN.SongR. (2010). Mind the (other) gap: The growing excellence gap in K-12 education. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.
29.
PortesA.HaoL. (2004). The schooling of children of immigrants: Contextual effects on the educational attainment of the second generation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 11920-11927.
30.
PortesA.ZhouM. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530, 74-96.
31.
PortesP. R. (2005). Dismantling educational inequality: A cultural-historical approach to closing the achievement gap. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
32.
PortesP. R.SalasS. (2010). In the shadow of Stone Mountain: Identity development, structured inequality, and the education of Spanish-speaking children. Bilingual Research Journal, 33, 241-248.
33.
Rance-RoneyJ. (2009). Best practices for adolescent ELLs. Educational Leadership, 66(7), 32-37.
34.
ReyesP.ScribnerJ. D.ScribnerA. P. (Eds.). (1999). Lessons from high-performing Hispanic schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
RomoH. D.FalboT. (1996). Latino high school graduation: Defying the odds. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
36.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL. (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom. (Expanded ed.). New York, NY: Irvington.
37.
RothsteinR. (2008). Whose problem is poverty?Educational Leadership, 65(7), 8-13.
38.
RuizdeVelascoJ.FixM. (2000). Overlooked & underserved: Immigrant students in U.S. secondary schools. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/pdfs/overlooked.pdf
39.
SlavinR. E.CalderónM. (Eds.). (2001). Effective programs for Latino students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
SwailW. S.CabreraA. F.LeeC. (2004). Latino youth and the pathway to college. The Pew Hispanic Center/USC Annenberg School for Communications. Washington, DC: Educational Policy Institute, Inc.
42.
SwailW. S.CabreraA. F.LeeC.WilliamsA. (2005). Latino students and the educational pipeline, part I: From middle school to the workforce: Latino students in the educational pipeline. Bethesda, MD: Educational Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.educationalpolicy.org
43.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1998). Talent and diversity: The emerging world of limited English proficient students in gifted education (Report No. ORAD 98–1100). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/PDFDocs/talentdiversity.pdf
44.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Ithaca, NY: SUNY Press.
45.
ValverdeL. A. (2006). Improving schools for Latinos: Creating better learning environments. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
46.
WainerA. (2004). The new Latino south and the challenge to public education. Los Angeles, CA: The Tomás Rivera Policy Institute.
47.
WalquiA. (2000a). Access and engagement: Program design and instructional approaches for immigrant students in secondary school. McHenry, IL: CAL/Delta Systems.
WeiR. C.Darling-HammondL.AdamsonF. (2010). Professional development in the United States: Trends and challenges. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council. Retrieved from http://www.nsdc.org/news/NSDCstudytechnicalreport2010.pdf
