All English language learners (ELLs) are to participate in an annual assessment of English language proficiency (ELP) under Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. This includes ELLs with disabilities, regardless of whether they are high-incidence disabilities (e.g., learning disability) or low-incidence disabilities (e.g., deaf or hard of hearing). This article summarizes findings from a national study of state ELP accommodation policies for ELLs with disabilities on these state assessments. It highlights the policy differences across states in the accommodations offered and also provides information on state-specific policies. Several recommendations based on the analysis are provided.
Abedi, J. (2006, April). Accommodations for English language learners that may alter the construct being measured. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association , San Francisco.
2.
Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C.H., & Lord, C. (2004). Assessment accommodations for English Language Learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 1-28
3.
Bolt, S.E., & Thurlow, M.L. (2004). Five of the most commonly allowed accommodations in state policy: Synthesis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 141-152.
4.
Center for Equity and Excellence in Education. ( 2005). Types of accommodations. Retrieved February 2, 2007, from http://ceee.gwu.edu/AA/Accommodations_Types.html#direct
5.
Chiu, C.W.T., & Pearson, P.D. (1999, June). Synthesizing the effects of test accommodations for special education and limited English proficiency students. Paper presented at the National Conference on Large Scale Assessment , Snowbird, UT. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 433 362)
6.
Clapper, A.T., Morse, A.B., Lazarus, S.S., Thompson, S.J., & Thurlow, M.L. (2005). 2003 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report No. 56) . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
7.
Elliott, J.L., & Thurlow, M.L. (2006). Improving test performance of students with disabilities on district and state assessments (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
8.
Francis, D.J., Rivera, M., Lesaux, N., Kieffer, M., & Rivera, H. (2006). Practical guidelines for the education of English language learners: RMC Research Corporation Research based recommendations for the use of accommodations in large-scale assessments. Portsmouth, NH: Center on Instruction. Retrieved March 30, 2007, from http://www.centeroninstruction.org/files/ELL3-Assessments.pdf
9.
Johnstone, C.J., Altman, J., Thurlow, M.L., & Thompson, S.J. (2006). A summary of research on the effects of test accommodations: 2002 through 2004 (Technical Report No. 45). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
10.
Koenig, J. A., & Bachman, L. F. (Eds.). (2004). Keeping score for all: The effects of inclusion and accommodation policies on large-scale educational assessments. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11.
Lazarus, S.S., Thurlow, M.L., Lail, K.E., Eisenbraun, K.D., & Kato, K. (2006). 2005 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report No. 64) . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
12.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects. (2006). Defining reading proficiency for accessible large-scale assessments: Some guiding principles and issues. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
13.
National Research Council. (2004). Factors that affect the accuracy of NAEP's estimates of achievement. In J. A. Koenig & L. F. Bachman (Eds.), Keeping score for all: The effects of inclusion and accommodation policies on large-scale educational assessments (pp. 62-84). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
14.
Rivera, C., & Collum, E. (Eds.). (2006). State assessment policy and practice for English language learners: A national perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Sireci S.G., Li, S., & Scarpati, S. (2003). The effects of test accommodations on test performance: A review of the literature (Center for Educations Assessment Research Report No. 485). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
16.
Sireci, S.G., Scarpati, S.E., & Li, S. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 457-490.
17.
Thompson, S., Blount, A., & Thurlow, M. (2002). A summary of research on the effects of test accommodations: 1999 through 2001 (Technical Report No. 34). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
18.
Thurlow, M.L., House, A., Boys, C., Scott, D., & Ysseldyke, J. (2000). State participation and accommodation policies for students with disabilities: 1999 update (Synthesis Report No. 33). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
19.
Thurlow, M.L., Lazarus, S., Thompson, S., & Robey, J. (2002). 2001 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations (Synthesis Report No. 46). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
20.
Tindal, G., & Fuchs, L. (2000). A summary of research on test changes: An empirical basis for defining accommodations. Lexington, KY: Mid-South Regional Resource Center.
21.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003, February). Non-regulatory guidance on the Title III state formula grant program, part II: Standards, assessments, and accountability, Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 . Washington, DC: Author, Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students.
22.
Zemisky, A.L., & Sireci, S. (in press). A summary of the research on the effects of test accommodations: 2005 through 2006 (synthesis report). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
