This study assesses the excellence gap by examining those who enroll in advanced, honors, and advanced placement (AP) classes among a low-income and a majority-Latinx population. Prospective longitudinal data come from a diverse, urban sample (N = 32,885) where 82.2% of the students received free or reduced price lunch. We examined numerous predictors (i.e., demographics, school readiness skills, prior academic competence) for eventual enrollment in an advanced course (middle school advanced, honors in middle and high school, and AP courses in high school) via multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results suggest that demographic factors (socioeconomic status, ethnicity, English-language learner status) often played a smaller role in advanced course enrollment after controlling for school-entry skills and prior academic competence with the exception of AP courses, where demographic effects persisted. Implications include targeted early intervention to get qualified students in poverty enrolled in academically advanced courses.
AlexanderK.CookM.McDillE. (1978). Curriculum tracking and educational stratification: Some further evidence. American Sociological Review, 43, 47–66.
2.
ArchbaldD.Farley-RippleE. N. (2012). Predictors of placement in lower level versus higher level high school mathematics. The High School Journal, 96, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2012.0014
3.
BeardJ. J.HsuJ.EwingM.GodfreyK. E. (2019). Studying the relationships between the number of APs, AP performance, and college outcomes. Educational Measurement, 38(4), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12295
4.
BecerraD. (2010). Differences in perceptions of barriers to college enrollment and the completion of a degree among Latinos in the United States. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 9(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192709359051
5.
BurneyV. H.BeilkeJ. R. (2008). The constraints of poverty on high achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 171–197. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2008-771
6.
BurnsK.EllegoodW. A.BernardBracy J. M.DuncanM.SweenyD. CII. (2019). Early college credit programs positively impact student success. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18801274
7.
BurtonN. W.WhitmanN. B.Yepes-BarayaM.ClineF.KimR. (2002). Minority student success: The role of teachers in Advanced Placement program courses. ETS Research Report Series, 2002, 1–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2002.tb01884.x
8.
CardD.GiulianoL. (2016). Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 13678–13683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605043113
9.
CarterP. L. (2005). Keepin it real: School success beyond Black and White. Oxford University Press.
10.
CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (2013). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give all children an even chance. Oxford University Press.
11.
ChajewskiM.MatternK. D.ShawE. J. (2011). Examining the role of advanced placement exam participation in 4-year college enrollment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00219.x
12.
CisnerosJ.Holloway-LibellJ.GomezL. M.CorleyK. M.PowersJ. M. (2014). The advanced placement opportunity gap in Arizona: Access, participation, and success. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 11, 20–33. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30093709
CongerD.LongM. C.IatarolaP. (2009). Explaining race, poverty, and gender disparities in advanced course-taking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20455
18.
CorraM.CarterS. J.CarterS. K. (2011). The interactive impact of race and gender on high school advanced course enrollment. Journal of Negro Education, 80, 33–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41341104
19.
CraneJ.MincicM.WinslerA. (2011). Parent-teacher agreement and reliability on the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA) in English and Spanish for ethnically diverse children in poverty. Early Education and Development, 22(3), 520–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2011.565722
20.
DaviesS.JanusM.DukuE.GaskinA. (2016). Using the Early Development Instrument to examine cognitive and non-cognitive school readiness and elementary student achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 35(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.10.002
21.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.. . . DuckworthK. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
22.
EdmundsJ. A.UnluF.FureyJ.GlennieE.ArshavskyN. (2020). What happends when you combine high school and college? The impact of the early college model on postsecondary performance and completion. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720912249
EvansB. J. (2019). How college students use Advanced Placement credit. American Education Research Jornal, 56(3), 925–954. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218807428
FlowersL. A. (2008). Racial differences in the impact of participating in Advanced Placement programs on educational and labor market outcomes. The Journal of Educational Foundations, 22(5), 121–132.
28.
FordD. Y. (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education problems and promises in recruitment and retention. Journal of Special Education, 32, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002246699803200102
29.
FordD. Y.HarmonD. A. (2001). Equity and excellence: Providing access to gifted education for culturally diverse students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 141–147.
30.
GamoranA.MareR. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality?American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146–1183.
31.
GrissomJ. A.ReddingC. (2016). Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858415622175
GutierrezR. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 357–364.
34.
HallettR. E.VenegasK. M. (2011). Is increased access enough? Advanced placement courses, quality, and success in low-income urban schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 468–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400305
35.
HébertT. P.ReisS. M. (1999). Culturally diverse high-achieving students in an urban high school. Urban Education, 34(4), 428–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085999344002
36.
HemphillF. C.VannemanA. (2011). Achievement gaps: How Hispanic and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the national assessment of educational progress. http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/studies/2011459.pdf
37.
HornL.KojakuL. K.CarrollC. D. (2001). High school academic curriculum and the persistence path through college persistence and transfer behavior of undergraduates 3 years after entering 4-year institutions. National Center for Education Statistics. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.446.4159&rep=rep1&type=pdf
38.
Jimenez-CastellanosO. (2008). Examining advanced placement program access and equity for low-income, Latino, and English language learners. Journal of the Association of Mexican American Educators, 2(1), 1–9.
39.
JimersonS. R.FergusonP. (2007). A longitudinal study of grade retention: Academic and behavioral outcomes of retained students through adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 314–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.314
40.
JonesJ.VanfossenB.EnsmingerM. (1995). Individual and organizational predictors of high school track placement. Sociology of Education, 68, 287–300.
LeBuffeP. A.NaglieriJ. A. (1999). Devereux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA). Kaplan Press.
45.
McBeeM. T. (2006). A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(2), 103–111. https://doi-org/10.4219/jsge-2006-686
MooreG. W.SlateJ. R. (2008). Who’s taking the advanced placement courses and how are they doing: A statewide two-year study. The High School Journal, 92, 56–67.
48.
MorrisE. W.PerryB. L. (2016). The punishment gap: School suspension and racial disparities in achievement. Social Problems, 63(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv026
NoltemeyerA. L.WardR. M.McloughlinC. (2015). Relationship between school suspension and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 44(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-14-0008.1
52.
OakesJ.GuitonG. (1995). Matchmaking: The dynamics of high school tracking decisions. American Education Research Journal, 32, 3–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032001003
53.
OatesG. L. (2009). An empirical test of five prominent explanations for the Black-White academic performance gap. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 12, 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-009-9091-5
54.
OhrtJ. H.LambieG. W.IevaK. P. (2009). Supporting Latino and African-American students in advanced placement courses: A school counseling program’s approach. Professional School Counseling, 13, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0901300104
55.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.CorwithS. (2017). Poverty, academic achievement, and giftedness: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738015
56.
PaganiL.TremblayR. E.VitaroF.BoulericeB.McDuffP. (2001). Effects of grade retention on academic performance and behavioral development. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579401002061
57.
PattersonB. F.PackmanS.KobrinJ. L. (2011). Advanced Placement® exam-taking and performance: Relationships with first-year subject area college grades (Research Report No. 2011-4). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561033.pdf
58.
PetersS. J.EngerrandK. G. (2016). Equity and excellence: Proactive efforts in the identification of underrepresented students for gifted and talented services. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216643165
59.
PetersS. J.GentryM.WhitingG. W.McBeeM. T. (2019). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833738
60.
PluckerJ. A.PetersS. J. (2016). Excellence gaps in education: Expanding opportunities for talented students. Harvard Education Press.
Promise. (2008). Dividing opportunities: Tracking in high school mathematics [Research Report]. http://www.promse.msu.edu/
66.
ReardonS. F. (2008). Differential growth in the Black-White achievement gap during elementary school among initially high- and low-scoring students (Working Paper No. 2008-7). Institute for Research on Education Policy & Practice. http://web.stanford.edu/group/cepa/workingpapers/WORKING_PAPER_2008_07.pdf
67.
ReardonS. F.PortillaX. A. (2016). Recent trends in income, racial, and ethnic school readiness gaps at kindergarten entry. Aera Open, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416657343
68.
RenbargerR.LongK. (2019). Interventions for postsecondary success for low-income and high-potential students: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1932202X19828744
69.
RicciardiC.Haag-WolfA.WinslerA. (2020). Factors associated with gifted identification for ethnically diverse children in poverty. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220937685
70.
RyanR. M.FauthR. C.Brooks-GunnJ. (2006). Childhood poverty: Implications for school readiness and early childhood education. In SpodekB.SarachoO. N. (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 323–346). Lawrence Erlbaum.
71.
SabolT. J.PiantaR. C. (2012). Patterns of school readiness forecast achievement and socioemotional development at the end of elementary school. Child Development, 83, 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01678.x
72.
SolórzanoD. G.OrnelasA. (2004). A critical race analysis of Latina/o and African American Advanced Placement enrollment in public high schools. The High School Journal, 87(3), 15–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40364293
Steenbergen-HuS.MakelM. C.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K-12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
75.
Steenbergen-HuS.MoonS. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210383155
76.
TaliaferroJ. D.DeCuir-GunbyJ. T. (2008). African American educators’ perspectives on the advanced placement opportunity gap. The Urban Review, 40, 164–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0066-6
77.
TaylorE. (2006). A critical race analysis of the achievement gap in the United States: Politics, reality, and hope. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500499025
78.
TaylorP. B.GunterP. L.SlateJ. R. (2001). Teachers’ perceptions of inappropriate student behavior as a function of teachers’ and students’ gender and ethnic background. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290102600206
79.
TenenbaumH. R.RuckM. D. (2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253
80.
TomlinsonC. A.JarvisJ. M. (2014). Case studies of success: Supporting academic success for students with high potential from ethnic minority and economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 191–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214540826
81.
TysonK.DarityW.JrCastellinoD. R. (2005). It’s not “a Black thing”: Understanding the burden of acting White and other dilemmas of high achievement. American Sociological Review, 70, 582–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000403
82.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). No child left behind: Expanding the advanced placement incentive program.
WakelynD., & National Governors Association Center. (2010). Raising rigor, getting results: Lesson learned from AP expansion. NGA Center for Best Practices. www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED507635.pdf
85.
WarneR. T.LarsenR.AndersonB.OdassoA. J. (2015). The impact of participation in the Advanced Placement program on students’ college admissions test scores. The Journal of Educational Research, 108, 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.917253
86.
WinslerA.TranH.HartmanS.MadiganA. L.ManfraL.BleikerC. (2008). School readiness gains made by ethnically-diverse children in poverty attending center-based childcare and public school pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.02.003
YonezawaS.WellsA. S.SernaI. (2002). Choosing tracks: “Freedom of choice” in detracking schools. American Education Research Journal, 39, 37–67. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039001037
89.
YoungJ. L.YoungJ. R.FordD. Y. (2017). Standing in the gaps: Examining the effects of early gifted education on Black girls’ achievement in STEM. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28, 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X17739549
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
