The study investigated the differential impact of sense of classroom community on effort in online versus face-to-face courses while controlling for potential effects of gender and team learning orientation. The interaction effects from ANOVA results suggested a gender difference across the two course delivery formats, with male students expending more effort than females in online courses while females put more energy than males in face-to-face courses. The hierarchical regression analyses results showed differential predictive patterns of student effort, with multiple predictors of student effort in face-to-face courses in contrast to a single value-interest predictor in online courses after controlling for individual differences. The results suggested the need of instructional differentiation of the two course delivery formats and the importance of enhancing the value and interest of online courses to promote student effort in distance education programs.
ArtinoA. R. (2008). Promoting academic motivation and self-regulation: Practical guidelines for online instructors. TechTrends, 52, 37-45.
2.
BerginD. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34, 87-98.
3.
BernardR. M.AbramiP. C.BorokhovskiE.WadeC. A.TamimR. M.SurkesM. A.BethelE. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243-1289.
4.
BlackA. E.DeciE. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.
5.
BookerK. C. (2008). The role of instructors and peers in establishing classroom community. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35, 12-16.
6.
ButtsE. A. (2000). Overcoming student resistance to group work. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 28, 80-83.
7.
CantwellR.AndrewsB. (2002). Cognitive and psychological factors underlying secondary school students’ feelings towards group work. Educational Psychology, 22, 75-90.
8.
CastagnettiC.RostiL. (2009). Effort allocation in tournaments: The effect of gender on academic performance in Italian universities. Economics of Education Review, 28, 357-369.
9.
ChanC. C. A. (2003). Examining the relationships between individual, team and organizational learning in an Australian hospital. Learning in Health and Social Care, 2, 223-235.
10.
ChoY.BangH.MathewS.BridgesS.WatsonA. (2010, April/May). An integrative approach for conceptualizing “sense of classroom community” among college students. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
11.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
12.
DanielJ.MarquisC. (1979). Interaction and independence: Getting the mixture right. Teaching at a Distance, 15, 25-44.
13.
DriskellJ. E.SalasE. (1992). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors, 34, 277-288.
14.
FulfordC. P.ZhangS. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21.
15.
GorsuchR. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
GravesL. N. (1992). Cooperative learning communities: Context for a new vision of education and society. Journal of Education, 174, 57-79.
17.
HeckertT. M.LatierA.Ringwald-BurtonA.DrazenC. (2006). Relations among student effort, perceived class difficulty appropriateness, and student evaluations of teaching: Is it possible to “buy” better evaluations through lenient grading?College Student Journal, 40, 588-596.
18.
KeeganD. (1986). The foundations of distance education. London, England: Croom Helm.
19.
KreijnsK.KirschnerP.JochemsW. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353.
20.
McCreaS. M.HirtE. R.MilnerB. J. (2008). She works hard for the money: Valuing effort underlies gender differences in behavioral self-handicapping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 292-311.
21.
McMillanD. W.ChavisD. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
22.
MolinariD. L. (2004). The role of social comments in problem-solving groups in an online class. American Journal of Distance Education, 18, 89-101.
23.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
24.
OliverK.KelloggS.TownsendL.BradyK. (2010). Needs of elementary and middle school teachers developing online courses for a virtual school. Distance Education, 31, 55-75.
25.
OstermanK. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70, 323-367.
26.
PalloffR. M.PrattK. (2000, October). Making the transition: Helping teachers to teach online. Paper presented at EDUCAUSE: Thinking it through, Nashville, TN.
27.
PigliapocoE.BoglioloA. (2008). The effects of psychological sense of community in online and face-to-face academic courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 3, 60-69. Available from http://www.i-jet.org
28.
PoropatA. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322-338.
29.
RamamoorthyN.CarrollS. (1998). Individualism/collectivism orientations and reactions toward alternative human resource management practices. Human Relations, 51, 571-588.
30.
ReeveJ. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal, 106, 225-236.
31.
ReeveJ.JangH.CarrellD.JeonS.BurchJ. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147-169.
32.
ReioT. G.Jr.MarcusR. F.Sanders-ReioJ. (2009). Contribution of student and instructor relationships and attachment style in school completion. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 170, 53-71.
33.
RogersA.SpitzmuellerC. (2009). Individualism-collectivism and the role of goal orientation in organizational training. International Journal of Training and Development, 13, 185-201.
34.
RovaiA. P. (2002). A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6, 41-56.
35.
RyanR. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.
36.
SaderaW. A.RobertsonJ.SongL.MidonM. N. (2009). The role of community in online learning success. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5, 277-284.
37.
SagorR. (2002). Lessons from skateboarders. Educational Leadership, 60, 34-38.
38.
SanchezB.ColonY.EsparzaP. (2005). The role of sense of school belonging and gender in the academic adjustment of Latino adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 619-628.
39.
SappD. A.SimonJ. (2005). Comparing grades in online and face-to-face writing courses: Interpersonal accountability and institutional commitment. Computers and Composition, 22, 471-489.
40.
SchunkD. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
SlavinR. E. (1994). Using student team learning (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Team Learning Project.
42.
StetsenkoA.LittleT. D.GordeevaT.GrasshofM.OettingenG. (2000). Gender effects in children’s beliefs about school performance: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 71, 517-527.
43.
StevensJ. P. (2001). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
StrikeK. A. (2004). Community, the missing element of school reform: Why schools should be more like congregations than banks. American Journal of Education, 110, 215-232.
45.
ThompsonD.AnitsalI.BarrettH. (2008). Attitudes toward teamwork in higher education: A comparative study of religiously affiliated universities and secular-based universities. Proceedings of the Academy of Educational Leadership, 15, 147-158.
46.
VoletS. E. (1997). Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students’ goals. Learning and Instruction, 7, 235-254.
47.
WagnerJ. A. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects of cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152-172.
48.
WangQ.WooH. L. (2007). Comparing asynchronous online discussions and face-to-face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 272-286.
49.
WardC.GarrettS.MarshW. (2006). Does instructor presence in the classroom influence examination scores in a therapeutics course delivered via interactive video-conferencing technology?Pharmacy Education, 6, 119-123.
50.
WestheimerJ.KahneJ. (1993). Building school communities: An experience based model. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 324-328.
51.
WightingM. J. (2006). Effects of computer use on high school students’ sense of community. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 371-379.
