This study examines how the opposition was portrayed in Republic TV's prime-time debates during India's 2019 parliamentary elections. While prior research has documented the channel's ideological alignment with the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), this study analyzes the substance of partisan bias through portrayals of the opposition during this pivotal electoral moment. Drawing on thematic analysis of seven debates selected via constructedweek sampling, the study identifies seven dominant themes: Challenges to National Allegiance, Communal Politics and Religious Alignment, Scrutiny of Democratic Integrity, Election Campaign Criticism, Ethical Challenges and Behavior, Opposition Alliance Instability, and Financial Misconduct. Each theme contains subthemes that further delineate these portrayals. A frequency analysis maps their distribution across speakers, revealing systematic alignment between the anchor and ruling-party-affiliated panelists. The findings highlight Republic TV's role in constructing a delegitimizing discourse and raise concerns about partisan media ecosystems and editorial coordination in India's election coverage.
AgarwalA.PriyadarshiP.SinhaS.GuptaS.JangraH.KumaraguruP.GarimellaK. (2024). Television discourse decoded: Comprehensive multimodal analytics at scale. Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 4752–4763). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671532
2.
BailC. A. (2016). Combining natural language processing and network analysis to examine how advocacy organizations stimulate conversation on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(42), 11823–11828. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607151113
3.
BecerrilM. E. A. (2020). Screening Hindutva: Religion and television in India. In RayA.Banerjee-DubeI. (Eds.), Nation, nationalism and the public sphere: Religious politics in India (pp. 214–238). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9789354791475.n11
4.
BehlN. (2022). India’s farmers’ protest: An inclusive vision of Indian democracy. American Political Science Review, 116(3), 1141–1146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000156
5.
BhatP. (2023). Hindu-nationalism and media: Anti-press sentiments by right-wing media in India. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 25(4), 296–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/15226379231201455
6.
BhatP.ChadhaK. (2023). Expanding public debate? Examining the impact of India’s top English language political talk shows. Media Asia, 50(2), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2022.2140953
7.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.
CappellaJ. N.JamiesonK. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford University Press.
10.
CavgiasA.CorbiR.MeloniL.NovaesL. M. (2023). Media manipulation in young democracies: Evidence from the 1989 Brazilian presidential election. Comparative Political Studies, 57(2), 221–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231169027
11.
ChadhaK. (2017). The Indian news media industry: Structural trends and journalistic implications. Global Media and Communication, 13(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766517704674
12.
ChakravarttyP.RoyS. (2015). Mr. Modi goes to Delhi: Mediated populism and the 2014 Indian elections. Television & New Media, 16(4), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415573957
13.
ChattopadhyayP. (2022). Whose communication is it anyway? Analysing sociopolitical debates in Indian tele-media. In KumarS. (Ed.), Political communication in contemporary India (pp. 153–161). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003159995
14.
ChauliaS. (2017). India aims for global soft-power clout via Republic TV [Reprint]. Today Online. Jindal Global University Repository. https://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/4201/
15.
ChenY.SherrenK.SmitM.LeeK. Y. (2023). Using social media images as data in social science research. New Media & Society, 25(4), 849–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211038761
16.
ConnollyE. A. (2024). An innovative methodological approach to analysing social media movements. International Journal of Social Media and Online Communities, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsmoc.342847
de SouzaR.HussainS. A. (2023). “Howdy Modi!”: Mediatization, Hindutva, and long distance ethnonationalism. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 16(2), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2021.1987505
DrabuO. (2018). Who is the Muslim? Discursive representations of the Muslims and Islam in Indian prime-time news. Religions, 9(9), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9090283
EntmanR. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176
FieldsE. E. (1988). Qualitative content analysis of television news: Systematic techniques. Qualitative Sociology, 11(3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988954
27.
FuJ.ZhouC.LiW.LiC.LiuJ.DengS.ZhangY.GuoZ.WuY. (2022). Methods for analyzing the contents of social media for health care: Scoping review [Preprint]. JMIR Preprints. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.43349
28.
GarimellaK.DattaA. (2024). Unraveling the dynamics of television debates and social media engagement: Insights from an Indian news show. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 18, 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31325
29.
GidengilE.EverittJ. (2003). Talking tough: Gender and reported speech in campaign news coverage. Political Communication, 20(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390218869
30.
GlückA. (2021). Replacing the public with customers: How emotions define today’s broadcast journalism markets. A comparative study between television journalists in the UK and India. Journalism Studies, 22(12), 1682–1700. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2021.1977166
31.
GrauS. L.KleiserS. B.BrightL. F. (2019). Exploring social media addiction among student millennials. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 22(2), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-02-2017-0058
32.
HaiderA. S. (2017). Frequency analysis as a way of uncovering news foci: Evidence from The Guardian and The New York Times. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n2p1
33.
HallinD. C. (2000). Media, political power, and democratization in Mexico. In CurranJ.ParkM. (Eds.), De-Westernizing media studies (pp. 97–110). Routledge.
34.
HallinD. C.ManciniP. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
35.
He HesterJ. B.DougallE. (2007). The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 811–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400410
IyengarS.KinderD. R. (2010). News that matters: Television and American opinion (eBook ed.). University of Chicago Press.
39.
JacksonR. A.HeathB. L. (2023). Small businesses can enhance strategic insights by text mining organizational writings. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 13(8), 818–840. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2023.138046
JonesK.GlynnM. S. (2019). How children use social media for brand interactions. Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, 20(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2018-0860
JungS.-Y.KimJ. (2024). The experience of good mentoring focused on overcoming turnover intention among millennial nurses. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, Article 1288829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1288829
KenezS.O’HalloranP.LiamputtongP. (2015). The portrayal of mental health in Australian daily newspapers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39(6), 513–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12441
KumarA. (2023). Primetime nationalism: Analysing monologues on India’s Republic TV and Times Now during Indo-China border conflict. Journalism Studies, 24(12), 1518–1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2230306
49.
KumarA.ThussuD. K. (2024). Primetime narratives on Russia–Ukraine conflict on India’s Republic TV. International Communication Gazette, 86(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485231220143
50.
KumarR. (2020). An analysis of the 2019 Indian general election: Transition in political landscape and its implications. Asian Review (아시아리뷰), 9(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.24987/SNUACAR.2020.02.9.2.131
51.
LacyS.RiffeD.StoddardS.MartinH.ChangK.-K. (2001). Sample size for newspaper content analysis in multi-year studies. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 836–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800414
52.
LandowskaA.BudzynskaK.ZhangH. (2024). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of moral foundations in argumentation. Argumentation, 38, 405–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-024-09636-x
53.
LawrenceR. G. (2000). Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication, 17(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846000198422
54.
MaierJ. (2022). What factors explain the broadcasting of televised election debates? Empirical evidence from Germany. European Journal of Communication, 38(3), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231221123201
55.
McChesneyR. W. (2004). The problem of the media: U. S. communication politics in the twenty-first century. Monthly Review Press.
56.
McCombsM. (2002, June). The agenda-setting role of the mass media in the shaping of public opinion. Paper presented at the Mass Media Economics 2002 Conference, London School of Economics. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/extra/McCombs.pdf
57.
MishraN. (2018). Broadcast media, mediated noise, and discursive violence—high decibel TV debates and the interrupted public sphere. KOME, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.17646/kome.2018.11
58.
MudgalV. (2015). Framing the 2014 elections: The curious absence of development. Television & New Media, 16(4), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415575907
59.
MuiseD.HosseinmardiH.HowlandB.MobiusM.RothschildD.WattsD. J. (2022). Quantifying partisan news diets in web and TV audiences. Science Advances, 8(28), eabn0083. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn0083
NowellL.NorrisJ. M.WhiteD.MoulesN. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
63.
OhmB. (2014). Contesting interpretational authority: Democracy and fascism in the Indian ‘empowered public’. Media International Australia, 152(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1415200113
64.
PalshikarS.SuriK. C. (2014). India’s 2014 Lok Sabha elections: Critical shifts in the long term, caution in the short term. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(39), 39–49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24480733
65.
PattersonT. E. (2013). Informing the news: The need for knowledge-based journalism. Vintage.
66.
RajagopalA. (2001). Politics after television: Hindu nationalism and the reshaping of the public in India. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489051
67.
RanganathanM. (2014). Indian Elections, 2014: Commercial media pushes social media into focus. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 24(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X14539073
68.
RiffeD.AustC. F.LacyS. R. (1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000115
69.
RobertsK.DowellA.NieJ.-B. (2019). Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data: A case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y
70.
RudgeA.FoleyK.LunnayB.MillerE. R.BatchelorS.WardP. (2021). How are the links between alcohol consumption and breast cancer portrayed in Australian newspapers? A paired thematic and framing media analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7657. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147657
71.
ScheufeleD. A.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
72.
SemetkoH. A.ValkenburgP. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
SinghG. (2019). Hindu nationalism in power: Making sense of Modi and the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance government, 2014–19. Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory, 15(3–4), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448727.2019.1630220
SmithM. J.BucktonC. H.PattersonC.HiltonS. (2023). User-generated content and influencer marketing involving e-cigarettes on social media: A scoping review and content analysis of YouTube and Instagram. BMC Public Health, 23(1), Article 15389. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15389-1
77.
SnelsonC. (2016). Qualitative and mixed methods social media research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), Article 1609406915624574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915624574
StrömbäckJ. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097
80.
StrömbäckJ.KaidL. L. (2008). The handbook of election news coverage around the world. Routledge.
81.
SubhajitP.PeguU. K. (2021). Media polarization and assertion of majoritarianism in Indian news media. The Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18848/2470-9247/CGP/v06i02/1-12
82.
ThompsonJ. B. (2013). Political scandal: Power and visibility in the media age. Polity Press.
ThussuD. K. (2019). Internationalizing media studies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
85.
TurkenburgE.GoovaertsI. (2022). Food for thought: A longitudinal investigation of reflection-promoting speech in televised election debates (1985–2019). Political Studies, 72(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221090102
86.
VermaR. (2024). Media exposure, vote choice, and polarization in Indian politics. In WallaceP.RoyR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Indian politics (pp. 157–176). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198894261.013.12
87.
WaldvogelT.WagschalU.MetzT.BeckerB. W.FeitenL.WeishauptS. (2021). Assessing the impact of party identification in transnational election campaigns: Evidence from the 2019 European parliament election. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 17(3), Article 1129. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i3.1129
