News Coverage of the Nile Dam Crisis in Chinese,Qatari and British Media: Exploring Proximity to Egypt and Ethiopia as a Framing Influence on CGTN,AJE and BBC's Reporting
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2024
News Coverage of the Nile Dam Crisis in Chinese,Qatari and British Media: Exploring Proximity to Egypt and Ethiopia as a Framing Influence on CGTN,AJE and BBC's Reporting
Academic literature points to proximity, including geographic, political, economic, and cultural, as a key news value that influences media attention, sourcing, and visual framing across conflicts. Focusing on the prolonged Nile Dam crisis that has put Egypt and Ethiopia on the verge of military conflict, the study uses quantitative and qualitative content analyses to explore how China, Qatar and the UK's proximity to Egypt and Ethiopia relates to the framing of the conflict in China Global Television Network (CGTN), Al Jazeera English (AJE), and British Broadcasting Corporation's (BBC) English-language news articles and photographs online in 2019-2021. While proximity factored in AJE's more frequent coverage of the dispute, the study reveals how media systems and dependency on news agencies can mitigate proximity's impact on coverage and how temporary political tensions and economic aspirations can prompt more favorable reporting of the least culturally, linguistically, geographically, economically, and/or politically proximate country.
About Us: A Truly Global Network. (n.d.). Al Jazeera Media Network. Retrieved June 6, 2022, fromhttps://careers.aljazeera.net/about-us/#:∼:text=AlJazeera is a place,talented%2C creative and spirited people
2.
AdegbolaO.GearhartS.ChoJ. (2022). Reporting bias in coverage of Iran protests by global news agencies. International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220966948
ArafatY. (2021). Framing of international conflict victims: Political proximity vs religious proximity. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(I), 680–689. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2021(5-i)51
5.
BarkhoL. (2007). Unpacking the discursive and social links in BBC, CNN and Al-Jazeera’s Middle East reporting. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 1(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.1.1.11_1
6.
BarkhoL. (2011). The role of internal guidelines in shaping news narratives: Ethnographic insights into the discursive rhetoric of Middle East reporting by the BBC and Al-Jazeera English. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2011.601642
7.
BashriM.NetzleyS.GreinerA. M. Y. (2012). Facebook revolutions: Transitions in the Arab world, transitions in media coverage ? A comparative analysis of CNN and Al Jazeera English’s online coverage of the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. Journal of Arab and Muslim Research, 5(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.5.1.19
BrantnerC.LobingerK.WetzsteinI. (2011). Effects of visual framing on emotional responses and evaluations of news stories about the Gaza conflict 2009. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(3), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800304
CacciatoreM. A.ScheufeleD. A.IyengarS. (2016). The End of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
DamanhouryK. E.Garud-paktarN. (2021). Soft power journalism : A visual framing analysis of COVID-19 on Xinhua and VOA ‘ s Instagram pages soft power journalism : A visual framing analysis of COVID-19 on Xinhua and VOA ‘ s Instagram pages. Digital Journalism, 10(9), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1957969
14.
DowneyR.JohnsonE.BrewerB. (2013). Through the lens: Visual framing of the Japan tsunami in U.S., British, and Chinese online media. International Symposium On Online Journalism, 3(1), 61–75.
El DamanhouryK.SalehF. (2017). Is it the same fight? Comparative analysis of CNN and Al Jazeera America’s online coverage of the 2014 Gaza war. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 10(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.10.1.85_1
EntmanR. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the white house’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176
21.
EntmanR. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.
22.
EntmanR. M. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. Case. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208314657
FahmyS.EakinB. (2014). High drama on the high seas: Peace versus war journalism framing of an Israeli/Palestinian-related incident. International Communication Gazette, 76(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513504046
26.
FahmyS.NeumannR. (2012). Shooting war or peace photographs? An examination of newswires’ coverage of the conflict in Gaza (2008-2009). American Behavioral Scientist, 56(2), NP1–NP26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211419355
27.
FrensleyN.MichaudN. (2006). Public diplomacy and motivated reasoning: Framing effects on Canadian media coverage of US foreign policy statements. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2(3), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00027.x
28.
FriedmanE.Herfroy-MischlerA. (2020). The media framing of blame agency in asymmetric conflict: Who is blaming whom for the 2014 Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations failure?Journalism Studies, 21(13), 1873–1892. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1797526
29.
GalalE. (2021). Qatar: A small country with a global outlook. In RitcherC.KozmanC. (Eds.), Arab Media systems (pp. 127–144). Open Book Publishers.
30.
GalanderM. M. (2012). News values, cultural proximity and cross-cultural media framing: How western and Muslim media covered Darfur. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 5(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.5.2.113_1
31.
GaltungJ.RugeM. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336500200104
32.
Garud-paktarN. (2022). Mediated Public Diplomacy: Frame-building Contest Between the United States and Pakistan During a Conflict. International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208817221085461
33.
GibsonR.ZillmannD. (2000). Reading between the photographs: The influence of incidental pictorial information on issue perception. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700209
34.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northeastern University Press.
35.
GoffmanE. (1979). Gender and Advertisements. Macmillan.
36.
GoodmanG. (2016). Local repercussions’: The impact of staff ‘bias’ and market ‘sensitivity’ on reuters coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict, 1967-73. International History Review, 38(3), 440–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2015.1046389
37.
GrbichC. (2007). Qualitative Data Analysis: An introduction. Sage Publications.
38.
GreenM. C.DillK. E. (2013). Engaging with stories and characters: Learning, persuasion, and transportation into narrative worlds. In DillK. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of media psychology (pp. 449–461). Oxford University Press.
39.
GreenwoodK.JenkinsJ. (2013). Visual framing of the Syrian conflict in news and public affairs magazines. Journalism Studies, 16(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.865969
HorvitB. (2006). International news agencies and the war debate of 2003. International Communication Gazette, 68(5–6), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048506068722
43.
HuangY.FahmyS. (2011). Same events, two stories: Comparing the photographic coverage of the 2008 anti-China/olympics demonstrations in Chinese and US newspapers. International Communication Gazette, 73(8), 732–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048511420091
44.
HuangY.FahmyS. (2013). Picturing a journey of protest or a journey of harmony? Comparing the visual framing of the 2008 Olympic torch relay in the US versus the Chinese press. Media, War & Conflict, 6(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635213495601
InglehartR.HaerpferC.MorenoA.WelzelC.KizilovaK.Diez-MedranoJ.LagosM.NorrisP.PonarinE.PuranenB. (2022). World Values Survey: All Rounds - Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.17.
47.
JangW. Y.HongJ.FrederickE. (2015). The framing of the North Korean six-party talks by Chinese and North Korean news agencies: Communist propaganda and national interests. Media International Australia, 154(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878(1515400107
48.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2) 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
49.
KeithS.SchwalbeC. B.SilcockB. W. (2009). Visualizing cross-media coverage: Picturing war across platforms during the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870802494941
50.
KeithS.SchwalbeC. B.SilcockB. W. (2010). Comparing war images across media platforms: Methodological challenges for content analysis. Media, War and Conflict, 3(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635210353676
51.
KnoblochS.HastallM.ZillmannD.CallisonC. (2003). Imagery effects on the selective reading of internet newsmagazines. Communication Research, 30(February), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202239023
52.
LeeH.LeeY. A.ParkS. A.WillisE.CameronG. T. (2013). What are Americans seeing? Examining the message frames of local television health news stories. Health Communication, 28(8), 846–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.743842
ManningP. (2001). News and news sources: A critical introduction. Sage.
55.
MaozZ.KupermanR. D.TerrisL.TalmudI. (2006). Structural equivalence and international conflict: A social networks analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 664–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002706291053
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
MessarisP.AbrahamL. (2001). The role of images in framing news stories. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 215–226). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MillerA.RobertsS. (2010). Visual agenda-setting & proximity after Hurricane Katrina: A study of those closest to the event. Visual Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551390903553697
MitchellT. (1994). Picture Theory: essays on verbal and visual representation. University of Chicago Press.
64.
ParryK. (2010). A visual framing analsis of British press photography druing the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. Media, War & Conflict, 3(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635210353679
65.
ParryK. (2011). Images of liberation? Visual framing, humanitarianism and British press photography during the 2003 Iraq invasion. Media, Culture & Society, 33(8), 1185–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711418274
66.
PatridgeL. (2005). A visual and textual framing analysis of terrorism: The case of Beslan, Russia. Iowa State University.
67.
PetleyJ. (2011). Rules, recycling, filters and conspiracies. In FranklinB.CarlsonM. (Eds.), Journalists, sources, and credibility (pp. 87–101). Routlege.
68.
PhillipsA. (2015). Journalism in Context. Routledge.
QureshiH. A.ÜnlüZ. (2020). Beyond the paradigm conflicts: A four-step coding instrument for grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920928188
71.
ReichZ. (2011). Source credibility as a journalistic work tool. In FranklinB.CarlsonM. (Eds.), Journalists, sources, and credibility (pp. 19–36). Routledge.
SaleemM.AndersonC. a. (2012). Arabs as terrorists: Effects of stereotypes within violent contexts on attitudes, perceptions, and affect. Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030038
74.
ScheufeleD. A.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326.x
75.
SchwalbeC. B.SilcockB. W.KeithS. (2008). Visual framing of the early weeks of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq: Applying the master war narrative to electronic and print images. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3), 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802205702
76.
SheaferT.GabayI. (2009). Mediated public diplomacy: A strategic contest over international agenda building and frame building. Political Communication, 26(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600903297240
77.
SheaferT.ShenhavS. R.AmsalemE. (2018). International frame building in mediated public diplomacy. In D’AngeloP. (Ed.), Doing news framing analysis II: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 249–273). Routledge.
78.
SheaferT.ShenhavS. R.TakensJ.van AtteveldtW. (2014). Relative political and value proximity in mediated public diplomacy: The effect of state-level homophily on international frame building. Political Communication, 31(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.799107
79.
SherifM. (1967). Social interaction: Process and products. Aldine.
80.
SiebertF. S.PetersonT.SchrammW. (1956). Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and Soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do. University of Illinois Press.
81.
SnowD. A.VliegenthartR.Corrigall-BrownC. (2007). Framing the French riots: A comparative study of frame variation. Social Forces, 86(2), 385–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/86.2.385
SuiM.DunawayJ.SobekD.AbadA.GoodmanL.SahaP. (2017). U.S. News coverage of global terrorist incidents. Mass Communication and Society, 20(6), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1350716
TankardJ. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. In SeverinW. J.TankardJ. W. (Eds.), Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media (pp. 95–106). Pearson College Division.
88.
WuH. D. (2000). Systemic determinants of international news coverage: A comparison of 38 countries. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/50.2.110
89.
YangL.ChenH. (2019). Framing terrorist attacks: A multi-proximity model. International Communication Gazette, 81(5), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518802245
90.
ZillmannD.KnoblochS.YuH. S. (2001). Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychology, 3(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0304_01
