The Onion is a satirical news site that has been growing in popularity over the last two decades. Based on theories in affect and social sharing, the current studies examined the impact of this online satirical news to understand its impact on affective states and online sharing. In Study 1, participants (N = 147) either viewed a satirical or serious (frame) news story and then were asked about affective states and sharing behaviors. In Study 2, participants (N = 143) viewed one of the two frames but on Instagram. In Study 1, results showed that serious news stories increased both positive and negative affect. Only positive affect mediated the relationship between frame and sharing. In Study 2, results showed that satirical Instagram posts were positively associated with negative affect, which mediated the relationship between frame and sharing. This study shows the important implications of online satirical news and illuminates how different platforms can affect audiences.
BaumgartnerJ.MorrisJ. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341–367.
2.
BaymG. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22, 259–276. doi:10.1080/10584600591006492
3.
BeckettC.DeuzeM. (2016). On the role of emotion in the future of journalism. Social Media + Society, 2. doi:10.1177/2056305116662395
4.
BergerJ.MilkmanK. L. (2012). What makes online content viral?Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 192–205. doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0353
5.
BerkowitzD.SchwartzD. A. (2016). Miley, CNN and The Onion. Journalism Practice, 10, 1–17. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1006933
ErmidaI. (2012). News satire in the press: Linguistic construction of humour in spoof news articles. In ChovanecJ.ErmidaI. (Eds.), Language and humour in the media. Newcastle, England: Cambridge Scholars.
10.
FifeJ. (2016). Peeling The Onion: Satire and the complexity of audience response. Rhetoric Review, 35, 322–334. doi:10.1080/07350198.2016.1215000
11.
GrayJ.JonesJ. P.ThompsonE. (2009). Satire TV: Politics and comedy in the post-network era. New York: NYU Press.
12.
GuadagnoR. E.RempalaD. M.MurphyS.OkdieB. M. (2013). What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2312–2319. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.016
13.
HarberK. D.CohenD. J. (2005). The emotional broadcaster theory of social sharing. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 382–400. doi:10.1177/0261927X05281426
14.
HartR. P.HarteliusE. J. (2007). The political sins of Jon Stewart. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24, 263–272. doi:10.1080/07393180701520991
15.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
KimH. S. (2015). Attracting views and going viral: How message features and news-sharing channels affect health news diffusion. Journal of Communication, 65, 512–534. doi:10.1111/jcom.12160
18.
LandrevilleK. D. (2015). Satire as uncertain territory: Uncertainty expression in discussion about political satire, opinion, and news. Humor, 28, 559–582.
19.
LeeA. M. (2013). News audiences revisited: Theorizing the link between audience motivations and news consumption. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 57, 300–317. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.816712
20.
LeeH.KwakN. (2014). The affect effect of political satire: Sarcastic humor, negative emotions, and political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 307–328. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.891133
21.
MartinR. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
NivenD. (2005). An economic theory of political journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 247–263. doi:10.1177/107769900508200202
24.
PanttiM. (2010). The value of emotion: An examination of television journalists’ notions on emotionality. European Journal of Communication, 25, 168–181. doi:10.1177/0267323110363653
25.
PattersonT. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good: How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy—and what news outlets can do about it.
Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
ReillyI. (2012). Satirical fake news and/as American political discourse. The Journal of American Culture, 35, 258–275. doi:10.1111/j.1542-734X.2012.00812.x
RiméB. (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1, 60–85. doi:10.1177/1754073908097189
32.
RiméB.FinkenauerC.LuminetO.ZechE.PhilippotP. (1998). Social sharing of emotion: New evidence and new questions. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 145–189. doi:10.1080/14792779843000072
33.
RubinV. L.ConroyN. J.ChenY.CornwellS. (2016). Fake news or truth? Using Satirical cues to detect potentially misleading news. In NAACL-HLT (pp. 7–17). doi:10.18653/v1/W16-0802
34.
SchudsonM. (2011). The sociology of news. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
35.
SheagleyG.O’LoughlinP. L.LindbergT. (2008). New humor, old school style: A content analysis of the political cues offered by The Onion on the 2000 and 2004 elections. In BaumgartnerJ. C.MorrisJ. S. (Eds.), Laughing matters: Humor and American politics in the media age (pp. 81–96). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
ShoemakerP. J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the surveillance function. Journal of Communication, 46, 32–47. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01487.x
37.
SimpsonP. (2003). On the discourse of satire. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
StroudN. J.MuddimanA. (2013). Selective exposure, tolerance, and satirical news. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 271–290. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt013
TsfatiY. (2010). Online news exposure and trust in the mainstream media: Exploring possible associations. American Behavioral Scientist, 54, 22–42. doi:10.1177/0002764210376309
42.
WaisanenD. J. (2011). Crafting hyperreal spaces for comic insights: The Onion news network’s ironic iconicity. Communication Quarterly, 59, 508–528. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.615690
43.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
44.
WeissJ. (2015, December6). Mass shootings in the U.S. this year? 353—or 4, depending on your definition. Dallas Morning News.
45.
WennerK. S. (2002). Peeling the Onion. American Journalism Review, 24, 49–55.
