Although the public regularly attempts to interact with reporters on Twitter, it is not clear to what extent reporters at various types of news outlets engage with citizens, politicians, and other users on the microblog. To find out, a content analysis was conducted on 4,500 tweets during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign from political reporters at TV networks/cable news, online-only news websites, and large newspapers. Findings indicate significant differences in Twitter interactivity by news outlet type, with TV political reporters most likely to interact with politicians and online-only political reporters most likely to interact with citizens. However, interactivity was generally low except with fellow journalists, which supports the normalization hypothesis.
ArmstrongC. L.GaoF. (2010). Now tweet this: How news organizations use Twitter. Electronic News, 4, 218–235.
2.
Barzilai-NahonK. (2011). Gatekeeping: A critical review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43, 1–79.
3.
BroersmaM.GrahamT. (2012). Social media as beat: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice, 6, 403–419.
4.
ChungD. (2007). Profits and perils: Online news producers’ perceptions of interactivity and uses of interactive features. Convergence, 13, 43–61.
5.
DomingoD. (2008). Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: Dealing with an uncomfortable myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 680–704.
6.
GleasonS. (2010). Harnessing social media. American Journalism Review, 32, 6–7.
7.
Herrera-DamasS.HermidaA. (2014). Tweeting but not talking: The missing element in talk radio’s institutional use of Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 481–500.
8.
KiousisS. (2002). Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media & Society, 4, 355–383.
9.
LarssonA. O. (2012). Interactivity on Swedish newspaper websites: What kind, how much and why?Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18, 195–213.
10.
LasorsaD. L.LewisS. C.HoltonA. E. (2012). Normalizing twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies, 13, 19–36.
11.
LawrenceR. G.MolyneuxL.CoddingtonM.HoltonA. (2014). Tweeting conventions: Political journalists’ use of Twitter to cover the 2012 presidential campaign. Journalism Studies, 15, 789–806.
12.
MarchionniD. M. (2013). Journalism-as-a-conversation: A concept explication. Communication Theory, 23, 131–147.
13.
McMillanS. (2002). A four-part model of cyber-interactivity. New Media & Society, 14, 271–291.
14.
MitchelsteinE.BoczkowskiP. (2009). Between tradition and change: A review of recent research on online news production. Journalism, 10, 562–586.
15.
NewhagenJ.NassC. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspaper and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 277–284.
ParmeleeJ. H. (2013). Political journalists and Twitter: Influences on norms and practices. Journal of Media Practice, 14, 291–305.
18.
ParmeleeJ. H.DeeleyD. (2017). Florida political reporters interact rarely online. Newspaper Research Journal, 38, 104–118.
19.
ParmeleeJ. H.RomanN.BeasleyB.PerkinsS. C. (in press). Gender and generational differences in political reporters’ interactivity on Twitter. Journalism Studies.
RussellF. M.HendricksM. A.ChoiH.StephensE. C. (2015). Who sets the news agenda on Twitter?Digital Journalism, 3, 925–943.
22.
SchultzB.ShefferM. L. (2010). An exploratory study of how Twitter is affecting sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 226–239.
23.
SeibP. (2002). Going live: Getting the news right in a real-time online world. Oxford, England: Rowman and Littlefield.
24.
SingerJ. (2005). The political J-blogger: “Normalizing” a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism, 6, 173–198.
XuW. W.FengM. (2014). Talking to the broadcasters on Twitter: Networked gatekeeping in Twitter conversations with journalists. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 420–437.
