#Kanhaiya: Exploring Indian journalists’ use of Twitter to share developing news and audience engagement with different types of tweets

Abstract

This exploratory study examined the twitter feeds of ten senior Indian journalists during a specific event of national importance to understand what type of tweets led to greater follower engagement. Further, we examined how followers engaged with congruent and incongruent messages. Analysis of tweets about a specific developing event – the arrest and release of a student activist – indicated that journalists largely tweeted opinions, and that this type of tweet attracted more follower engagement than purely factual tweets. Analysis of each editor’s most commented upon tweets indicated that followers showed a higher level of engagement with incongruent messages than with messages with which they agreed. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.

Keywords

Content analysis framing India journalism selective exposure Twitter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali

(2014) Social Media Played Big Role in India’s Election. Available at: https://www.voanews.com/silicon-valley-technology/social-media-played-big-role-indias-election. (accessed 6 December 2020).

Althaus

Tewksbury

(2002) Agenda setting and the ‘new’ news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research 29(2): 180–207.

Archambault

Grudin

(2012). A longitudinal study of facebook, linkedin, & twitter use. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Austin, TX, 5–10 May, pp.2741–2750. Austin, TX: ACM Digital Library.

Bakker

De Vreese

(2011) Good news for the future? Young people, internet use and political participation. Communication Research 38(4): 451–470.

Bandura

(2001) Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology 3(3): 265–299.

BBC.com (2016). India JNU student leader Kanhaiya Kumar freed on bail. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-35718127.

Belair-Gagnon

Mishra

Agur

(2014). Reconstructing the Indian public sphere: Newswork and social media in the Delhi gang rape case. Journalism 15(8): 1059–1075.

Broersma

Graham

(2012) Social media as beat: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice 6(3): 403–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.663626

Bruns

(2012) Journalists and Twitter: How Australian news organizations adapt to a new medium. Media International Australia 144(1): 97–107.

10.

Bryant

Davies

(2008) Selective exposure. In: Donsbach

(ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication. New York: Blackwell, pp.4544–4550.

11.

Business Standard (2019) Social media main news source for young Indians. Available at: https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/social-media-main-news-source-for-young-indians-119032600471_1.html (accessed 5 December 2020).

12.

Caumont

(2013) 12 trends shaping digital news. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/10/16/12-trends-shaping-digital-news/ (accessed 2 December 2020).

13.

Chadha

(2012) Twitter as media watch-dog? Lessons from India’s Radia tapes scandal. Global Media and Communication 8(2): 171–176.

14.

Chadha

(2017) The Indian news media industry: Structural trends and journalistic implications. Global Media and Communication 13(2): 139–156.

15.

Colistra

(2012) Shaping and cutting the media agenda: Television reporters’ perceptions of agenda and frame-building and agenda-cutting influences. Journalism and Communication Monographs 14(2): 85–146.

16.

Cozma

Chen

(2012) What’s in a tweet? Foreign correspondents’ use of social media. Journalism Practice 7(1): 33–46.

17.

De Vreese

(2005) News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 13(1): 51–62.

18.

Donsbach

(1991) Exposure to political content in newspapers: The impact of cognitive dissonance on readers’ selectivity. European Journal of Communication 6(2): 155–186.

19.

Druckman

Nelson

(2003) Framing and deliberation: How citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science 47: 729–745.

20.

Dubois

Gaffney

(2014) The multiple facets of influence-identifying political influentials and opinion leaders on twitter. American Behavioral Scientist 58(10): 1260–1277.

21.

Dvir-Gvirsman

Tsfati

Menchen-Trevino

(2016) The extent and nature of ideological selective exposure online: Combining survey responses with actual web log data from the 2013 Israeli Elections. New Media & Society, 18(5): 857–877.

22.

Entman

(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication 43(4): 51–58.

23.

Exchange4Media (2017) Active social media users in India grow by 15% from 2015 to become 136 million: Yral Report 2016. Available at: http://www.exchange4media.com/digital/active-social-media-users-in-india-grow-by-15-from-2015-to-become-136-million-yral-report-2016_67225.html (accessed 1 December 2020).

24.

Gans

(1979) Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon.

25.

Gottfried

Shearer

(2016) News use across social media platforms 2016. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/ (accessed 1 December 2020).

26.

Hart

Albarracín

Eagly

, et al. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin 135(4): 555–588.

27.

Hermida

(2012) Tweets and truth: Journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journalism Practice 6(5–6): 659–668.

28.

Hindman

(2009) The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29.

Holcomb

Gross

Mitchell

(2011) How Mainstream Media Outlets Use Twitter: Content Analysis Shows Evolving Relationship. Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. Pew Research Center: Washington DC. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2011/11/14/how-mainstream-media-outlets-use-twitter (accessed 3 December 2020).

30.

Iyengar

(2016) The arrest of a student leader at a top university reignites India’s intolerance debate. Available at: http://time.com/4224571/india-jnu-kanhaiya-kumar-arrest-protests-sedition/ (accessed 4 December 2020).

31.

Iyengar

Hahn

(2009) Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication 59(1): 19–39.

32.

Kazmin

(2016) India’s BJP accused of dissent crackdown. Available at: https://app.ft.com/content/27554b34-d2e5-11e5-8887-98e7feb46f27 (accessed 6 December 2020).

33.

Kim

S-H

Scheufele

Shanahan

(2002) Think about it this way: Attribute agenda setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79(1): 7–25.

34.

Krippendorff

(2013) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

35.

Lasorsa

Lewis

Holton

(2011) Normalizing twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies 13(1): 19–36.

36.

Lecheler

Bos

Vliegenthart

(2015) The mediating role of emotions: News framing effects on opinions about immigration. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 92(4): 812–838.

37.

Lee

Kim

Sang

(2017) How do journalists leverage Twitter? Expressive and consumptive use of Twitter. The Social Science Journal 54(2): 139–147.

38.

LiveMint.com (2017) Print circulation in India bucks global trend, grows 4.87% in past decade: ABC. Available at: https://www.livemint.com/Consumer/gWR3Ca04xSqk7UHKAFYmlI/Print-circulation-in-India-bucks-global-trend-grows-487-i.html (accessed 6 December 2020).

39.

Messing

Westwood

(2014) Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research 41(8): 1042–1063.

40.

Metag

Rauchfleisch

(2017) Journalists’ use of political tweets: Functions for journalistic work and the role of perceived influences. Digital Journalism 5(9): 1155–1172.

41.

Metzger

Hartsell

Flanagin

(2015) Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research 47(1): 3–28.

42.

Mitchell

Rosenstiel

(2012) Mobile Devices and News Consumption: Some Good Signs for Journalism. Pew Research Center Annual Report on American Journalism. Available at: https://www.journalism.org/2012/03/18/mobile-devices-and-news-consumption-some-good-signs-for-journalism/ (accessed 6 December 2020).

43.

Myers

Nisbet

Maibach

, et al. (2012) A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change: A letter. Climatic Change 13: 1105–1112.

44.

Nelson

Webster

(2017) The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society 3(3): 1–13.

45.

Nix

Pickett

(2017) Third-person perceptions, hostile media effects, and policing: Developing a theoretical framework for assessing the Ferguson effect. Journal of Criminal Justice 51: 24–33.

46.

Patel

(2014) India’s social media election battle. Available at: http://www.bbc.com: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-26762391 (accessed 30 November 2020).

47.

Pathak

Sunny

Sebastian

(2016) Govt. acts tough, JNU student leader charged with sedition. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/Govt.-acts-tough-JNU-student-leader-charged-with-sedition/article14075511.ece (accessed 30 October 2020).

48.

Perloff

(2009) Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In: Bryant

Oliver

(eds.) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge, pp.268–284.

49.

Podger

(2009) The limits of control: With journalists and their employers increasingly active on social media sites like Facebook and Twitter, news organizations are struggling to respond to a host of new ethics challenges. American Journalism Review 31(4): 32–38.

50.

Poell

Rajagopalan

(2015) Connecting activists and journalists: Twitter communication in the aftermath of the 2012 Delhi rape. Journalism Studies 16(5): 719–733.

51.

Powers

Vera-Zambrano

(2018) How journalists use social media in France and the United States: Analyzing technology use across journalistic fields. New Media & Society 20(8): 2728–2744.

52.

PTI (2015) Twitter accounts for only 17% of Indian social network users. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/internet/twitter-accounts-for-only-17-of-indian-social-network-users/article6830300.ece (accessed 30 October 2020).

53.

PTI (2016) Emergency-like situation says Left after arrest of JNU students’ union president. Available at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/afzal-guru-event-jnusu-president-arrested-after-anti-india-slogans-in-campus/ (accessed 1 December 2020).

54.

Rao

(2014) Covering rape in shame culture: Studying journalism ethics in India’s new television news media. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 29(3): 153–167.

55.

Ray

(2016) JNU students’ union president Kanhaiya Kumar arrested for sedition. Available at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jnusu-president-kanhaiya-kumarsent-to-three-day-police-custody/1/594880.html (accessed 7 December 2020).

56.

Reese

(2001) Understanding the global journalist: A hierarchy-of-influences approach. Journalism Studies 2(2): 173–187.

57.

Reese

Shoemaker

(2016) A media sociology for the networked public sphere: The hierarchy of influences model. Mass Communication and Society 19(4): 389–410.

58.

Russell

Hendricks

Choi

, et al. (2015) Who sets the news agenda on Twitter? Journalists’ posts during the 2013 US government shutdown. Digital Journalism 3(6): 925–943.

59.

Schemer

Wirth

Matthes

(2012) Value resonance and value framing effects on voting intentions in direct-democratic campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist 56: 334–352.

60.

Schwalbe

Silcock

Candello

(2015) Gatecheckers at the visual news stream. Journalism Practice 9(4): 465–483.

61.

Sears

Freedman

(1967) Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly 31(2): 194–213.

62.

Shoemaker

Reese

(1995) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content, White Plains. New York, NY: Longman (that is, what the Book mentions. As does the Google Scholar citation. I think White Plains is in NY, much like Thousand Oaks, CA, is for SAGE).

63.

Singer

(2014) User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society 16(1): 55–73.

64.

Stacks

Salwen

(2010) An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

65.

Statista.com (2016) Most popular social networks worldwide as of October 2020, ranked by number of active users. Available at: http://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (accessed 29 November 2020).

66.

Sundar

Knobloch-Westerwick

Hastall

(2007) News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 58(3): 366–378.

67.

Tandoc

Jr Vos

(2016) The journalist is marketing the news: Social media in the gatekeeping process. Journalism Practice 10(8): 950–966.

68.

The Hindu (2015) Twitter accounts for only 17% of Indian social network users. Available at: http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology (accessed 5 December 2020).

69.

The Indian Express (2016) JNU row: Kanhaiya Kumar beaten up by lawyers at Patiala House Court, sent to 14 days of judicial custody. Available at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/jnu-delhi-police-kanhaiya-kumar-patiala-house-court-india-news/ (accessed 3 December 2020).

70.

The Times of India (2016) Can hate speech be free speech? Arun Jaitley attacks opposition over JNU incident. Available at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com (accessed 5 December 2020).

71.

Time (2014) The 2014 elections are the most expensive ever held in India. Available at: http://time.com/33062/india-elections-expenditure/ (accessed 6 April 2019).

72.

Valeriani

Vaccari

(2015) Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society 18(9): 1857–1874.

73.

Vis

(2013) Twitter as a reporting tool for breaking news. Digital Journalism 1(1): 27–47.

74.

Willnat

Weaver

(2014) The American journalist in a digital age: A first look. In: International communication association annual conference, Seattle, WA. ICA. Available at: http://news.indiana.edu/releases/iu/2014/05/2013-americanjournalist-key-findings.pdf.

75.

World Press Trends Database (2019) World Press Trends 2019: Facts and figures. Available at: http://www.wptdatabase.org/world-press-trends-2019-facts-and-figures (accessed 7 December 2020).

76.

Zhou

Moy

(2007) Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication 57(1): 79–98.