Examining the psycho-economics of paying intent using the third-person effect framework, this study examines the extent to which self–other asymmetry factors into news consumers’ intentions to pay for multiplatform news products. Findings from a web-based panel survey of 767 U.S. internet users suggest people consistently perceive others as more likely to pay for news across three news platforms (print, web, and app) and that the perceived difference in how much more likely others would pay for news than oneself widens from print to web and to app editions. Such findings reveal the economic nature of news as multiplatform products in the eyes of news consumers from a novel perspective and offer a theoretical understanding of the psychology behind consumers’ paying intent for multiplatform news products in the contemporary media environment.
BabcockL.LoewensteinG. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 109–126. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2138254
BrosiusH.EngelD. (1996). The causes of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes towards media influence?International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 142–162. doi:10.1093/ijpor/8.2.142
CamererC. F.LoewensteinG.RabinM. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
CarmonZ.ArielyD. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360–370. doi:10.1086/317590
10.
ChapinJ. R. (2008). Third-person perception and racism. International Journal of Communication, 2, 100–107. doi:1932-8036/20080100
11.
ChyiH. I. (2009). Information surplus and news consumption in the digital age: Impact and implications. In PapacharissiZ. (Ed.), Journalism and citizenship: New agendas (pp. 91–107). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
12.
ChyiH. I. (2012). Paying for what? How much? And why (not)? Predictors of paying intent for multiplatform newspapers. International Journal on Media Management, 14, 227–250. doi:10.1080/14241277.2012.657284
13.
ChyiH. I.LasorsaD. L. (2002). An explorative study on the market relation between online and print newspapers. Journal of Media Economics, 15, 91–106. doi:10.1207/S15327736ME1502_2
14.
ChyiH. I.LeeA. M. (2012, 5). Will the Internet disrupt? A reality check on format preference for traditional and digital content across five media. Paper presented at the 10th World Media Economics & Management Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece.
15.
ChyiH. I.LeeA. M. (2013). Online news consumption: A structural model linking preference, use, and paying intent. Digital Journalism, 1, 194–211. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.753299
16.
ChyiH. I.YangM. J. (2009). Is online news an inferior good? Examining the economic nature of online news among users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 594–612. doi:10.1177/107769900908600309
17.
ConnersJ. L. (2005). Understanding the third-person effect. Communication Research Trends, 24, 1–22. Retrieved fromcscc.scu.edu/trends/v24/v24_2.pdf
18.
CookJ. E.AttariS. Z. (2012). Paying for what was free: Lessons from the New York Times paywall. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 682–687.
19.
DavidP.JohnsonM. (1998). The role of self in third-person effects about body image. Journal of Communication, 48, 37–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02769.x
20.
DavisonW. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763
21.
DavisonW. P. (1996). The third-person effect revisited. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 113–119. doi:10.1093/ijpor/8.2.113
22.
De WaalE.SchoenbachK.LaufE. (2005). Online newspapers: A substitute or complement for print newspapers and other information channels?Communications, 30, 55–72. doi:10.1515/comm.2005.30.1.55
DuckJ. M.MullinB. A. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third-person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 77–93. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250107
EvelandW. P.Jr.McLeodD. M. (1999). The effect of social desirability on perceived media implications for third-person perception. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11, 315–333. doi:10.1093/ijpor/11.4.315
31.
GuntherA. C. (1995). Overrating the X-rating: The third-person perception and support for censorship of pornography. Journal of Communication, 451, 27–38.
32.
GuntherA. C.PerloffR. M.TsfatiY. (2008). Public opinion and the third person effect. In DonsbachW.TraugottM. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 184–191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
GuntherA. C.ThorsonE. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19, 574–596. doi:10.1177/009365092019005002
HoorensV.RuitersS. (1996). The optimal impact phenomenon: Beyond the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 599–610. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<599:: AID-EJSP773>3.0.CO;2-7
36.
HuY. (2000). Communication behavior as a critical factor on the third-person effect. Paper presented at the Association of Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, Phoenix, AZ.
JohanssonB. (2005). The third-person effect: Only a media perception?Nordicom Review, 26, 81–94.
40.
JennerM.FlemingK. (2011, 426). The push to paid: Attitudes of publishers toward paid content. Reynolds Journalism Institute, University of Missouri. Retrieved fromhttp://www.niemanlab.org/pdfs/rjipaidcontent.pdf
KahnemanD.KnetschJ. L.ThalerR. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348.
43.
KogutT.Beyth-MaromR. (2008). Who helps more? How self-other discrepancies influence decisions in helping situations. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 595–606.
44.
KruegerJ. (1998). Enhancement bias in description of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(5), 505–516. doi:10.1177/0146167298245006
45.
KurtD.InmanJ. F. (2013). Mispredicting others’ valuations: Self-other difference in the context of endowment. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 78–89.
46.
LambeJ. L.McLeodD. M. (2005). Understanding third-person perception processes: Predicting perceived impact on self and others for multiple expressive contexts. Journal of Communication, 55, 277–291.
47.
LeeB.TamboriniR. (2005). Third-person effect and Internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and Internet self-efficacy. Journal of Communication, 55, 292–310.
48.
LewisR. (1995). Relation between newspaper subscription price and circulation, 1971–1992. Journal of Media Economics, 8, 25.
49.
LiX. (2008). Third-person effect, optimistic bias, and sufficiency resource in Internet use. Journal of Communication, 58, 568–587.
LoV.WeiR. (2002). Third-person effect, gender, and pornography on the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46, 13–33.
52.
MasonL. (1995). Newspaper as repeater: An experiment on defamation and third-person effect. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 610–620.
53.
McLeodD. M.DetenberB. H.EvelandW. P.Jr. (2006). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51, 678–695. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02902.x
54.
McLeodD. M.EvelandW. P.Jr.NathansonA. I. (1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153–174. doi:10.1177/009365097024002003
55.
MeirickP. C. (2005). Self-enhancement motivation as a third variable in the relationship between first- and third-person effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 473–483. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh077
56.
MessickD. M.BloomS.BoldizarJ. P.SamuelsonC. D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 480–500. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(85)90031-9
57.
MingsS. M.WhiteP. B. (2000). Profiting from online news: The search for viable business models. In KahinB.VarianH. R. (Eds.), Internet publishing and beyond: The economics of digital information and intellectual property (pp. 62–96). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
PaulB.SalwenM. B.DupagneM. (2000). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 57–85. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_04
68.
PerloffR. M. (1993). Third-person effect research 1983–1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167–184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/5.2.167
69.
PerloffR. M. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In BryantJ.OliverM. B. (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 252–268). New York, NY: Routledge.
PicardR. G. (2005). The nature of media product portfolios. In PicardR. G. (Ed.), Media product portfolios: Issues in management of multiple products and services (pp. 1–22). Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.
PriceV.TewksburyD. (1996). Measuring the third-person effect of news: The impact of question order, contrast, and knowledge. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 120–141. doi:10.1093/ijpor/8.2.120
76.
PriceV.TewksburyD.HuangL. (1998). Third-person effects on publication of a holocaust-denial advertisement. Journal of Communication, 48, 3–26. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02745.x
SalwenM. B.DriscollP. D. (1997). Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O.J. Simpson trial. Journal of Communication, 47, 60–75. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02706.x
79.
SalwenM. B.DupagneM. (1999). The third-person effect: Perceptions of the media’s influence and immoral consequences. Communication Research, 26, 523–549. doi:10.1177/009365099026005001
80.
ShahD. V.FaberR. J.YounS. (1999). Susceptibility and severity: Perceptual dimensions underlying the third-person effect. Communication Research, 26, 240–267. doi:10.1177/009365099026002006
SunY.PanZ.ShenL. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58, 280–300. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
Tal-OrN.TsfatiY.GuntherA. C. (2009). The influence of presumed media influence: Origins and implications of the third-person perception. In NabiR. L.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 99–112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86.
TsfatiY.CohenJ. (2003). On the effect of the “third person effect”: Perceived influence of media coverage and residential mobility intentions. Journal of Communication, 53, 711–727. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02919.x
87.
WeiR.LoV.LuH. (2007). Reconsidering the relationship between the third-person effect and optimistic bias. Communication Research, 34, 665–684. doi:10.1177/0093650207307903
WuW.KooS. H. (2001). Perceived effects of sexually explicit Internet context: The third-person effect in Singapore. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 260–274.
