This study examines reporter perceptions of extramedia-level influences on news content, based on original data from a national web-based survey of television reporters. Using three extramedia measures (advertiser, public relations, and political influences) and three theoretical approaches, this research considers how, how often, and under what conditions extramedia forces attempt to influence television media and their coverage, and to what effect they are successful at doing so, based on reporter perceptions. The study also attempts to advance theory by further developing and testing the little-studied area of agenda cutting and by using two other theoretical approaches, agenda building and frame building.
BerkowitzD. (1987, autumn). TV news sources and news channels: A study in agenda-building. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 508–513.
9.
BerkowitzD.AdamsD. B. (1990, winter). Information subsidies and agenda building in local television news. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 723–731.
10.
BreedW. (1955, May). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces, 33, 326–335.
11.
CohenB. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
ColistraR. F. (2012, summer). Shaping and cutting the media agenda: Television reporters’ perceptions of agenda- and frame-building and agenda-cutting influences. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 14, 85–146.
13.
CroteauD.HoynesW. (2001). The business of media: Corporate media and the public interest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
14.
DillmanD. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method(2d ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
15.
GandyO. H. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
GansH. (1980). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
17.
HatchD. (2001, December). Local news execs feeling ad pressure. Electronic Media19(50), 12.
18.
JustM.LevinR.ReganK. (2001, November/December). News for sale: Half of stations report sponsor pressure on news decisions. Supplement to Columbia Journalism Review, 40, 2.
LazarsfeldP. F.MertonR. K. (1948). Mass communication, popular taste, and organized social action. In BrysonL. (Ed.), Communication of ideas (pp. 95–118). New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
21.
MaherT. M. (2001). Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting? In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.JrGrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 83–94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
MastersonP. (1993, January). Many editors report advertiser pressure: Most have had ads pulled due to stories. Advertising Age, 64, 22.
23.
Media Tenor. (2003). Media and mad cow disease: As low as it gets. Media Tenor Quarterly Journal, 2, 72.
24.
NeumanW. R.JustM. R.CriglerA. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
PanZ.KosickiG. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.JrGrantA. E. (Eds.). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (p. 47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2008, March 17). The web: Alarming, appealing and a challenge to journalistic values—financial woes now overshadow all other concerns for journalists. Retrieved fromhttp://people-press.org/reports/pdf/403.pdf
PonderS. E. (1994, fall). The president makes news: William McKinley and the first presidential press corps, 1897–1901. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 24, 823–836.
30.
PriceC. J. (1998, April). Does power change the news? A content analysis of network news coverage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Paper presented in the News Division at the Broadcast Education Association meeting in Las Vegas, NV.
31.
PriceC. J. (2003). Interfering owners or meddling advertisers? How network television news correspondents feel about ownership and advertiser influence on news stories. The Journal of Media Economics, 16, 181.
SachsmanD. B. (1976). Public relations influence on coverage of environment in San Francisco area. Journalism Quarterly, 53, 54–60.
34.
SallotL. M.JohnsonE. A. (2006, June). Investigating relationships between journalists and public relations practitioners: Working together to set, frame and build the public agenda, 1991-2004. Public Relations Review, 32, 151.
35.
ScheufeleD. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103–122.
36.
ScheufeleD. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 297–316.
37.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (1991). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
38.
ShoemakerP. J.ReeseS. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content(2d ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
39.
SigalL. V. (1973). Reporters and officials: The organization and politics of newsmaking. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
40.
SoleyL. C.CraigR. L. (1992, December). Advertising pressures on newspapers: A survey. Journal of Advertising, 21, 6.
TurkJ. V. (1986). Information subsidies and media content: A study of public relations influence on the news. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs 100.
44.
TurkJ. V. (1985). Information subsidies and influence. Public Relations Review, 11, 10–25.
45.
WhiteD. M. (1950, fall). The ‘gate keeper’: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383–390.
46.
WoberJ. M.GunterB. (1988). Television and social control. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
47.
WoberJ. M. (2001, October). Agenda cutting: Some remarks on the phenomenon and its importance. Paper presented at Media Tenor’s Agenda-Setting Conference, Bonn, Germany.
