Collaborative robots (cobots) have revolutionized industrial automation by enabling seamless human–robot interaction in shared workspaces. These advanced robots are designed to work alongside humans, enhancing productivity, efficiency, and safety through sophisticated sensing and control capabilities. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of collaborative robotics, while introducing the Internet of Cobots (IoC) as a pivotal enabler of next-generation manufacturing systems. Through IoC capabilities, cobots are transforming industrial environments by implementing advanced safety protocols, enabling dynamic task allocation, and achieving seamless integration with human workers over 5G networks. This paper synthesizes the key technological advancements, starting from fundamental sensing, control, and actuation architectures to sophisticated artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms that enable human-like adaptability. Special attention is given to the industrial safety norms that enhance workplace safety of the IoC through real-time data sharing of job processing, human proximity, and potential hazards, while building trust in the decision-making of human–robot collaboration. This review highlights emerging trends within the Industry 5.0 paradigm, where IoC-enabled cobots drive the human-centric and personalized manufacturing processes. By providing a comprehensive overview of networked cobots, their transformative impact, and regulatory frameworks, this review offers a valuable insight into the future of intelligent, adaptable, and human-centred industrial automation.
AjoudaniAZanchettinAMIvaldiS, et al. (2018) Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration. Autonomous Robots42: 957–975.
2.
Al HageJEl NajjarMEPomorskiD (2016) Fault tolerant multi-sensor fusion for multi-robot collaborative localization. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI), IEEE, pp.272–278.
3.
Al-AtawiAAAlyahyanSAlatawiMN, et al. (2023) Stress monitoring using machine learning, IoT and wearable sensors. Sensors23(21): 8875.
4.
AlShaheenOTKhanZHMekidSN (2024) RDM-3D: A remote dashboard for 3D printer performance monitoring. In: 2024 1st International Conference on Innovative Engineering Sciences and Technological Research (ICIESTR), pp.1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICIESTR60916.2024.10798381.
5.
ArifAZakeriZOmurtagA, et al. (2024) Neurophysiological approach for psychological safety: Enhancing mental health in human–robot collaboration in smart manufacturing setups using neuroimaging. Information15(10): 640.
6.
AvalleGDe PaceFFornaroC, et al. (2019) An augmented reality system to support fault visualization in industrial robotic tasks. IEEE Access7: 132343–132359.
7.
BiZMLuoCMiaoZ, et al. (2021) Safety assurance mechanisms of collaborative robotic systems in manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing67: 102022.
8.
BerxNBresciaAAqamarinaR, et al. (2023) Stakeholders’ perspectives on safety-related human–robot collaborative scenarios. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems20(5): 17298806231200095.
9.
BochAThomasBR (2025) Human-robot dynamics: A psychological insight into the ethics of social robotics. International Journal of Ethics and Systems41(1): 101–141.
10.
BogueR (2017) Robots that interact with humans: A review of safety technologies and standards. Industrial Robot: An International Journal44(4): 395–400.
11.
BoualouacheAEngelT (2023) A survey on machine learning-based misbehavior detection systems for 5G and beyond vehicular networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials25(2): 1128–1172.
12.
CaiWChenHZhangM (2024) A survey on collaborative hunting with robotic swarm: Key technologies and application scenarios. Neurocomputing598: 128008.
13.
ColgateJEWannasuphoprasitWPeshkinMA (1996) Cobots: Robots for collaboration with human operators. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. November 17–22, 1996. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 15281, pp. 433–439.
14.
CostaJSilvaCAntunesM, et al. (2017) Adaptive learning for dynamic environments: A comparative approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence65: 336–345.
15.
DhandaMRogersBAHallS, et al. (2025) Reviewing human-robot collaboration in manufacturing: Opportunities and challenges in the context of Industry 5.0. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing93: 102937.
16.
DinhLQNguyenDTVuTC, et al. (2024) Comprehensive review of security problems in mobile robotic assistant systems: Issues, solutions, and challenges. Journal of Computing Theories and Applications2(2): 182–201.
17.
Dodig-CrnkovicGHolsteinTPelliccioneP, et al.Future intelligent autonomous robots, ethical by design. Lessons learned from autonomous cars ethics. In: Proc. ICSIT 2023 Conference. ISSN, 2023, pp.2771–6368.
18.
DouthwaiteJALeasgeBGleirscherM, et al. (2021) A modular digital twinning framework for safety assurance of collaborative robotics. Frontiers in Robotics and AI8: 758099.
19.
DraganADLeeKCSrinivasaSS (2013) Legibility and predictability of robot motion. In: 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), IEEE, pp.301–308.
EmericCGeoffroyDDossouP-E (2020) Development of a new robotic programming support system for operators. Procedia Manufacturing51: 73–80.
22.
FanZChenWZhuG, et al. (2019) Collaborative robot transport system based on edge computing. In: 2019 IEEE 9th Annual International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER), IEEE, pp.1320–1326.
23.
FranklinCSDominguezEGFrymanJD, et al. (2020) Collaborative robotics: New era of human–robot cooperation in the workplace. Journal of Safety Research74: 153–160.
24.
GaedeCRanzFHummelV, et al. (2020) A study on challenges in the implementation of human–robot collaboration. Journal of Management in Engineering1: 29–39.
25.
GallalaAKumarAAHichriB, et al. (2022) Digital twin for human–robot interactions by means of Industry 4.0 enabling technologies. Sensors22(13): 4950.
26.
GaoXYJungeKHughesK, et al. (2024) Beyond Manual Dexterity: Designing a Multi-Fingered Robotic Hand for Grasping and Crawling. In: 40th Anniversary of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA@40), Netherlands.
27.
GleirscherMCalinescuR. (2020) Safety controller synthesis for collaborative robots. In: 2020 25th International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS), IEEE, pp.83–92.
28.
GhoshASainiABaradH (2025) Artificial intelligence in governance: Recent trends, risks, challenges, innovative frameworks and future directions. AI & Society28: 1–23.
29.
GranataIFaccioMBoschettiG (2024) Industry 5.0: Prioritizing human comfort and productivity through collaborative robots and dynamic task allocation. Procedia Computer Science232: 2137–2146.
30.
GualtieriLRauchEVidoniR (2021) Emerging research fields in safety and ergonomics in industrial collaborative robotics: A systematic literature review. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing67: 101998.
31.
GualtieriLRauchEVidoniR (2022) Development and validation of guidelines for safety in human-robot collaborative assembly systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering163: 107801.
32.
GuidolinMBertiNGnesottoP, et al. (2024) Trust the robot! Enabling flexible collaboration with humans via multi-sensor data integration. In: 2024 IEEE 29th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), IEEE, pp.1–8.
HancockPABillingsDRSchaeferKE, et al. (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors53(5): 517–527.
35.
HentoutAAouacheMMaoudjA, et al. (2019) Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: A literature review of the decade 2008–2017. Advanced Robotics33(15–16): 764–799.
36.
HerbsterSBehrensRElkmannN (2021) A new approach to estimate the apparent mass of collaborative robot manipulators. In: Experimental Robotics: The 17th International Symposium, Springer, pp.211–221.
37.
HoffmanGBhattacharjeeTNikolaidisS (2024) Inferring human intent and predicting human action in human–robot collaboration. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems7: 73–95.
38.
HuangCZhouSLiJ, et al. (2023) Allocating robots/cobots to production systems for productivity and ergonomics optimization. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering21(3): 2841–2855.
39.
HullTMinarcinMA (2016) Considerations in collaborative robot system designs and safeguarding. SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing9(3): 545–551.
40.
IFR (2024) Collaborative Robots – How Robots Work alongside Humans. Frankfurt am Main: International Federation of Robotics.
41.
ISO 10218-2:2025 (2025) Robotics – Safety Requirements – Part 2: Industrial Robot Applications and Robot Cells. Geneva: ISO.
International Organization for Standardization (2020) Robotics and robotic devices – Guidelines for the application of ISO 13482 in personal care robot safety (ISO/TR 23482-1:2020). Available at: https://www.iso.org.
44.
International Organization for Standardization (2023) Information technology–Artificial intelligence–Management system for AI–Requirements (ISO/IEC 42001:2023).Available at: https://www.iso.org.
45.
International Organization for Standardization (2024) Information technology – Artificial intelligence (AI) – Use cases (ISO/IEC TR 24030:2024).Available at: https://www.iso.org.
JacobsL (2024) Collaborative robots in the workplace: Occupational, geographic, and demographic opportunities for technology adoption. Working Paper.
48.
KalyaevIMelnikEKlimenkoA (October 7–9, 2020) Distributed methods for autonomous robot groups fault-tolerant management. In: Interactive Collaborative Robotics: 5th International Conference, ICR 2020. St. Petersburg, Russia: Springer, 135–147.
49.
KannanSSVenkateshVLMinB-C (2023) SMART-LLM: Smart multi-agent robot task planning using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10062. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.10062.
50.
KhalidAKhanZHIdreesM, et al. (2022) Understanding vulnerabilities in cyber physical production systems. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing35(6): 569–582.
51.
KhalidAPierreKKhanZH, et al. (2018) Security framework for industrial collaborative robotic cyber-physical systems. Computers in Industry97: 132–145.
52.
KhanZNasirAMekidS (2025/08/30 2025) Fault-tolerant control strategies for industrial robots: State of the art and future perspective on AI-based fault management. Artificial Intelligence Review58(11): 62.
53.
KhanSAWaqarAHussainM, et al. (2023) Digital Twin for Advanced Automation of Future Smart Grid. In: 1st International Conference on Advanced Innovations in Smart Cities (ICAISC-2023), Jeddah, KSA.
54.
KhanZSiddiqueA (2022) 3D Bioprinting and organ transplantation: Patient dream or ethical nightmare?Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies32(1): 1–9.
55.
KhanZHKhalidAIqbalJ (2018) Towards realizing robotic potential in future intelligent food manufacturing systems. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies48: 11–24.
56.
KimHYangW (2021) Variable admittance control based on human–robot collaboration observer using frequency analysis for sensitive and safe interaction. Sensors21(5): 1899. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/5/1899.
57.
KimS (2022) Working with robots: Human resource development considerations in human–robot interaction. Human Resource Development Review21(1): 48–74.
58.
KirschbaumJPosseltTMösleinKM (2024) Designing innovation ecosystems with functional roles: The case of industrial, intelligent manufacturing. In: Handbook on Digital Platforms and Business Ecosystems in Manufacturing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 106–125.
59.
KoppulaHSSaxenaA (2015) Anticipating human activities using object affordances for reactive robotic response. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence38(1): 14–29.
60.
KorsahGAStentzADiasMB (2013) A comprehensive taxonomy for multi-robot task allocation. The International Journal of Robotics Research32(12): 1495–1512.
61.
KurowskiT (2019) Collaborative robots open doors for manufacturing: In labor-constrained industries, collaborative robots could boost productivity. Plant Engineering73(6): 75–77.
62.
LaiMGoKLiZ, et al. (2025) RoboBallet: Planning for multirobot reaching with graph neural networks and reinforcement learning. Science Robotics10(106): eads1204.
63.
LibertKMosconiECadieuxN (2020) Human-machine interaction and human resource management perspective for collaborative robotics implementation and adoption.
64.
LiuJChenYDongZ, et al. (2022) Robot cooking with stir-fry: Bimanual non-prehensile manipulation of semi-fluid objects. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(2): 5159–5166.
65.
LiuLGuoFZouZ, et al. (2024) Application, development and future opportunities of collaborative robots (cobots) in manufacturing: A literature review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction40(4): 915–932.
66.
LuYLiGYueY, et al. (2024) Fault detection and data-driven optimal adaptive fault-tolerant control for autonomous driving using learning-based SMPC. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles: 1–15. doi: 10.1109/TIV.2024.3385755.
67.
MatúšováMBučányováMHruškováE (2019) The future of industry with collaborative robots. MATEC Web of Conferences299: 02008.
68.
MauricePAllienneLMalaiséA, et al. (2018) Ethical and social considerations for the introduction of human-centered technologies at work. In: 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), IEEE, pp.131–138.
69.
MenonCCartaSFoersterF, et al. (2021) Improving public engagement with ethical complexities of assistive robots. In: International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications, Valletta, Malta. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 71–94.
70.
MichaelisJESiebert-EvenstoneAShafferDW, et al. (2020) Collaborative or simply uncaged? Understanding human-cobot interactions in automation. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.1–12.
71.
MillerJBraunMBilzJ, et al. (2021) Impact of haptic feedback on applied intracorporeal forces using a novel surgical robotic system – a randomized cross-over study with novices in an experimental setup. Surgical Endoscopy35: 3554–3563.
72.
MoizAFKhawajaHMKhanZH, et al. (2023) QuadSWARM: a real-time autonomous surveillance system using multi quadcopters UAV. In: 1st International Conference on Advanced Innovations in Smart Cities (ICAISC-2023), Jeddah, KSA.
73.
Moley Robotics: The future is served. (2024). https://www.moley.com/ (accessed 1 June 2024).
74.
NanFSunSFoehnP, et al. (2022) Nonlinear MPC for quadrotor fault-tolerant control. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(2): 5047–5054.
ProiaSCarliRCavoneG, et al. (2021) Control techniques for safe, ergonomic, and efficient human-robot collaboration in the digital industry: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering19(3): 1798–1819.
77.
PeshkinMAColgateJEWannasuphoprasitW, et al. (2002) Cobot architecture. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation17(4): 377–390.
78.
RahmanMMKhatunFJahanI, et al. (2024) Cobotics: The evolving roles and prospects of next-generation collaborative robots in Industry 5.0. Journal of Robotics2024(1): 2918089.
79.
RasheedMWTanveerRAkhtarMU, et al. (2018) ROBO-FLOCK: Development of a low-cost Leader-follower Swarm of Mobile Robots. In: International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET).
80.
RehmanMMURehmanHZUKhanZH (2020) Cyber-attacks on medical implants: A case study of cardiac pacemaker vulnerability. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems9(6): 1229–1235.
81.
RicciardiRSeshadri-KreadenUYankovskyA, et al. (2025) The COMPARE study: Comparing perioperative outcomes of oncologic minimally invasive laparoscopic, da Vinci robotic, and open procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence. Annals of Surgery281(5): 748–763.
82.
Różańska-WalczukM (2022) Collaborative robotics. Safety and ethical considerations. In: Machine Intelligence and Digital Interaction Conference. Cham: Springer, pp.260–269.
83.
SalemMLakatosGAmirabdollahianF, et al. (October 26-30, 2015) Towards safe and trustworthy social robots: Ethical challenges and practical issues. In: Social Robotics: 7th International Conference, ICSR 2015, Paris, France, 2015, pp.584–593.
84.
SathiyaVMahalakshmiSRamabalanS, et al. (2025) Designing green robots with environmental sustainability by applying the concept of multi-criteria decision making. Scientific Reports15(1): 22749.
85.
SeyitoğluFFusté-FornéFYiğitS, et al. (2025) Robot chefs: The impacts, compatibility and suitability. British Food Journal127(1): 307–323.
86.
SherwaniFAsadMMIbrahimBSKK. Collaborative robots and industrial revolution 4.0 (IR 4.0). In: 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Smart Technologies (ICETST), 2020, IEEE, pp.1–5.
87.
TannousMMiragliaMIngleseF, et al. (2020) Haptic-based touch detection for collaborative robots in welding applications. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing64: 101952.
88.
UrbaniakDDamsgaardSBZhangW, et al. (2024) Distributed control for collaborative robotic systems using 5G edge computing. IEEE Access12: 148706–148718.
89.
ValoriMScibiliaAFassiI, et al. (2021) Validating safety in human–robot collaboration: Standards and new perspectives. Robotics10(2): 65.
90.
van WynsbergheALeyMRoeserS (2022) Ethical aspects of human–robot collaboration in industrial work settings. In: The 21st Century Industrial Robot: When Tools Become Collaborators, pp.255–266.
91.
VicentiniF (2020) Terminology in safety of collaborative robotics. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing63: 101921.
92.
VicentiniF (2021) Collaborative robotics: A survey. Journal of Mechanical Design143(4): 040802.
WeissAWortmeierA-KKubicekB (2021) Cobots in Industry 4.0: A roadmap for future practice studies on human–robot collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems51(4): 335–345.
96.
YaacoubJ-PANouraHNSalmanO, et al. (2022) Robotics cyber security: Vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and recommendations. International Journal of Information Security21(1): 115–158.
97.
ZhangWYangXXuZ, et al. (2021) An adaptive fault-tolerant control method for robot manipulators. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems19(12): 3983–3995.
98.
ZhuBZhangLNiuB, et al. (2024) Adaptive reinforcement learning for fault-tolerant optimal consensus control of nonlinear canonical multiagent systems with actuator loss of effectiveness. IEEE Systems Journal18(3): 1681–1692.
99.
ZhuDHChangYP (2020) Robot with humanoid hands cooks food better? Effect of robotic chef anthropomorphism on food quality prediction. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management32(3): 1367–1383.
100.
ZlotRM (2006) An Auction-Based Approach to Complex Task Allocation for Multirobot Teams. The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
