In the quest for efficiency and innovation in manufacturing, intelligent retrieval and reuse technologies have emerged as critical strategies for optimizing the manufacturing processes of electromechanical products. This study systematically reviews 140 seminal theoretical contributions from 2010 to 2024, examining the current status, key technologies, and specific implementations within the manufacturing sector. The analysis categorizes intelligent retrieval into six distinct methods and examines reuse from four key dimensions, revealing a fundamental trade-off between efficiency and flexibility. By synthesizing the key technological evolution trends and primary system bottlenecks, this research provides actionable guidance for researchers and practitioners to navigate future challenges and opportunities in the field.
AgrawalM.MoparthiN. R. (2023). A hybrid multi-source data fusion for word, sentence, aspect, and document-level sentiment analysis on real-time databases. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, (Preprint), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-234076
2.
AristaR.MasF.Morales-PalmaD.VallellanoC. (2022). Industrial resources in the design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems for aerospace: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 142, 103719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103719
3.
AristaR.ZhengX.LuJ.MasF. (2023). An ontology-based engineering system to support aircraft manufacturing system design. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 68, 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.02.012
BaiJ.SiQ.QinF. (2019a). 3D Model classification and retrieval based on convolutional neural networks and voting mechanism. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 31(02), 123–134.
6.
BaiJ.WangM.KongD. (2019b). Deep common semantic space embedding for sketch-based 3D model retrieval. Entropy, 21(4), 369. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21040369
7.
BaoH.WangZ.TaoJ.LiH.YuS.SongP. (2024). Non-cooperative game modular design method for mechanical and electrical products for reuse and assembly complexity balance. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 61(05), 285–296. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2187.TH.20241105.1615.016
8.
BeaubouefT.PetryF. E. (2009). Uncertainty modeling for database design using intuitionistic and rough set theory. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 20(3), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.3233/ifs-2009-0422
BrancaT. A.CollaV.AlgermissenD.GranbomH.MartiniU.MorillonA.PietruckR.RosendahlS. (2020). Reuse and recycling of by-products in the steel sector: Recent achievements paving the way to circular economy and industrial symbiosis in Europe. Metals, 10(3), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10030345
11.
ChazaraP.NegnyS.MontastrucL. (2016). Flexible knowledge representation and new similarity measure: Application on case based reasoning for waste treatment. Expert Systems With Applications, 58, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.014
12.
ChenL.LiuH.MooreP. (2019). A semantic recommender algorithm for 3D model retrieval based on deep belief networks. International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, 19(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijcse.2019.099643
13.
ChenS.YiJ.JiangH.ZhuX. (2016). Ontology and CBR based automated decision-making method for the disassembly of mechanical products. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(3), 564–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.06.005
14.
ChenX.GaoS.GuoS.BaiJ. (2012). A flexible assembly retrieval approach for model reuse. Computer-Aided Design, 44(6), 554–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.02.001
15.
ChhimP.ChinnamR. B.SadawiN. (2019). Product design and manufacturing process based ontology for manufacturing knowledge reuse. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(2), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1290-2
16.
ChuJ.ZhaoX.SongD.LiW.ZhangS.LiX.LiuA. (2022). Improved semantic representation learning by multiple clustering for image-based 3D model retrieval. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSWIS.297033
17.
DuanJ.DuanY. (2024). Toward a framework of extracting typical machining process routines based on knowledge representation learning. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 60, 102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102431
18.
DuruptA.BricogneM.RemyS.TroussierN.RowsonH.BelkadiF. (2019). An extended framework for knowledge modelling and reuse in reverse engineering projects. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 233(5), 1377–1389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405418789973
19.
EsmaeilianB.BehdadS.WangB. (2016). The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 39, 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.03.001
20.
FahimniaB.SarkisJ.DavarzaniH. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
FisherO.WatsonN.PorcuL.BaconD.RigleyM.GomesR. L. (2018). Cloud manufacturing as a sustainable process manufacturing route. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 47, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.03.005
23.
GaiardelliS.LoraM.SpelliniS.FummiF. (2024). RRPDG: A graph model to enable AI-based production reconfiguration and optimization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 20(4), 6844–6854. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2024.3352645
GaoL.LiuY.ChenQ.YangH.HeY.WangY. (2023). A user-knowledge vector space reconstruction model for the expert knowledge recommendation system. Information Sciences, 632, 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.03.025
26.
GaoZ.LiY.WanS. (2020a). Exploring deep learning for view-based 3D model retrieval. ACM transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377876
27.
GaoZ.XueH.WanS. (2020b). Multiple discrimination and pairwise CNN for view-based 3D object retrieval. Neural Networks, 125, 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2020.02.017
28.
GebhardtM.ManolakisI.ChatterjeeA.KalinkaG.DeubenerJ.PfnürH.ChakrabortyS.MeinersD. (2021). Reducing the raw material usage for room temperature infusible and polymerisable thermoplastic CFRPs through reuse of recycled waste matrix material. Composites Part B: Engineering, 216, 108877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108877
29.
GiovanniniA.AubryA.PanettoH.HaouziH. E.JuniorO. C.PhdL. P. (2016). Knowledge representation, retrieval and reuse for product family design: An anti-logicist approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 101, 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.10.001
30.
GoT. F.WahabD. A.RahmanM. N. A.RamliR.HussainA. (2012). Genetically optimised disassembly sequence for automotive component reuse. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5409–5417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.044
31.
GongB.LiuJ.WangX.TangX. (2012). Learning semantic signatures for 3D object retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 15(2), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2012.2231059
32.
GuoX.ZhaoW.WangJ.WangC.ZhangK.ChenL. (2017). Research on process design knowledge model and retrieval method for innovative design. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 53(15), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2017.15.066
33.
GuoY.HuJ.PengY. (2012). A CBR system for injection mould design based on ontology: A case study. Computer-Aided Design, 44(6), 496–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2011.12.007
34.
HahmG. J.LeeJ. H.SuhH. W. (2015). Semantic relation based personalized ranking approach for engineering document retrieval. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(3), 366–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.003
35.
HanZ.MoR.HaoL. (2019). Clustering and retrieval of mechanical CAD assembly models based on multisource attributes information. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 58, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.003
36.
HanZ.MoR.YangH.HaoL. (2018). CAD Assembly model retrieval based on multi-source semantics information and weighted bipartite graph. Computers in Industry, 96, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.01.003
37.
HashemiH.ShaharounA. M.SudinI. (2014). A case-based reasoning approach for design of machining fixture. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 74, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5930-4
38.
HuJ.QiJ.PengY. (2015). New CBR adaptation method combining with problem–solution relational analysis for mechanical design. Computers in Industry, 66, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.08.004
39.
HuK.WangB.YongJ.PaulJ. (2013). Relaxed lightweight assembly retrieval using vector space model. Computer-Aided Design, 45(3), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.10.005
40.
HuZ.ZhangX.XiongH. (2024). Two-stage attention network for fault diagnosis and retrieval of fault logs. Expert Systems with Applications, 249, 123365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123365
41.
HuZ.ZhaoW.XiongH.ZhangX. (2023). A hierarchical retrieval approach for automatically generating assembly instructions. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 68, 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.002
42.
HuaY.WangR.WangZ.WangG.YanY. (2024). Knowledge graph with deep reinforcement learning for intelligent generation of machining process design. Journal of Engineering Design, 2024, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2024.2338342
43.
HuangB.HeK.HuangR.ZhangF.LiX.ZhangS. (2022). Efficient NC process scheme generation method based on reusable macro and micro process fusion. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 120(3), 2517–2535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08959-x
44.
HuangB.ZhangS.HuangR.LiX.LiangJ. (2019a). 3D CAD model retrieval method for macroscopic process reuse. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 26(12), 3386–3398. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2020.12.021
45.
HuangJ.YouJ. X.LiuH. C.SongM. S. (2020). Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 199, 106885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106885
46.
HuangR.JiangJ.HeK.ChenZ. (2017). An effective freeform surface retrieval approach for potential machining process reuse. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91(9-12), 4341–4358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0071-1
47.
HuangR.JiangJ.HuangB.ZhangS. (2019b). Multilevel structured NC machining process model based on dynamic machining feature for process reuse. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 104(5-8), 2045–2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03889-7
48.
HuangR.JiangJ.ZhangS. (2018). Local structure retrieval method of cavity parts with associated process guidance. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 30(04), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1089.2018.16470
49.
HuangR.ZhangS.BaiX.XuC. (2014). Multi-level structuralized model-based definition model based on machining features for manufacturing reuse of mechanical parts. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75(5-8), 1035–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6183-y
50.
HuangR.ZhangS.BaiX.XuC.HuangB. (2015). An effective subpart retrieval approach of 3D CAD models for manufacturing process reuse. Computers in Industry, 67, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.12.001
51.
HuangY.WangG.WangR.PengT.LiH.YanY. (2024). A case-based knowledge graph with reinforcement learning for intelligent design approach of complex product. Journal of Engineering Design, 2024, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2024.2355756
HussainS.ZiaM. A.ArshadW. (2021). Additive deep feature optimization for semantic image retrieval. Expert Systems with Applications, 170, 114545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114545
54.
IqbalA.ZhaoG.SuhaimiH.HeN.HussainG.ZhaoW. (2020). Readiness of subtractive and additive manufacturing and their sustainable amalgamation from the perspective of Industry 4.0: A comprehensive review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 111(9-10), 2475–2498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06287-6
55.
JeonS. M.LeeJ. H.HahmG. J.SuhH. (2016). Automatic CAD model retrieval based on design documents using semantic processing and rule processing. Computers in Industry, 77, 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.01.002
56.
JiangM.GuoY.HuangS.PuJ. (2024). Generating the assembly instructions of helicopter subassemblies using the hierarchical pruning strategy and large language model. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 42, 100723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2024.100723
57.
JingL.YangJ.MaJ.XieJ.LiJ.JiangS. (2023). An integrated implicit user preference mining approach for uncertain conceptual design decision-making: A pipeline inspection trolley design case study. Knowledge-Based Systems, 270, 110524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110524
58.
KangY. B.KrishnaswamyS.ZaslavskyA. (2013). A retrieval strategy for case-based reasoning using similarity and association knowledge. IEEE transactions on Cybernetics, 44(4), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2013.2257746
59.
KatayamaK.HirashimaT. (2020). A retrieval method for 3D CAD assembly models using 3D radon transform and spherical harmonic transform. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 103(5), 992–1001. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2019dap0010
60.
KongY.CuiX.ZhangZ.LiuY. (2024). Research on and application of feature recognition and intelligent retrieval method for multi-component alloy powder injection molding gear based on partition templates. Metals, 14(5), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14050579
61.
KoppelaarR. H. E. M.PamidiS.HajósiE.HerrerasL.LeroyP.JungH. Y.ConchesoA.DanielR.FranciscoF. B.ParradoC.Dell’AmbrogioS. (2023). A digital product passport for critical raw materials reuse and recycling. Sustainability, 15(2), 1405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021405
62.
KumarA.StarlyB. (2022). “FabNER”: Information extraction from manufacturing process science domain literature using named entity recognition. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 33(8), 2393–2407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01807-x
63.
KyriakouH.NickersonJ. V.SabnisG. (2017). Knowledge reuse for customization: Metamodels in an open design community for 3D printing. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.17
64.
LeeK. Y.JungH. J.KwonY. (2024). Boundary-spanning technology search, product component reuse, and new product innovation: Evidence from the smartphone industry. Research Policy, 53(4), 104959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.104959
65.
LetaiefM. B.TlijaM.LouhichiB. (2020). An approach of CAD/CAM data reuse for manufacturing cost estimation. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 33(12), 1208–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2020.1815842
66.
LiB. M.XieS. Q. (2015). Module partition for 3D CAD assembly models: A hierarchical clustering method based on component dependencies. International Journal of Production Research, 53(17), 5224–5240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1015748
67.
LiC. (2022). A novel framework for discovery and reuse of typical process route driven by symbolic entropy and intelligent optimisation algorithm. Plos one, 17(9), e0274532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274532
68.
LiC.ChangZ.LiL. (2019). A new typical process route discovery and reuse system based on information entropy and PSO-Kmeans clustering algorithm. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 41(01), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1051/jnwpu/20234110198
69.
LiC.MoR.ChangZ.ZhangD.XiangY. (2015a). Typical product process route discovery method with multi-dimensional manufacturing information. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 51(15), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2015.15.148
70.
LiC.WangD.YangW. (2022). Case representation and retrieval for complex product design based on case-based reasoning. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 43(3), 2985–3002. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-212927
71.
LiL.QinF.GaoS. (2013). Extended rational representation of design that effectively supports design knowledge retrieval and reuse. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 25(10), 1514–1522.
72.
LiL.QinF.GaoS.LiuY. (2014). An approach for design rationale retrieval using ontology-aided indexing. Journal of Engineering Design, 25(7-9), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2014.969690
73.
LiW.MacG.TsoutsosN. G.GuptaN.KarriR. (2020). Computer aided design (CAD) model search and retrieval using frequency domain file conversion. Additive Manufacturing, 36, 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101554
74.
LiZ.DengZ.GeZ.LvL.GeJ. (2023). A hybrid approach of case-based reasoning and process reasoning to typical parts grinding process intelligent decision. International Journal of Production Research, 61(2), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.2010144
75.
LiZ.ZhouX.LiuW. (2015b). A geometric reasoning approach to hierarchical representation for B-rep model retrieval. Computer-Aided Design, 62, 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.05.008
76.
LiZ.ZhouX.LiuW.NiuQ.KongC. (2016). A similarity-based reuse system for injection mold design in automotive interior industry. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 87(5-8), 1783–1795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8530-7
77.
LiZ.ZhouX.WangW. M.HuangG.TianZ.HuangS. (2018). An ontology-based product design framework for manufacturability verification and knowledge reuse. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 99(9-12), 2121–2135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2099-2
78.
LiangJ.ZhangS.HuangB.ZhangY.HuangR. (2022). NC Process analysis–based intersecting machining feature recognition and reuse approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 123(7-8), 2393–2413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10281-5
79.
LiuA. A.GuoF. B.ZhouH. Y.LiW. H.SongD. (2020a). Semantic and context information fusion network for view-based 3D model classification and retrieval. IEEE Access, 8, 155939–155950. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018875
80.
LiuH.LiY.ChenJ.XiongY.DuX.ShiQ. (2017a). A new design knowledge retrieval model based on granularity and clustering theories. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 231(8), 1540–1559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406216668206
81.
LiuH.WangD.GuoL.LiuW.ZhangG.SunW. (2019a). Application analysis of advanced design technology in agricultural equipment research. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 50(07), 1–18.
82.
LiuJ.LiuX.NiZ.ZhouH. (2018). A new method of reusing the manufacturing information for the slightly changed 3D CAD model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 29, 1827–1844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1220-3
83.
LiuJ.ZhouH.LiuX.JingX. (2017b). A flexible process information reuse method for similar machining feature. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 92(1-4), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0131-6
84.
LiuJ.ZhouH.TianG.LiuX.JingX. (2019b). Digital twin-based process reuse and evaluation approach for smart process planning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 100, 1619–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2748-5
85.
LiuL.YuanT.SongH.WangH. (2019c). Manufacturing technology knowledge retrieval system based on OSE and UCF. IEEE Access, 7, 39623–39638. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906422
86.
LiuL. F.LiY. N.YanX.CavallucciD. (2020b). A new function-based patent knowledge retrieval tool for conceptual design of innovative products. Computers in Industry, 115, 103154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103154
87.
LiuZ.LiY.ZhaoL.GuoP. (2021). Construction of intelligent query system for metro electromechanical equipment faults based on the knowledge graph. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 41(3), 4351–4368. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-189695
88.
LuoC.WangX.SuC.NiZ. (2017). A fixture design retrieving method based on constrained maximum common subgraph. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 15(2), 692–704. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2017.2674961
89.
LupinettiK.GianniniF.MontiM.PernotJ. (2018). Multi-criteria retrieval of CAD assembly models. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 5(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.11.003
90.
LupinettiK.GianniniF.MontiM.PernotJ. P. (2019a). Content-based multi-criteria similarity assessment of CAD assembly models. Computers in Industry, 112, 103111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.07.001
91.
LupinettiK.PernotJ. P.MontiM.GianniniF. (2019b). Content-based CAD assembly model retrieval: Survey and future challenges. Computer-Aided Design, 113, 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2019.03.005
92.
MaL.HuangZ.WangY. (2010). Automatic discovery of common design structures in CAD models. Computers & Graphics, 34(5), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2010.06.002
93.
MaS.TianL. (2015). Ontology-based semantic retrieval for mechanical design knowledge. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 28(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2013.874593
94.
MohamedW.Ben HamzaA. (2012). Reeb graph path dissimilarity for 3D object matching and retrieval. Visual Computer, 28, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-011-0640-5
95.
NapoleoneA.BruzzoneA.AndersenA. L.BrunoeT. D. (2022). Fostering the reuse of manufacturing resources for resilient and sustainable supply chains. Sustainability, 14(10), 5890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105890
96.
PakkanenJ.JuutiT.LehtonenT. (2019). Identifying and addressing challenges in the engineering design of modular systems–case studies in the manufacturing industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 30(1), 32–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1552779
97.
ParisH.MandilG. (2018). The development of a strategy for direct part reuse using additive and subtractive manufacturing technologies. Additive Manufacturing, 22, 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.026
98.
PengG.WangH.ZhangH.HuangK. (2019). A hypernetwork-based approach to collaborative retrieval and reasoning of engineering design knowledge. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 42, 100956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100956
99.
QiangZ.PingY.YangX. (2017). Research on a knowledge modelling methodology for fault diagnosis of machine tools based on formal semantics. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 32, 92–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.01.002
100.
QiaoH.WangX.XuT.WeiZ.XiangY. (2022). 3D Assembly model retrieval method for a multiassembly interface. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 1984979. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1984979
101.
QiaoH.WuQ.YuS.DuJ.XiangY. (2019). A 3D assembly model retrieval method based on assembly information. Assembly Automation, 39(4), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-03-2018-047
102.
QinF.GaoS.YangX.LiM.BaiJ. (2016). An ontology-based semantic retrieval approach for heterogeneous 3D CAD models. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(4), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.10.001
103.
RaoR. V. (2011). Advanced modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes: International research and development (pp. 55–175). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-015-1_2.
104.
RenS.ZhaoY.HongH.GuiF.XieZ. (2019). A multi-attribute similarity case retrieval method for low-carbon design. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 55(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2019.01.149
105.
RenuR.MockoG. (2016b). Retrieval of solid models based on assembly similarity. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 13(5), 628–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2016.1150708
106.
RenuR. S.MockoG. (2016a). Computing similarity of text-based assembly processes for knowledge retrieval and reuse. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 39, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.03.004
SaundersM.LewisP.ThornillA. (2012). Research methods for Business Students. Pearson.
109.
ShiF.ChenL.HanJ.ChildsP. (2017). A data-driven text mining and semantic network analysis for design information retrieval. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139(11), 111402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037649
SiddiquaA.FanG. (2019). Semantics-enhanced supervised deep autoencoder for depth image-based 3D model retrieval. Pattern Recognition Letters, 125, 806–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2019.08.004
112.
SongD.YangY.LiW.ShaoZ.NieW.LiX.LiuA. (2024). Adaptive semantic transfer network for unsupervised 2D image-based 3D model retrieval. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 238, 103858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2023.103858
113.
SuC.JiangQ.HanY.WangT.HeQ. (2025). Knowledge graph-driven decision support for manufacturing process: A graph neural network-based knowledge reasoning approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 64, 103098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.103098
114.
TaoS.HuangZ. (2011). Assembly model search method based on attribute adjacency graph matching. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 23(02), 290–297.
115.
TaoS.HuangZ.MaL.GuoS.WangS.XieY. (2013). Partial retrieval of CAD models based on local surface region decomposition. Computer-Aided Design, 45(11), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2013.05.008
116.
TuJ.LiY.LiW.XiongY. (2013). A knowledge retrieval model and implementation for product innovation design. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 19(02), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2013.02.78.tujw.005
117.
UrwinE. N.YoungR. I. M. (2014). The reuse of machining knowledge to improve designer awareness through the configuration of knowledge libraries in PLM. International Journal of Production Research, 52(2), 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.839894
118.
VieiraG. S.FonsecaA. U.SousaN. M.FelixJ. P.SoaresF. (2023). A novel content-based image retrieval system with feature descriptor integration and accuracy noise reduction. Expert Systems with Applications, 232, 120774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120774
119.
ViganoR.OsorioG. G. (2012). Assembly planning with automated retrieval of assembly sequences from CAD model information. Assembly Automation, 32(4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445151211262410
120.
WangD.YanG.LeiY.ZhangJ. (2012a). A retrieval algorithm of sheet metal parts based on relationships of features. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 25(3), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60410-X
121.
WangH.JohnsonA. L.BracewellR. H. (2012b). The retrieval of structured design rationale for the re-use of design knowledge with an integrated representation. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.02.003
122.
WangH.LiH.WenX.LuoG. (2021). Ontology driven reuse of complex product system design information framework. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 27(6), 1662–1672. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2021.06.012
123.
WangH.ZhangS.BaiX.ZhangK. (2010). A distance-curvature shape distribution retrieval algorithm for 3D CAD surface model. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 22(5), 762–770. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1089.2010.10684
124.
WangP.LiY.ZhangJ.YuJ. (2016). An assembly retrieval approach based on shape distributions and earth mover’s distance. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 86, 2635–2651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8368-z
125.
WangP.ZhangJ.LiY.YuJ. (2017a). Reuse-oriented common structure discovery in assembly models. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31(1), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-1232-0
WangW.MoD. Y.WangY.TsengM. (2019). Assessing the cost structure of component reuse in a product family for remanufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30, 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1267-1
128.
WangW.WangY.MoD.TsengM. (2017b). Component reuse in remanufacturing across multiple product generations. Procedia CIRP, 63, 704–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.033
129.
WangW.WangY.MoD.TsengM. (2017c). Managing component reuse in remanufacturing under product diffusion dynamics. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.010
130.
WangY.LiY.ZhangJ.ZhangL. (2014). Assembly similarity analysis based on random walk and optimal matching. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 26(03), 401–410.
131.
WenJ.GuoW.ShaoH. (2017). Case knowledge retrieval method based on domain ontology and CBR. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 23(07), 1377–1385. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2017.07.002
132.
WenP.MaY.WangR. (2023). Systematic knowledge modeling and extraction methods for manufacturing process planning based on knowledge graph. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 58, 102172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102172
133.
WuY.GaoQ. (2014). Spatial structure similarity retrieval method of product assembly model. Journal of Computer Aided Design and Graphics, 26(01), 113–120.
134.
WuY.LeeJ. H.KimY. S.LeeS. W.KimS. J.YuanX. (2017). A similarity measurement framework of product-service system design cases based on context-based activity model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 104, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.015
135.
WuZ.LiangC. (2024). A review and prospects of manufacturing process knowledge acquisition, representation, and application. Machines, 12(6), 416. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines12060416
136.
WuZ.LiuW.ZhengW.NieW. (2021). Manufacturing process similarity measurement model and application based on process constituent elements. International Journal of Production Research, 59(14), 4205–4227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1759838
137.
XaviorA. M.AnounciaM. S. (2012). Case-based reasoning (CBR) model for hard machining process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 61, 1269–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4092-5
138.
XiaX.PengJ.WangL.GuoY.ZhangZ. (2025). A generalized growth scheme generation method for waste mechanical parts based on HetGNN. Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2025.0141
139.
XuC.ZhangS.FengZ.ZhangL.WangR. (2019). A multi-source similar subparts based NC process fusion and regrouping approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 102(1), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3112-5
XuF.LiuX.ChenW.ZhouC.CaoB. (2018). Ontology-based method for fault diagnosis of loaders. Sensors, 18(3), 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030729
142.
XuJ.JiY.QiG.LiuX.SongL. (2010). Classification and coding method of mechanical parts supporting mass customization design. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 46(11), 149–155. https://doi.org/ 10.3901/JME.2010.11.149
143.
XuJ.JiY.QiG.SongL.LiuX. (2012). Research on technical object reuse modeling technology based on modular product platform. China Mechanical Engineering, 23(14), 1681–1687+1692.
144.
XuL.HuangC.LiC.WangJ.LiuH.WangX. (2021a). An improved case based reasoning method and its application in estimation of surface quality toward intelligent machining. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32(1), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01573-2
145.
XuN.GaoY.LiuA. A.TianH.ZhangY. (2024b). Multi-modal validation and domain interaction learning for knowledge-based visual question answering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 36(11), 6628–6640. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2024.3384270
146.
YouC.TsaiY.LiuK. (2010). Representation and similarity assessment in case-based process planning and die design for manufacturing automotive panels. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2609-3
147.
YuX.LiuJ.HeM. (2011). Knowledge retrieval techniques for complex product design based on domain ontology. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 17(02), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2011.02.3.yux.007
148.
ZhangC.ZhouG.LuQ.ChangF. (2017a). Graph-based knowledge reuse for supporting knowledge-driven decision-making in new product development. International Journal of Production Research, 55(23), 7187–7203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351643
149.
ZhangC.ZhouG.LuQ.ChangF. (2018a). Generating significant subassemblies from 3D assembly models for design reuse. International Journal of Production Research, 56(14), 4744–4761. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1465608
150.
ZhangJ.PangJ.YuJ.WangP. (2018b). An efficient assembly retrieval method based on Hausdorff distance. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 51, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.11.012
151.
ZhangK.ZhangS.BaiX.LiL. (2010a). A local matching algorithm for 3D CAD models based on isomorphism of attribute graphs. Journal of Xi ‘an Jiaotong University, 44(11), 56–60.
152.
ZhangK.ZhangS.WeiS.ZhouY. (2024). An efficient assembly retrieval method based on compressed part parameter vectors. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, 18(5), JAMDSM0053–JAMDSM0053. https://doi.org/10.1299/jamdsm.2024jamdsm0053
153.
ZhangX.MingX.BaoY. (2022). A flexible smart manufacturing system in mass personalization manufacturing model based on multi-module-platform, multi-virtual-unit, and multi-production-line. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 171, 108379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108379
154.
ZhangX.MoR.ShiY.ZhouF. (2010b). A 3D model shape retrieval descriptor. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 22(5), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1089.2010.10804
155.
ZhangX.NassehiA.SafaiehM.NewmanS. T. (2013). Process comprehension for shopfloor manufacturing knowledge reuse. International Journal of Production Research, 51(23-24), 7405–7419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.757669
156.
ZhangY.RenS.LiuY.SakaoT.HuisinghD. (2017b). A framework for big data driven product lifecycle management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 159, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.172
157.
ZhaoX.ShiX.YangB.GaoQ.YuZ.LiuJ.TianY.HuangT. (2019). Skeleton-Based 3D object retrieval using retina-like feature descriptor. IEEE Access, 7, 157341–157352. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944307
158.
ZhengJ.WangY.ChenL.ZhangK. (2019). A new case retrieval method based on double frontiers data envelopment analysis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 36(1), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181106
159.
ZioutA.AzabA.AltaraziS.ElMaraghyW. H. (2013). Multi-criteria decision support for sustainability assessment of manufacturing system reuse. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 6(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.10.006
