Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose:

In Argentina, there is no consensus on the functional assessment of children with cerebral palsy (CP). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for children with CP are tools that standardize clinical functional assessments. The aim was to build functioning profiles of children with CP aged 2 to 18 years in eight Argentine cities, to identify their functional needs and contribute to improving assessment processes.

Methods:

Cross-sectional study, developed in stages. This article describes the last stage, the creation of the functional profile of a sample surveyed in eight cities. Twenty-five categories established in the common abbreviated core set of CP were evaluated through the application of a protocol called PC-CIFuncional (previously created). This protocol consists of scales or culturally sensitive instruments, assessed through clinical evaluations and questionnaires for children and families.

Results:

One hundred thirty-three functioning profiles were built using the previously developed PC-CIFuncional protocol. Of the participants, 52.7% had severe motor compromise with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels IV and V. In children at GMFCS level IV-V, most categories in activities and participation—including recreation, communication and physical activity—showed severe limitations and restrictions, compared with their peers. The use of technology for daily living and mobility in children with less motor compromise (GMFCS level I-III) was neither a facilitator nor a barrier, but in children with greater compromise it was a complete facilitator.

Conclusions:

Differences in functional needs were identified in children with CP according to motor involvement. This project standardizes the identification of functional needs and therapeutic goals based on ICF language, creating novel functioning profiles in Argentina.

Keywords

ICF disability cerebral palsy functioning core sets participation

Introduction

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most frequently occurring disability in the pediatric population.¹ Its consequent clinical manifestations are as diverse as the children who present them. The estimated incidence of CP ranges from 1.4 to 1.8 per 1000 live births in industrialized countries,^2,3 with a prevalence of 2.95 to 3.4 per 1000 live births in low- and middle-income countries,^4,5 where diagnosis and initiation of therapy occurs later than in high-income countries.^6,7 Although confirming a diagnosis of CP is important, it does not provide much information about a child's functional characteristics. Diagnoses are associated with symptomatology, but do not predict function.⁸

Adopting a global assessment of functioning would provide an ecological and integrated perspective on the interaction between body functions and structures, as well as environmental factors.⁹ Factors such as family, friends, social attitudes and health systems have a significant influence that must be systematically measured. In Argentina, only 60.3% of individuals with disabilities have health coverage through employment-based social security systems.¹⁰ Consequently, just over three in 10 people rely exclusively on the public health system.¹¹ Previous studies have shown that children with CP in Argentina who lack social security coverage receive fewer and shorter duration of therapies compared to their peers.¹²

Assessing functioning supports the therapeutic team in identifying meaningful goals and engaging children, adolescents, and their families in the rehabilitation process. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) offers a structured framework for this purpose.^13,14 Since the ICF includes over 1400 categories, developing Core Sets with the most relevant ones for each condition became essential. In 2014, Schiariti et al. introduced the first ICF Core Sets for children and youth with CP, along with guidelines for global implementation.¹⁵ Various initiatives have supported the implementation of ICF Core Sets across contexts. These initiatives have been used to assess activity, participation, and functioning profiles in CP populations across various countries, and even in other conditions such as Zika.^16–19

In Argentina, there is no national-level information on the functioning of this population. In a previous stage of this project, the PC-CIFuncional protocol was developed for Argentina (the Spanish translation of CP-ICFunctional).²⁰ Using this created protocol, this work aimed to 1) create functioning profiles of a nationally representative sample of children with CP according to the Common Brief ICF Core Set and 2) analyze differences in the functioning profiles of children with CP according to their motor compromise. It was established that a minimum number of 100 participants would be required. It is believed that this methodology can be replicated in other countries.

Materials and methods

This study was part of a cross-sectional study, developed in five stages. Stage 1: ICF formation process. Stage 2: Consensus for the definition of instruments to apply the common abbreviated set of CP (creation of the PC-CIFunctional protocol). Stage 3: Level of intra-interobserver agreement prior to protocol application. Stage 4: Pilot test and protocol adjustments. Stage 5: Construction of the performance profile. This article describes the results of Stage 5. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies was followed.

This multicenter study was carried out in 10 rehabilitation centers in eight cities in Argentina (San Salvador de Jujuy, Mendoza, Córdoba, Rosario, Reconquista, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires [CABA], La Plata, General Pacheco). Thirteen professionals comprised the panel of experts who participated in the course, protocol creation and application. They had to be graduates, have training in pediatric rehabilitation and have more than six years of experience in working with the CP population.

Participants

A functioning profile was developed based on a sample of children and adolescents aged two to 18 years. Participants included children and adolescents with CP receiving care at health and rehabilitation centers in eight cities across Argentina. The largest number of cases possible at each institution were included. All children and adolescents had a confirmed diagnosis of CP and represented all Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) classification levels.²¹ All children who gave consent were included. Children whose families did not wish to participate or did not give their assent were excluded, which resulted in the exclusion of 29 children. The aim of the recruitment strategy was to obtain a sufficient sample of children with CP, according to the specifications of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments. It was established a minimum number of 100 participants.²²

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital Nacional de Clínicas de Córdoba (REPIS N° 3262/3764) and had the informed consent of fathers, mothers, guardians and/or caregivers and the assent of children over 13 years of age.

Measurements

The PC-CIFuncional protocol derives its name from the abbreviations ‘PC’ for parálisis cerebral (cerebral palsy in Spanish) and ‘CIF’ for the Spanish term for the ICF. This protocol provides guidelines for the development of functioning profiles.²³ To create the functioning profiles, the Common Brief ICF Core Set for CP was used, which consists of 25 categories to assess the four domains of the ICF. For each category, the instruments previously established in the protocol developed by a team of experts were used. These instruments corresponded to clinical evaluations or questionnaires given to families (Table 1). The instruments used included the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life (CPQOL) questionnaire, language items from the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM) cognitive domain, the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition (PDMS-2), the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88), goniometric assessments, and the Modified Ashworth Scale. For categories without existing scales, custom questions were developed and validated by experts. Each evaluation was carried out across two sessions of approximately 40 min, amounting to a total of one hour and 20 min on average for completion.

Table 1.

Tools proposed to apply the Brief Common ICF Core Set for CP according to the PC-CIFuncional protocol.

ICF domain	ICF code	ICF category	Instrument selected	Type of instrument	ICF qualifier option
Body functions	b117	Intellectual functions	Questions elaborated according to age and severity of CP	Questionnaire	0 = No impairment 1 = Mild impairment 2 = Moderate impairment 3 = Severe impairment 4 = Complete impairment
Body functions	b134	Sleep functions	CPQOL	Questionnaire
Body functions	b167	Mental functions of language	Comprehensive and expressive language items of the cognitive domain of the WeeFIM	Clinical examination
Body functions	b210	Seeing functions	Questionnaire applied to the caregiver or the child	Questionnaire
Body functions	b280	Sensation of pain	CPQOL	Questionnaire
Body functions	b710	Mobility of joint functions	Goniometry	Clinical examination
Body functions	b735	Muscle tone functions	Modified Ashworth Scale	Clinical examination
Body functions	b760	Control of voluntary movement functions	PDMS-2	Clinical examination
Body structures	s110	Structure of brain	Imaging examination results	Technical investigation
Activities & participation	d415	Maintaining a body position	GMFM-88	Clinical examination	0 =no difficulty 1 = mild difficulty 2 = moderate difficulty 3 = severe difficulty 4 = complete difficulty
Activities & participation	d440	Fine hand use	Questions elaborated according to the age group	Questionnaire
Activities & participation	d450	Walking	GMFM-88	Clinical examination
Activities & participation	d460	Moving around in different locations	Elaborate questions	Questionnaire
Activities & participation	d530	Toileting	Elaborate questions	Questionnaire
Activities & participation	d550	Eating	Questionnaire applied to the caregiver or the child	Questionnaire
Activities & participation	d710	Basic interpersonal interactions	CPQOL	Questionnaire
Activities & participation	d760	Family relationships	CPQOL	Questionnaire
Environmental factors	e115	Products and technology for personal use in daily living	Elaborate questions	Questionnaire	+4 = complete facilitator +3 = substantial facilitator +2 = moderate facilitator +1 = mild facilitator 0 = not a barrier/facilitator 1 = mild barrier 2 = moderate barrier 3 = severe barrier 4 = complete barrier
Environmental factors	e120	Products and technology for personal indoor and outdoor mobility and transportation	Elaborate questions	Questionnaire
Environmental factors	e125	Products and technology for personal for communication	Elaborate questions	Questionnaire
Environmental factors	e150	Design, construction and building products and technology of buildings for public use	CPQOL	Questionnaire
Environmental factors	e310	Immediate family	CPQOL	Questionnaire
Environmental factors	e320	Friends	CPQOL	Questionnaire
Environmental factors	e460	Societal attitudes	CPQOL	Questionnaire
Environmental factors	e580	Health services, systems and policies	CPQOL	Questionnaire

Abbreviations: ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health . CP: cerebral palsy. CPQOL: Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire. PDMS-2: Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition. GMFM-88: Gross Motor Function Measure. WeeFIM: Functional Independence Measure for Children.

Statistical analysis

For the analysis of quantitative data, continuous variables were described as means with their respective standard deviations (SDs) or medians with interquartile range according to their distribution. Discrete variables were presented as percentages with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical calculations were performed using the statistical software MedCalc 18.2.1.

Results

A total of 133 functioning profiles were created. The mean age of the children was 7 ± 4 years. Most of them, 85.7% (n = 114), had social security. Sixty-nine participants (52.7%) were at GMFCS levels IV and V. According to the Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE) classification,²⁴ the predominant type of CP was bilateral spastic in 52.3% (n = 69). All the participants’ characteristics are described in Table 2.

Table 2.

Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of the population evaluated (n = 133).

Sociodemographic characteristics	n	%	95% CI
Sex
Male	79	59.4	50.5–67.8
Female	54	40.6	32.7–49.4
Social security
Yes	114	85.7	78.5–91.1
No	19	14.3	8.8–21.4
Mother's educational level
No education/Incomplete elementary school	1	0.8	0.0–4.1
Primary school complete/Secondary school incomplete	29	23.4	16.4–31.5
Completed high school or incomplete tertiary/university education	49	39.5	31.1–48.3
Tertiary/University completed or postgraduate degree	45	36.3	28.1–45.0
No information	9	6.7	3.0–12.3
Province
Buenos Aires	70	52.6	43.7–61.3
Córdoba	20	15.0	9.4–22.2
Jujuy	12	9.0	4.7–15.2
Mendoza	7	5.3	2.1–10.5
Santa Fe	24	18.0	11.8–25.5
Clinical characteristics	n	%	95% CI
Degree of severity GMFCS
I	29	22.1	15.3–30.1
II	17	13.0	7.8–19.9
III	16	12.2	7.1–18.9
IV	18	13.7	8.3–20.7
V	51	38.9	30.5–47.7
No information	2	1.6	0.2–5.4
European Classification of CP
Bilateral Spastic	69	52.3	43.4–61.0
Unilateral Spastic	37	28.1	20.6–36.5
Ataxic	5	3.8	1.2–8.6
Dyskinetic	17	12.9	7.7–19.8
Choreoathetosis	4	3.0	0.8–7.5
Not specified	1	0.8	0.0–4.1
Associated conditions
Epilepsy/seizures	18	13.6	8.2–20.6
ID	31	23.5	16.5–31.6
Both (Epilepsy-ID)	23	17.4	11.3–24.9
Neither	43	32.6	24.7–41.2
Not specified	18	13.7	8.3–20.7

CI: confidence interval. GMFCS: Gross Motor Function Classification System. CP: cerebral palsy. ID: intellectual disability.

The functioning profiles described the functional abilities and challenges and the impact of environmental factors on a child's daily performance. As shown in Tables 3 and 4, the population can be grouped based on GMFCS levels. Children with mild to moderate motor compromise (GMFCS levels I-III) are presented in Table 3 and those with severe motor compromise (GMFCS levels IV and V) in Table 4. Figures 1 and 2 were created based on the highest prevalences in Tables 3 and 4.

Figure 1.

Functioning profile of children with cerebral palsy GMFCS level I–III.

Figure 2.

Functioning profile of children with cerebral palsy GMFCS level IV–V.

Table 3.

Table of relative frequency (%) describing the functioning profile of children with cerebral palsy GMFCS level I–III (n = 62).

Body functions and structures		Qualifier 0 no impairment n (%)	Qualifier 1 mild impairment n (%)	Qualifier 2 moderate impairment n (%)	Qualifier 3 severe impairmentn (%)	Qualifier 4 complete impairmentn (%)
b117	Intellectual functions	23 (37.1)	30 (48.4)	6 (9.7)	3 (4.8)	0 (0)
b134	Sleep functions	31 (50.8)	22 (36.1)	4 (6.6)	3 (4.9)	0 (0)
b167	Mental functions of language	42 (67.7)	7 (11.3)	3 (4.8)	7 (11.3)	3 (4.8)
b210	Seeing functions	36 (59.0)	13 (21.3)	12 (19.7)	0 (0)	0 (0)
b280	Sensation of pain	29 (47.5)	15 (24.6)	8 (13.1)	3 (4.9)	6 (9.8)
b710	Mobility of joint functions	8 (13.3)	10 (16.7)	14 (23.3)	17 (28.3)	11 (18.3)
b735	Muscle tone functions	5 (8.3)	36 (60.0)	13 (21.7)	4 (6.7)	2 (3.3)
b760	Control of voluntary movement functions	21 (34.4)	14 (23.0)	12 (19.7)	14 (23.0)	0 (0)
s110	Structure of brain

Activities and participation		Qualifier 0 no difficultyn (%)	Qualifier 1 mild difficultyn (%)	Qualifier 2moderate difficultyn (%)	Qualifier 3 severe difficulty n (%)	Qualifier 4 complete difficulty n (%)
d415	Maintaining a body position	23 (37.1)	25 (40.3)	8 (12.9)	6 (9.7)	0 (0)
d440	Fine hand use	21 (33.9)	30 (48.4)	8 (12.9)	3 (4.8)	0 (0)
d450	Walking	7 (11.3)	26 (41.9)	11 (17.7)	16 (25.8)	2 (3.2)
d460	Moving around in different locations	27 (43.5)	18 (29.0)	8 (12.9)	8 (12.9)	1 (1.6)
d530	Toileting	16 (25.8)	30 (48.4)	4 (6.5)	5 (8.1)	7 (11.3)
d550	Eating	45 (72.6)	15 (24.2)	2 (3.2)	0 (0)	0 (0)
d710	Basic interpersonal interactions	26 (41.9)	24 (38.7)	7 (11.3)	5 (8.1)	0 (0)
d760	Family relationships	40 (64.5)	16 (25.8)	5 (8.1)	0 (0)	0 (0)

Environmental factors		Qualifier 4 complete barrier n (%)	Qualifier 3 severe barrier n (%)	Qualifier 2 Moderate barrier n (%)	Qualifier 1 mild barrier n (%)	Qualifier 0 no barrier/facilitator n (%)	Qualifier 1+mild facilitator n (%)	Qualifier 2+moderate facilitator n (%)	Qualifier 3+substantial facilitator n (%)	Qualifier 4+complete facilitator n (%)
e115	Products and technology for personal use in daily living	0 (0)	0 (0)	2 (3.2)	4 (6.5)	24 (38.7)	7 (11.3)	7 (11.3)	9 (14.5)	9 (14.5)
e120	Products and technology for personal indoor and outdoor mobility and transportation	0 (0)	0 (0)	3 (4.8)	2 (3.2)	43 (69.4)	3 (4.8)	3 (4.8)	3 (4.8)	5 (8.1)
e125	Products and technology for personal for communication	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (1.6)	0 (0)	54 (87.1)	3 (4.8)	1 (1.6)	2 (3.2)	1 (1.6)
e150	Design, construction and building products and technology of buildings for public use	2 (3.2)	3 (4.8)	11 (17.7)	2 (3.2)	18 (29.0)	0 (0)	7 (11.3)	2 (3.2)	17 (27.4)
e310	Immediate family	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	3 (4.8)	0 (0)	9 (14.5)	10 (16.1)	40 (64.5)
e320	Friends	0 (0)	0 (0)	2 (3.2)	0 (0)	14 (22.6)	2 (3.2)	10 (16.1)	6 (9.7)	28 (45.2)
e460	Societal attitudes	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (1.6)	1 (1.6)	5 (8.1)	6 (9.7)	12 (19.4)	13 (21.0)	24 (38.7)
e580	Health services, systems and policies	3 (4.8)	0 (0)	0 (0)	3 (4.8)	8 (12.9)	7 (11.3)	17 (27.4)	3 (4.8)	21 (33.9)

GMFCS: Gross Motor Function Classification System.

Table 4.

Table of relative frequency (%) describing the functioning profile of children with cerebral palsy GMFCS level VI–V (n = 69).

Body functions and structures		Qualifier 0 no impairmentn (%)	Qualifier 1 mild impairmentn (%)	Qualifier 2 moderate impairmentn (%)	Qualifier 3 severe impairmentn (%)	Qualifier 4 complete impairmentn (%)
b117	Intellectual functions	2 (2.9)	15 (21.7)	23 (33.3)	11 (15.9)	18 (26,1)
b134	Sleep functions	23 (34.3)	21 (31.3)	14 (20.9)	6 (9.0)	3 (4,5)
b167	Mental functions of language	5 (7.2)	4 (5.8)	2 (2.9)	28 (40.6)	30 (43,5)
b210	Seeing functions	22 (34.9)	13 (20.6)	11 (17.5)	12 (19.0)	5 (7,9)
b280	Sensation of pain	22 (31.9)	17 (24.6)	15 (21.7)	9 (13.0)	6 (8,7)
b710	Mobility of joint functions	0 (0)	5 (7.7)	19 (29.2)	24 (36.9)	17 (26,2)
b735	Muscle tone functions	0 (0)	22 (32.4)	20 (29.4)	19 (27.9)	7 (10,3)
b760	Control of voluntary movement functions	5 (7.4)	4 (5.9)	4 (5.9)	28 (41.2)	27 (39,7)
s110*	Brain structure

Activities and participation		Qualifier 0 no difficulty n (%)	Qualifier 1 mild difficulty n (%)	Qualifier 2 moderate difficulty n (%)	Qualifier 3 severe difficulty n (%)	Qualifier 4 complete difficulty n (%)
d415	Maintaining a body position	1 (1.4)	0(0)	3 (4.3)	27 (39.1)	38 (55.1)
d440	Fine hand use	3 (4.3)	3 (4.3)	12 (17.4)	21 (30.4)	30 (43.5)
d450	Walking	1 (1.4)	1 (1.4)	0 (0)	5 (7.2)	62 (89.9)
d460	Moving around in different locations	1 (1.4)	1 (1.4)	1 (1.4)	10 (14.5)	56 (81.2)
d530	Toileting	1 (1.4)	2 (2.9)	6 (8.7)	18 (26.1)	42 (60.9)
d550	Eating	6 (8.7)	23 (33.3)	18 (26.1)	5 (7.2)	17 (24.6)
d710	Basic interpersonal interactions	30 (43.5)	23 (33.3)	14 (20.3)	1 (1.4)	1 (1.4)
d760	Family relationships	44 (63.8)	19 (27.5)	5 (7.2)	0 (0)	1 (1.4)

Environmental factors		Qualifier 4 complete barrier n (%)	Qualifier 3 severe barrier n (%	Qualifier 2 moderate barrier n (%)	Qualifier 1 mild barrier n (%)	Qualifier 0 no barrier/facilitator n (%)	Qualifier 1+mild facilitator n (%)	Qualifier 2+moderate facilitator n (%)	Qualifier 3+substantial facilitator n (%)	Qualifier 4+complete facilitator n (%)
e115	Products and technology for personal use in daily living	1 (1.5)	3 (4.5)	1 (1.5)	2 (3.0)	4 (6.0)	0 (0)	9 (13.4)	17 (25.4)	30 (44.8)
e120	Products and technology for personal indoor and outdoor mobility and transportation	0 (0)	3 (4.4)	4 (5.9)	0 (0)	5 (7.4)	1 (1.5)	9 (13.2)	15 (22.1)	30 (44.1)
e125	Products and technology for personal for communication	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (1.5)	0 (0)	32 (47.1)	6 (8.8)	10 (14.7)	8 (11.8)	11 (16.2)
e150	Design, construction and building products and technology of buildings for public use	8 (11.6)	2 (2.9)	12 (17.4)	7 (10.1)	20 (29.0)	1 (1.4)	16 (23.2)	2 (2.9)	1 (1.4)
e310	Immediate family	1 (1.5)	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (1.5)	2 (2.9)	4 (5.9)	6 (8.8)	3 (4.4)	51 (75.0)
e320	Friends	1 (1.4)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	11 (15.9)	4 (5.8)	17 (24.6)	9 (13.0)	27 (39.1)
e460	Societal attitudes	0 (0)	0 (0)	1 (1.4)	2 (2.9)	9 (13.0)	8 (11.6)	18 (26.1)	17 (24.6)	14 (20.3)
e580	Health services, systems and policies	1 (1.4)	1 (1.4)	2 (2.9)	4 (5.8)	7 (10.1)	18 (26.1)	16 (23.2)	10 (14.5)	10 (14.5)

GMFCS: Gross Motor Function Classification System. * Category s110 (brain structure) results are omitted, as the available magnetic resonance imaging data were insufficient to allow for a reliable interpretation.

Figures 1 and 2 show the functioning profile of the total population according to GMFCS level groups. Regardless of the GMFCS level, categories such as sleep functions (b134), visual functions (b210) and pain sensation (b280) presented no difficulties (score 0).

In bodily functions, children at GMFCS level I-III presented severe impairment (score 3) in the category of joint mobility functions (b710), and mild impairment (score 1) in intellectual functions (b117) and muscle tone functions (b735). In activity and participation, no category presented severe restrictions (Figure 1).

In terms of components of bodily functions, children with GMFCS IV-V levels presented complete impairment (score 4) in the category of mental functions of language (b167) and severe impairment (score 3) in functions related to joint mobility (b710) and control of voluntary movements (b760). In the activities and participation dimension, children with GMFCS IV-V presented complete difficulties (score 4) in most categories, except basic interpersonal interactions (d710) and family relationships (d760) (Figure 2).

Differences in environmental factors were observed according to GMFCS level. In terms of technology use—both for daily life and mobility—children at GMFCS level I-III generally did not perceive it as either a facilitator or a barrier (score 0). In contrast, for children with GMFCS IV-V levels, technology was considered a full facilitator (score +4) (Figure 1 and 2). Among children with GMFCS I-III levels (Figure 1), several environmental factors were reported as full facilitators (score +4): immediate family (e310), friends (e320), social attitudes (e460), and health services, systems, and policies (e580). However, for those with severe motor impairments, only immediate family and friends were consistently identified as full facilitators (score +4) (Figures 2).

Category s110 (brain structure) results are omitted, as the available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were insufficient to allow for a reliable interpretation.

Discussion

This study describes the process of applying a culturally sensitive ICF-based tool to operationalize the pediatric ICF Core Sets for the population with CP in Argentina. Not only did this process enable the creation of the first national functioning profile of this population, it also made other relevant contributions, such as 1) raising awareness about the importance of investing in professional ICF training in clinical settings; 2) implementing a unique protocol to standardize functional data collection and the creation of ICF-based functioning profiles; and 3) providing concrete functional information that could guide therapeutic interventions for children and adolescents with CP in Argentina. Overall, the protocol called PC-CIFuncional made it possible to identify functional needs and relevant environmental factors, contributing to the standardization of the assessment process. Although all team members were qualified to administer the various scales and instruments used to develop the functioning profiles, in practice, the professionals most frequently involved were physiatrists, physiotherapists, and/or occupational therapists. It is important to note that the specific professionals participating in the process varied depending on the resources and composition of the health and rehabilitation teams at each center.

Regarding the clinical characteristics of the sample, a high prevalence of cases of children with severe motor disability with GMFCS levels IV and V attending rehabilitation centers in Argentina was observed. This may be due to data collection in institutions specialized in motor disabilities; however, the proportions align with previous Argentine studies on CP.²⁵ This sample was also similar in its distribution according to levels of gross motor function to those previously described in underdeveloped or low-income countries, such as Bangladesh, and developing countries, such as other Latin American countries, with a higher prevalence of more severe cases.^26,27 In contrast, in developed countries, such as Australia and the United States, mild levels of CP (levels I-II) constitute 40 to 60% of the population.^6,28 These differences in severity could be explained by the types of centers included which, being specialized in motor disability, are likely to have treated more severe cases, but could also be due to other factors such as lack of early detection and intervention, access to treatment or support equipment, and fewer children with CP diagnosed with mild motor impairment.

Functional profiles based on GMFCS level make it possible to identify needs more specifically, not only for each group but also for each individual. Previous studies have demonstrated that functional profiles are valuable tools for designing intervention strategies tailored to the unique abilities and limitations of each child with CP or another disability.^23,29

The findings of this study confirm that children with severe motor impairments (GMFCS levels IV–V) experience greater functional limitations, particularly in the domains of body functions (three out of the eight components) and activities and participation (five categories). These results are consistent with previous research. For instance, studies conducted in Russia, Brazil, and Turkey have reported similar patterns of severe impairment, especially in areas related to voluntary movement, muscle tone, intellectual functions, and gross motor performance.^16,18,30 This aligns with studies showing that nearly all CP Core Set parameters correlate with poor GMFM-66 outcomes in children with GMFCS IV-V levels, highlighting the broad impact of severe motor impairment.¹⁶ These converging findings reinforce the importance of early identification and intervention strategies aimed at minimizing the effects of motor impairment on overall functioning. Furthermore, they highlight the need to tailor rehabilitation approaches to better support children with high levels of motor involvement.

Regardless of GMFCS level, there tended to be fewer impairments, limitations, or restrictions in the following categories: seeing functions (b210), sleep functions (b134), sensation of pain (b280), basic personal interactions (d710), and family relationships (d760). Although some studies report that more than 50% of children with CP have some visual impairment,¹⁰ this was not the case in the present study population. With respect to sleep functions (b134), Espinosa and Ortiz reported that only 16.7% of a sample of children with CP reported some sleep disturbance,³¹ which coincides with the current study. As for the categories of basic personal interactions (d710), the results reinforce the importance of a social and family network for the child with disabilities, and of further research on its evaluation in rehabilitation processes.

Among the environmental factors, the use of technology for both daily life and mobility was neither a facilitator nor a barrier for children with less motor compromise, while it was a complete facilitator for children with greater motor compromise. It is important to mention that, although most children participating in the study need an assistive device for communication, many do not have one, making it a major barrier to communication. Inequalities in access to assistive devices between individuals with and without social security should continue to be investigated in order to highlight these disparities and propose targeted solutions. In a study on the use of assistive technology to promote adaptive skills in children with CP,³² Stasolla et al. found that various assistive technologies were effective in fostering independence and self-determination among children with CP, regardless of their levels of intellectual and motor functioning. Technologies for the activities of daily living, mobility and communication provide autonomous access to request and choice processes. These results continue to show the impact that assistive devices have in facilitating the participation of children with CP and the impact on their quality of life.³² For this reason, it is necessary to identify the causes of the difficulties in accessing them and ensure that everyone, according to their particular needs, is in a position to gain access.

By promoting participation, family, friends, and health services are a fundamental support network for people with disabilities; child- and family-centered care in particular are indispensable in the rehabilitation process of children with disabilities.^33,34,35 Many families rated health services as facilitators simply because they had access to them, even if the quality was suboptimal or not family centered. It is essential to investigate health disparities among individuals with CP in Argentina, with particular attention to the quality of and access to rehabilitation services. In Argentina, Law 24.901 (1997) establishes the system of basic benefits for the comprehensive habilitation and rehabilitation of persons with disabilities, including the provision of assistive devices.³⁶ The law designates the social security system as the primary payer of these benefits. Consequently, children with CP who are not covered by a social security scheme often experience severely limited or precarious access to rehabilitation services and assistive technologies. Future studies should explore access to communication devices and opportunities for community-based participation, such as recreation, music, and arts, both inside and outside school.

This study had limitations. The sample was drawn exclusively from rehabilitation centers, so children with mild motor impairments and without social insurance may be underrepresented. Therefore, the results should be interpreted in this context and not extrapolated to the whole population of children with CP. As participation in the study was voluntary, no data were collected from individuals who declined to participate. Therefore, it was not possible to assess potential differences between participants and non-participants, which may have introduced a degree of selection bias.

One of the strengths of the present study is its multicenter and multidisciplinary nature. This was the first collaborative initiative, which described functioning profiles, in rehabilitation centers in different provinces of Argentina that are recognized for their work with people with CP. The unique perspectives of the team made it possible to obtain adequate representativeness in the creation and application of the protocol of this first version of PC-CIFuncional. In addition, due to the success of the ICF educational course, this project has enabled hundreds of professionals in the country to receive training in ICF. The research team has provided four additional courses and continues to provide ICF education, with an emphasis on ICF-based tools for clinical practice.

Future directions

Due to the success of the collaboration working with professionals across the country, the study team is creating a network of centers to apply PC-CIFuncional to gain full representation of provinces. Importantly, the project recently received funding from a federal agency (PICT RAICES 2022–2024) to carry out the multicenter implementation of PC-CIFuncional in the next three years.

Conclusion

This project standardizes the identification of functional assessments and therapeutic goals using ICF language. Different functional needs were identified in children with CP depending on their level of motor commitment. This suggested that the functional profiles might be influenced by different factors that must be considered when thinking about therapeutic goals. This novel protocol called PC-CIFuncional facilitates the creation of much-needed functional profiles of children with CP in Argentina, filling an important gap in national disability data. The systematic application of PC-CIFuncional in this country will contribute to individual assessments in rehabilitation centers, and comparisons of functional needs at the provincial and national levels, ultimately guiding appropriate services and interventions for children and adolescents with CP.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants, researchers and collaborators who participated in the study for their effort and contribution. The authors thank the collaborators in the different phases of the study. In the PC-CIFuncional creation stage, we would like to thank Mariana Melaragno, Agustina Fabbro, Úrsula Ivancic, Maria Laura Mammana, Geraldina Morganti, Andrea de los Ríos, Lourdes Graffigna, Romina Vera, Valeria Menéndez, Silvana Domínguez, Federico Ángel Benito, and Alejandra Capone for their participation. In addition, in the process of making the performance profiles, we appreciate the collaboration of Sandra Schenfelt, Sonia Spiazzi, Mayra Rossetti, Mailen Cernadas, Roxana Ramírez, Cielo Frangi, Carolina Zinni, Cecilia Lucentini, Jackie Ducoté, Verónica Parareda, Juan Zamora, and Mariana Stoisa.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee CIEIS- Hospital Nacional de Clínicas FCM (REPIS N° 3262/3764) and had the informed consent of fathers, mothers, guardians and/or caregivers and the assent of children over 13 years of age.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Material resources were provided by the Institute for Clinical and Epidemiological Research (INICyE). The National University of Córdoba funded the work through a grant from SECyT (Resolution SECyT N.° 411/18). The Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation supported this work through grant PRG10321. In addition, it was carried out with the support of the SALUD INVESTIGA 2020–2021 grants, awarded by the Ministry of Health of Argentina through the Directorate of Health Research, and a grant through a PICT project awarded by the Fund for Scientific and Technological Research FONCyT (PICT-2021-III-A-00062).

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

María de las Mercedes Ruiz Brunner

Eduardo Cuestas

Elisabeth Cieri

Ana Laura Condinanzi

Carolina Ayllon

Verónica Schiariti

References

Oskoui

Coutinho

Dykeman

, et al. An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013; 55: 509–519.

Galea

Mcintyre

Smithers-Sheedy

, et al. Cerebral palsy trends in Australia (1995–2009): a population-based observational study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2019; 61: 186–193.

Hollung

Vik

Lydersen

, et al. Decreasing prevalence and severity of cerebral palsy in Norway among children born 1999 to 2010 concomitant with improvements in perinatal health. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2018; 22: 814–821.

Chauhan

Singh

Jaiswal

, et al. Prevalence of cerebral palsy in Indian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Pediatr 2019; 86: 1124–1130.

Khandaker

Muhit

Karim

. Epidemiology of cerebral palsy in Bangladesh: a population-based surveillance study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2019; 61: 601–609.

Benfer

Jordan

Bandaranayake

, et al. Motor severity in children with cerebral palsy studied in a high-resource and low-resource country. Pediatrics 2014; 134: e1594–e1602.

LeBrun

Banskota

, et al. Socioeconomic Status influences functional severity of untreated cerebral palsy in Nepal: a prospective analysis and systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477: 10–21.

Lollard

Simdonsson

. Diagnosis to function. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2005; 26: 323–330.

Lavanchy

. Clasificación internacional del funcionamiento, de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) y su aplicación en rehabilitación. Rehabil Integr 2011; 6: 33–45.

10.

Cornejo

Zamilpa F de

Guerrero

, et al. Estado visual en niños con parálisis cerebral en el centro de rehabilitación e inclusión infantil teletón aguascalientes. Lux Médica 2022; 17: 4.

11.

INDEC . CENSO 2022-República Argentina: Salud y previsión social. Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2022. https://censo.gob.ar/index.php/el-609-de-la-poblacion-tiene-obra-social-prepaga-o-cobertura-de-pami/.

12.

Escobar

Ruiz Brunner

Schiariti

, et al. Dosing of interventions and interdisciplinary care in the rehabilitation process of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy in Argentina. Arch Argent Pediatr 2025; 123: e202410551.

13.

World Health Organization . International classification of functioning, disability and health: children and youth version: ICF-CY. 2007. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43737.

14.

Schiariti

Mâsse

. Relevant areas of functioning in children with cerebral palsy based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health coding system. J Child Neurol 2015; 30: 216–222.

15.

Schiariti

Selb

Cieza

, et al. International classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for children and youth with cerebral palsy: a consensus meeting. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015; 57: 149–158.

16.

Üneş

Coşkun

. An ICF core set based investigation of the effects of gross motor functions on health in children with cerebral palsy. Türk Fiz ve Rehabil Derg 2023; 34: 249–257.

17.

Raji

Mehraban

Ahmadi

, et al. Assessment priorities in cerebral palsy using ICF core set by Iranian occupational therapists. Can J Occup Ther 2019; 86: 289–298.

18.

Liao

H-F

Hwang

A-W

Schiariti

, et al. Validating the ICF core set for cerebral palsy using a national disability sample in Taiwan. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 42: 642–650.

19.

Gama

Tavares

Salvino de Brito

, et al. Profile of functioning of Brazilian children with congenital Zika syndrome: a longitudinal study applying the common brief ICF core set for cerebral palsy. Early Child Dev Care 2023; 193: 1607–1619.

20.

Zuluaga

Brunner

Cuestas

, et al. Development of an assessment protocol to operationalize the core set of the international classification of functioning for people with cerebral palsy. Arch Argent Pediatr 2025; 124: e202410550.

21.

Rosenbaum

Palisano

Bartlett

, et al. Development of the gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 249–253.

22.

Teixeira

Viana

KDAL

. Nutritional screening in hospitalized pediatric patients: a systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2016; 92: 343–352.

23.

Escobar

Schiariti

Ruiz Brunner

, et al. Profiles of functioning of a group of children with cerebral palsy in Argentina: preliminary data from the first national study. Arch Argent Pediatr 2024; 122: e202310257.

24.

Cans

. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 42: 16.

25.

Ruiz Brunner

Cieri

Marco

MPR

, et al. Nutritional status of children with cerebral palsy attending rehabilitation centers. Dev Med Child Neurol 2020; 62: 1383–1388.

26.

Figueroa

Rojas

Barja

. Morbimortalidad asociada al estado nutricional y vía de alimentación en niños con parálisis cerebral. Rev Chil Pediatría 2017; 88: 478–486.

27.

Silva

BNS

Brandt

Cabral

, et al. Malnutrition frequency among cerebral palsy children: differences in onset of nutritional intervention before or after the age of five years. Rev Nutr 2017; 30: 713–722.

28.

Brooks

Day

Shavelle

, et al. Low weight, morbidity, and mortality in children with cerebral palsy: new clinical growth charts. Pediatrics 2011; 128: e299–e307.

29.

Ferreira

Schiariti

Regalado

, et al. Functioning and disability profile of children with microcephaly associated with congenital Zika virus infection. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: 1107.

30.

Schiariti

Longo

Shoshmin

, et al. Implementation of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF) core sets for children and youth with cerebral palsy: global initiatives promoting optimal functioning. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: 1899.

31.

Espinosa

Ortiz

. Frecuencia de trastornos del sueño en niños con discapacidad y alteraciones respiratorias. Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab 2011; 23: 115–122.

32.

Stasolla

Caffò

Perilli

, et al. Assistive technology for promoting adaptive skills of children with cerebral palsy: ten cases evaluation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2019; 14: 489–502.

33.

Cieri

Cuestas

. The family with a disabled child: a brief historical journey to the present. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba 2020; 77: 335–338.

34.

Jackman

Sakzewski

Morgan

, et al. Interventions to improve physical function for children and young people with cerebral palsy: international clinical practice guideline. Dev Med Child Neurol 2022; 64: 536–549.

35.

Milićević

. Exploring participation in family activities among serbian children with cerebral palsy and children with typical development: diversity, frequency, children’s presence, and engagement. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 1583–1594.

36.

Ministerio de Justicia de la Nación Argentina . Ley 24.901 - Sistema de prestaciones básicas en habilitación y rehabilitación integral a favor de las personas con discapacidad. 24.901 Argentina; 1997, pp.1–10. https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/45000-49999/47677/norma.htm.

ICF-based functioning profiles in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: Evidence from a population-based study in Argentina

Abstract

Purpose:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Participants

Measurements

Statistical analysis

Results

Discussion

Future directions

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Ethical considerations

Funding

Declaration of conflicting interests

ORCID iDs

References