This paper provides an applied case to delineate Functional Urban Areas in Ankara, Turkey, adapting the original method developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Union (EU) to the lack of commuting-flow data. The proposed method aims to overcome the lack of official commuting data, a challenge often encountered in non-European countries. Other challenges addressed by the paper are the need to ensure consistency with existing administrative and institutional settings in Turkey and selecting the most appropriate local units to be used as building blocks. The methodology developed in this study can serve as a model for other countries facing similar data limitations, contributing to the global effort to standardise urban delineation.
DijkstraLPoelmanHVeneriP. The EU-OECD definition of a functional urban area. OECD Regional Development Working Papers; 2019/11. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
2.
OECD, European Union, FAO, United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Applying the degree of urbanisation: a methodological manual to define cities, towns and rural areas for international comparisons. OECD Regional Development Studies. Paris; Brussels: OECD Publishing; European Union, 2021.
3.
AhasRAasaASilmS, et al.Mobile positioning data in tourism studies and monitoring: case study in Tartu, Estonia. In: SigalaMMichLMurphyJ (eds) Information and communication technologies in tourism 2007. Vienna: Springer, 2007, pp.119–128.
4.
HadachiAPourmoradnasseriMKhoshkhahK. Unveiling large-scale commuting patterns based on mobile phone cellular network data. J Transp Geogr2020; 89: 102871.
5.
ŠvedaMBarlíkP. Daily commuting in the Bratislava metropolitan area: case study with mobile positioning data. Pap Appl Geogr2018; 4: 409–423.
6.
ŠvedaMSládeková MadajováM. Estimating distance decay of intra-urban trips using mobile phone data: the case of Bratislava, Slovakia. J Transp Geogr2023; 107: 103552.
7.
PintérGFeldeI. Commuting analysis of the Budapest metropolitan area using mobile network data. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf2022; 11: 466.
8.
VlagPDurnellUMalmrosJ. Quality improvement in mobile phone position data: a collaboration model between SCB and an operator. Presented at: 2022 VILNIUS, 2022.
9.
SadeghinasrBAkhavanAWangQ. Estimating commuting patterns from high resolution phone GPS data. CoRR2019: abs/1907.03744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482438.002
NicholsEO'BrianAFeuerS, et al.Use of mobile phone location data in official statistics, social, demographic and health studies. US Census Bureau Research Report Series; 2/2023, 2023.
12.
NovakJAhasRAasaA, et al.Application of mobile phone location data in mapping of commuting patterns and functional regionalization: a pilot study of Estonia. J Maps2013; 9: 10–15.
13.
BrezziMVeneriP. Assessing polycentric urban systems in the OECD. Country, regional and metropolitan perspectives. Eur Plan Stud2015; 23: 1128–1145.
14.
VeneriP. Urban spatial structure in OECD cities. Is urban population decentralising or clustering?Pap Reg Sci2018; 97: 1355–1375.
15.
BağırYKKüçükbayrakMTorunH. Declining labor market informality in Turkey: unregistered employment and wage underreporting. Working Paper of the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye; 21/19, 2021.
16.
CernatABuil-GilDBrunton-SmithI, et al.Estimating crime in place: moving beyond residence location. Crime Delinq2022; 68: 2061–2091.
17.
OlhanE. The structure of rural employment in Turkey. Ankara: FAO Representation in Turkey, 2011.
18.
GüntherILaunovA. Informal employment in developing countries: opportunity or last resort?J Dev Econ2012; 97: 88–98.
19.
OECD. OECD employment outlook 2019: the future of work. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
20.
MotteBAguileraABoninO, et al.Commuting patterns in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro. What differences between formal and informal jobs?J Transp Geogr2016; 51: 59–69.
21.
EllegårdK. Thinking time geography. Concepts, methods and applications. London: Routledge, 2018.
22.
CompagnucciFMorettiniG. Inner areas matter: a place-sensitive approach for the identification of the daily life spaces in the Italian Abruzzo region. Socioecon Plann Sci2024; 93: 101859.
23.
MetzD. Time constraints and travel behaviour. Transp Plan Technol2021; 44: 16–29.
24.
GeddesP. Cities in evolution. London: William & Norgate, 1915.
25.
HupkesG. The law of constant travel time and trip-rates. Futures1982; 14: 38–46.
26.
TannerJC. Factors affecting the amount of travel. Road Research Technical Paper 51. London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1961.
27.
ZahaviY. Equilibrium between travel demand system supply and urban structure. In: VisserEJ (eds) Transport decisions in an age of uncertainty. The Hague: Springer, 1977, pp.194–199.
FadicMGarcilazoJEMoreno-MonroyAI, et al.Classifying small (TL3) regions based on metropolitan population, low density and remoteness. OECD Regional Development Working Papers; 2019/06. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
30.
OECD, European Commission. Cities in the world. A new perspective to urbanisation. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.
31.
Moreno-MonroyAISchiavinaMVeneriP. Metropolitan areas in the world. Delineation and population trends. J Urban Econ2021; 125: 103242.
