There is need and opportunity for assessments that support quick and playful – yet also accurate, rigorous and developmentally sensitive – appraisals of early numeracy. Ideally, these should be accessible to those who have opportunity to support children’s learning development and ultimately shift children’s trajectories. The iPad-based Early Years Toolbox (EYT) Early Numeracy assessment was developed and evaluated to determine its validity and reliability, and appropriateness of use by researchers and preschool educators. Results from two studies with 246 children aged 3–5 years indicated the following: construct validity and internal consistency, concurrent validity with established measures, developmental sensitivity, test–retest reliability and highly comparable results whether used by a researcher or an educator. This yields a brief and playful assessment of early numeracy and a potential approach to develop broad-use early years assessments.
AunioP.NiemivirtaM. (2010). Predicting children's mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.06.003
4.
AunioP.RasanenP. (2016). Core numerical skills for learning mathematics in children aged five to eight years - a working model for educators. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(5), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293x.2014.996424
5.
BalladaresJ.KankarašM. (2020). Attendance in early childhood education and care programmes and academic proficiencies at age 15. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 214, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f16c7ae5-en
6.
Beltrán-NavarroB.Abreu-MendozaR. A.MatuteE. M.RosselliM. (2018). Development of early numerical abilities of spanish-speaking mexican preschoolers: A new assessment tool. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 7(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2016.1266940.
7.
BjorklundC.BarendregtW. (2016). Teachers' pedagogical mathematical awareness in Swedish early childhood education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066426
8.
BynnerJ.DuncanS. (1997). Does numeracy matter? Evidence from the national child development study on the impact of poor numeracy on adult life. London: Basic Skills Agency.
9.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York: Routledge.
10.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. H.LiuX. F. H. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: The research-based early maths assessment. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 457–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701777272
DoigB.McCraeB.RoweK. (2003). A good start to numeracy: Effective numeracy strategies from research and practice in early childhood. ACER.
13.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.PaganiL. S.FeinsteinL.EngelM.Brooks-GunnJ.SextonH.DuckworthK.JaspelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
14.
ElliotC. D. (2007). Differential ability scales (2nd ed.). Harcourt Assessment.
15.
FentonA.MacDonaldA.McFarlandL. (2016). A strengths approach to supporting early mathematics learning in family contexts. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood,41, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911604100107
16.
FryeD.BaroodyA. J.BurchinalM.CarverS. M.JordanN. C.McDowellJ. (2013). Teaching math to young children: A practice guide (NCEE 2014-4004). NCEE. http://whatworks.ed.gov
17.
GinsburgH. P.BaroodyA. J. (2003). Test of early mathematics ability. PRO-ED.
18.
Hannula-SormunenM. M.LehtinenE.RasanenP. (2015). Preschool children's spontaneous focusing on numerosity, subitizing, and counting skills as predictors of their mathematical performance seven years later at school. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(2–3), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.1016814
19.
HirschS.LambertK.CoppensK.MoellerK. (2018). Basic numerical competences in large-scale assessment data: Structure and long-term relevance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.015
20.
HowardS. J.MelhuishE. C. (2017). An Early Years Toolbox (EYT) for assessing early executive function, language, self-regulation, and social development: Validity, reliability, and preliminary norms. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916633009
21.
HowardS. J.VasseleuE. (2020). Self-regulation and executive function longitudinally predict advanced learning in preschool. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00049.
22.
HowardS. J.VasseleuE.Neilsen-HewettC.de RosnayM.WilliamsK. E. (2021). Predicting academic school readiness and risk status from different assessment approaches and constructs of early self-regulation. Child & Youth Care Forum. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-021-09636-y
23.
JordanN. C.GluttingJ.RamineniC. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.004
24.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.RamineniC.LocuniakM. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939
25.
JungM.HartmanP.SmithT.WallaceS. (2013). The effectiveness of teaching number relationships in preschool. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 165–178. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED539908
26.
KnausM. (2017). Supporting early mathematics learning in early childhood settings. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 42(3), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.23965/ajec.42.3.01
27.
MacDonaldA.MurphyS. (2021). Mathematics education for children under four years of age: a systematic review of the literature. Early years, 41(5), 522-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2019.1624507.
28.
ManningM.GarvisS.FlemingC.WongG. T. (2017). The relationship between teacher qualification and the quality of the early childhood education and care environment. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13, 1–82. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.1
29.
MononenR.AunioP.KoponenT.AroM. (2014). A review of early numeracy interventions for children at risk in mathematics. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 6(1), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.14355
30.
NguyenT.WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. S.WolfeC.SpitlerM. E. (2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.02.003
31.
PerryB.MacDonaldA. (2015). Educators' expectations and aspirations around young children's mathematical knowledge. Professional Development in Education, 41(2), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.990578
32.
PurpuraD. J.BaroodyA. J.LoniganC. J. (2013). The transition from informal to formal mathematical knowledge: Mediation by numeral knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031753
33.
PurpuraD. J.LoniganC. J. (2013). Informal numeracy skills: The structure and relations among numbering, relations, and arithmetic operations in preschool. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212465332
34.
PurpuraD. J.LoniganC. J. (2015). Early numeracy assessment: The development of the Preschool Early Numeracy Scales. Early Education and Development, 26(2), 286–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.991084
35.
Riley-AyersS. (2014). Formative assessment: Guidance for early childhood policymakers (CEELO policy report). New Brunswick, NJ: Center on Enhancing Early Learning Outcomes.
SirajI.HowardS.J.KingstonD., et al. (2019). Comparing regulatory and non-regulatory indices of early childhood education and care (ECEC) quality in the Australian early childhood sector. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46, 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00325-3.
