This Australian study examines whether and how technologies such as Artificially Intelligent (AI) toys in a home-based setting might socially and emotionally support children with diverse needs through play. Building on the concept of ‘emotional capital', and employing a design-based research approach, parents during the COVID-19 lockdown periods in 2020 intentionally used robotic toys to engage their children with additional diverse needs in home-based play experiences. The data from both parents’ and children’s (n = 5) Zoom interviews, digital observations and children’s drawings demonstrated how children creatively conversed with their AI robots in innovative and empathy-based dialogues that generated happy feelings and a sense of ‘imaginary’ togetherness with their robot during the coding experiences. This study contributes to research by exploring the use of AI robotic toys together with physical and artificial environments and offers a case to build children’s emotional capital in enabling children’s social-emotional literacies.
ArnottL.KewalramaniS.GrayC.DardanouM. (2020). Role play and technologies in early childhood. In KingdonZ. (Ed.), A Vygotskian Analysis of Children’s Play Behaviours: Beyond the Home Corner (pp. 76–92). Routledge.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
7.
BritoR.DiasP.OliveiraG. (2018). Young children, digital media and smart toys: How perceptions shape adoption and domestication. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 807–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12655
8.
BrymanA. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
9.
ClandininD. J. (Ed.), (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology. Sage Publications.
10.
Department of Education and Training (2018). Belonging, being and becoming – the early years learning framework for Australia. https://docs.education.gov.au/node/2632
GiddingsS. (2019). Toying with the singularity: AI, Automata and Imagination in play with robots and virtual pets. In MascheroniG.HollowayD. (Eds.), The internet of toys: Practices, affordances and the political economy of children’s smart play (pp. 67–87). Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
HancockK.LawrenceD.MitrouF.ZarbD.BerthelsenD.NicholsonJ.ZubrickS. (2012). The association between playgroup participation, learning competence and social-emotional wellbeing for children aged four-five years in Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911203700211
14.
HuijnenC. A. G. J.LexisM. A. S.JansensR.de WitteL. P. (2017). How to implement robots in interventions for children with autism? A co-creation study involving people with Autism, parents and professionals. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(10), 3079–3096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3235-9
KewalramaniS.KidmanG.PalaiologouI. (2021). Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) interfaced robotic toys in early childhood settings: A pedagogy for children’s inquiry literacy. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(5), 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2021.1968458
17.
LavigneJ. V.LeBaillyS. A.HopkinsJ.GouzeK. R.BinnsH. J. (2009). The prevalence of ADHD, ODD, depression, and anxiety in a community sample of 4-year-olds. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410902851382
18.
LuckinR.CukurovaM. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences‐driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
19.
MascheroniG.HollowayD. (Eds.), (2017). The Internet of Toys: A report on media and social discourses around young children and IoToys. DigiLitEY.
20.
McDaidD.HewlettE.ParkA-L. (2017). Understanding effective approaches to promoting mental health and preventing mental illness. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 97: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bc364fb2-en.
21.
McReynoldsE.HubbardS.LauT.SarafA.CakmakM.RoesnerF. (2017). Toys that listen: A study of parents, children, and internet-connected toys. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 5197–5207).
22.
MorganA. (2013). Proof of concept: Beginning to use design-based research to improve science literacies for middle years learners. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 36(1), 3–16.
23.
PhillipsJ.PhillipsonS.Tyler-MerrickG. (2021). Growing children’s social and emotional skills: Using the TOGETHER Programme. Routledge.
24.
SalamonA. (2017). Infants’ practices: Shaping (and shaped by) the arrangements of early childhood education. In KemmisS.MahonK.FranciscoS. (Eds.), Exploring educational and professional practice: Through the lens of practice architectures (pp. 83–99). Springer.
25.
SalamonA.SumsionJ.HarrisonL. (2017). Infants draw on 'emotional capital' in early childhood education contexts: A new paradigm. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 18(4), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117742771
SukkarH.DunstC. J.KirkbyJ. (2017). Early Childhood Intervention working with families of young children with special needs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688442.
28.
WichstrømL.Berg‐NielsenT. S.AngoldA.EggerH. L.SolheimE.SveenT. H. (2012). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in preschoolers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(6), 695–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02514.x
29.
WrightS. (2011). Meaning, mediation and mythology. In FaulknerD.CoatesE. (Eds.), Exploring children’s creative narratives (pp. 157–176). Routledge.
30.
YatesT.OstroskyM.M.CheathamC.A.FettigA.ShafferL.SantosR. M. (2008). Research synthesis on screening and assessing social-emotional competence. University of Illinois at UrbanaCenter of the Social Emotional Foundations for Early Learning.
