There is growing evidence that coaching early childhood educators leads to higher quality teaching practices and improved child learning outcomes. Despite this, there is a lack of Australian evidence on the impact that coaching in collaborative, interdisciplinary teams in early childhood education and care settings has on teacher effectiveness and by extension child learning. This paper will draw on data from two collaborative interdisciplinary research projects – the Victorian Advancing Early Learning Study and the Every Toddler Talking Initiative – to explore the features of coaching, collaboration and interdisciplinary partnerships that support early childhood educators to engage in the process of continuous improvement. We argue that governance and leadership is critical in enabling interdisciplinary teams to engage in a collaborative process of continuous improvement and that threshold conditions are required within early childhood education and care services to foster interdisciplinary coaching collaborations in a sustained manner.
Artman-MeekerK. M.FettigA.BartonE.PenneyA.ZengS. (2015). Applying an evidence-based framework to the early childhood coaching literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 183–196.
2.
Australian Children’s Education and Care Authority. (2009). National Quality Framework. Sydney, Australia: ACECQA.
3.
Australian Children’s Education and Care Authority. (2018). NQF Snapshot Q2 2018. Sydney, Australia: ACECQA.
BrittoP.YoshikawaH.BollerK. (2011). Quality of early childhood development programs and policies in global contexts: Rationale for investment, conceptual framework and implications for equity. Social Policy Reports of the Society for Research in Child Development, 25(2), 1–31.
6.
BrookesI. (2016) Implementation of a collective vision for social equity in education, health and development. In PageJ.TaylerC. (Eds.), Learning and teaching in the early years (pp. 148–151) Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CabellS. Q.JusticeL. M.McGintyA. S.DeCosterJ.ForstonL. D. (2015). Teacher–child conversations in preschool classrooms: Contributions to children’s vocabulary development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30, Part A(1st Quarter), 80–92.
CollinsA.GoodsonB.LuallenJ.FountainA. R.CheckowayA. (2010). Evaluation of child care subsidy strategies: Massachusetts Family Child Care study, OPRE 2011-1. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
10.
Department of Education and Training and Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2016). Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework. Melbourne, Australia: Department of Education and Training.
11.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2009). Early years learning framework. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
12.
DickinsonD. K.DarrowC. L.TinubuT. A. (2008). Patterns of teacher-child conversations in head start classrooms: Implications for an empirically grounded approach to professional development. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 396–429.
13.
DomitrovichC. E.GestS. D.JonesD.GillS.DeRousieR. S. (2010). Implementation quality: Lessons learned in the context of the Head Start REDI trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(3), 284–298.
14.
DownerJ. T.Kraft-SayreM.PiantaR. C. (2009). On-going, web-mediated professional development focused on teacher-child interactions: Early Childhood Educators’ Usage Rates and Self-reported Satisfaction. Early Education & Development, 20(2), 321–345.
15.
DuncanG. J.SojournerA. J. (2013). Can intensive early childhood intervention programs eliminate income-based cognitive and achievement gaps?Journal of Human Resources, 48(4), 945–968.
16.
EadieP.StarkH.NiklasF. (2019). Quality of Interactions by Early Childhood Educators Following a Language-Specific Professional Learning Program. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(3), 251–263. doi:10.1007/s10643-019-00929-5
17.
EadieP.TaylerC.StarkH. (2017). Every Toddler Talking final report. August. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: University of Melbourne.
18.
EdwardsA. (2011). Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 33–39
19.
ElekC.PageJ. (2018). Critical features of effective coaching for early childhood educators: A review of the empirical research literature. Professional Development in Education, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2018.1452781
20.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2005). can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?Child Development, 76, 949–967.
22.
HindmanA. H.SnellE. K.WasikB. A.LewisK. N.HammerC. S.Iannone-CampbellC. (2015). Research and practice partnerships for professional development in early childhood: Lessons from ExCELL-e. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1–2), 12–28.
23.
HowesC.TsaoC. (2012). Introduction: Introducing a conceptual framework of professional development in early childhood. In HowesC.HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (Eds.), Effective early childhood professional development. improving teacher practice and child outcomes. (pp. 1–10) Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
24.
JamesC. R.DunningG.ConnollyM.ElliottT. (2007). Collaborative practice: A model of successful working in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(5), 541–554.
JudkinsD.St. PierreR.GutmannB.GoodsonB.von GlatzA.HamiltonJ.RimdziusT. (2008). A study of classroom literacy interventions and outcomes in even start. (NCEE 2008–4028).Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S Department of Education.
27.
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 1–42.
Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA) (2010) Education and Care Services National Regulations under the Education and Care Services National Law.https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/regulations/2011-653.pdf
30.
NiklasF.TaylerC. (2018). Room quality and composition matters: Children’s verbal and numeracy abilities in Australian early childhood settings. Learning and Instruction, 54, 114–124.
31.
PageJ.TaylerC. (2016) Leading for learning. In PageJ.TaylerC. (Eds.), Learning and teaching in the early years (pp. 112–133) Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
32.
PetersonS. M.ValkaC.BakeraA.C.BruggeraL.HightowerA.D. (2010). We’re not just interested in the work: Social and emotional aspects of early educator mentoring relationships. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnerships in Learning, 18(2), 155–175.
33.
PiantaC. C.La ParoK. M.HamreB. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System™: Manual K-3. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brooks Publishing.
34.
PiantaR. C.MashburnA. J.DownerJ. T.HamreB. K.JusticeL. M. (2008). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher-child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 431–451.
35.
PiantaR. C.HamreB.DownerJ.BurchinalM.WillifordA.LoCasale-CrouchJ.Scott-LittleC. (2017). Early childhood professional development: Coaching and coursework effects on indicators of children’s school readiness. Early Education and Development, 28(8), 956–975.
36.
PilsworthN.MacBeanC.TaylerC.PageJ.EadieP.NiklasF. (2017). Victorian Advancing Early Learning Study final report. August. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: University of Melbourne.
37.
RameyC. T. (2018). The Abecedarian approach to social, educational, and health disparities. Clinical Child Family Psychology Review, 21(4), 527–544. doi:10.1007/s10567–018–0260-y.
38.
RameyC. T.BryantD. M.SparlingJ. J.WasikB. H. (1985). Project CARE: A comparison of two early intervention strategies to prevent retarded development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(2), 12–25.
39.
RobertsonJ. (2008). Coaching educational leadership: Building leadership capacity through partnerships. London, UK: Sage.
40.
RoddJ. (2013). Leadership in early childhood: The pathway to professionalism (4th ed.). Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
41.
RushD. D.SheldenM. L. (2011). The early childhood coaching handbook. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
42.
ScarinciN.RoseT.PeeJ.WebbK. (2014). Impacts of an in-service education program on promoting language development in young children: A pilot study with early childhood educators. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 31(1), 37–51.
43.
ShonkoffJ.PhillipsD. (2000). From neurons to neighbourhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44.
SkeatJ.EadieP.UkoumunneO.ReillyS. (2010). Predictors of parents seeking help or advice about children’s communication development in the early years. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(6), 878–887.
45.
StamopoulosE.BarblettL. (2018). Early childhood leadership in action. Evidence-based approaches for effective practice. Crows Nest, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
46.
TaylerC. (2017). The E4Kids study: Assessing the effectiveness of Australian early childhood education and care programs: Overview of findings at 2016. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: University of Melbourne.
47.
TwiggD.PendergastD.FlückigerB.GarvisS.JohnsonG.RobertsonJ. (2013). Coaching for early childhood educators: An insight into the effectiveness of an initiative. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 4(1), 73–90.
48.
The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Graduate School of Education (n.d.). The Abecedarian Approach Australia. Retrieved fromhttps://3a.education.unimelb.edu.au
49.
van HuizenT.PlantengaJ. (2018). Do children benefit from universal early childhood education and care? A meta-analysis of evidence from natural experiments. Economics of Education Review, 66, 206–222.
50.
WalterC.BriggsJ. (2012). What professional development makes the most difference to teachers?Oxford, UK: University of Oxford Department of Education.
51.
WeitzmanE.GreenbergJ. (2002). Learning language and loving it: A guide to promoting children’s social, language, and literacy development in early childhood settings (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Hanen Centre.
