Knowledge about the causes of critical ailments and risks during a maternity episode is crucial for women’s health. Although maternity-care knowledge is present both in explicit and tacit forms, there is a lack of requisite knowledge among women. Rural women rely on their community for such knowledge.
Objective:
This article sought to analyse knowledge-sharing practices of rural women in India in relation to critical decisions during a maternity episode.
Method:
Primary data were gathered through interview of 306 married women, who had had at least one childbirth during the previous 5 years, and were collected using structured interviews conducted in 10 villages of two districts in West Bengal, India. Their knowledge level of risks and networks of communication was examined for four critical decisions: (i) general health, (ii) choice of delivery method, (iii) antenatal check-up visits and (iv) nutrition.
Results:
This empirical study using degree-centrality method demonstrated that the pattern of knowledge flow is not uniform for different types of decisions. Many women were not aware of critical danger signs during pregnancy episodes. Only 28% of participants could mention at least three danger signs during pregnancy episodes. For the purposes of this study, these women were considered “knowledgeable.”
Discussion:
Maternal health in the community could be improved by redesigning the knowledge network for sharing the maternity-care knowledge of risks and danger signs. This research highlights the influence of culture on maternity-related knowledge-sharing in rural India and uncovers structural holes in the knowledge network.
Implications:
Results of this research could be used to design policies and programs to create community-based knowledge networks for maternity care.
AhmedSCreangaAAGillespieDG. (2010) Economic status, education and empowerment: implications for maternal health service utilization in developing countries. PLoS One5(6): e11190. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011190.
2.
AksoyMAksoyANDostbilA. (2014) The relationship between fear of childbirth and women’s knowledge about painless childbirth. Obstetrics and Gynecology International2014: 274303. DOI: 10.1155/2014/274303.
3.
AmritaRoyRB (2015) Integrating knowledge, attitude and practice in decision model for maternity care in emerging economy. In: Global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC) 2015 IEEE, Seattle, WA, USA, 8–11 October 2015, pp. 71–78. Washington, USA: IEEE Xplore. DOI: 10.1109/GHTC.2015.7343957.
4.
ArgoteLIngramP (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes82(1): 150–169.
5.
ArmstrongKKendallE (2010) Translating knowledge into practice and policy: the role of knowledge networks in primary health care. Health Information Management Journal39(2): 9–17.
6.
BenovaLCampbellOMRSholkamyH. (2014) Socio-economic factors associated with maternal health-seeking behaviours among women from poor households in rural Egypt. International Journal for Equity in Health13: 111.
7.
BhatRMavalankarDVSinghPV. (2009) Maternal healthcare financing: Gujarat’s Chiranjeevi scheme and its beneficiaries. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition27(2): 249–258.
8.
BlondinJLoGiudiceJ (2018) Pregnant women’s knowledge and awareness of nutrition. Applied Nursing Research39: 167–174.
9.
BramesfeldAWedegärtnerFElgetiH. (2007) How does mental health care perform in respect to service users’ expectations? Evaluating inpatient and outpatient care in Germany with the WHO responsiveness concept. BMC Health Services Research7: 99.
10.
CampbellOMGrahamWJ (2006) Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet368: 1284–1299.
11.
CampbellOMRCalvertCTestaA. (2016) The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care. Lancet388(3): 2193–2208.
12.
CorbinJMorseJM (2003) The unstructured interactive interview: issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry9(3): 335–354.
13.
de NooyWMrvarABatageljV (2011) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN:0521602629.
14.
Dwumfour-AsareBKwapongMA (2013) Anaemia awareness, beliefs and practices among pregnant women: a baseline assessment at Brosankro community in Ghana. Journal of Natural Sciences Research3(15): 1–9.
15.
FergusonBL (2012) The effects of maternal education on the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system data. PhD Thesis, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA.
16.
FloresV (2018) Fear versus trust: the impact of fear on birth experience and maternal outcomes. Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health32(3): 220–241.
FruchtermanTMJReingoldEM (1991) Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience21(11): 1129–1164.
19.
FudgeHNeufeldAHarrisonMJ (1997) Social networks of women caregivers. Public Health Nursing14(1): 20–27.
20.
GargiuloMBenassiM (2000) Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science11(2): 183–196.
21.
GogineniJ (2012) An ingenious decision support system for remote health monitoring of pregnant women. Masters of Engineering Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
22.
GoldmanJMeuserJRogersJ. (2010) Interprofessional collaboration in family health teams: an Ontario-based study. Canadian Family Physician56(10): e368–e374.
23.
GopalanSSMohantySDasA (2012) Assessing community health workers’ performance motivation: a mixed-methods approach on India’s Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA) Programme. BMJ Open2(5): 1–10.
GrahamWJWooddSByassP. (2016) Diversity and divergence: the dynamic burden of poor maternal health. Lancet388: 2164–2175.
26.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
27.
GrayDE (2009) Doing Research in the Real World. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
28.
GrimesDABensonJSinghS. (2006) Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet368(9550): 1908–1919.
29.
GrossKArmstrong SchellenbergJKessyF. (2011) Antenatal care in practice: an exploratory study in antenatal care clinics in the Kilombero Valley, south-eastern Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth11: 36.
30.
GuptaRKShoraTNVermaAK. (2015) Knowledge regarding antenatal care services, its utilization, and delivery practices in mothers (aged 15–49 years) in a rural area of North India. Tropical Journal of Medical Research18(2): 89–94.
31.
HailuMGebremariamAAlemsegedF (2011) Knowledge about obstetric danger signs among pregnant women in Aleta Wondo District, Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences20(1): 25–32.
32.
HemmingHELangilleL (2006) Building knowledge in literacy and health. Canadian Journal of Public Health97: S31–S36.
33.
IBM Corp. Released (2011) IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 20.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.
34.
InkpenACTsangEWK (2005) Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review30(1): 146–165.
35.
Institute of Medicine (2004) Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington: National Academies Press.
36.
International Institute for Population Sciences (2015) National Family Health Survey-4. State Fact Sheet West Bengal 2015-16. Mumbai. Available at: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/factsheet_NFHS-4.shtml (accessed 12 February 2017).
37.
IsraelGD (1992) Determining Sample Size. University of Florida, IFAS Extension, PE0D6 (April 2009), pp. 1–5. Available at: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/PD/PD00600.pdf (accessed 3 April 2015).
38.
JamshedS (2014) Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy5(4): 87–88.
39.
KanuJSTangYLiuY (2014) Assessment on the knowledge and reported practices of women on maternal and child health in rural sierra leone: a cross-sectional survey. PLoS One9(8): e105936.
40.
KoblinskyMMoyerCACalvertC. (2016) Quality maternity care for every woman, everywhere: a call to action. Lancet388(6): 2307–2320.
41.
KrukMEKujawskiSMoyerCA. (2016) Next generation maternal health: external shocks and health-system innovations. Lancet388(5): 2296–2306.
42.
KumarMMostafaJRamaswamyR (2017) Federated health information architecture: enabling healthcare providers and policymakers to use data for decision-making. Health Information Management Journal47(2): 85–93. DOI: 10.1177/1833358317709704. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1833358317709704(accessed 2 February 2018).
43.
KwastBE (1995) Building a community-based maternity program. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics48(suppl): S67–S82.
44.
KwastBE (1996) Reduction of maternal and perinatal mortality in rural and peri-urban settings: what works?European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology69(1): 47–53.
45.
LeischowSJMilsteinB (2006) Systems thinking and modeling for public health practice. American Journal of Public Health96(3): 403–405.
46.
LukeDAHarrisJK (2007) Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annual Review of Public Health28(1): 69–93.
47.
MbalindaSNNakimuliAKakaireO. (2014) Does knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy predict birth preparedness? A critique of the evidence from women admitted with pregnancy complications. Health Research Policy and System/BioMed Central12(1): 60.
48.
MontgomeryALRamUKumarR. (2014) Maternal mortality in India: causes and healthcare service use based on a Nationally Representative Survey. PLoS One9(1): e83331. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083331.
49.
NyamtemaASUrassaDPvan RoosmalenJ (2011) Maternal health interventions in resource limited countries: a systematic review of packages, impacts and factors for change. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth11(1): 1–12.
50.
OssaiENUzochukwuBS (2015) Knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy among clients of maternal health service in urban and rural primary health centres of Southeast Nigeria. Journal of Community Medicine and Health Education5(2): 1000337.
51.
PadmanabanPRamanPSMavalankarDV (2009) Innovations and challenges in reducing maternal mortality in Tamil Nadu, India. (Special Issue: Case studies on safe motherhood). Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition27(2): 202–219.
52.
PallikadavathSFossMStonesRW (2004) Antenatal care: provision and inequality in rural north India. Social Science and Medicine59(6): 1147–1158.
53.
ParentRRoyMSt-JacquesD (2007) A systems-based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model. Journal of Knowledge Management11(6): 81–93.
54.
PerumalNColeDCOuédraogoHZ. (2013) Health and nutrition knowledge, attitudes and practices of pregnant women attending and not-attending ANC clinics in Western Kenya: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth13: 146.
RajeevBKAshishDN (2007) Healthcare knowledge management issues, advances, and successes (health informatics series). In: HannahKJBallMJ (eds) Health Informatics, New York: Springer. pp. 65–87.
57.
RamanSNichollsRRitchieJ. (2016) How natural is the supernatural? Synthesis of the qualitative literature from low and middle income countries on cultural practices and traditional beliefs influencing the perinatal period. Midwifery39: 87–97.
58.
ReddyNRKishoreSGViswanathaPG. (2016) A study to assess the knowledge and utilization of Janani Suraksha Yojana among postnatal mothers attending the urban health centre of Bangalore medical college and research institute. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health3(2): 512–516.
59.
RutaremwaGWanderaSOJhambaT. (2015) Determinants of maternal health services utilization in Uganda. BMC Health Services Research15(1): 271.
60.
SenguptaP (2012) Addressing participation of women in maternal health care in light of its key knowledge correlates: findings from the Indian Sundarbans. In: BhojaniUMishraAPrashanthNSSoorsW (eds), BMC Proceedings. conference: 2nd national conference on bringing evidence into public health policy EPHP. Bengaluru, 5–6 October 2012, 6(suppl 5), pp. 5–6. London, UK: BioMed Central.
61.
Shefner-RogersCL (2004) Pregnancy knowledge, attitudes, and practices in Indonesia: Does husband’s social support make a difference?PhD Thesis, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
62.
SibbaldSLWathenCNKothariA. (2013) Knowledge flow and exchange in interdisciplinary primary health care teams (PHCTs): an exploratory study. Journal of the Medical Library Association101(2): 128–137.
63.
SinghPKRaiRKAlagarajanM. (2012) Determinants of maternity care services utilization among married adolescents in rural India. PLoS One7(2): e31666.
64.
SmethurstL (2014) What Influences Maternal Health Practices in Four Countries? Insights and Lessons Learned. Research Report for Health Issue 04, March 2014. London, UK: BBC Media Action.
65.
SzulanskiG (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal17: 2744.
66.
WHO (2014) Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2013. Report ISBN 978 92 4 150722 6. WHO Press, Switzerland.
67.
WHO (2015) Laying the Foundation for the Strategic Framework. Strategies Toward Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality (EPMM). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Publications. ISBN: 978 92 4 150848 3.
68.
WHO (2016) WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Publications. ISBN 978 92 4 154991 2.
69.
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, et al. (2015) Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2015. Report, ISBN 9789241565141, November 2015. Switzerland: WHO Press.
70.
WiegersTA (2009) The quality of maternity care services as experienced by women in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth9: 18.
WinnardK (1995) No longer giving life through death. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics48: S7–S20.
73.
WuADBegorayDLMacDonaldM. (2010) Developing and evaluating a relevant and feasible instrument for measuring health literacy of Canadian high school students. Health Promotion International25(4): 444–452.
74.
WynessL (2014) Nutritional issues of vulnerable groups around pregnancy. British Journal of Midwifery22(2): 94–104.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
