The introduction of electronic medical records (EMRs) can expose patients to the risk of infringement of their privacy. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between patients' concerns about information privacy and their protective responses. A questionnaire survey conducted in a Taiwanese hospital revealed that, regarding information privacy, patients' concerns about the collection of information about themselves, the secondary use of this information and the possibility of errors in the recorded information were associated with their information privacy-protective responses, while concern for unauthorised access to their information by other staff in the medical facility was not. Medical facilities should devote every effort to alleviate patients' concerns about the invasion of their information privacy to avoid eroding the reputation of medical facilities and impeding the promotion of EMRs.
AndreevP.HeartT.MaozH.PliskinN. (2009). Validating formative partial least squares (PLS) models: Methodological review and empirical illustration. Paper presented at the ICIS 2009 Proceedings, Phoenix, Arizona.
2.
BagozziR.YiY. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40(1): 8–34.
3.
BarrowsR.C.Jr.ClaytonP.D. (1996). Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association3(2): 139–148.
4.
BatesD.W.CohenM.LeapeL.L.OverhageJ.M.ShabotM.M.SheridanT. (2001). Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association8(4): 299–308.
5.
BélangerF.CrosslerR.E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly35(4): 1017–1041.
6.
BushA.J.HairJ.F.Jr. (1985). An assessment of the Mall Intercept as a data collection method. Journal of Marketing Research22(2): 158–167.
7.
ChinW.W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly22(1): VII–XVI.
8.
ChinW.W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Handbook of Partial Least Squares Concepts, Methods and Applications. VinziV EspositoChinW.W.HenselerandJ.WangH. (Eds.). Heidelberg, Springer: 655–690.
9.
ChurchillG.A.Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research16(1): 64–73.
10.
CulnanM.J. (1993). How did they get my name - an exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quarterly17(3): 341–361.
11.
DinevT.HartP, (2006). Internet privacy concerns and social awareness as determinants of intention to transact. International Journal of Electronic Commerce10(2): 7–29.
12.
FornellC.LarckerD.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39–50.
13.
GefenD.StraubD. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems16: 91–109.
14.
GostinL.O.Turek-BrezinaJ.PowersM.KozloffR.FadenR.SteinauerD. D. (1993). Privacy and security of personal information in a new health care system. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association270(20): 2487–2493.
15.
HenselerJ.RingleC.M.SinkovicsR.R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20: 277–319.
16.
Institute of Medicine (1994). Health data in the information age: Use, disclosure, and privacy. USA, The National Academies Press.
17.
Institute of Medicine. (1997). For the record: Protecting electronic health information. USA, The National Academies Press.
18.
KingT.BrankovicL.GillardP, (2012). Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases. International Journal of Medical Informatics81(4): 279–289.
19.
LeeD.LaroseR.RifonN. (2008). Keeping our network safe: A model of online protection behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology27(5): 445–454.
20.
MalhotraN.K.KimS.S.AgarwalJ. (2004). Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research15(4): 336–355.
21.
MilbergS.J.SmithH.J.BurkeS.J. (2000). Information privacy: Corporate management and national regulation. Organization Science11(1): 35–57.
22.
MilneG.R.RohmA. J.BahlS. (2004). Consumers' protection of online privacy and identity. Journal of Consumer Affairs38(2): 217–232.
23.
NowakG.J.PhelpsJ. (1995). Direct marketing and the use of individual-level consumer information: Determining how and when ‘privacy’ matters. Journal of Direct Marketing9(3): 46–60.
24.
RindfleischT.C. (1997). Privacy, information technology, and health care. Communications of the ACM, 40(8): 92–100.
25.
RingleC.M.WendeS.WillA. (2005). SmartPLS (M3) (Version 2.0 Beta). Hamburg, Germany. Available at: http://www.smartpls.de/ (accessed 31 May 2013).
26.
RogersR.W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology91(1): 93–114.
27.
RogersR.W. (1983). Cognitive and psychological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In: Social psychophysiology. CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. (Eds.). New York, Guilford: 153–176.
28.
RothsteinM.A. (2007). Health privacy in the electronic age. The Journal of Legal Medicine28(4): 487–501.
29.
SarathyR.RobertsonC.J. (2003). Strategic and ethical considerations in managing digital privacy. Journal of Business Ethics46(2): 111–126.
30.
SheehanK.B.HoyM.G. (2000). Dimensions of privacy concern among online consumers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing19(1): 62–73.
31.
SmithH.J.MilbergS.J.BurkeS.J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quarterly20(2): 167–196.
32.
SonJ.Y.KimS.S. (2008). Internet users' information privacy-protective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quarterly32(3): 503–529.
33.
StewartK.A.SegarsA.H. (2002). An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Information Systems Research13(1): 36–49.
34.
StoneE.F.GueutalH.G.GardnerD.G.McClureS. (1983). A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology68(3): 459–468.
35.
SykesT.A.VenkateshVRaiA. (2011). Explaining physicians' use of EMR systems and performance in the shakedown phase. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association18(2): 125–130.
36.
van SlykeC.ShimJ.T.JohnsonR.JiangJ.J. (2006). Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems7(6): 415–444.
37.
WetzelsM.Odekerken-SchröderG.van OppenC. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly33(1): 177–195.
38.
YounS. (2005). Teenagers' perceptions of online privacy and coping behaviors: A risk-benefit appraisal approach. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media49(1): 86–110.
39.
YounS. (2009). Determinants of online privacy concern and its influence on privacy protection behaviors among young adolescents. The Journal of Consumer Affairs43(3): 389–418.
40.
ZhouL.SoranC.S.JenterC.A.VolkL.A.OravE.J.BatesD.W.SimonS.R. (2009). The relationship between electronic health record use and quality of care over time. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association16(4): 457–464.
