Patient and clinician perspectives of an integrated electronic medication prescribing and dispensing system: A qualitative study at a multisite Australian hospital network

Abstract

Background:

While clinician attitudes towards electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) systems have been widely studied, little is known about the perspectives of patients, despite being the primary beneficiaries of these systems.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to explore and compare patient and clinician attitudes towards an integrated e-prescribing and dispensing system, in order to guide improvements in system implementation, service delivery and enhancements to system functionality.

Method:

A cross-sectional survey was developed and administered to patients and multidisciplinary clinicians at a multisite Australian metropolitan teaching hospital network in all areas where e-prescribing was fully implemented. Participants’ views on perceived impact and valued features of the e-prescribing system were elucidated.

Results:

Overall, 783 participants (400 patients and 383 clinicians) completed the survey. Although 98% of clinicians were aware of the transition to e-prescriptions, only 36% of patients were aware prior to the study. Over 80% of patients and clinicians perceived improvements in prescribing and dispensing safety and clinician workflow; 90% of patients were comfortable with information privacy associated with e-prescriptions; and 86% of patients preferred e-prescriptions to handwritten prescriptions. Although over 80% of patients valued features that improved access to information and medication safety, clinicians were more discerning about valued system features.

Conclusion:

The majority of patients and clinicians reported a positive impact of e-prescribing on safety and efficiency. Both groups valued safe and effective use of medicines, although differences existed in the importance placed on key system features. A greater focus on patient engagement and communication is needed to optimise the delivery of patient-centred care.

Keywords

electronic prescribing medical order entry systems electronic health records attitude to computers computerised physician order entry systems patient data privacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

Gajanayake

Sahama

(2014) The Australian general public’s perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR). International Journal of Medical Informatics 83(12): 889–900.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2010) Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care (putting the framework into action: getting started - activities for health service executives and boards). Sydney: ACSQHC, 2010.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) (2012) National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Sydney: ACSQHC.

Ayatollahi

Roozbehi

Haghani

(2015) Physicians’ and nurses’ opinions about the impact of a computerized provider order entry system on their workflow. Perspectives in Health Information Management 12: 1g.

Bates

Leape

Cullen

. (1998) Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. Journal of the American Medical Association 280(15): 1311–1316.

Bramble

Abbott

Fuji

. (2013) Patient safety perspectives of providers and nurses: the experience of a rural ambulatory care practice using an EHR with E-prescribing. Journal of Rural Health 29(4): 383–391.

Crosson

Isaacson

Lancaster

. (2008) Variation in electronic prescribing implementation among 12 ambulatory practices. Journal of General Internal Medicine 23(4): 364–371.

Day

Roffe

Richardson

. (2011) Implementing electronic medication management at an Australian teaching hospital. The Medical Journal of Australia 195(9): 498–502.

Desroches

Agarwal

Angst

. (2010) Differences between integrated and stand-alone e-prescribing systems have implications for future use. Health Affairs 29(12): 2268–2277.

10.

Devine

Hollingworth

Hansen

. (2010) Electronic prescribing at the point of care: a time-motion study in the primary care setting. Health Services Research 45(1): 152–171.

11.

Devine

Williams

Martin

. (2010) Prescriber and staff perceptions of an electronic prescribing system in primary care: a qualitative assessment. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 10: 72.

12.

Donyai

O’Grady

Jacklin

. (2008) The effects of electronic prescribing on the quality of prescribing. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 65(2): 230–237.

13.

Frail

Kline

Snyder

(2014) Patient perceptions of e-prescribing and its impact on their relationships with providers: a qualitative analysis. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 54(6): 630–633.

14.

Franklin

O’Grady

Donyai

. (2007) The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study. Quality and Safety in Health Care 16(4): 279–284.

15.

Franklin

Reynolds

Sadler

. (2014) The effect of the electronic transmission of prescriptions on dispensing errors and prescription enhancements made in English community pharmacies: a naturalistic stepped wedge study. BMJ Quality and Safety 23: 629–638.

16.

Freeman

Taylor

Adelman

(2009) Electronic medical record system in a headache specialty practice: a patient satisfaction survey. Headache 49(2): 212–215.

17.

Gagnon

M-P

Nsangou

É-R

Payne-Gagnon

. (2014) Barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic prescription: a systematic review of user groups’ perceptions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 21(3): 535–541.

18.

Georgiou

Ampt

Creswick

. (2009) Computerized provider order entry – what are health professionals concerned about? A qualitative study in an Australian hospital. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78(1): 60–70.

19.

Hakim

(2010) E-prescribing and primary noncompliance: physician and patient experience. Professional Case Management 15(2): 62–67.

20.

Hodgkinson

Larmour

Lin

. (2017) The impact of an integrated electronic medication prescribing and dispensing system on prescribing and dispensing errors: a before and after study. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research 47(2): 110–120.

21.

Hordern

Georgiou

Whetton

. (2011) Consumer e-health: an overview of research evidence and implications for future policy. Health Information Management Journal 40(2): 6–14.

22.

Khajouei

Wierenga

Hasman

. (2011) Clinicians satisfaction with CPOE ease of use and effect on clinicians’ workflow, efficiency and medication safety. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80(5): 297–309.

23.

Lapane

Dubé

Schneider

. (2007) Patient perceptions regarding electronic prescriptions: is the geriatric patient ready? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 55(8): 1254–1259.

24.

Lapane

Rosen

Dubé

(2011) Perceptions of e-prescribing efficiencies and inefficiencies in ambulatory care. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80(1): 39–46.

25.

Liu

Luo

Zhang

. (2013) Patient satisfaction with electronic medical/health record: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 27(4): 785–791.

26.

Monash Health (2016) Annual Report 2015–16. Melbourne: Monash Health.

27.

Nanji

Rothschild

Boehne

. (2014) Unrealized potential and residual consequences of electronic prescribing on pharmacy workflow in the outpatient pharmacy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 21(3): 481–486.

28.

Overhage

Perkins

Tierney

. (2001) Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians’ time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 8(4): 361–371.

29.

Payne

Nichol

Hoey

. (2002) Characteristics and override rates of order checks in a practitioner order entry system. In: Proceedings/American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium (ed Kohane

), San Antonio, Texas, USA, 9–13 November 2002. Hanley & Belfus, Inc.

30.

Payne

Hines

Chan

. (2015) Recommendations to improve the usability of drug-drug interaction clinical decision support alerts. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 22(6): 1243–1250.

31.

Porterfield

Engelbert

Coustasse

(2014) Electronic prescribing: improving the efficiency and accuracy of prescribing in the ambulatory care setting. Perspectives in Health Information Management 11: 1g.

32.

Raghuvanshi

Choudhary

(2013) Medication turnaround time in the pharmacy department. International Journal of Research and Development in Pharmacy and Life Sciences 2(5): 626–630.

33.

Ridsdale

Hudd

(1994) Computers in the consultation: the patient’s view. British Journal of General Practice 44(385): 367–369.

34.

Strayer

Semler

Kington

. (2010) Patient attitudes toward physician use of tablet computers in the exam room. Family Medicine 42(9): 643–647.

35.

Sweidan

Williamson

Reeve

. (2010) Identification of features of electronic prescribing systems to support quality and safety in primary care using a modified Delphi process. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 10: 21.

36.

Vodicka

Mejilla

Leveille

. (2013) Online access to doctors’ notes: patient concerns about privacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(9): 1–8.

37.

Weingart

Simchowitz

Shiman

. (2009) Clinicians’ assessments of electronic medication safety alerts in ambulatory care. Archives of Internal Medicine 169(17): 1627–1632.

38.

Westbrook

Reckmann

. (2012) Effects of two commercial electronic prescribing systems on prescribing error rates in hospital in-patients: a before and after study. PLoS Medicine 9(1). Available at: e1001164. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001164

39.

Xie

Weinger

Gregg

. (2014) Presenting multiple drug alerts in an ambulatory electronic prescribing system. Applied Clinical Informatics 5(2): 334–348.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.31 MB

0.35 MB