Routinely coded hospital data (‘administrative data’) have been criticised as invalid and unreliable, without due regard for how Australian data differ from those of other healthcare systems. The skills and education of coders, degree of professional coding supervision, and the existence and rigour of coding audits all strengthen Australian routine hospital data.
CampbellS.E.CampbellM.K.GrimshawJ.M.WalkerA. E. (2001). A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. Journal of Public Health Medicine23(3): 205–11.
2.
LessingC.SchmitzA.AlbersB.SchrappeM. (2010). Impact of sample size on variation of adverse events and preventable adverse events: Systematic review on epidemiology and contributing factors. Quality and Safety in Health Care19:e24.
3.
MichelJ.L.ChengD.JacksonT.J. (2011). Comparing the coding of complications in Queensland and Victorian admitted patient data. Australian Health Review35: 245–252.
4.
SoL.BeckC.A.BrienS.KennedyJ.FeasbyT.E.GhaliW.A.QuanH. (2010). Chart documentation quality and its relationship to the validity of administrative data discharge records. Health Informatics Journal16(2): 101–113.
WillisC.D.JolleyD.J.McNeilJ.J.CameronP.A.PhillipsL.E. (2011). Identifying and improving unreliable items in registries through data auditing. International Journal for Quality in Health Care23(3): 317–323.
