There is a need to enhance the effectiveness and reach of complex health promotion initiatives by providing opportunities for diverse health promotion practitioners and others to interact in online settings. This paper reviews the existing literature on how to take health promotion communities and networks into online settings. A scoping review of relevant bodies of literature and empirical evidence was undertaken to provide an interpretive synthesis of existing knowledge on the topic. Sixteen studies were identified between 1986 and 2007. Relatively little research has been conducted on the process of taking existing offline communities and networks into online settings. However, more research has focused on offline (i.e. not mediated via computer networks); ‘virtual’ (purely online with no offline interpersonal contact); and ‘multiplex’ communities (i.e. those that interact across both online and offline settings). Results are summarised under three themes: characteristics of communities in online and offline settings; issues in moving offline communities online, and designing online communities to match community needs. Existing health promotion initiatives can benefit from online platforms that promote community building and knowledge sharing. Online e-health promotion settings and communities can successfully integrate with existing offline settings and communities to form ‘multiplex’ communities (i.e. communities that operate fluently across both online and offline settings).
AstbrinkG.BeekhuyzenJ. (2003). Synergies of universal design and user-centred design. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Computer Interaction(HCI), Crete, Greece.
2.
BaumS. (2008). Suburban scars: Australian cities and socio-economic deprivation. Urban Research Program, Research Paper 15, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
3.
BeekhuyzenJ.von HellensL. (2009). Reciprocity and sharing in an underground file sharing community. Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
4.
BeekhuyzenJ.von HellensL.NielsenS. (2011). Underground online music communities: Exploring rules for membership. Online Information Review25(5): 699–715.
5.
BenbasatI.ZmudR. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. Management Information Systems Quarterly27(2): 183–194.
6.
BoothA.PapaioannouD.SuttonA. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London, SAGE.
7.
BoulosM.N.K.WheelertS. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal24(1): 2–23.
8.
BoyerN.MaherPKirkmanS. (2006). Transformative learning in online settings: The use of self-direction, metacognition, and collaborative learning. Journal of Transformative Education4(4): 335–360.
9.
BrownJ.BroderickA.J.LeeN. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing21(3): 2–20.
10.
BuhlerC. (2000). Empowered participation of users with disabilities in R&D projects. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies55(4): 645–659.
11.
ByronI. (2010). Placed-based approaches to addressing disadvantage: Linking science and policy. Family Matters84(Spring 2010): 20–27.
12.
DeLoneW.H.McLeanE.R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research3(1): 60–95.
13.
DeLoneW.H.McLeanE.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems19(4): 9–30.
14.
EversK. (2006) e-Health promotion: The use of the Internet for health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion20(4): Suppl 1–7, iii.
15.
FryJ.P.NeffR.A. (2009). Periodic prompts and reminders in health promotion and health behavior interventions: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research11(2): e16.
16.
HamptonK.N.WellmanB. (2000). Examining community in the digital neighbourhood: Early results from Canada's wired suburb. In Digital Cities, LNCS 1765. IshidaT.IsbisterK. (Eds), Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag: 194–208.
17.
HardikerN.R.GrantM.J. (2011). Factors that influence public engagement with e-Health: A literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics80: 1–12.
18.
KavanaughA.CarrollJ.M.RossonM.B.ZinT.T.ReeseD.D. (2005). Community networks: Where offline communities meet online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10(4): Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/kavanaugh.html (accessed 26 February, 2013).
19.
KimW.G.LeeC.HiemstraS.J. (2004). Effects of an online virtual community on customer loyalty and travel product purchases. Tourism Management25(2): 343–355.
20.
KohJ.KimT-G.ButlerB.BockG-W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM50(2): 69–73.
21.
LarsonK. (2007). The health impacts of place-based interventions in areas of concentrated disadvantaged: A review of the literature. Liverpool New South Wales, Sydney South West Area Health Service.
22.
LinH-F. (2007). The role of online and offline features in sustaining virtual communities: An empirical study. Internet Research17(2): 119–138.
23.
MaM.AgarwalR.(200). Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Information Systems Research. 18(1): 42–67.
24.
Maloney-KrichmarD.PreeceJ. (2003). An ethnographic study of an online health support community. The 15th Annual Conference on Ethnographic and Qualitative Research in Education. Duquesne University, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania.
25.
MaoJ-Y.VredenburgK.SmithP.W.CareyT. (2005). The state of user-centred design practice. Communications of the ACM48(3): 105–109.
26.
MatookS.BrownS.A. (2008). Conceptualizing the IT artifact for MIS research. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems ICIS 2008, Association for Information Systems, Paris, France.
27.
McMillanD.W.ChavisD.M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theoryJournal of Community Psychology14(1): 6–23.
28.
NipJ. (2004). The relationship between online and offline communities: The case of the queer sisters. Media, Culture and Society26(3): 409–428.
29.
PreeceJ. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
30.
PreeceJ. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour and Information Technology. 20(5): 347–356.
31.
PreeceJ.AbrasC.Maloney-KrichmarD. (2004). Designing and evaluating online communities: Research speaks to emerging practice. International Journal of Web Based Communities1(1): 2–18.
32.
RymanS.BurrellL.HardhamG.RichardsonB.RossJ. (2009). Creating and sustaining online learning communities: Designing for transformative learning. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning5(3): 32–45.
33.
SessionsL. (2010). How offline gatherings affect online communities. Information, Communication & Society13(3): 375–395.
34.
SkinnerH.A.MaleyO.NormanC.D. (2006). Developing internet-based e-health promotion programs: The Spiral Technology Action Research (STAR) model. Health Promotion Practice7(4): 406–417.
35.
SpitulnikD. (1993). Anthropology and mass media. Annual Review of Anthropology22(1): 293–315.
36.
VredenburgK.IsenseeS.RighiC. (2002). User-centred design: An integrated approach. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
37.
WaltherJ.B.PingreeS.HawkinsR.P.BullerD.B. (2005). Attributes of interactive online health information systems. Journal of Medical Internet Research7(3): 33.
38.
WhittakerS.IsaacsE.O'DayV, (1997). Widening the net. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin29(3): 27–30.
39.
WilsonS.M.PetersonL.C. (2002). The anthropology of online communities. Annual Review of Anthropology31(1): 449–467.
40.
World Health Organization (1986). The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva, WHO.
41.
World Health Organization (1997). The Jakarta Declaration. Geneva, WHO.
