This article takes stock of the literature around digital platforms and shows how this review can inform policy choices in developing countries. Through the review, this article sets a research agenda for platforms in emerging markets. Four elements are specifically analyzed. First, the definition of multisided platforms; second, technology and behavioral enablers; third, the emerging business models; and, fourth, platform dynamics. Each of these elements is assessed in terms of its relevance in emerging and developing countries. Policy implications for development are also highlighted, building the foundations for a new research agenda.
European Commission, Case No COMP/M.7217 - FACEBOOK/WHATSAPP (European Commission, 10/03/2014), Office for Publications of the European Union, Luxembourg L-2985 and CASE M.8228 - FACEBOOK/WHATSAPP (European Commission, 05/17/2017), Office for Publications of the European Union. Luxembourg, M-7217. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7217_20141003_20310_3962132_EN.pdf
8.
EvansD. (2013). Economics of vertical restraints for multi-sided platforms. University of Chicago Law School.
9.
EvansD.SchmalenseeR. (2010). Failure to launch: Critical mass in platform businesses. Review of Network Economics, 9, 1–26.
10.
FilistrucchiL. (2018). Market definition in multi-sided markets. In OECD Rethinking the use of traditional Antitrust Methods, OECD (pp. 37–54). Paris.
11.
FriedenR. (2018). The Internet of Platforms and Two-Sided Markets: Implications for Competition and Consumers. Vill. L. Rev., 63, 269. Forthcoming, presented at the 7th Conference on the Regulation of Infrastructures, at the Florence School of Regulation, Fiesole, June 20 and 21, 2018.
12.
FriedenR. (2017). The internet of platforms and two-sided markets: Legal and regulatory implications for competition and consumers. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3051766
13.
GawerA. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43, 1239–1249.
14.
GraefI.WahyuningtyasS. Y.ValckeP. (2015). Assessing data access issues in online platforms. Telecommunications Policy, 39, 375–387.
15.
HagiuA. (2006). Proprietary vs. open two-sided platforms and social efficiency (May 2006)(AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper No. 06-12; Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 09-113). Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=980755 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.980755
16.
HayekF. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.
17.
HentenA. H.WindekildeI. M. (2016). Transaction costs and the sharing economy. INFO, 18, 1–15.
18.
HungenbergH.DenkerH.MauchS. (2008). The long tail of social networking. Revenue models of social networking sites Albrecht Enders *. European Management Journal, 26, 199–211.
19.
International Telecommunications Union. (2015). Global Symposium of Regulators. Geneva: ITU Press.
20.
KellyT.RossottoC. M. (2012). Broadband strategies handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
RagoobarT.WhalleyJ.HarleD. (2011). Public and private intervention for next-generation access deployment: Possibilities for three European countries. Telecommunications Policy, 35, 827–841.
26.
RochetJ.-C.TiroleJ. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 990–1029.
27.
RohlfsJ. (1974). Theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5, 16–37.
28.
RuutuS.CaseyT.KotivirtaV. (2017). Development and competition of digital service platforms: A system dynamics approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 119–130.
29.
SchwabK. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Boston: Crown Business, Harvard University Press.
30.
SouminenK. (2017). Accelerating Digital Trade in Latin America and the Caribbean, Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0000636
31.
TanB.PanS.ZianguaL.LihuaH. (2015). The role of IS capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: The digital ecosystem strategy of Alibaba.com. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 248–280.
32.
TauscherK.LaudienS. (2018). Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces. European Management Journal, 36, 319–329.
33.
TsaiW. C. (2016). Analyzing the emergence of Alibaba group from business ecosystem perspective. Journal of International Management Studies (1993-1034), 11, 53–64.
34.
VaradajanR.YadavM.VenkateshS. (2008). First-mover advantage in an Internet-enabled market environment: Conceptual framework and propositions. Journal of the Academic Marketing Science, 36, 293–308.
35.
WahyuningtyasS. Y. (2018). The decentralisation via self-regulation of online platforms and competition policy challenges: A study on Go-Jek in Indonesia. forthcoming, presented at the 7th Conference on the Regulation of Infrastructures, at the Florence School of Regulation, Fiesole, June 20 and 21, 2018.
36.
World Bank. (2016). World Development Report 2016. Digital dividends. Washington, DC.
37.
World Bank. (2018). Russia Digital Economy Report. Washington, DC, forthcoming.
38.
ZysmanJ.KenneyM. (2016). The rise of the platform economy (2016). Issues in Science and Technology, 32, 61–69.
